Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by using the GRADE approach. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Japana Centra Revuo Medicina Web (Ichu-shi web), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Articles fulfilling the predefined inclusion criteria were appraised and used for meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) and serum creatinine elevation. Other outcomes included ACR50, ACR70, changes in C-reactive protein, modified Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, gastrointestinal disorders, metabolic and nutritional disorders, and infections and infestations. RESULTS: We identified five randomized controlled studies, four of which compared tacrolimus to placebo and were included in the meta-analysis. The risk ratio of ACR20 achievement was 1.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-2.42) for 1-2 mg/day and 2.30 (95% CI 1.79-2.96) for 3 mg/day. The risk ratio of creatinine elevation was 1.95 (95% CI 1.18-3.23) for 1-2 mg/day and 3.81 (95% CI 2.43-5.99) for 3 mg/day. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus is effective with acceptable safety in the management of RA.

Epidemiological characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis in Japan: Prevalence estimates using a nationwide population-based questionnaire survey.

Objectives: To elucidate the epidemiological characteristics of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Japan using data from the Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions, a nationwide questionnaire survey conducted in 2016.Methods: In total, 222,365 men and 245,251 women aged ≥16 years were included in the study. RA patients were defined as those who reported 'currently receiving treatment for RA at hospitals, clinics, or a facility for Japanese traditional massage, acupuncture, moxibustion, or judo-orthopedics.' The number of RA patients was estimated from the age-specific prevalence and total Japanese population in 2016. Further, the prevalence of individuals experiencing difficulties in activities of daily living due to health problems and those with mental distress as evaluated by K6 Scale was examined.Results: The estimated number and prevalence of RA in Japan with 95% confidence interval was 822 (768-880) thousand and 0.75% (0.70-0.80%). The population peaked in the late 60s, and the prevalence continued increasing until the early 80s, regardless of sex. Compared with non-RA participants, RA patients were more likely to experience difficulties in activities and to be distressed.Conclusion: High prevalence of RA in older age and mental and physical burden among RA patients were confirmed.

An assessment of the use of complementary and alternative medicine by Korean people using an adapted version of the standardized international questionnaire (I-CAM-QK): a cross-sectional study of an internet survey.

BACKGROUND: In Korea, there are two types of medical doctors: one practises conventional medicine (hereafter called a physician), and the other practises traditional medicine (hereafter called a Korean medical doctor). This study aimed to compare the provision of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by these providers to CAM use per self-judgement in Korea. METHODS: We analysed 1668 Korean people via an internet survey with the Korean adopted version of the I-CAM-Q, namely, the International Questionnaire to measure use of CAM, to understand whether respondents used CAM based either on a prescription or advice from a physician or a Korean medical doctor or on self-judgement. RESULTS: In the previous 12 months, the proportions of respondents who were treated by a physician, who were treated by a Korean medical doctor and who were not treated by anyone were 67.9, 20.7 and 14.2%, respectively. Among the respondents who received CAM based on a prescription or advice from a physician, traditional Korean medicine practices and dietary supplements were commonly used; only a small percentage used other CAM therapies. Respondents who received CAM based on a prescription or advice from a Korean medical doctor showed similar results. Acupuncture and moxibustion, traditional Korean medicines (decoction), or cupping were more commonly used. Korean traditional medicines as over-the-counter (OTC) drugs were more commonly used by respondents who received CAM therapy based on a prescription or advice from a physician than by those who received CAM therapy based on a prescription or advice from a Korean medical doctor. A total of 74% of the responders used any CAM by self-judgement in the previous 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: For the use of CAM in Korea, in addition to the Korean traditional medical care provided by Korean medical doctors, general physicians advised people regarding Korean traditional medical care and dietary supplements.

Integrating patients' perceptions into clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Patients' values and preferences are among the key factors that determine the strength of recommendations presented in clinical practice guidelines (CPG). The aim of this study was to summarize the integration process for patients' perceptions into the development of CPG for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management in Japan. METHODS: We used a mixed-methods approach. Questionnaires that could be self-administered were mailed to 2222 RA patients randomly selected from the Japan Rheumatism Friendship Association (JRFA) membership list that was age- and prefecture-stratified. A focus group with five JRFA executive members was formed to verify the results of the questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 1470 patients aged 20-79 years old returned the questionnaire. Analysis of the questionnaire data revealed that the topics selected by the CPG task force met the patients' needs. The focus group participants showed reluctance to use the term 'preference' because patients would not want to take any medications but would have to take them out of necessity. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that the new CPG successfully addressed clinical issues that were important to both rheumatologists and patients. Clinicians should understand patients' reluctance to take medications and explain the role of each medication well to increase adherence.

Comparative Effectiveness of Oral Medications for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a disease that imposes a significant burden on patients. Although multiple treatment options for PAH are available, head-to-head comparisons are difficult to conduct. Network meta-analysis (NMA) can be a useful alternative for direct comparison to estimate the relative effectiveness of multiple treatments. The objective of the present study was to conduct a systematic review and NMA to evaluate the relative effectiveness among oral PAH medications.Data collection was performed by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Ichushi-Web. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing at least 1 of the following 3 outcome measurements; 6-minute walk distance test (6MWD), WHO functional class (WHOFC), and mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) were included (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015016557). Outcomes were evaluated by estimating the differences in the mean change from baseline or by estimating the odds ratios. Analyses were performed using WinBUGS 1.4.3.Seven double-blind RCTs were eligible. NMA results showed similar improvements in 6MWD for all medications assessed. Bosentan and sildenafil caused a statistically significant improvement in WHOFC compared to other medications.The relative effectiveness of oral PAH medications could be compared using NMA, which suggested the superiority of bosentan and sildenafil in the improvement of WHOFC.

Profiles of EQ-5D utility scores in the daily practice of Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis; Analysis of the IORRA database.

OBJECTIVE: Along with the advances of newly developed medical therapies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the number of pharmacoeconomical issues has been paid attention rapidly. For cost-utility analysis and determination of quality-adjusted life years, measurement of the EuroQol 5-dimensional descriptive system (EQ-5D) is essential, and has been used in several clinical studies. However, EQ-5D utility measure in Japanese patients with RA, especially in daily practice has not been fully documented. We analyzed the distribution of EQ5D utility scores and investigated the relationship between other clinical measures based on our Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) database. METHOD: Among 5,284 outpatients who participated in the IORRA cohort study on October 2007, data from 5,043 patients who completed the EQ-5D questionnaire were cross-sectionally analyzed. EQ-5D scores in each subgroup for baseline feature such as gender, age, disease activity score 28 (DAS28), and Japanese version of health assessment questionnaire (J-HAQ) were evaluated. For the evaluation of variables that influenced EQ-5D score, the contribution of each variable was evaluated by ANOVA. RESULTS: Average EQ-5D score was 0.76 in 5,284 patients (84% females, average age: 59.0 years, average disease duration: 12.4 years) whose average DAS28 was 3.3 and average J-HAQ was 0.74. EQ-5D scores were highly correlated with J-HAQ and DAS28, and were significantly lower in females and rheumatoid factor-positive patients. Older age, longer disease duration, higher DAS28, and higher J-HAQ were also significantly associated with lower EQ-5D scores. In multivariate analysis, the factor that most strongly influenced EQ-5D was J-HAQ (57.6%), followed by pain visual analog score (VAS; 12.5%). CONCLUSION: This study clearly demonstrated the distribution of EQ-5D score in the daily practice of RA patients, and provides important information for the pharmacoeconomical studies in rheumatology.

The process of collecting and evaluating evidences for the development of Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis, Japan College of Rheumatology 2014: Utilization of GRADE approach.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the process of collecting and evaluating evidence for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for developing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for rheumatologists in Japan. METHODS: The task force comprised rheumatologists, epidemiologists, health economists, and patients. First, the critical outcomes were determined according to a three-round Delphi method, and eight topics with 88 clinical questions (CQs) were formulated. A systematic review of CQs was conducted using the Cochran Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, and Japana Centra Revvo Medicina (2003-2012). A questionnaire survey and focus group interview were performed to capture the patients' values and preferences. Data from the National Health Insurance drug price list and product information provided by pharmaceutical companies were collected to evaluate drug cost and safety. The GRADE approach was used to describe the evidence quality and determine the strength of recommendations. Recommendations were developed using a modified Delphi method by a multidisciplinary panel including patients. RESULTS: Eight meetings and frequent e-mail communications were conducted to draft a quality assessment of evidence and recommendations. For 88 CQs, recommendation statements were determined. CONCLUSIONS: Using the GRADE approach, new CPGs successfully addressed important clinical issues for treating RA patients. Timely updating of recommendations should be routinely considered.

Postoperative complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using a biological agent - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate, through a systematic review of the literature, the association between the use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and surgical site infection (SSI) or wound healing delay after orthopedic surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A systematic review of articles indexed in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science from 1992 to 2012 was performed. The search aimed to identify studies describing SSI or wound healing delay in patients with RA treated with or without bDMARDs. Articles fulfilling the predefined inclusion criteria were reviewed systematically and their quality was appraised. RESULTS: There was no Cochrane review on this subject. We found 75 articles through specific searches of PubMed and Web of Science, and hand searching. After inclusion and exclusion by full-text review, 10 articles were found for SSI, and 5 articles for delayed wound healing. The use of bDMARDs appeared to increase the rate of SSI slightly, especially in large joint-replacement surgery. Delayed wound healing was not increased by the use of bDMARDs. However, the definitions of SSI and delayed wound healing varied between the reviewed articles. Most of the articles focused on tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors. CONCLUSION: bDMARDs slightly increase the relative risk of SSI but not that of delayed wound healing after orthopedic surgery and should be used with appropriate caution.

Once-Weekly Injection of Low-Dose Teriparatide (28.2 µg) Reduced the Risk of Vertebral Fracture in Patients with Primary Osteoporosis.

We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial to assess the effect of 28.2 µg teriparatide versus placebo (1.4 µg teriparatide) on reduction of the incidence of vertebral fractures. Individuals enrolled in this study included patients with primary osteoporosis with one to five vertebral fractures and capable of self-supported walking. Attention was focused on incident vertebral fractures, change in bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, and safety. A total of 316 subjects participated in the study, which lasted up to 131 weeks. Incident vertebral fractures occurred in 3.3% of subjects in the 28.2 µg teriparatide-treated group and 12.6% of subjects in the placebo group during the 78-weeks study period. Kaplan-Meier estimates of risk after 78 weeks were 7.5 and 22.2 % in the teriparatide and placebo groups, respectively, with a relative risk reduction of 66.4% by teriparatide (P = 0.008). Lumbar BMD in the 28.2 µg teriparatide group increased significantly by 4.4 ± 4.7 % at 78 weeks, which was significantly higher than the corresponding data in the placebo group (P = 0.001). Adverse events were observed in 86.7% of individuals in the teriparatide group and 86.1% of those in the placebo group. In conclusion, weekly injection of a low-dose of teriparatide (28.2 µg) reduced the risk of incident vertebral fractures and increased lumbar BMD.

Analysis of direct medical and nonmedical costs for care of rheumatoid arthritis patients using the large cohort database, IORRA.

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to determine the annual direct medical and nonmedical costs for the care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using data from a large cohort database in Japan. METHODS: Direct medical costs [out of pocket to hospitals and pharmacies and for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)] and nonmedical costs (caregiving, transportation, self-help devices, house modifications) were determined for RA patients who were participants in the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) studies conducted in October 2007 and April 2008. Correlations between these costs and RA disease activity, disability level, and quality of life (QOL) were assessed. RESULTS: Data were analyzed from 5,204 and 5,265 RA patients in October 2007 and April 2008, respectively. The annual direct medical costs were JPY132,000 [out of pocket to hospital (US$1 = JPY90 in 2007)], JPY84,000 (out of pocket to pharmacy), and JPY146,000 (CAM). Annual direct nonmedical costs were JPY105,000 (caregiving), JPY22,000 (transportation), JPY30,000 (self-help devices), and JPY188,000 (house modifications). Based on the utilization rate for each cost component, the annual medical and nonmedical costs for each RA patient were JPY262,136 and JPY61,441, respectively. Costs increased with increasing RA disease activity and disability level or worsening quality of life (QOL). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the IORRA database, patients with RA bear heavy economic burdens that increase as the disease is exacerbated. The results also suggest that the increase in medical and nonmedical costs may be ameliorated by the proactive control of disease activity.

A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Forty Systematic Reviews of Foods with Function Claims (FFC) in Japan: Quality Assessment Using AMSTAR 2.

BACKGROUND: The Foods with Function Claims (FFC) was introduced in Japan in April 2015 to make more products available that are labeled with health functions. The products' functionality of function claims must be explained by scientific evidence presented in systematic reviews (SRs), but the quality of recent SRs is unclear. This study assessed the quality of SRs in the FFC registered on the Consumer Affairs Agency (CAA) website in Japan. METHODS: We searched the database from 1 April to 31 October 2022. Confidence in the methodological quality of each SR was evaluated by the AMSTAR 2 checklist. RESULTS: Forty SRs were randomly extracted on the basis of the eligibility criteria and recruitment procedures. Overall confidence was rated as "high" (N = 0, 0%), "moderate" (N = 0, 0%), "low" (N = 2, 5%), or "critically low" (N = 38, 95%). The mean AMSTAR 2 score was 51.1% (SD 12.1%; range 19-73%). Among the 40 SRs, the number of critical domain deficiencies was 4 in 7.5% of SRs, 3 in 52.5% of SRs, 2 in 35% of SRs, and 1 in 5% of SRs. Registering the review's protocol and comprehensive search strategies were particularly common deficiencies. Additionally, the risk of bias (RoB) was insufficiently considered. CONCLUSION: Overall, the methodological quality of the SRs based on the FFC, introduced eight years earlier, was very poor. This was especially true in the interpretation and discussion of critical domains, which had many deficiencies in terms of protocol registration, a comprehensive literature search strategy, and accounting for the RoB.

Budget impact analysis of comprehensive genomic profiling for untreated advanced or recurrent solid cancers in Japan.

AIMS: In Japan, the use of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is only available for cancer patients who have no standard of care (SoC), or those who have completed SoC. This may lead to missed treatment opportunities for patients with druggable alterations. In this study, we evaluated the potential impact of CGP testing before SoC on medical costs and clinical outcome in untreated patients with advanced or recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC), non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSQ-NSCLC), or colorectal cancer (CRC) in Japan between 2022 and 2026. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We constructed a decision-tree model reflecting the healthcare environment of Japan, to estimate the clinical outcome and medical costs impact of CGP testing by comparing two groups (with vs without CGP testing before SoC). The epidemiological parameters, detection rates of druggable alterations, and overall survival were collected from literature and claims databases in Japan. Treatment options selected based on druggable alterations were set in the model based on clinical experts' opinions. RESULTS: In 2026, the number of untreated patients with advanced or recurrent BTC, NSQ-NSCLC, and CRC was estimated to be 8600, 32,103, and 24,896, respectively. Compared with the group without CGP testing before SoC, CGP testing before SoC increased druggable alteration detection and treatment rate with matched therapies in all three cancer types. The medical costs per patient per month were estimated to increase with CGP testing before SoC in the three cancer types by 19,600, 2900, and 2200 JPY (145, 21, and 16 USD), respectively. LIMITATIONS: Only those druggable alterations with matched therapies were considered in the analysis model, while the potential impact of other genomic alterations provided by CGP testing was not considered. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggested that CGP testing before SoC may improve patient outcomes in various cancer types with a limited and controllable increase in medical costs.

Review of the use of defined daily dose concept in drug utilisation research in China.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to understand the characteristics of drug utilisation researches (DURs) using concepts of defined daily dose in China and to provide further suggestion for future DURs in China. METHODS: DURs using concepts of defined daily dose published in China were identified from China Journal Full-text Database, and in-depth data analysis was conducted for DURs published in every even-numbered year. RESULTS: In total, 2,911 DURs published between 1989 and 2009 were identified, of which 1,268 were included for further data analysis. All studies were hospital-based. Types of drugs commonly assessed in DURs were Anti-infectives for systemic use (34.1%), drugs for Nervous system (25.5%) and drugs for Alimentary tract and metabolism (14.3%). In addition, 63 DURs published in even-numbered year focusing on Chinese Herbal Medicine (CHM) were identified. Commonly used sources of defined dose were Xin Bian Yao Wu Xue/New Materia Medica (83.9%), drug information leaflets (66.8%) and Chinese Pharmacopoeia (52.0%). Common indicators used in DURs include defined daily doses (DDDs), drug utilisation index (DUI) and daily dose cost (DDC). CONCLUSION: DUR is a popular method to explore the use of both pharmaceutical drugs and CHM in China. The definition of defined daily dose and its related indicators presented in the DURs were highly varied. From this, it follows that DURs with more consistent methodology are highly needed for a thorough understanding of drug utilisation in China. Apart from DURs focusing on the hospital setting, more DURs from other health settings are needed.

Revisiting the Term "Compassionate Use" and Leadership of the World Health Organization in Resolving Confusion in the Age of COVID-19 and Beyond.

We discuss the term "compassionate use" (CU) as an example of terminology having a huge impact on drug regulation. CU is used in many confusing situations, and its meaning varies significantly. We ethically affirm the necessity of CU. We insist that CU should be properly placed in exceptional status. The regulation of CUs is much more lenient than that of clinical trials because of the difference in the purpose. Whether consciously or unconsciously, abuse results in confusion and is never acceptable. The World Health Organization (WHO) proposed not to use the previous term CU but to replace it with another one. WHO also proposed the term MEURI (monitored emergency use of unregistered and experimental interventions). However, this was extremely incomplete, and WHO used the term CU subsequently. The main purpose of the proposal needs to be thoroughly implemented. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond, expectations regarding WHO's role and leadership in global health issues are rising. We hope that WHO will play a major role in promoting research ethics preparedness while discontinuing the use of confusing terms such as CU and will develop alternative terms and their content. We discuss the evaluation of MEURI, the Japanese version of CU, and appropriate and inappropriate terminology related to the therapeutic use of unapproved drugs. We also discuss the expected appearance of CU including its name. It is appropriate to target group/cohort patients and unapproved drugs in the late stage of development. It is also important to solve the problem of incentives for CUs of pharmaceutical companies that are rushing to obtain marketing approval. The UK's Early Access to Medicine Scheme has provided many suggestions. We believe that our opinion can contribute to WHO's efforts to resolve the confusion and promote research ethics preparedness in health emergencies.

Funding and infrastructure among large-scale clinical trials examining cardiovascular diseases in Japan: evidence from a questionnaire survey.

BACKGROUND: Large-scale clinical trials with thousands of participants are often needed to evaluate the risk reductions of cardiac events and/or death. Many recent clinical trials have evaluated the incidences of cardiac events using hard endpoints, especially in cardiovascular and metabolic medicine. A high investigation cost is involved in conducting a large-scale clinical trial, and obtaining sufficient funding is essential. The infrastructural environment of clinical trials is currently inadequate in Japan. We conducted a questionnaire-based survey to address this issue. The present study sought to clarify the current situation surrounding large-scale clinical trials in terms of funding and infrastructure, and to inform discussion about improving the financial and infrastructural situation for clinical trials. METHODS: We sent questionnaires to 119 sponsors of large-scale clinical trials between August 2007 and December 2007, and between July 2009 and August 2009. Answers to each question were summarized and data were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: We received responses from the sponsors of 63 (52.9%) out of 119 trials to which questionnaires were sent. The results revealed that 25 trials (39.7%) were funded by foundations, and 21 trials (33.3%) were funded by public agencies. All of the foundations involved in conducting clinical trials, where funding sources were specified, were funded by private organizations such as pharmaceutical companies. All of the clinical trials with a cost of JPY 300 million (USD 3.27 million) or more were funded by private organizations, and none were funded solely by public agencies. The sponsors of 23 trials (36.5%) responded that the trial was 'not registered' to clinical trial registry. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire responses revealed that there were still many trials whose funding sources were unclear and many sponsors were unaware of their responsibilities in managing and/or financing the costs of clinical trials. These findings indicate that further discussion is required to establish appropriate frameworks and/or rules regarding funding, while considering conflicts of interest. This discussion should take place as soon as possible to facilitate appropriate clinical trials.

Duplicate publication cases in the field of Kampo (Japanese herbal medicine) in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Duplicate publication has a negative influence on science and publishing communities. We found duplicate publication cases in the field of Kampo (traditional Japanese herbal medicine) while compiling the Evidence Reports of Kampo Treatment (EKAT) 2009 published by the Special Committee for Evidence-based Medicine (EBM), the Japan Society for Oriental Medicine (JSOM). Therefore, we checked the articles that appeared in the EKAT 2009 and analyzed how duplicate publication occurred. METHODS: The EKAT 2009 contains structured abstracts of 320 randomized controlled trial studies. We checked 384 articles referred to by the structured abstracts to identify duplicate publications according to the following criteria: hypothesis and results are the same; the authors are in common; no description as to a secondary publication is offered; no cross-references to related papers. RESULTS: Eleven articles that appeared in the EKAT 2009 were identified as duplicate publications. These articles showed four duplicate patterns: reproducing an already published article with the same sample data and results (n=3); adding new sample data with the same results (n=1); reporting part of the preliminary sample with the same results (n=1); translating an original article into another language (n=6). CONCLUSION: Among the 11 duplicate publications in the EKAT 2009, we discovered 4 duplicate patterns. These patterns reflect Japanese researchers' behavior that leads to the production of duplicate publications: the authors complete a previous article and submit it to a more prestigious journal; translate an original English article for Japanese physicians without referring to the original paper. To raise the awareness of duplicate publication among researchers, the understanding of publication ethics is essential.

[Quality Control and Quality Assurance for the Intermediate Zone between Food and Drug: Rational Use of Such Products and the Need to Modify the Pharmacy Education].

General views on three aspects were discussed. The first aspect is regulatory categories, which can range from "soft to hard", an expression using the English and Japanese translation of the French term, "drogue douce" (soft drug). This categorization starts with "so-called health foods" and extends to Foods with Health Claims [Foods with Nutrient Functional Claims (FNFC); Foods with Functional Claims (FFC); Foods for Specified Health Uses (FOSHU)], OTC drugs, and ethical drugs. "The Basic Policy for New Drug Approval" (1967) made a distinction between OTC and prescription drugs. FOSHU (1991) originally included foods for "patients", such as low allergen rice with preventive "health claims". Foods for Medical Uses (FMU) later became an independent subcategory under Foods for Special Dietary Uses. On the other hand, manufacturers of FFC can make various "health claims" on the basis of randomized controlled trial or systematic review (2015). Products in the intermediate zone between food and drug have an annual market of over 2 trillion yen (US$ 20 billion). The second aspect is the five elements, i.e., quality, safety, efficacy, information, and cost, which are derived from WHO's "The rational use of drugs" (1985). The adoption of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by the UN General Assembly (2015) led to the addition of "ecology" as the sixth element, which is applicable for herbal and animal raw materials. The third aspect is quality control and quality assurance. This initially began with manufactured products and was expanded to the service fields handled by various health workers including pharmacists.

Compliance of Clinical Trial Protocols for Foods with Function Claims (FFC) in Japan: Consistency between Clinical Trial Registrations and Published Reports.

BACKGROUND: A new type of foods with a health claims notification system, the Foods with Function Claims (FFC), was introduced in Japan in April 2015. This cross-sectional study sought to clarify compliance of clinical trial protocols reported as the scientific basis of efficacy in the FFC system. METHODS: All articles based on clinical trials published on the Consumer Affairs Agency website from 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2021 were reviewed. Items assessed included first author characteristics (for-profit or academia), journal name, year published, journal impact factor in 2020, article language, name of clinical trial registration (CTR), and seven compliance items (Title: T, Participant: P, Intervention: I, Comparison: C, Outcome: O, Study design: S, and Institutional Review Board, IRB). Among studies that conducted CTR, consistency with these seven compliance items was evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 136 studies that met all inclusion criteria, 103 (76%) performed CTR, and CTR was either not performed or not specified for 33 (24%). Compliance between the protocol and the text was high (≥96%) for items P and S, but considerably lower for items T, I, C, O, and IRB (52%, 15%, 13%, 69%, and 27%, respectively). Furthermore, 43% of protocols did not include functional ingredients or food names in items T or I. The total score was 3.7 ± 1.1 pts (out of 7). CONCLUSIONS: Some CTs had no protocol registration, and even registered protocols were suboptimal in transparency. In addition to selective reporting, a new problem identified was that the content of the intervention (test food) was intentionally concealed.

International survey on willingness-to-pay (WTP) for one additional QALY gained: what is the threshold of cost effectiveness?

Although the threshold of cost effectiveness of medical interventions is thought to be 20 000- 30 000 UK pounds in the UK, and $50 000-$100 000 in the US, it is well known that these values are unjustified, due to lack of explicit scientific evidence. We measured willingness-to-pay (WTP) for one additional quality-adjusted life-year gained to determine the threshold of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Our study used the Internet to compare WTP for the additional year of survival in a perfect status of health in Japan, the Republic of Korea (ROK), Taiwan, Australia, the UK, and the US. The research utilized a double-bound dichotomous choice, and analysis by the nonparametric Turnbull method. WTP values were JPY 5 million (Japan), KWN 68 million (ROK), NT$ 2.1 million (Taiwan), 23 000 UK pounds (UK), AU$ 64 000 (Australia), and US$ 62 000 (US). The discount rates of outcome were estimated at 6.8% (Japan), 3.7% (ROK), 1.6% (Taiwan), 2.8% (UK), 1.9% (Australia), and 3.2% (US). Based on the current study, we suggest new classification of cost-effectiveness plane and methodology for decision making.

Effectiveness of aquatic exercise and balneotherapy: a summary of systematic reviews based on randomized controlled trials of water immersion therapies.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this review was to summarize findings on aquatic exercise and balneotherapy and to assess the quality of systematic reviews based on randomized controlled trials. METHODS: Studies were eligible if they were systematic reviews based on randomized clinical trials (with or without a meta-analysis) that included at least 1 treatment group that received aquatic exercise or balneotherapy. We searched the following databases: Cochrane Database Systematic Review, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, JDream II, and Ichushi-Web for articles published from the year 1990 to August 17, 2008. RESULTS: We found evidence that aquatic exercise had small but statistically significant effects on pain relief and related outcome measures of locomotor diseases (eg, arthritis, rheumatoid diseases, and low back pain). However, long-term effectiveness was unclear. Because evidence was lacking due to the poor methodological quality of balneotherapy studies, we were unable to make any conclusions on the effects of intervention. There were frequent flaws regarding the description of excluded RCTs and the assessment of publication bias in several trials. Two of the present authors independently assessed the quality of articles using the AMSTAR checklist. CONCLUSIONS: Aquatic exercise had a small but statistically significant short-term effect on locomotor diseases. However, the effectiveness of balneotherapy in curing disease or improving health remains unclear.