The Possible Role of Mycotoxins in the Pathogenesis of Endometrial Cancer.

Endometrial cancer is one of the most common cancer types among women. Many factors can contribute to the development of this disease, including environmental factors and, thus, eating habits. Our study aims to determine the levels of various mycotoxins and their metabolites in the blood serum and endometrial tissue samples of participants with previously proven endometrial cancer and to find possible contributions to cancer development. In the cohort clinical trial, 52 participants aged between 44 and 86 were studied. The participants were divided into two groups: patients or matched controls. All patients had previously histologically diagnosed endometrial cancer. The cancer patients were divided into low-grade endometrioid and low- plus high-grade endometrioid groups. Controls had no history of endometrial malignancy or premalignancy. Blood serum and endometrial tissue samples were obtained from all study patients. We compared the concentrations of total Aflatoxins (Afs), Deoxynivalenol (DON), Ochratoxin-A (OTA), T2-toxin and HT2 toxin (T2/HT2 toxin), Zearalenone (ZEN), alpha-Zearalenol (α-ZOL), and Fumonisin B1 (FB1) in the serum and endometrium between the different study groups. As a result, we can see a significant correlation between the higher levels of Afs and zearalenone and the presence of endometrial cancer. In the case of Afs, DON, OTA, T2/HT2 toxins, ZEN, and alpha-ZOL, we measured higher endometrial concentrations than in serum. Considering the effect of mycotoxins and eating habits on cancer development, our results might lead to further research exploring the relationship between certain mycotoxins and endometrium cancer.

Comparison of Combined Parenteral and Oral Hormonal Contraceptives: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

BACKGROUND: Delivering contraceptive hormones through a transdermal patch or a vaginal ring might have advantages over the traditional oral route. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness, compliance, and side effect profile of oral and parenteral drug administration methods. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search in four medical databases-MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), Embase, and Scopus-from inception to 20 November 2022. Randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy, compliance, and adverse event profile of combined parenteral and oral hormonal contraceptives were included. RESULTS: Our systematic search provided 3952 records; after duplicate removal, we screened 2707 duplicate-free records. A total of 13 eligible studies were identified after title, abstract, and full-text selection. We observed no significant difference in contraceptive efficacy (Pearl Index) between oral and parenteral drug administration (MD = -0.06, CI: -0.66-0.53; I2 = 0%). We found significant subgroup differences between parenteral methods in terms of compliance (χ2 = 4.32, p =0.038, I2 = 80%) and certain adverse events: breast discomfort (χ2 = 19.04, p =0.001, I2 = 80%), nausea (χ2 = 8.04, p =0.005, I2 = 75%), and vomiting (χ2 = 9.30, p =0.002; I2 = 72%). CONCLUSION: Both parenteral and oral contraceptives can be used as an effective contraceptive method, and the route of administration should be tailored to patient needs and adverse event occurrence.