RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Many of the assessment tools used to study depression amongst older people in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) are adaptations of instruments developed in other cultural settings. There is a need to validate those instruments in LMICs. METHODS: 721 men and women aged 55-80 years from the Mysore Birth Records Cohort underwent standardised assessments for sociodemographic characteristics, cardiometabolic risk factors, cognitive function and mental health. Sensitivity, specificity and level of agreement of EURO-D diagnosis of depression with diagnosis of depression derived by the Geriatric Mental State (GMS) examination were calculated. To validate the EURO-D score against GMS depressive episode, we used maximum Youden's index as the criterion for each cut-off point. Concurrent validity was assessed by measuring correlations with the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO DAS II). RESULTS: Of the 721 (408 men and 313 women) who participated in this study, 138 (54 men and 84 women) were diagnosed with depression. Women had higher depression scores on the EURO-D scale and disability on the WHO DAS II scale. A maximum Youden's Index of 0.60 was observed at a EURO-D cut-off of 6, which corresponded to 95% sensitivity, 64% specificity, kappa value of 0.6 and area under the curve (AUC) of 80%. There was significant and positive correlation between EURO-D and WHO DAS II scores. LIMITATIONS: Future independent validation studies in other settings are required. DISCUSSION: This study supports the use of the EURO-D scale for diagnosing depression amongst older adults in South India.