RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine prognostic factors and to provide long-term mortality data in patients with positive lymph nodes at the time of radical prostatectomy in a sample with long-term follow-up. METHODS: A total of 527 patients with complete data sets treated in the years 1992-2014 were studied. The median follow-up was 7.2 years. The median number of removed lymph nodes was 15. Age, year of surgery, Gleason score, local tumor stage, prostate-specific antigen level, lymph node density, lymph node count and the number of positive lymph nodes were included in multivariable competing risk analyses with prostate cancer mortality as endpoint. RESULTS: After 20 years, 28% of patients (95% CI 20-36%) died from non-prostate cancer (competing) causes, whereas 29% (95% CI 23-36%) died from prostate cancer. Only lymph node density (stratified by the median of 11.1%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.66, 95% CI 1.04-2.64, p = 0.0340) and Gleason score (8-10 vs. <8: HR 5.97, 95% CI 3.18-11.23, p < 0.0001) were independent predictors of prostate cancer mortality. Patients with a Gleason score <8 and a lymph node density < median had a 20-year prostate cancer mortality of only 5% (95% CI 0-10%), whereas this rate in patients with Gleason score 8-10 and a lymph node density ≥ median was 44% (95% CI 32-56%), p < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality in patients with positive lymph nodes was determined by tumor aggressiveness and the relative extent of spread; neither the year of surgery nor the number of removed lymph nodes was associated with outcome. Patients with a lymph node density of <11.1% and a Gleason score <8 had an excellent long-term outcome.
Assuntos
Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Idoso , Seguimentos , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Prognóstico , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Kisspeptin-10 (Kiss-10) in patients with small renal tumours (SRTs) and controls. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Kiss-10 was measured in preoperative plasma samples in a cohort of 143 patients with unilateral renal tumours smaller than or equal to 4 cm and 40 age-matched controls by a competitive ELISA test kit. The cohort of patients included 56 patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), 43 with papillary RCC (pRCC), 12 with chromophobe RCC (chRCC) and 32 with oncocytomas. RESULTS: Kiss-10 was detected in all patients and controls. SRT patients revealed significantly higher Kiss-10 levels than controls (mean value 10.04 vs. 6.37 pmol/l, p < 0.001). In SRT patients, Kiss-10 was detected at significantly different concentrations between the subgroups (p = 0.021). The highest concentration was observed in those with oncocytomas (11.50 pmol/) followed by chRCC, pRCC and ccRCC patients (9.89, 10.01 and 9.25 pmol/l, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 for the comparison of all tumours vs. controls (p < 0.001) and an AUC of 0.671 for all malignant tumours vs. oncoytomas (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: This study shows that Kiss-10 levels are significantly altered by malignancy and tumour subtypes even in patients with SRTs. Kiss-10 therefore deserves further attention as a plasmatic biomarker for renal tumours.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renais/metabolismo , Kisspeptinas/metabolismo , Adenoma Oxífilo/metabolismo , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Área Sob a Curva , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Células Renais/metabolismo , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Curva ROC , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The best technique of radical prostatectomy - open versus robot-assisted approach - is controversially discussed. In this study, we compared the complication rates of open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy during the introduction and subsequent routine use of a da Vinci® robotic device while open surgery remained the standard approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1st, 2006, and June 4th, 2012, 2,754 men underwent radical prostatectomy at our department. Among them, 317 received robot-assisted and 2,438 open surgery. According to the requirements for prostate cancer centers certified by the Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft (German Cancer Society), a prospective database recording perioperative complications was built up. The complication rates of open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy were compared with the χ(2) or Fisher exact test. The distributions of quantitative variables were compared with U tests. RESULTS: Whereas the demographic factors favored patients selected for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, there were no differences between open and robot-assisted surgery concerning length of stay, autologous blood transfusion rates and the incidence of perioperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy had comparable complication rates. With better patient- and tumor-related parameters as well as decreasing transfusion rates in the robot-assisted subgroup, this observation might reflect the learning curves of the involved robotic surgeons.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Robótica , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Transfusão de Sangue , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Competência Clínica , Desenho de Equipamento , Humanos , Laparoscopia/instrumentação , Laparoscopia/mortalidade , Curva de Aprendizado , Tempo de Internação , Linfocele/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/terapia , Prostatectomia/instrumentação , Prostatectomia/métodos , Prostatectomia/mortalidade , Robótica/instrumentação , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/instrumentação , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/mortalidade , Equipamentos Cirúrgicos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The best technique of radical prostatectomy--open retropubic versus robot-assisted surgery--is a subject of controversy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1st, 2007 and December 31st, 2011, 2,177 men underwent radical prostatectomy at our department. 252 (12%) cases were laparoscopic robot-assisted, the remainder open retropubic procedures. In Germany, certified prostate cancer centers are required to collect urinary tract-related outcome data after radical prostatectomy using the International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. The questionnaire data were used to compare both surgical approaches concerning the urinary tract-related outcome 1, 2 and 3 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Neither the voiding score nor the incontinence score or the bother scale sum differed between the two cohorts at any of the measurement times. CONCLUSIONS: Concerning continence recovery, in this series, there were no detectable differences between robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Robótica , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Alemanha , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Incontinência Urinária/psicologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the consistency of several comorbidity classifications and concomitant diseases at radical prostatectomy (RP) during a 10-year period. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In 1,297 patients who underwent RP between 1993 and 2002, age and several comorbidity classifications were derived from patient records and assigned to the year of surgery. Trends were evaluated using the Cochran-Armitage trend test. RESULTS: Parallel to an increasing frequency of RPs and a shift toward more organ-confined tumors (P = 0.0094), the proportion of patients aged > or =70 years increased (P = 0.0077). The proportion of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status class 3 increased (P < 0.0001), whereas that of ASA class 1 decreased (P < 0.0001). A Charlson score > or =1 has been assigned with an increasing frequency (P = 0.0008), whereas the trend with a Charlson score of > or =2 did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07). In contrast to the latter 2 classifications, no significant trends were observed with classifications related to diabetes mellitus and heart disease. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the application of the ASA classification may change significantly over time, whereas cardiac and diabetes-related conditions, as well as the Charlson score were apparently less sensitive to changing classification standards in the RP setting.
Assuntos
Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/classificação , Idoso , Comorbidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prognostic significance of the individual conditions contributing to the Charlson comorbidity score in patients selected for radical prostatectomy. METHODS: A total of 1910 consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy from 1992 to 2004 were studied. The Charlson score and its contributing single conditions were analyzed, and the patients were stratified into 3 age groups. Comorbid (noncancer), competing (nonprostate cancer), and overall mortality were used as the study endpoints. Mantel-Haenszel hazard ratios and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated. Comparisons were made using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Eleven comorbid conditions were significant predictors of any type of mortality in the different age groups. Eight conditions (congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, diabetes, hemiplegia, moderate or severe renal disease, diabetes with end organ damage, moderate or severe liver disease, and metastatic solid tumor) were significant predictors of overall mortality. Two conditions (moderate or severe renal disease and metastatic solid tumor) were significant predictors of overall mortality in patients <63 years old. Five conditions (myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, hemiplegia, moderate or severe renal disease, and diabetes with end organ damage) were significant predictors in patients aged 63-69 years, and 3 (peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, and moderate or severe liver disease) were significant in patients aged >or=70 years. CONCLUSIONS: In patients selected for radical prostatectomy, the Charlson score can also predict the mortality risk in those >70 years of age. The selection for good risks alters, however, the prognostic weight of the individual comorbid diseases in this age group.