Precision of Chatbot Generative Pretrained Transformer Version 4-Generated References for Colon and Rectal Surgical Literature.

INTRODUCTION: The objective is to assess the precision of references generated by Chatbot Generative Pretrained Transformer version 4 (ChatGPT-4) in scientific literature pertaining to colon and rectal surgery. METHODS: Ten frequently studied keywords pertaining to colon and rectal surgery were chosen: colon cancer, rectal cancer, anal cancer, total neoadjuvant therapy, diverticulitis, low anterior resection, transanal minimally invasive surgery, ileal pouch anal anastomosis, abdominoperineal resection, and hemorrhoidectomy. ChatGPT-4 was prompted to search for the most representative citations for all keywords. After this, two separate evaluators meticulously examined the outcomes each key element, awarding full accuracy to generated citations in which there was no discrepancies in any of the fields when cross-referenced with the Scopus, Google, and PubMed databases. References from ChatGPT-4 underwent a thorough review process, which involved careful examination of key elements such as the article title, authors, journal name, publication year, and Digital Object Identifier (DOI). RESULTS: Forty-one of the 100 references generated by were fully accurate; however, but none included a DOI. Partial accuracy was observed in 67 of the references, which were identifiable by title and journal. Performance varied across specific keywords; for example, references for colon and rectal cancer were 100% identifiable by title and journal, but no term had 100% accuracy across all categories. Notably, none of the generated references correctly listed all authors. Conducted within a short timeframe during which ChatGPT4 is rapidly evolving and updating its knowledge base. CONCLUSIONS: While ChatGPT-4 offers improvements over its predecessors and shows potential for use in academic literature, its inconsistent performance across categories, lack of DOIs, and irregularities in authorship listings raise concerns about its readiness for application in the field of colon and rectal surgery research.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Infections Following Appendectomy of Complicated Appendicitis: A Meta-analysis and Retrospective Single-institutional Study.

Patients with complicated appendicitis have an increased risk for postoperative infections. Potential risk factors for postoperative infections through a meta-analysis and retrospective chart review are discussed. A meta-analysis consisting of 35 studies analyzing complicated appendicitis treated with an appendectomy noting at least 1 postoperative infection was performed. A retrospective review was then conducted in patients diagnosed with complicated appendicitis after appendectomy. Of 5326 patients in total, 15.4% developed postoperative infections. Laparoscopic surgery and perioperative hyperoxygenation were found to be protective factors for the development of infection. Retrospectively, 53.2% of patients presented with complicated appendicitis. Patients with complicated appendicitis were more likely to be older in age and have an increased length of stay. Patient demographics, operative time, and comorbid status had no effect on postoperative infection or readmission rate. Physicians should strongly consider minimally invasive techniques to treat all cases of complicated appendicitis irrespective of comorbidities, age, sex, or body mass index.

Gender and Race Demographics of Fellowships After General Surgery Training in the United States: A Five-Year Analysis in Applicant and Resident Trends.

INTRODUCTION: The gender and minority gap in general surgery residency is narrowing; however, literature lacks comprehensive data regarding the demographics of fellowship programs following general surgery training. METHODS: Data from 2017 to 2021 for gender, ethnicity, and surgical subspecialty are publicly available from the ERAS database and ACGME yearly data reports. Cochran-Armitage trend tests were used to determine statistical significance in trends for female and minority applicants and trainees. RESULTS: The overall trend of female applicants to surgical specialties remained stagnant. However, female applicants to vascular surgery increased significantly from 25% to 35% (P = .045). There was no significant increase in female trainees in any surgical specialties evaluated. Furthermore, the overall trend of minority applicants to surgical specialties also remained stagnant, except for pediatric surgery, which showed significantly fewer minority applicants. Despite pediatric surgery having fewer applicants, minority trainees in this specialty increased significantly from 8% to 19% (P = .008). CONCLUSION: Several current initiatives, such as intentional mentorship, are being reported to promote diverse and equal representation among female and minority applicants and trainees. However, the current overall margin of increase in diversity among surgical specialty applicants and trainees is minimal, indicating that continued efforts are needed to diversify surgical specialty training programs.

Validation of Use of Flipped Classroom for Surgery Core Clerkships.

BACKGROUND: The flipped classroom (FC) is an integrated learning paradigm that equips students with self-directed study materials before scheduled meeting times allowing for the deeper application of acquired knowledge with an instructor. There is limited data on the application of FC to clinical undergraduate medical education and particularly as it applies to a surgical clerkship. METHODS: This study is a four-year retrospective study that includes two cohorts of students who matriculated through two training paradigms, traditional classroom (TC) and FC. Information regarding the FC cohort was collected from June 2018 to July 2020 (N=166). A two-year matched historical cohort of students enrolled in the clerkship and taught with the TC paradigm from June 2016 to July 2018 was used for comparison (N=157). The primary aim of this study is to assess the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) surgery shelf performance when the FC model is utilized compared to the TC model. This study will validate a prior similar study that had a smaller cohort with different secondary endpoints. Therefore, the secondary aim of this study assesses how teaching style can affect other performance metrics of a rotation (such as clinical performance, quizzes, Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE), and practicums) and how time was utilized by faculty, staff, and students. RESULTS: There was no difference in overall NBME surgery shelf performance when comparing the FC to the traditional classroom teaching (68.94 vs 70.34, P= 0.1667). Likewise, there was no difference in quiz performance. The FC did allow instructors to spend more time in other clinical components of the curriculum leading to a significant difference in student practicum (84.2 vs 88.26, P = 0.0186) and OSCE grades (87.54 vs 90.58, P <0.0001). CONCLUSION: The surgery NBME shelf performance is not compromised by FC and therefore can be used as an alternative to traditional classroom setting for teaching medical knowledge to surgery clerkship students. In addition, the FC can improve time management for instructors allowing for improved teaching and development in other components of the surgery curriculum.

Microaggression and Implicit Bias.

Microaggression is an unconscious statement or action regarded as discrimination against a marginalized community. Microaggression coupled with implicit bias (unconscious prejudice in favor or against one person or group) can be psychologically damaging to the targeted community. The difficulty with microaggressions and implicit biases is that they are subjective and unconscious, and the offender may not view them as damaging. Microaggressions and implicit biases can affect both the patient and the physician. Whether it is the patient that is the victim of these phenomena or the physician, the goal of quality patient care is adversely affected. When patients are victims, bias can also lead to systematic dismissal of symptoms, inferior medical services, and less aggressive preventive care. Physicians who are victims of such phenomena may deal with the repeated trauma of receiving microaggressions and biases from patients and/or colleagues which may cause mental distress and ultimately functional impairment affecting work performance. In either case, repeated direct and indirect exposure of microaggressions and biases through encounters within and outside the workforce are cumulative leading to lasting internalized damage. Awareness that implicit biases and microaggressions exist and recognition that these phenomena are problematic are the first steps toward fostering a more equitable and inclusive culture. As a society and especially as health care workers, we must become increasingly culturally aware and sensitive of all communities for the ultimate good of patient care.

Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopy: Does the Participation of a Resident Matter?

Presently, endoscopic procedures are a requirement for training competency for completion of a general surgery residency. There are no studies to date that have assessed whether having a resident perform a colonoscopy impacts quality indicators such as adenoma detection rate (ADR). To retrospectively review ADR in adult patients, who undergo screening colonoscopy at a single institution with (ColFacR) and without (ColFac) the participation of a general surgery resident. A total of 792 patients were identified in the database screening colonoscopies between the ages of 45 and 80 from July 2013 to June 2015. Of those, 501 were reviewed after exclusion criteria. When comparing the ColFac group (n = 316) to the ColFacR group (n = 185), there were no differences between age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, or quality of bowel preparation. The mean number of total polyps, hyperplastic polyps, and adenomatous polyps retrieved were similar between the two groups. There was no difference in the ADR for the ColFac cases and ColFacR cases (25.95% vs 27.03%, respectively, P = 0.834). ADR is similar in elective colonoscopies that were performed with or without a general surgery resident. The participation of a general surgery resident in routine colonoscopies should not impact reported quality indicators.

Diagnostic Modalities for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Serologic Markers and Endoscopy.

The evaluation, diagnosis, and monitoring of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has improved significantly over the past few decades. However, differentiation and management of the subtypes of IBD (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and indeterminate colitis) can still be challenging. The evolution of serologic markers has improved our understanding of the pathogenesis and natural history of IBD. In addition, advancements in endoscopy and endoscopic scoring systems have improved the accuracy of diagnosis and the efficacy of surveillance of IBD patients. This article reviews the recent literature on serologic markers, endoscopy, and endoscopy scoring systems.

Rare case of a strangulated intercostal flank hernia following open nephrectomy: A case report and review of literature.

INTRODUCTION: Flank incisions may be associated with incisional flank hernias, which may progress to incarceration and strangulation. Compromised integrity of the abdominal and intercostal musculature due to previous surgery may be associated with herniation of abdominal contents into the intercostal space. There have been six previously reported cases of herniation into the intercostal space after a flank incision for a surgical procedure. This case highlights the clinical picture associated with an emergent strangulated hernia and highlights the critical steps in its management. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present a case of a 79-year-old adult man with multiple comorbidities presenting with a strangulated flank hernia secondary to an intercostal incision for a right-sided open nephrectomy. The strangulated hernia required emergent intervention including right-sided hemi-colectomy with ileostomy and mucous fistula. DISCUSSION: Abdominal incisional hernias are rare and therefore easily overlooked, but may result in significant morbidity or even death in the patient.. The diagnosis can be made with a thorough clinical examination and ultrasound or computed topographical investigation. Once a hernia has become incarcerated, emergent surgical management is necessary to avoid strangulation and small bowel obstruction. CONCLUSION: Urgent diagnosis and treatment of this extremely rare hernia is paramount especially in the setting of strangulation.

Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in African Americans with and without HIV: A Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of anal carcinoma has increased over the last few decades especially in African Americans (AA) despite the use of highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART). Here, we retrospectively review oncologic outcomes of AA patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with and without HIV to further examine the cause of this trend. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All adult AA patients diagnosed with anal SCC from 2000 to 2007 who met inclusion were examined. All patients were staged according to the American Joint Committee on Carcinoma (AJCC) sixth edition staging classification. Patients were divided into two cohorts: HIV (-) and HIV (+). Demographics, comorbidities, and oncologic outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-two AA patients with anal SCC were analyzed. Fifteen (68.%) were HIV (+) and seven (32%) were negative. Seventy-four percent of HIV (+) patients were on HAART therapy at the time of diagnosis. The HIV (+) cohort was significantly younger, mostly male, and had more comorbidities compared to the negative cohort. There was no difference in tumor, nodal or metastasis (TNM) stage for both cohorts. HIV (+) patients were more likely to receive non-operative therapy. The 5-year survival rate for HIV negative and positive patients was 57% and 58%, respectively. AJCC stage was the only factor predictive of survival after performing Cox hazard proportional regression analysis, HR: 1.96 (95% CI, 0.987 to 3.881). CONCLUSIONS: In the HAART era, HIV (+) AA patients are at high risk of developing anal SCC. However, the prognosis of HIV (+) AA with anal SSC is similar to that of their HIV (-) counterparts. Carcinoma stage is the only factor predictive of survival.