RESUMO
Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy of the modified laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters by nephrologists. Methods: A total of 188 patients diagnosed as end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were enrolled, who received catheter and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) therapy from January 2011 to May 2016 in Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital. They were divided into group A (with modified laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters, n=59) and group B (with conventional placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter, n=129). The demographic and clinical characteristics, past abdominal operation history, surgery time, hospital stay after operation, expenses for surgery and hospitalization, early and late complications including bleeding, pain, leakage, peritonitis and catheter displacement were observed. Results: Patients with previous abdominal surgery accounted for 11.9% in group A and 0 in group B(χ2=15.897, P<0.001). The duration of the operation was (38.9±12.8)min in group A and (64.1±12.7)min in group B(t=-6.466 6, P=0.000 0). The cost of the operation was (5 488.4±156.1) yuan in group A and (1 602.7±48.92) yuan in group B (t=257.129, P=0.000 0). Catheter displacement within one month was observed in 0 and 11.6%(χ2=7.455 3, P=0.003), pain in 15.3% and 41.9% (χ2=12.862 2, P=0.000), and catheter displacement after one month in 0 and in 16.3% (χ2=10.812 4, P=0.000) of the patients, respectively in group A and group B. The incidences of peritonitis within one month and beyond one month, leakage, bleeding and so on showed no difference between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusions: Placement of PD catheter with laparoscope is suitable for renal failure patients with abdominal operation history and replacement PD catheter. It also has the advantages of shorter surgery time, less pain and lower incidences of catheter displacement, expanding the application of PD. However, bleeding, leakage, hernia and other complications are frequently seen.