RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess focused cardiac ultrasound impact on clinician hemodynamic characterization of patients with suspected septic shock as well as expert-generated focused cardiac ultrasound algorithm performance. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. SETTING: Single-center, noncardiac PICU. PATIENTS: Less than 18 years old receiving focused cardiac ultrasound study within 72 hours of sepsis pathway initiation from January 2014 to December 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Hemodynamics of patients with suspected septic shock were characterized as fluid responsive, myocardial dysfunction, obstructive physiology, and/or reduced systemic vascular resistance by a bedside clinician before and immediately following focused cardiac ultrasound performance. The clinician's post-focused cardiac ultrasound hemodynamic assessments were compared with an expert-derived focused cardiac ultrasound algorithmic hemodynamic interpretation. Subsequent clinical management was assessed for alignment with focused cardiac ultrasound characterization and association with patient outcomes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seventy-one patients with suspected septic shock (median, 4.7 yr; interquartile range, 1.6-8.1) received clinician performed focused cardiac ultrasound study within 72 hours of sepsis pathway initiation (median, 2.1 hr; interquartile range, -1.5 to 11.8 hr). Two patients did not have pre-focused cardiac ultrasound and 23 patients did not have post-focused cardiac ultrasound hemodynamic characterization by clinicians resulting in exclusion from related analyses. Post-focused cardiac ultrasound clinician hemodynamic characterization differed from pre-focused cardiac ultrasound characterization in 67% of patients (31/46). There was substantial concordance between clinician's post-focused cardiac ultrasound and algorithm hemodynamic characterization (33/48; κ = 0.66; CI, 0.51-0.80). Fluid responsive (κ = 0.62; CI, 0.40-0.84), obstructive physiology (к = 0.87; CI, 0.64-1.00), and myocardial dysfunction (1.00; CI, 1.00-1.00) demonstrated substantial to perfect concordance. Management within 4 hours of focused cardiac ultrasound aligned with algorithm characterization in 53 of 71 patients (75%). Patients with aligned management were less likely to have a complicated course (14/52, 27%) compared with misaligned management (8/19, 42%; p = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of focused cardiac ultrasound in the evaluation of patients with suspected septic shock frequently changed a clinician's characterization of hemodynamics. An expert-developed algorithm had substantial concordance with a clinician's post-focused cardiac ultrasound hemodynamic characterization. Management aligned with algorithm characterization may improve outcomes in children with suspected septic shock.