RESUMO
Renal cell cancer is the third most common urological malignancy following prostate and bladder malignancies. Cardiac metastases to the right side of the heart without inferior vena cava (IVC) involvement are exceedingly rare, with only a handful of cases described in the literature. Metastasis to the head and neck region is also rare, occurring in an estimated 1% of cases. Here we present a case of a patient with recurrent syncopal events secondary to renal cell carcinoma without IVC involvement, with metastases both to the right ventricle and cervical lymph nodes. To our knowledge, this is the first case that presents with both of these rare findings together and that highlights cancer screening in patients with high risk factors and new exam findings in patients with syncopal events having negative initial workup.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Linfadenopatia , Humanos , Masculino , Veia Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The ASPIRE and ENDEAVOUR trials have shown cardiovascular adverse effects in patients treated with carfilzomib-based regimens. Therefore, we conducted this meta- analysis of published clinical trials to identify the cumulative incidence and risk of cardiovascular adverse effects due to carfilzomib. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library was performed, and we identified 45 prospective trials of carfilzomib with data on 5583 patients. Among all patients being treated with carfilzomib (N=5,583), 8.9% sustained all grade cardiotoxicity, while 4.4% sustained high-grade cardiotoxicity. All-grade hypertension was present in 13.2%, while the incidence of high-grade hypertension was 5.3%. RESULTS: The observed incidences of all-grade heart failure, edema, and ischemia were 5.1%, 20.7%, and 4.6%, respectively. Likewise, for high-grade heart failure and edema observed incidence was 3.2%, and 2.7%, respectively. There was no difference in the event rate of all and highgrade cardiotoxicity between newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and relapsed/refractory (p-value 0.42 and 0.86, respectively). Likewise, we did not observe any difference in the event rate of all and high-grade cardiotoxicity when carfilzomib was used as a single agent versus when used in combination therapy with other agents (p-value 0.43 and 0.73, respectively). CONCLUSION: Carfilzomib is associated with a significant risk of cardiovascular toxicity and hypertension. With the increasing utilization of carfilzomib, it is critical for primary care physicians, oncologists and cardiologists to be aware of the risk of cardiotoxicity associated with the use of carfilzomib to recognize and treat baseline cardiovascular risk factors in such patients.