Comparison of prognostic factors and survival among black patients and white patients treated with irradiation for non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have reported differences in cancer incidence and survival between populations of Blacks and Whites. A 45% higher death rate from lung cancer for Black men and a survival duration for Black patients with lung cancer that is generally shorter than that for White patients have also been reported. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether race affects known prognostic factors for non-small-cell lung cancer in Black versus White patients. This analysis attempts to determine which prognostic factors may contribute to the reported differences in disease outcome. METHODS: We used data from 1565 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated in four randomized prospective trials conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). The data were pooled for a retrospective analysis of survival and prognostic factors by race. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed significant differences between Blacks and Whites with regard to sex, weight loss, histology, and RTOG T stage (P < .05), but the only clinically significant difference (P < or = .01) was weight loss. Despite these findings, overall survival for Blacks and Whites did not differ significantly (P = .67). Median survival for Blacks and Whites with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of 90 or more was 12.1 and 11.3 months, respectively (P = .45). Survival for Blacks and Whites with a KPS of less than 90 was 7.8 and 6.8 months, respectively. Cause of death did not differ between the two races. For both races, KPS, age, sex, weight loss, and RTOG T and N stages were significant prognostic factors for survival (P < .01), but race was not a significant prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: Further studies of the differential in cancer survival for Blacks and Whites may be indicated, but greater impact may be achieved by addressing socioeconomic factors, lifestyle and occupational risk factors, health education, and access to adequate health care.

Relationship between the neurotoxicity of the hypoxic cell radiosensitizer SR 2508 and the pharmacokinetic profile.

Complete pharmacological data from 71 patients treated on the phase I trial of SR 2508 were analyzed to see if the dose-limiting toxicity of peripheral neuropathy is related to the individual patient's pharmacokinetic profile. In a retrospective analysis, the risk of toxicity was best predicted by using the bivariate model of total drug exposure and the time over which the treatment course was given. Drug exposure [area under the curve (AUC)] for a single treatment was calculated by the integral over time of the serum concentration of SR 2508. Since the AUC was constant during the course of a patient's treatment, the total drug exposure (total-AUC) was estimated by the product of the AUC times the number of drug administrations. While the clinical efficacy of hypoxic cell sensitizers remains to be proven, SR 2508 is better tolerated than its predecessors, misonidazole and desmethylmisonidazole, as three times the amount of SR 2508 can be given. If this model is confirmed in the current phase II and III trials, the probability of developing neuropathy would be predictable for an individual patient from measurements made at the time of the first drug dose, allowing for the adjustment of drug schedule to avoid all but minor toxicity.

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: a comparison of adjuvant doxorubicin and observation for patients with localized soft tissue sarcoma.

Forty-seven patients with stage I, II, or III soft tissue sarcoma were entered into a prospective randomized Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) adjuvant protocol. Eligibility included conservative or radical primary treatment for local cure. Patients were then randomized to control or Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH). Adriamycin was administered at 70 mg/m2 (slow push, every 3 weeks for seven courses for a maximum of 550 mg/m2). To date, 32 patients, 17 males and 15 females, with an age range of 17 to 75 years (median, 44 years) have been followed sufficiently long to be included in this analysis. Nine patients have died. The median follow-up of the remaining 23 patients is 30 months (range, 2 to 50 months). Survival was not significantly different between Adriamycin or control. However, the disease-free interval was slightly different in favor of observation. This preliminary report does not support the hypothesis that Adriamycin is an effective adjuvant therapy for soft tissue sarcoma. Due to the small numbers, these results must be interpreted in relation to our ability to detect a difference, if in fact one existed. These preliminary data suggest that adjuvant Adriamycin not be used outside the confines of a clinical trial such as the current intergroup adjuvant sarcoma study.

Single-arm, open-label phase II study of intravenously administered tirapazamine and radiation therapy for glioblastoma multiforme.

PURPOSE: This phase II study tested the efficacy and safety of tirapazamine (Sanofi Synthelabo Research, Malvern, PA), a bioreductive agent, in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. The patients were staged according to a model constructed by a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of glioma patients in prior Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials and compared with a matched standard population, as predicted by the model. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 124 patients diagnosed with a GBM were treated with radiation therapy and intravenous tirapazamine between January 27,1995, and April 25,1997. All patients received 60 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. Tirapazamine was delivered three times a week for 12 treatments during radiotherapy. Fifty-five patients received tirapazamine at 159 mg/m(2). A second dose level, 260 mg/m(2), was opened, and 69 patients were entered. RESULTS: There was no significant survival advantage to the drug in any RPA class at either dose level. The median survival time was 10.8 months for the patient population treated with the 159-mg/m(2) dose of tirapazamine and 9.5 months for the group treated with the 260-mg/m (2) dose of tirapazamine. Survival times by RPA class for patients receiving tirapazamine at 159 mg/m(2) were 27.4 months (class III), 10.8 months (class IV), 7.9 months (class V), and 3.8 months (class VI). Survival times by RPA class for patients receiving tirapazamine at 260 mg/m(2) were 16.2 months (class III), 10.3 months (class IV), 5. 1 months (class V), and 1.3 months (class VI). Patients in RPA class III treated in the 159 mg/m(2) dose arm had a notably longer survival than patients in the RTOG database RPA class III, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. There were no fatal toxicities. Grade 3/4 toxicities were more frequent at the higher dose level. CONCLUSION: Survival in the population treated with radiation and tirapazamine was equivalent to the control population. Patients in RPA class III treated with radiation and tirapazamine at the 159-mg/m(2) dose had a longer survival when compared with the historical controls. The improvement in survival did not reach statistical significance. Toxicity was acceptable in both treatment arms, but grade 3/4 toxicities were more frequent in the higher dose regimen.

Does improved depth dose characteristics and treatment planning correlate with a gain in therapeutic results? Evidence from past clinical experience using conventional radiation sources.

Experience with the use of external beam conventional radiation over a period of several decades has shown that in every instance where there has been a major advance in the physical delivery of radiation to the tumor (beam energy and characteristics and precise tumor dose delivery) there has been a corresponding major improvement in the treatment results. The advent of megavoltage sources following the invention and use of Cobalt 60 and medical linear accelerator units during the late 1940's and early 1950's and their major impact on tumor control and patient survival in solid tumors such as carcinoma of the prostate, Hodgkin's Disease, head and neck tumors and cancer of the cervix are being discussed. Most recently, the use of computerized tomography and computer systems for treatment planning is likely to show a further improvement in the therapeutic results.

Hemibody radiation, an active therapeutic modality for the management of patients with small cell lung cancer.

In a previously published paper, the results of a preliminary clinical trial comparing systemic radiation (upper and lower hemibody technique) versus systemic chemotherapy in the management of all stages of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), suggested that hemibody radiation (HBI) was as efficient as systemic chemotherapy, particularly for patients with early disease. We are now presenting the final results of the above trial. The two year survival has shown that as many patients in the HBI as in the chemotherapy arm have reached this endpoint. However, there is a difference in favor of chemotherapy on both the median and one year survival for those patients with advanced stages. Therefore, as of June 1981, we have initiated a study incorporating HBI as a consolidating-maintenance agent for patients with all stages of the disease who have received a 3 1/2 months induction systemic chemotherapy plus local chest irradiation. Up to date, 65 patients have been entered and our median survival for those who received the complete treatment is 62.5 weeks.

Misonidazole with dexamethasone rescue: an escalating dose toxicity study.

Neurotoxicity induced by misonidazole (MISO) and desmethylmisonidazole (DMM) has become the dose limiting factor in clinical work. In 1981, we reported a preliminary study suggestive that Dexamethasone (DEXA) does have a protective effect against peripheral neuropathies (PN) resulting from toxicity of misonidazole. Furthermore, in that study we have observed that DEXA did not alter the plasma pharmacokinetics of misonidazole. We are presently investigating the use of DEXA (2 mg t.i.d. during treatment), with escalating doses of MISO in an attempt to modify its neurotoxicity. To date, 16 patients have been registered to receive total doses of MISO ranging from 13.5 to 17.5 gm/M2 given in 9 equally divided doses over 3 weeks. DEXA, 2 mg t.i.d. is given 3 days prior to the first dose and continues for the duration of therapy. All patients receive palliative radiation. No toxicity was seen at the total dose of 13.5 gm/M2. One grade I PN occurred in the first four patients receiving 15.5 gm/M2. Six additional patients were entered at this dose level and no further incidence of PN was observed. Patients are being entered at the next step of 17.5 gm/M2.

Binding of 3H-misonidazole to solid human tumors as a measure of tumor hypoxia.

Treatment-resistant, chronically hypoxic tumor cells have been assumed to exist in some solid human tumors, limiting their curability. To date, six patients with different types of tumors have been studied using radioactive labelled electron affinic compounds that bind to hypoxic cells. Although the gross clinical appearance of the tumors in all six patients was of a large and fixed mass which might on clinical grounds be expected to contain hypoxic cells, we have observed drug binding to hypoxic regions in only two, a rapidly growing small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and a malignant melanoma. The hypoxic fraction of the malignant melanoma was found to be 6% and the SCLC tumor approximately 10%. We have observed that areas of maximum adduct formation can be found in tumor cells immediately adjacent to blood vessels, suggesting that blood flow over the labelling interval was restricted. These preliminary studies suggest that sensitizer adduct formation in human tumor tissue may be a useful measure of tissue pO2 at the cellular level and that tumor hypoxia might be more related to the rate of tumor growth and histological grading than to tumor size.

Heterogeneity in response to treatment with buthionine sulfoximine or interferon in human malignant glioma cells.

Two tumor cell lines were established from each of three human malignant glioma biopsy specimens (M059, M067, M071) and sensitivity to treatment with radiation or chemotherapeutic agents (BCNU, nitrogen mustard) was determined. The effects of recombinant human interferon-alpha (rIFN) on the radiation response and of buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) on the drug response were investigated as well. For tumor M059, two cell lines that differed significantly in radiosensitivity were isolated (surviving fractions at 2 Gy = 0.02 and 0.64). The chemosensitivity and response to chemical modification differed as well. Cell lines established from tumor M071 differed in their response to rIFN only and were not sensitized by BSO. M067 cell lines showed little difference and were not sensitized by either agent. These results suggest that differences may exist both within and among human malignant gliomas with regard to their sensitivity to drugs, radiation, and the ability of chemical agents to modify treatment responses.

Radiosensitivity testing of human primary brain tumor specimens.

The inherent radiosensitivity of early passage cells derived from 22 patients with tumors of glial origin has been determined using a clonogenic assay system. The mean (+/- SD) surviving fraction at 2 Gy was 0.37 +/- 0.22 (range = 0.02-0.87). No correlation between inherent radiosensitivity and tumor cell plating efficiency or intracellular glutathione was observed. Tumor cells that were both resistant to nitrosoureas and expressed the Mer+ phenotype did not differ significantly in their radiosensitivity as compared to cells that were repair deficient (Mer-) and sensitive to nitrosoureas. Initial clinical follow-up suggests that factors in addition to inherent tumor cell radiosensitivity, such as performance status and age, continue to be the most important determinants of the response of patients with primary brain tumors to radiotherapy.

Intervention with the hypoxic tumor cell sensitizer etanidazole in the combined modality treatment of limited stage small-cell lung cancer. A one-institution study.

PURPOSE: We report the toxicity, patterns of failure and survival of a cohort of patients with limited disease (LD) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated with combined radiation and chemotherapy. During the course of thoracic irradiation, we added intravenous (i.v.) etanidazole (SR-2508, a third-generation 2-nitroimidazole) as a hypoxic cell sensitizer in an attempt to reduce the primary local failure rate and improve survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between July 1988 and August 1990, 30 consecutive patients with limited disease SCLC were enrolled and treated on a Phase II protocol receiving a standard combination chemotherapy regimen utilizing i.v. cisplatin 25 mg/m2/day x 3 days, i.v. etoposide 100 mg/m2/day x 3 days alternating with intravenous cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m2/day, intravenous doxorubicin 15 mg/m2, and intravenous vincristine 2 mg (CAV) to a total of six cycles every 3 weeks. Radiotherapy and etanidazole were started after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Etanidazole was administered intravenously at a dose of 2 g/m2 three times per week for a total of 30 g/m2 during the course of thoracic radiation that delivered 50.00 Gy tumor dose in 25 fractions in an overall time of 6 weeks. RESULTS: The overall response rate of the primary lesion in the thorax was 96% (CR + PR), with 64% complete responses. The median time to treatment failure was 18 months. Of the patients that have relapsed, only 18% failed in the thorax (alone or concomitant with other sites). This is a marked improvement compared to the 40-50% rate reported in the literature. The 2-year crude survival was 46%. The 3- and 5-year crude survival rate with no evidence of disease was 33 and 30%, respectively. We have observed a 10% increase in the incidence of transient etanidazole related peripheral neuropathies compared to previous etanidazole studies not utilizing systemic chemotherapy. There was no increased incidence of radiation esophagitis, pulmonary toxicity, or nephro- or myelotoxicity over and above what has been routinely observed with this radio/chemotherapy regimen. There were no treatment related deaths. CONCLUSION: The moderate increase in etanidazole-related transient peripheral neuropathies could have been related to the concomitant use of etanidazole with vincristine and cisplatin. Although the almost 50% improvement in the incidence of tumor failure rate in the thorax in this small group of patients did not correlate with an equal marked improvement in their survival, the 5-year survival outcome in our series is at least equal or better than the best reports in the literature of larger clinical trials. We believe there is sufficient data from this study, particularly the improvement of local tumor control, to warrant a large randomized controlled clinical trial, using the most current systemic chemotherapy with concomitant thoracic irradiation with or without the most effective available hypoxic cell cytotoxic/sensitizer.

High dose misonidazole with dexamethasone rescue: a possible approach to circumvent neurotoxicity.

With a view to modifying misonidazole (MISO) neurotoxicity, we initiated a randomized clinical study to assess a possible drug interaction and toxicity protection when dexamethasone (DXM) is administered concomittantly with MISO. The ongoing study consists of: 1. Pharmacokinetic evaluation; 2. Assessment of toxicity. Fourteen patients undergoing radiation therapy for different types of malignant neoplasia (excluding brain tumors) have been randomized to receive either MISO alone, or DXM one week prior and during treatment with MISO. Five of seven patients receiving MISO alone developed peripheral neuropathies while only one out of 7 patients that received MISO with DXM coverage developed a transient and mild neuropathy. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of MISO in plasma and urine of those patients receiving DXM has shown no evidence of drug interaction. It is postulated that the mechanism of action of DXM is at the nerve cell membrane level, restoring and stabilizing cell surface properties. In future studies we will investigate the use of DXM with increasing doses of MISO above the recommended maximum dose of 12 gm/m2, hoping to achieve a higher tumor tissue level of MISO while avoiding unacceptable toxicity. The effect of Allopurinol on the plasma kinetics of MISO was studied in four additional patients, observing also no evidence of drug interaction.

Clinical trials with hypoxic cell sensitizers: time to retrench or time to push forward?

Results of world-wide clinical trials with misonidazole are discussed. An attempt is made to assess the reasons for the lack of positive results and the cost-benefit analysis is critically reviewed. The data on the clinical investigations of the second generation misonidazole analogues SR-2508 and RO-03-8799 are presented. Emphasis is placed on future work such as tumor selection for clinical trials, reduction of drug toxicity and methods to increase the drug radiosensitizing properties. Because of the large amount of knowledge, experience, productivity and good scientific clinical data accummulated with nitroimidazoles over the past five years, it is recommended that this is the time to push forward with the work on the newest, more efficient compounds.

The effect of radiation on normal human CNS as detected by NMR spectroscopy.

In a prospective study, proton (1H) and phosphorus (31P) nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy were used to search for effects of brain tumor radiotherapy on normal human central nervous system. Phosphorus spectroscopy data at 1.5 T seems to suggest that any radiation induced damage that may occur as a result of therapeutic brain irradiation, does not alter the relative concentrations of phosphorus metabolites or the intracellular pH beyond the limits of normal variation (approximately +/- 20%). Proton spectroscopy, on the other hand, detects post radiation changes in the ratios of certain nuclear magnetic resonance visible metabolites following radiotherapy, particularly choline/N-acetylaspartate, and especially in regions of brain receiving high doses of radiation. Such changes may be indicative of the release of membrane bound choline during radiation induced demyelination of brain. Of interest, we have found elevated metabolite ratios of 31P in normal central nervous system prior to radiotherapy, which persisted throughout the time span of the study in both the ipsilateral and contralateral cerebral hemispheres.

Final report of the phase I trial of the hypoxic cell radiosensitizer SR 2508 (etanidazole) Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 83-03.

In a Phase I trial SR 2508 was administered by rapid intravenous infusion to 102 patients receiving radiation therapy. The dose-limiting toxicity was peripheral sensory neuropathy (PN) which was related to the cumulative dose administered. The highest single daily dose, 3.7 g/m2, was tolerated without toxicity. The lowest cumulative toxic dose was 21.6 g/m2, and the highest non-toxic dose was 40.8 g/m2. Grade 1 neuropathies were mild and self-limited; grade 2 neuropathies were long-lasting and debilitating. In a retrospective analysis, the risk of developing neurotoxicity was related to the cumulative drug exposure calculated by the area-under-the-curve (AUC) of plasma concentration versus time. There was an increased incidence of neuropathy in patients with a cumulative AUC of greater than or equal to 36 mM-hr. At a total dose of 34 g/m2 over 6 weeks, the incidence of Grade 1 neuropathy was approximately 30%; no grade 2 neuropathy occurred at this dose and schedule. Additional toxicities observed included nausea and vomiting (6%), skin rash (4%), and transient arthralgias (3%). One patient had transient abnormalities in liver function tests of unknown etiology. (In a more recent Phase II trial neutropenia has been observed which may be related to SR2508). Approximately three times more SR 2508 is tolerable compared to misonidazole, and it appears that severe neuropathy can be avoided by monitoring individual patient pharmacokinetic parameters. Evaluation of the efficacy of this hypoxic cell sensitizer is in progress.

Final report on phase I trial of WR-2721 before protracted fractionated radiation therapy.

This is the final report of the Phase I Protocol for the initial clinical study of Multiple Dose WR-2721 with radiotherapy (RTOG 80-02). The essential object of the study was to determine the highest dose of WR-2721 that could be given daily for the greatest number of weeks 15 to 30 minutes before conventional radiation treatment schedules. Eighty-four patients were entered into various dose levels. The major and dose-limiting toxicities were emesis, hypotension and malaise. The latter symptom was characterized by increasing weakness, fatigability, and ill-feeling. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) established by this study is 340 mg/m2 given 4 days a week (excepting Wednesday) for 5 weeks. The drug is delivered intravenously in 7 minutes. There were no long-term blood chemistry changes. There were no deaths due to the administration of the radioprotector.

Phase I trial of the hypoxic cell radiosensitizer SR-2508: the results of the five to six week drug schedule.

Sixty-five patients were entered on the long schedule of the Phase I trial of SR-2508. The planned total doses ranged from 30 to 40.8 g/m2 using various treatment schema including daily, split course, and every-other-day schedules. The individual dose size was 2 g/m2 for 56 patients and 1.7 g/m2 for nine. In contrast to misonidazole and desmethylmisonidazole, more SR-2508 can be administered as the duration of therapy is lengthened. All six patients on the 30 g/m2 step tolerated the drug without toxicity. This total dose was not achievable in the three week schedule. Additionally, a number of patients did not develop neuropathy at a cumulative dose of 40.8 g/m2. Although the analysis is not yet complete, a given patient's drug exposure as measured by their total AUC (mMxhr), defined as the area-under-the-curve of serum concentration of SR-2508 vs. time for a single dose times the number of doses given, is useful in predicting toxicity for that patient. The recommended starting schedule for the Phase II and III trials is 34 g/m2 over a 6 week period (2 g/m2 every other day). A total AUC of approximately 39 mMxhr should be tolerable. The drug regimen must be altered for patients who have a high AUC. Therefore, it is mandatory to have an accurate and rapid pharmacokinetic analysis for each patient. The clinical efficacy of the hypoxic cell sensitizers remains to be proven. However, using the guidelines derived from the Phase I trial, SR-2508 should be a relatively safe drug, producing minor or no toxicity.

Survival improvement in anaplastic astrocytoma, combining external radiation with halogenated pyrimidines: final report of RTOG 86-12, Phase I-II study.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the toxicity and tumor efficacy of the halopyrimidine IUdR as a chemical modifier of radiation response in patients with malignant glioma. The preliminary results published in 1993 demonstrated no real advantage in the group of patients with glioblastoma. However, a benefit appeared to be evolving in the group of patients with Anaplastic Astrocytoma (AA). We are now presenting the results on the long-term follow-up of patients with AA. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between August 1987 and October 1991, 79 patients were entered in a prospective study with newly diagnosed malignant glioma. Twenty-one of 79 were AA. The study was designed to have a fixed dose of radiation consisting of 60.16 Gy in 32 fractions in 6.5 weeks but varying the dose schedule of IUdR, delivered in a continuous intravenous infusion of long (96 h) or short (48 and 24 h) duration, every week for the 6.5 weeks of radiation treatment. RESULTS: The last AA patient was entered in March 1991. Ninety-five percent of the AA patients were under 59 years of age and 86% had a Karnofsky score 80. Thirty-eight percent had a tumor diameter of less than 5 cm and 52% had a tumor diameter between 5-10 cm. Seventy-six percent had partial or total tumor resection. The toxicity of this treatment was acceptable and has already been published elsewhere. At the time of this report, 14 out of 21 patients with AA are dead. The median survival, calculated from the Kaplan-Meier, is 3.2 years. Thirty-three percent of the patients have survived 5 years. These results compare favorably with the best results reported in the literature with postoperative external radiation plus chemotherapy, median survival time (MST) of 3 years, and previous Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) experience with radiation alone, MST of 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings in patients with AA corroborate the improved therapeutic results published recently when combining external radiation with "long" infusion of i.v. BUdR and indicate the need to proceed with randomized Phase III studies utilizing halogenated pyrimidines and radiation. One such study has already been activated, RTOG # 94-04.

Initial pharmacology and toxicology of intravenous desmethylmisonidazole.

Since January 1981, 52 patients have entered the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Phase I trial with intravenous (i.v.) desmethylmisonidazole (DMM). DMM is less lipophilic than misonidazole (MISO) and theoretically will be less neurotoxic due to lower penetration into neural tissue and more rapid elimination. The drug is administered intravenously to achieve the maximum drug concentration in tumor for a given dose. The protocol slowly escalates the total dose of drug administered. At this time the planned dose on the three week schedule is 1g/m2 five times per week to a total of 15g/m2, and on the seven week schedule is 1.25g/m2 twice weekly to a total dose of 17.5g/m2. The preliminary plasma pharmacokinetic data demonstrates high peak plasma levels within five minutes of the end of the drug infusion. Compared to MISO the percent of DMM excreted in the urine is increased, 63% vs 10%, and the elimination half-life is decreased: DMM, i.v. 5.3h; MISO, i.v. 9.3h; MISO, oral 10 to 13h. Neurotoxicity has been observed in approximately 30% of patients given a cumulative dose of greater than 11g/m2. This is in comparison to a 50% incidence in the RTOG Phase I study with oral MISO at doses of 12g/m2. There is not sufficient data to evaluate the relationship between neurotoxicity and drug exposure. Further patient accrual on this study is required to better define the properties of DMM.

Pharmacokinetic interaction of BCNU and misonidazole in humans.

Although considerable laboratory in vitro and in vivo evidence is now available suggesting that misonidazole (MISO) enhances chemotherapy tumor responses, experience with human tumors is limited. Further, the mechanism of this enhancement is not definitely known. One possible mechanism is that MISO alters the pharmacokinetics of the chemotherapeutic agent, vice versa or both. We studied a group of patients with recurrent malignant gliomas, following radiotherapy. After proven recurrence, they were treated with i.v. BCNU in combination with oral MISO in an 8 week cycle. Our aims were: 1. To obtain a second remission; 2. To assess the toxicity of this combination; 3. To assess the plasma pharmacokinetics of each drug alone and in combination. Six patients entered the protocol. Four of six patients obtained either a partial or subpartial response. Prolonged moderate myelosuppression was observed in 2/6 patients after 3 cycles; 2/6 patients experienced seizures after the first cycle of chemotherapy for the first time in the course of their disease. The plasma pharmacokinetic data indicates no evidence of a MISO-BCNU drug interaction.