Rare single nucleotide variants in COL5A1 promoter do not play a major role in keratoconus susceptibility associated with rs1536482.

BACKGROUND: Keratoconus is a chronic degenerative disorder of the cornea characterized by thinning and cone-shaped protrusions. Although genetic factors play a key role in keratoconus development, the etiology is still under investigation. The occurrence of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with keratoconus in Russian patients is poorly studied. The purpose of this study was to validate whether three reported keratoconus-associated SNPs (rs1536482 near the COL5A1 gene, rs2721051 near the FOXO1 gene, rs1324183 near the MPDZ gene) are also actual for a Russian cohort of patients. Additionally, we investigated the COL5A1 promoter sequence for single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in a subgroup of keratoconus patients with at least one rs1536482 minor allele (rs1536482+) to assess the role of these SNVs in keratoconus susceptibility associated with rs1536482. METHODS: This case-control study included 150 keratoconus patients and two control groups (main and additional, 205 and 474 participants, respectively). We performed PCR targeting regions flanking SNVs and the COL5A1 promoter, followed by Sanger sequencing of amplicons. The additional control group was genotyped using an SNP array. RESULTS: The minor allele frequency was significantly different between the keratoconus and control cohorts (main and combined) for rs1536482, rs2721051, and rs1324183 (p-value < 0.05). The rare variants rs1043208782 and rs569248712 were found in the COL5A1 promoter in two out of 94 rs1536482+ keratoconus patients. CONCLUSION: rs1536482, rs2721051, and rs1324183 were associated with keratoconus in a Russian cohort. SNVs in the COL5A1 promoter do not play a major role in keratoconus susceptibility associated with rs1536482.

Prevalence and Associations of Keratoconus Among Children, Adults, and Elderly in the Population-Based Ural Eye Studies.

PURPOSE: To estimate prevalence and associations of keratoconus in populations in Russia with an age from childhood to seniority. METHODS: The study population consisted of the cohorts of 3 population-based studies performed in urban and rural areas within the same geographical region in Bashkortostan/Russia: the Ural Children Eye Study (UCES; age = 6-18 y; n = 4890), the Ural Eye and Medical Study (UEMS; age = >40 y; n = 5314), and the Ural Very Old Study (UVOS; age = >85 y; n = 651). Based on Scheimflug imaging, keratoconus was defined by a keratometric reading of ≥48 diopters (D) in any eye. RESULTS: The mean maximal and minimal corneal refractive power increased from the UCES (43.58 ± 1.50 D and 42.70 ± 1.42 D, respectively) to the UEMS (44.26 ± 1.70 D and 43.61 ± 1.76 D, respectively) and to the UVOS (45.1 ± 1.72 D and 43.98 ± 1.68 D, respectively). Correspondingly, keratoconus prevalence increased from the UCES (42/4890; 0.086%; 95% CI = 0.060, 0.112) to the UEMS (112/5314; 2.11%; 95% CI = 1.72, 2.49) and to the UVOS (42/651; 6.45%; 95% CI = 4.56, 8.34). In the UCES, higher keratoconus prevalence was associated (multivariable analysis) with higher birth order [odds ratio (OR) = 2.34; 95% CI = 1.32, 4.15; P = 0.004], lower birth weight (OR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.99, 0.99; P < 0.001), and shorter axial length (OR = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.08, 0.30; P < 0.001). In the UEMS, keratoconus prevalence correlated with shorter axial length (OR = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.10, 0.23; P < 0.001), larger corneal volume (OR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.09, 1.25; P = 0.001), thicker lens (OR = 2.27; 95% CI = 1.06, 5.28; P = 0.04), cortical cataract degree (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.01, 1.04; P = 0.01), and higher stage of age-related macular degeneration (OR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.09, 2.51; P = 0.02). In the UVOS, keratoconus prevalence correlated with lower educational level (OR = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.71, 0.99; P = 0.04) and lower dynamometric handgrip force (OR = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.88, 0.97; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In this study on multiethnic groups from Russia, keratoconus prevalence increased from the pediatric group (0.09%) to the adult group (2.11%) and seniority group (6.45%), correlated mostly with biometric ocular parameters and was in all age groups statistically independent of most systemic parameters.