Congenital hypopituitarism: clinical, molecular and neuroradiological correlates.

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have suggested that mutations in genes encoding several hypothalamo-pituitary (H-P) transcription factors result in hypopituitarism [isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) and combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD)], which may in turn be related to the neuroanatomy revealed by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Although studies have focused on patients with either optic nerve hypoplasia (ONH) or isolated hypopituitarism with normal optic nerves, few studies have compared the two groups. We aimed to relate the clinical phenotype of a large cohort (n = 170) of children with congenital hypopituitarism including septo-optic dysplasia (SOD) attending a single centre to the neuroradiological and genetic findings. DESIGN: Clinical, biochemical, MR imaging and molecular data were analysed retrospectively in 170 patients with or 'at-risk' (with ONH) of hypopituitarism to determine predictors of hypopituitarism. RESULTS: The presence of ONH was significantly associated with an absent septum pellucidum [odds ratio (OR) 31.5, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 7.3-136.6, P < 0.001], an abnormal corpus callosum (OR 10.5, 95% CI 3.8-28.6, P < 0.001) and stalk abnormalities (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.2, P = 0.009). The risk of hypopituitarism was 27.2 times greater in patients with an undescended posterior pituitary (95% CI 3.6-205.1, P < 0.001). Anterior pituitary hypoplasia (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.3-7.0, P = 0.006) and an absent pituitary stalk (P < 0.001) were also significantly associated with hypopituitarism. With respect to the type or severity of hypopituitarism, CPHD was more often associated with an abnormal corpus callosum (OR 6.1, 95% CI 1.4-27.4, P = 0.008) and stalk abnormalities (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.3-6.1, P = 0.006). Male to female ratio was significantly greater in patients with normal optic nerves (3.3:1) as compared with those with ONH (1.2:1). The prevalence of diabetes insipidus, thyrotrophin and ACTH deficiencies was significantly greater in patients with ONH as compared with 'idiopathic' hypopituitarism. Mutations in pituitary transcription factors and genes regulating GH secretion were rare (5/170) in this cohort of patients with sporadic hypopituitarism. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that individuals presenting with ONH are at high risk for neuroradiologic and endocrine abnormalities. The neuroradiologic features are predictive not only of the presence, but also of the type, of hypopituitarism. The association of midline abnormalities with hypopituitarism in this cohort suggests a common developmental origin for these features, the aetiology of which remains unidentified in the majority of cases.

HESX1 mutations are an uncommon cause of septooptic dysplasia and hypopituitarism.

CONTEXT: Mutations in the transcription factor HESX1 have previously been described in association with septooptic dysplasia (SOD) as well as isolated defects of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. OBJECTIVE: Given that previous screening was carried out by SSCP detection alone and limited to coding regions, we performed an in-depth genetic analysis of HESX1 to establish the true contribution of HESX1 genetic defects to the etiology of hypopituitarism. DESIGN: Nonfamilial patients (724) with either SOD (n = 314) or isolated pituitary dysfunction, optic nerve hypoplasia, or midline neurological abnormalities (n = 410) originally screened by SSCP were rescreened by heteroduplex detection for mutations in the coding and regulatory regions of HESX1. In addition, direct sequencing of HESX1 was performed in 126 patients with familial hypopituitarism from 66 unrelated families and in 11 patients born to consanguineous parents. PATIENTS: All patients studied had at least one of the three classical features associated with SOD (optic nerve hypoplasia, hypopituitarism, midline forebrain defects). RESULTS: Novel sequence changes identified included a functionally significant heterozygous mutation at a highly conserved residue (E149K) in a patient with isolated GH deficiency and digital abnormalities. The overall incidence of coding region mutations within the cohort was less than 1%. CONCLUSIONS: Mutations within HESX1 are a rare cause of SOD and hypopituitarism. However, the large number of familial patients with SOD in whom no mutations were identified is suggestive of an etiological role for other genetic factors. Furthermore, we have found that within our cohort SOD is associated with a reduced maternal age compared with isolated defects of the hypothalamopituitary axis.

Evolution of gonadotropin deficiency in a patient with type II autosomal dominant GH deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Type II isolated GH deficiency (IGHD type II) is caused by dominant negative splicing or point mutations of the GH-1 gene. Studies have suggested that dominant mutant GH forms prevent the secretion of wild-type GH, resulting in eventual cell death; surprisingly, some patients with these GH mutations develop other hormonal deficiencies (ACTH, TSH). SUBJECTS: The proband presented at the age of 2.3 years with IGHD. His father, also known to have been treated for IGHD as a child, had subsequently been lost to follow-up, having remained without treatment during this time. At re-evaluation at the age of 38 years, he complained of lack of stamina and poor libido. Clinical and biochemical assessment confirmed severe GHD, borderline ACTH insufficiency, suboptimal basal and stimulated gonadotropins, and a poor prolactin response to provocation. The basal testosterone concentration was low, and he complained of secondary infertility. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed anterior pituitary hypoplasia in both patients. Genetic testing revealed a heterozygous splicing mutation in GH-1 (intervening sequence-3 + 1G>A) in both patients, known to cause IGHD type II. INTERVENTIONS: The proband showed an excellent growth response to recombinant human GH (rhGH). His father, also treated with rhGH, showed improved quality of life on rhGH, but testosterone concentrations continued to decline, necessitating treatment with testosterone with symptomatic benefit but no improvement in semen quality. CONCLUSIONS: This case supports recent experimental and clinical observations suggesting that the cytotoxicity associated with accumulation of dominant negative mutant 17.5 kDa GH causes a form of GHD that can evolve into multiple hormone deficiencies. Hence, patients diagnosed initially with IGHD type II require continued long-term clinical follow-up.

Novel mutations within the POU1F1 gene associated with variable combined pituitary hormone deficiency.

CONTEXT: Mutations within the gene encoding the pituitary-specific transcription factor POU1F1 are associated with combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD). Most of the affected individuals manifest GH, prolactin, and TSH deficiency. OBJECTIVE: We have now screened 129 individuals with CPHD and isolated GH deficiency for mutations within POU1F1. RESULTS: Causative mutations were identified in 10 of 129 individuals (7.8%). Of these, five patients harbored the dominant negative R271W mutation, which is a well-recognized mutational hot spot. We have also identified a second frequently occurring mutation, E230K, which appears to be common in Maltese patients. Additionally, we describe two novel mutations within POU1F1, an insertion of a single base pair (ins778A) and a missense mutation (R172Q). Functional studies have revealed that POU1F1 (E230K) is associated with a reduction in transactivation, although DNA-binding affinity is similar to the wild-type protein. On the other hand, POU1F1 (R172Q) is associated with a reduction in DNA binding and transactivation, whereas POU1F1 (ins778A) is associated with loss of DNA binding and a reduction in transactivation. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the phenotype associated with POU1F1 mutations may be more variable, with the occasional preservation of TSH secretion. Additionally, our data revealed POU1F1 mutations in three patients who were diagnosed as having ACTH deficiency but who, on further evaluation, were found to have normal cortisol secretion. Hence, elucidation of the genotype led to further evaluation of the phenotype, with the cessation of cortisol replacement that had been commenced unnecessarily. These data reflect the importance of mutational analysis in patients with CPHD.

Expanding the spectrum of mutations in GH1 and GHRHR: genetic screening in a large cohort of patients with congenital isolated growth hormone deficiency.

CONTEXT: It is estimated that 3-30% of cases with isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) have a genetic etiology, with a number of mutations being reported in GH1 and GHRHR. The aim of our study was to genetically characterize a cohort of patients with congenital IGHD and analyze their characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 224 patients (190 pedigrees) with IGHD and a eutopic posterior pituitary were screened for mutations in GH1 and GHRHR. To explore the possibility of an association of GH1 abnormalities with multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies, we have screened 62 patients with either multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies (42 pedigrees), or IGHD with an ectopic posterior pituitary (21 pedigrees). RESULTS: Mutations in GH1 and GHRHR were identified in 41 patients from 21 pedigrees (11.1%), with a higher prevalence in familial cases (38.6%). These included previously described and novel mutations in GH1 (C182X, G120V, R178H, IVS3+4nt, a>t) and GHRHR (W273S, R94L, R162W). Autosomal dominant, type II IGHD was the commonest form (52.4%), followed by type IB (42.8%) and type IA (4.8%). Patients with type II IGHD had highly variable phenotypes. There was no difference in the endocrinology or magnetic resonance imaging appearance between patients with and without mutations, although those with mutations presented with more significant growth failure (height, -4.7 +/- 1.6 SDS vs. -3.4 +/- 1.7 SDS) (P = 0.001). There was no apparent difference between patients with mutations in GH1 and GHRHR. CONCLUSIONS: IGHD patients with severe growth failure and a positive family history should be screened for genetic mutations; the evolving endocrinopathy observed in some of these patients suggests the need for long-term follow-up.

The role of growth hormone in determining birth size and early postnatal growth, using congenital growth hormone deficiency (GHD) as a model.

OBJECTIVE: The role of GH in early human growth is unclear. Congenital GH deficiency (CGHD) provides a useful tool to explore this putative role. We have assessed the effects of CGHD on birth size and early postnatal growth, and the further impact of the presence of additional pituitary hormone deficiencies and midline brain defects on these parameters. DESIGN, PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Weight, length and BMI expressed as standard deviation scores (SDS), over the first two years of life, were retrospectively compared in 44 GH-deficient children (M:F 26 : 18). Thirty-eight of 44 patients underwent GH provocation testing and all patients had neuro-imaging of the brain. The patients were divided into three groups of increasing phenotypic complexity {group A [n = 12, isolated GHD, no midline defects], group B [n = 10, combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD); no midline defects], group C (n = 22, CPHD with midline defects)}. RESULTS: Mean birth weight, length and BMI SDS were -0.4, -0.9 and +0.1 SDS, respectively. The differences were significant for weight (P = 0.03) and BMI (P = 0.003), but not length (P = 0.3) SDS, between groups A and C. Of the three groups, group A had a lower weight and BMI SDS than group C. The prevalence of postnatal complications (n = 25) was significantly different in the three groups [group A (8%), group B (80%), group C (73%); P < 0.001] and particularly between patients with isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) (group A) and CPHD (groups B and C; P < 0.0001). No patients in group A presented with neonatal hypoglycaemia as compared with 70% of those in group B and 59% in group C (P = 0.001). A reduced length SDS was observed in all patients within 6 months of birth and the reduction was greatest in group B (P = 0.03). Group C remained significantly (P < 0.05) heavier at 12, 18 and 24 months compared to group A. BMI SDS was significantly (P < 0.05) greater at all study points in CPHD patients (groups B and C) as compared with IGHD. Serum GH concentrations at testing did not correlate significantly with birth length (r = -0.08, P = 0.7), birth weight (r = -0.08, P = 0.6) or the age at induction of GH treatment (r = 0.12, P = 0.5). There were no significant differences between peak serum GH concentrations in patients in groups A (7.8 +/- 6.3 mU/l), B (3.9 +/- 4.8 mU/l) or C (8.7 +/- 5.4 mU/l). CONCLUSIONS: Length, weight and BMI data from our study groups suggest that GH per se has a minimal effect on intrauterine growth but a significant effect during the infancy period. Early growth may also be influenced by the complexity of the hypopituitary phenotype reflected by the presence of additional pituitary hormone deficiencies and midline forebrain defects.

Mutations within the transcription factor PROP1 are rare in a cohort of patients with sporadic combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD).

OBJECTIVE: Mutations within the pituitary-specific paired-like homeobox gene PROP1 have been described in 50-100% of patients with familial combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD). We screened a cohort of sporadic (n = 189) and familial (n = 44) patients with hypopituitarism (153 CPHD and 80 isolated hormone deficiencies) for mutations within the coding sequence of PROP1. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Patients with congenital hypopituitarism were recruited from the London Centre for Paediatric Endocrinology as well as several national and international centres. The pituitary phenotype ranged from isolated growth hormone deficiency (IGHD) to panhypopituitarism. Clinical data, including endocrine and neuro-radiological studies were obtained from patient records, and DNA was collected and screened for mutations within PROP1 using PCR and single-stranded conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis. Positive results on SSCP were sequenced directly. RESULTS: The prevalence of PROP1 mutations in unselected sporadic cases of hypopituitarism was lower (1.1%) than in familial cases (29.5%). PROP1 mutations can be associated with a highly variable phenotype, and both pituitary hypoplasia and pituitary hyperplasia. We describe the waxing and waning of a pituitary mass over 20 months in association with a PROP1 mutation that is predicted to lead to complete loss of function. Additionally, we have identified a possible founder mutation in CPHD patients from the Indian subcontinent. CONCLUSIONS: PROP1 mutations are rare in sporadic cases of CPHD, although the prevalence rises if there is a positive family history or if the patients are carefully selected with respect to the endocrine and neuroradiological phenotype. There is considerable phenotypic variability in families with the same mutation, indicating the role of other genetic or environmental factors on phenotypic expression. Finally, the pituitary enlargement that is observed in patients with PROP1 mutations can wax and wane in size before eventual involution.