Phase I pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study of 17-(allylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17AAG, NSC 330507), a novel inhibitor of heat shock protein 90, in patients with refractory advanced cancers.

PURPOSE: 17-(Allylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17AAG), a benzoquinone antibiotic, down-regulates oncoproteins by binding specifically to heat shock protein 90 (HSP90). We did a phase I study of 17AAG to establish the dose-limiting toxicity and maximum tolerated dose and to characterize 17AAG pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Escalating doses of 17AAG were given i.v. over 1 or 2 hours on a weekly x 3 schedule every 4 weeks to cohorts of three to six patients. Plasma pharmacokinetics of 17AAG and 17-(amino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17AG) were assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Expression of HSP70 and HSP90 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was measured by Western blot. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled to 11 dose levels between 10 and 395 mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose was 295 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in both patients (grade 3 pancreatitis and grade 3 fatigue) treated with 395 mg/m2. Common drug-related toxicities (grade 1 and 2) were fatigue, anorexia, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. Reversible elevations of liver enzymes occurred in 29.5% of patients. Hematologic toxicity was minimal. No objective responses were observed. 17AAG pharmacokinetics was linear. Peak plasma concentration and area under the curve of 17AG, the active major metabolite of 17AAG, increased with 17AAG dose, but the relationships were more variable than with 17AAG. 17AAG and 17AG in plasma were >90% protein bound. There were no consistent changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cell HSP90 or HSP70 content. CONCLUSIONS: 17AAG doses between 10 and 295 mg/m2 are well tolerated. 17AAG pharmacokinetics is linear. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell HSP90 and HSP70 are uninformative pharmacodynamic markers. The dose recommended for future studies is 295 mg/m2 weekly x 3, repeated every 4 weeks.

Phase I study of weekly (day 1 and 8) docetaxel in combination with capecitabine in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: Capecitabine in combination with docetaxel given every 3 weeks has shown a high degree of activity in a number of tumor types, but at the expense of significant toxicity. To improve the therapeutic index, we evaluated a weekly regimen of docetaxel in combination with capecitabine, and determined the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities and pharmacokinetics of this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with docetaxel on days 1 and 8, and capecitabine, twice daily on days 1-14, of an every-21-day cycle. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were assessed on days 1 and 8 of the first cycle of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Enrolled in the study were 25 patients. The most frequent toxicities were asthenia, hand-foot syndrome and mucositis. Inability to deliver at least 75% of the planned doses of both drugs during the first two cycles of chemotherapy was noted at dose levels 2, 3 and 4. Dose level 1 (docetaxel 30 mg/m2 and capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily) is the recommended dose for phase II studies. Five patients experienced a partial response, and eight patients had stabilization of disease. Coadministration of capecitabine did not alter the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. CONCLUSION: The regimen consisting of docetaxel 30 mg/m2 (days 1, 8) and capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily (days 1-14) was well tolerated. Capecitabine did not alter pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. Further testing of this regimen in tumor-specific trials, especially gastric, lung and breast cancer, is warranted.