Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Acute Stroke: The RESIST Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Despite some promising preclinical and clinical data, it remains uncertain whether remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) with transient cycles of limb ischemia and reperfusion is an effective treatment for acute stroke. Objective: To evaluate the effect of RIC when initiated in the prehospital setting and continued in the hospital on functional outcome in patients with acute stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a randomized clinical trial conducted at 4 stroke centers in Denmark that included 1500 patients with prehospital stroke symptoms for less than 4 hours (enrolled March 16, 2018, to November 11, 2022; final follow-up, February 3, 2023). Intervention: The intervention was delivered using an inflatable cuff on 1 upper extremity (RIC cuff pressure, ≤200 mm Hg [n = 749] and sham cuff pressure, 20 mm Hg [n = 751]). Each treatment application consisted of 5 cycles of 5 minutes of cuff inflation followed by 5 minutes of cuff deflation. Treatment was started in the ambulance and repeated at least once in the hospital and then twice daily for 7 days among a subset of participants. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was improvement in functional outcome measured as a shift across the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) at 90 days in the target population with a final diagnosis of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Results: Among 1500 patients who were randomized (median age, 71 years; 591 women [41%]), 1433 (96%) completed the trial. Of these, 149 patients (10%) were diagnosed with transient ischemic attack and 382 (27%) with a stroke mimic. In the remaining 902 patients with a target diagnosis of stroke (737 [82%] with ischemic stroke and 165 [18%] with intracerebral hemorrhage), 436 underwent RIC and 466 sham treatment. The median mRS score at 90 days was 2 (IQR, 1-3) in the RIC group and 1 (IQR, 1-3) in the sham group. RIC treatment was not significantly associated with improved functional outcome at 90 days (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.20, P = .67; absolute difference in median mRS score, -1; -1.7 to -0.25). In all randomized patients, there were no significant differences in the number of serious adverse events: 169 patients (23.7%) in the RIC group with 1 or more serious adverse events vs 175 patients (24.3%) in the sham group (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.11; P = .68). Upper extremity pain during treatment and/or skin petechia occurred in 54 (7.2%) in the RIC group and 11 (1.5%) in the sham group. Conclusions and Relevance: RIC initiated in the prehospital setting and continued in the hospital did not significantly improve functional outcome at 90 days in patients with acute stroke. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03481777.

Implementation and findings on a one-minute sit-stand test for prehospital triage in patients with suspected COVID-19-a pilot project.

INTRODUCTION: During the initial Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic wave, sparse personal protection equipment made telephone triage of suscpeted COVID-19 patients for ambulance transport necessary. To spare resources, stable patients were often treated and released on-scene, but reports from Italy suggested that some later detoriated. We implemented a prehospital sit-stand test to identify patients in risk for detoriation. METHODS: The test was implemented as part of a new guideline in stable suspected COVID-19 patients younger than 70 years with no risk factors for serious disease triaged by general practitioners to ambulance response in the Central Denmark Region. Data were collected from April 6th to July 6th 2020. The primary outcome for this study was the proportion of patients treated with oxygen within 7 days among patients decompensating vs patients not decompensating during the test. RESULTS: Data on 156 patients triaged to ambulance response by general practioners were analysed. In total 86/156 (55%) were tested with the sit-stand test. Due to off-guideline use of the test, 30/86 (34.8%) were either older than 70 or had risk factors for serious disease. 10/156 (6%) of patients had a positive COVID-19-test. In total, 17/86 (20%) decompensated during the test and of these, 9/17 (53%) were treated with oxygen compared to 2/69 (3%) in patients who did not decompensate (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In a population suspected of COVID-19 but with a low COVD-19 prevalence, decompensation with the sit-stand test was observed in 20% of patients and was associated with oxygen treatment within 7 days. These findings are hypotheses-generating and suggest that physical exercise testing may be usefull for decision making in emergency settings.

Fine for non-attendance in public hospitals in Denmark: A survey of non-attenders' reasons and attitudes.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate non-attending patients' reasons for non-attendance and their general and specific attitudes towards a non-attendance fine. DATA SOURCES: Non-attenders at two hospital departments participating in a trial of fine for non-attendance from May 2015 to January 2017. DESIGN: A quantitative questionnaire study was conducted among non-attenders. DATA COLLECTION: Non-attending patients in the intervention group were invited to complete the questionnaire. The response rate was 39% and the total number of respondents was 71 individuals. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The main reason for non-attendance was technical challenges with the digital appointment and with cancelation. The main part of the respondents was generally positive towards a fine for non-attendance. However, approximately the half had a negative attitude towards the actual fine issued. CONCLUSIONS: Technical challenges with appointments and cancelation should get special attention when addressing non-attendance. Danish non-attending patients are primarily positive towards the general principle of issuing a fine for non-attendance. However, a significant proportion of the generally positive, reported a negative specific attitude to the specific fine issued to them. This, however, did not affect their general attitude.

Volunteering to Care for People with Severe Mental Illness: A Qualitative Study of the Significance of Professional and Private Life Experience.

Challenges in recruiting volunteers encountered by psychiatric services are barely elucidated despite a general societal increase in volunteering. The aim of the study was to explore the significance of professional and private life experiences in willingness to volunteer to care for people with severe mental illness. Focus group interviews with volunteers in the Community Family Programme was conducted, followed by thematic analysis. All interviewees had professional and/or private experience of SMI, which had a major influence on their initial willingness to volunteer. Volunteering was an opportunity to pass on their experiences and to care for SMI people in ways that were not possible in their professions. The interviewees did not distinguish between the influences of professional and/or private life experiences on their willingness to volunteer. The study demonstrates the importance of professional and/or private life experiences in initial considerations about volunteering for mental health care. The consequences for recruitment practices are discussed.

Cost Analysis of Community Based Family Support of Patients with Severe Mental Illness.

Community-based family support is a new option to patients with severe mental illness in which the patient and a volunteer family meet on a regular basic. This study examined whether this support could reduce patients' use of psychiatric services. This matched case-control study included 86 patients with severe mental illness. 40 patients were offered the intervention: community-based family support intervention. Patients' use of psychiatric hospital services was followed from 2 years before to 2 years after the intervention using a difference-in-difference analytical approach. Although community-based family support seemed to reduce hospital admission, the reduction in cost did not compensate the cost of the programme. However, this does not rule out the potential cost effectiveness, and future studies should assess the clinical benefits and cost effectiveness of community-based family support. The present study does not provide sufficient basis for recommending the general implementation of community-based family support.

Paradoxes of follow-up - health professionals' views on follow-up after surgical treatment in gynecological cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Evidence now reveals that attending a follow-up program may not improve survival for low-stage gynecological cancer patients. The aim of this study was to explore health professionals' experiences with the follow-up programs and their views on follow-up in the future. METHODS: A qualitative approach was undertaken with semi-structured focus group interviews. Three focus group interviews were conducted at neutral ground. One group with onco-gynecologists, one group with specialist nurses, and one mixed group. The main themes of the interviewguide were: Existing follow-up program, life after cancer and future follow-up. The interviews were transcribed verbatim. Patterns and themes were uncovered from the data inspired by interpretive description. RESULTS: The doctors described most advantages, such as: Quality control of their own work, detection of sequelae after surgery, and credit and appraisal from the patients. A disadvantage was the inadequate use of the nurses' main competencies. Some dilemmas were described by the nurses as well as doctors: First, both groups were aware of the existing evidence that attendance of follow-up programs may not improve survival and yet, health professionals still performed the follow-ups and most often did not address this paradox for the patients. Second, the existing follow-up program seemed to bring the patients comfort and security on one hand, but on the other hand it seemed to induce insecurity and anxiety. The health professionals agreed that future follow-up should be individualized with focus on the single patients' needs and psychological wellbeing. The health professionals identified a great challenge in communicating the evidence and the forthcoming changes in the follow-up programs to the patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that the existing follow-up regime contains several dilemmas. According to the health professionals, future follow-up must be more individualized, and a shift in focus is needed from relapse to quality of life after cancer.

Effect of urgency level on prehospital emergency transport times: a natural experiment.

Accurate estimation of ambulance transport time from the scene of incident to arrival at the emergency department (ED) is important for effective resource management and emergency care system planning. Further, differences in transport times between different urgency levels highlight the benefits of ambulance transports with highest urgency level in a setting where ambulances are allowed to not follow standard traffic rules. The objective of the study is to compare ambulance urgency level on the differences in estimates of ambulance transport times generated by Google Maps and the observed transport times in a prehospital setting where emergency vehicles have their own traffic laws. The study was designed as a natural experiment and register study. Ambulance transports dispatched with different levels of urgency (Level A and B) were included in the Central Denmark Region (a mixed urban and rural area) from March 10 to June 11, 2021. Ambulance transports for highest urgency level were compared to lowest urgency level with Google Maps estimated transport times as reference. We analyzed 1981 highest urgency level and 8.958 lowest urgency level ambulance transports. Google Maps significantly overestimated the duration of transports operating at highest level of urgency (Level A) by 1.9 min/10 km (95% CI 1.8; 2.0) in average and 4.8 min/10 km (95% CI 3.9; 5.6) for the first driven 10 km. Contrary, Google Maps significantly underestimated the duration of transports operating at lowest level of urgency (Level B) by -1.8 min/10 km (95% CI -2.1; -1.5) in average and -4.4 min/10 km (95% CI -5.4; -3.5) for the first driven 10 km. Google Maps systematically overestimates transport times of ambulance transports driven with Level A, the highest level of urgency in a setting where ambulances are allowed to not follow standard traffic rules. The results highlight the benefit of using urgency Level A and provide valuable information for emergency care management.

Standard vs. targeted oxygen therapy prehospitally for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (STOP-COPD): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: A high concentration of inspired supplemental oxygen may possibly cause hypercapnia and acidosis and increase mortality in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Even so, patients with AECOPD are being treated with high oxygen flow rates when receiving inhalation drugs in the prehospital setting. A cluster-randomised controlled trial found that reduced oxygen delivery by titrated treatment reduced mortality-a result supported by observational studies-but the results have never been reproduced. In the STOP-COPD trial, we investigate the effect of titrated oxygen delivery compared with usual care consisting of high flow oxygen delivery in patients with AECOPD in the prehospital setting. METHODS: In this randomised controlled trial, patients will be blinded to allocation. Patients with suspected AECOPD (n = 1888) attended by the emergency medical service (EMS) and aged > 40 years will be allocated randomly to either standard treatment or titrated oxygen, targeting a blood oxygen saturation of 88-92% during inhalation therapy. The trial will be conducted in the Central Denmark Region and include all ambulance units. The power to detect a 3% 30-day mortality risk difference is 80%. The trial is approved as an emergency trial. Hence, EMS providers will include patients without prior consent. DISCUSSION: The results will provide evidence on whether titrated oxygen delivery outperforms standard high flow oxygen when used to nebulise inhaled bronchodilators in AECOPD treatment. The trial is designed to ensure unselected inclusion of patients with AECOPD needing nebulised bronchodilators-a group of patients that receives high oxygen fractions when treated in the prehospital setting where the only compressed gas is generally pure oxygen. Conducting this trial, we aim to improve treatment for people with AECOPD while reducing their 30-day mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Union Clinical Trials (EUCT) number: 2022-502003-30-00 (authorised 06/12/2022), ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT05703919 (released 02/02/2023), Universal trial number: U1111-1278-2162.

Life after gynecologic cancer--a review of patients quality of life, needs, and preferences in regard to follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the literature on quality of life (QoL) of gynecologic cancer survivors, their needs and preferences regarding follow-up, and possible predictors of long-term QoL. METHODS: A systematic literature search was made in the following databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Bibliotek.dk, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and SveMed+. We searched the period 1995-2012 for English-language literature. The search was made during July 2011 to February 2012. When possible, the search was made using MeSH terms. Additional reports were collected by systematically viewing the reference lists of the retrieved articles. RESULTS: Overall studies indicate that survivors after gynecologic cancer do not have impaired QoL in the long term. In general, the patients are highly satisfied with the follow-up program. The patients' greatest concern is fear of recurrence. The most frequent reported unmet need is help in dealing and living with the fear of recurrence. It seems that psychosocial status at time of diagnosis is determining for QoL and well-being in the long term. Association has been found between coping style and QoL, risk of depression, and anxiety in the long term after cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Even though long-term QoL does not seem to be impaired, the patients are struggling with fear of recurrence, and the way of coping with this fear is a possible predictor for long-term QoL after cancer. However, there is a lack of evidence on QoL, needs, and preferences regarding follow-up of the survivors after gynecologic cancer. The quality of the follow-up regimen is questionable, and it is not evidence based. Thus, it is extremely important to optimize the follow-up program and move focus to life quality. There is a need for an evidence-based strategy regarding follow-up for low-risk gynecologic cancer patients.

Association Between Number of Volunteer Responders and Interventions Before Ambulance Arrival for Cardiac Arrest.

BACKGROUND: Volunteer responder (VR) programs for activation of laypersons in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have been deployed worldwide, but the optimal number of VRs to dispatch is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the number of VRs arriving before Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and the proportion of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation. METHODS: We included OHCAs not witnessed by EMS with VR activation from the Capital Region (September 2, 2017, to May 14, 2019) and the Central Region of Denmark (November 5, 2018, to December 31, 2019). We created 4 groups according to the number of VRs arriving before EMS: 0, 1, 2, and 3 or more. Using a logistic regression model adjusted for EMS response time, we examined associations between the number of VRs arriving before EMS and bystander CPR and defibrillation. RESULTS: We included 906 OHCAs. The adjusted ORs for bystander CPR were 2.40 (95% CI: 1.42-4.05), 3.18 (95% CI: 1.39-7.26), and 2.70 (95% CI: 1.32-5.52) when 1, 2, or 3 or more VRs arrived before EMS (reference), respectively. The adjusted OR for bystander defibrillation increased when 1 (1.97 [95% CI: 1.12-3.52]), 2 (2.88 [95% CI: 1.48-5.58]), or 3 or more (3.85 [95% CI: 2.11-7.01]) VRs arrived before EMS (reference). The adjusted OR of bystander defibrillation increased to 1.95 (95% CI: 1.18-3.22) when ≥3 VRs arrived first compared with 1 VR arriving first (reference). CONCLUSIONS: We found an association of increased bystander CPR and defibrillation when 1 or more VRs arrived before the EMS with a trend toward increased bystander defibrillation with increasing number of VRs arriving first.

Association of intraosseous and intravenous access with patient outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Here we report the results of a study on the association between drug delivery via intravenous route or intraosseous route in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Intraosseous drug delivery is considered an alternative option in resuscitation if intravenous access is difficult or impossible. Intraosseous uptake of drugs may, however, be compromised. We have performed a retrospective cohort study of all Danish patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the years 2016-2020 to investigate whether mortality is associated with the route of drug delivery. Outcome was 30-day mortality, death at the scene, no prehospital return of spontaneous circulation, and 7- and 90-days mortality. 17,250 patients had out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. 6243 patients received no treatment and were excluded. 1908 patients had sustained return of spontaneous circulation before access to the vascular bed was obtained. 2061 patients were unidentified, and 286 cases were erroneously registered. Thus, this report consist of results from 6752 patients. Drug delivery by intraosseous route is associated with increased OR of: No spontaneous circulation at any time (OR 1.51), Death at 7 days (OR 1.94), 30 days (2.02), and 90 days (OR 2.29). Intraosseous drug delivery in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with overall poorer outcomes than intravenous drug delivery.

Socioeconomic Disparities in Prehospital Emergency Care in a Danish Tax-Financed Healthcare System: Nationwide Cohort Study.

Background: Differences related to socioeconomic status (SES) in use of prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) have been reported. However, detailed data on potential disparities in the quality of the EMS according to SES are lacking. Methods: A nationwide cohort study of medical emergency calls made to the Danish emergency number 1-1-2 in the period 2016-2017. To measure quality of care, performance indicators from the Danish Quality Registry for Prehospital Emergency Medical Services were used. SES was based on income, education and adherence to workforce. Poisson regression was used to measure relative risk (RR). Results: We included 388,378 medical 1-1-2 calls, of which 261,771 were unique individuals; 42% of the calls concerned patients with low education, 5% concerned patients living in relative poverty and 23% concerned patients receiving social subsidy. There were no significant differences between the SES regarding time span for arrival of first EMS units. However, patients receiving social subsidy and retired people were more likely to be released at scene and to call again within 24 hours: Adjusted RRs were 2.79 [2.20; 3.54] and 2.08 [1.58; 2.75], respectively, compared with patients having a job. In addition, patients receiving social subsidy and retired people were more likely to call again within 24 hours after receiving telephone advice only: Adjusted RRs 2.35 [1.95; 2.82] and 1.88 [1.51; 2.35], respectively compared with patients having a job. Adjusted RRs for unplanned hospital contact after being treated and released at scene were higher for patients receiving social subsidy and retired people, respectively, relative to patients having a job. Conclusion: Patients with low SES were significantly more likely to contact the hospital or EMS again after their first call or after treatment and release at scene compared with patients with high SES. This indicates that callers with low SES did not receive the appropriate help.

Prehospital fluid therapy in patients with suspected infection: a survey of ambulance personnel's practice.

BACKGROUND: Fluid therapy in patients with suspected infection is controversial, and it is not known whether fluid treatment administered in the prehospital setting is beneficial. In the absence of evidence-based guidelines for prehospital fluid therapy for patients with suspected infection, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel are challenged on when and how to initiate such therapy. This study aimed to assess EMS personnel's decision-making in prehospital fluid therapy, including triggers for initiating fluid and fluid volumes, as well as the need for education and evidence-based guidelines on prehospital fluid therapy in patients with suspected infection. METHODS: An online survey concerning fluid administration in prehospital patients with suspected infection was distributed to all EMS personnel in the Central Denmark Region, including ambulance clinicians and prehospital critical care anaesthesiologists (PCCA). The survey consisted of sections concerning academic knowledge, statements about fluid administration, triggers to evaluate patient needs for intravenous fluid, and clinical scenarios. RESULTS: In total, 468/807 (58%) ambulance clinicians and 106/151 (70%) PCCA responded to the survey. Of the respondents, 73% (n = 341) of the ambulance clinicians and 100% (n = 106) of the PCCA felt confident about administering fluids to prehospital patients with infections. However, both groups primarily based their fluid-related decisions on "clinical intuition". Ambulance clinicians named the most frequently faced challenges in fluid therapy as "Unsure whether the patient needs fluid" and "Unsure about the volume of fluid the patient needs". The five most frequently used triggers for evaluating fluid needs were blood pressure, history taking, skin turgor, capillary refill time, and shock index, the last of which only applied to ambulance clinicians. In the scenarios, the majority administered 500 ml to a normotensive woman with suspected sepsis and 1000 ml to a woman with suspected sepsis-related hypotension. Moreover, 97% (n = 250) of the ambulance clinicians strongly agreed or agreed that they were interested in more education about fluid therapy in patients with suspected infection. CONCLUSION: The majority of ambulance clinicians and PCCA based their fluid administration on "clinical intuition". They faced challenges deciding on fluid volumes and individual fluid needs. Thus, they were eager to learn more and requested research and evidence-based guidelines.

Activation of Citizen Responders to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During the COVID-19 Outbreak in Denmark 2020.

Background Little is known about how COVID-19 influenced engagement of citizen responders dispatched to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) by a smartphone application. The objective was to describe and analyze the Danish Citizen Responder Program and bystander interventions (both citizen responders and nondispatched bystanders) during the first COVID-19 lockdown in 2020. Methods and Results All OHCAs from January 1, 2020, to June 30, 2020, with citizen responder activation in 2 regions of Denmark were included. We compared citizen responder engagement for OHCA in the nonlockdown period (January 1, 2020, to March 10, 2020, and April 21, 2020, to June 30, 2020) with the lockdown period (March 11, 2020, to April 20, 2020). Data are displayed in the order lockdown versus nonlockdown period. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation rates did not differ in the 2 periods (99% versus 92%; P=0.07). Bystander defibrillation (9% versus 14%; P=0.4) or return-of-spontaneous circulation (23% versus 23%; P=1.0) also did not differ. A similar amount of citizen responders accepted alarms during the lockdown (6 per alarm; interquartile range, 6) compared with the nonlockdown period (5 per alarm; interquartile range, 5) (P=0.05). More citizen responders reported performing chest-compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation during lockdown compared with nonlockdown (79% versus 59%; P=0.0029), whereas fewer performed standardized cardiopulmonary resuscitation, including ventilations (19% versus 38%; P=0.0061). Finally, during lockdown, more citizen responders reported being not psychologically affected by attending an OHCA compared with nonlockdown period (68% versus 56%; P<0.0001). Likewise, fewer reported being mildly affected during lockdown (26%) compared with nonlockdown (35%) (P=0.003). Conclusions The COVID-19 lockdown in Denmark was not associated with decreased bystander-initiated resuscitation in OHCAs attended by citizen responders.

Increased bystander intervention when volunteer responders attend out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Aim: The primary aim was to investigate the association between alarm acceptance compared to no-acceptance by volunteer responders, bystander intervention, and survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Materials and methods: This retrospective observational study included all suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) with activation of volunteer responders in the Capital Region of Denmark (1 November 2018 to 14 May 2019), the Central Denmark Region (1 November 2018 to 31 December 2020), and the Northern Denmark Region (14 February 2020 to 31 December 2020). All OHCAs unwitnessed by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) were analyzed on the basis on alarm acceptance and arrival before EMS. The primary outcomes were bystander cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR), bystander defibrillation and secondary outcome was 30-day survival. A questionnaire sent to all volunteer responders was used with respect to their arrival status. Results: We identified 1,877 OHCAs with volunteer responder activation eligible for inclusion and 1,725 (91.9%) of these had at least one volunteer responder accepting the alarm (accepted). Of these, 1,355 (79%) reported arrival status whereof 883 (65%) arrived before EMS. When volunteer responders accepted the alarm and arrived before EMS, we found increased proportions and adjusted odds ratio for bystander CPR {94 vs. 83%, 4.31 [95% CI (2.43-7.67)] and bystander defibrillation [13 vs. 9%, 3.16 (1.60-6.25)]} compared to cases where no volunteer responders accepted the alarm. Conclusion: We observed a fourfold increased odds ratio for bystander CPR and a threefold increased odds ratio for bystander defibrillation when volunteer responders accepted the alarm and arrived before EMS.

Personalised medicine and the state: A political discourse analysis.

The last decade has seen a range of health policy initiatives relating to personalised medicine. There is an emerging body of studies that demonstrates the continued importance of states in the development of personalised medicine. This paper contributes to this literature by focusing on how political discourses construct the role of states in personalised medicine. Based on a case study of the introduction of a national programme in Denmark, the analysis identifies specific discursive mechanisms in this construction. The material consists of documents from key national stakeholders, media coverage and interviews with experts at the national level. The analysis found three types of discursive mechanisms. Firstly, mechanisms can relate to problem definitions, and these were concerned with a number of salient problems of health services. Secondly, mechanisms can relate to underlying assumptions, and these were about the possibility of engineering healthcare improvement through data and by extension personalised medicine. Thirdly, mechanisms can relate to discursive effects, and here the state emerged as a highly influential governor. These mechanisms are likely to be highly relevant for other countries, but future research needs to test this. Health policy practitioners and health administrators thus need to invest effort into influencing political discourses around personalised medicines, in addition to the formulation of policies itself.

Pre-charging the defibrillator before rhythm analysis reduces hands-off time in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with shockable rhythm.

AIM: To evaluate the effect of pre-charging the defibrillator before rhythm analysis on hands-off time in patients suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with shockable rhythm. METHODS: Pre-charging was implemented in the Emergency Medical Service in the Central Denmark Region in June 2018. Training consisted of hands-on simulation scenarios, e-learning material, and written instructions. Data were extracted from the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry for a 14-month period spanning the implementation of pre-charging. Patients having received at least one shock were included. Transthoracic impedance data were analysed. We recorded hands-off time and peri-shock pauses for all defibrillation procedures and the total hands-off fraction for all cardiac arrests. RESULTS: Impedance and outcome data were available for 178 patients. 523 defibrillation procedures were analysed. The pre-charge method was associated with shorter median hands-off time per defibrillation procedure (7.6 (IQR 5.8-9.9) vs. 12.6 (IQR 10-16.4) seconds, p < 0.001) but longer pre-shock pause (4 (IQR 2.7-6.1) vs 1.7 (IQR 1.2-3) seconds, p < 0.001) when compared to the current guideline-recommended defibrillation method. The total hands-off fraction per cardiac arrest was reduced after implementation of the pre-charge method (16.5% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.003). No increase in shocks to non-shockable rhythms or personnel was registered. Patients who received only pre-charge defibrillations had an increased odds ratio of return of spontaneous circulation (aOR 2.91; 95%CI 1.09-7.8, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Pre-charging the defibrillator reduced hands-off time during defibrillation procedures, reduces the total hands-off fraction and may be associated with increased return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with shockable rhythm.

Emergency Medical Services response levels and subsequent emergency contacts among patients with a history of mental illness in Denmark: a nationwide study.

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: People with mental illness have higher use of emergency services than the general population and may experience problems with navigating in complex healthcare systems. Poor physical health contributes to the excess mortality among the mentally ill. OBJECTIVE: To compare the level of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response and subsequent contacts emergency between patients with and without a history of mental illness. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A nationwide cohort study was conducted in Denmark including medical 1-1-2 calls 2016 2017. The healthcare system is financed through taxation allowing free access to healthcare services including ambulance services. EXPOSURE: Exposed groups had a history of major, moderate, or minor mental illness. OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: We studied seven national prehospital care Performance Indicators (PI 1-7). The selected PI concerned EMS response levels and subsequent contacts to prehospital and in-hospital services. Exposed groups were compared to nonexposed groups using regression analyses. RESULTS: We included 492 388 medical 1-1-2 calls: 8, 10, and 18% of calls concerned patients with a history of major, moderate, or minor mental illness, respectively.There were no clinically relevant differences regarding response times (PI 1-2) or registration of symptoms (PI 3) between groups.If only telephone advice was offered, patients with a history of major, moderate or minor mental illness were more likely to recall within 24 h (PI 4): adjusted risk ratio (RR) 2.11 (1.88-2.40), 1.96 (1.20-2.21), and 1.38 (1.20-1.60), but less or equally likely to have an unplanned hospital contact within 7 days (PI 6): adjusted RRs 1.05 (0.99-1.12), 1.04 (0.99-1.10), and 0.90 (0.85-0.94), respectively.If released at the scene, the risk of recalling (PI 5) or having an unplanned hospital contact (PI 7) was higher among patients with a history of mental illness: adjusted RRs 2.86 (2.44-3.36), 2.41 (2.05-2.83), and 1.57 (1.35-1.84), and adjusted RRs 2.10 (1.94-2.28), 1.68 (1.55-1.81), and 1.25 (1.17-1.33), respectively.Patients with a history of mental illness were more likely to receive telephone advice only adjusted RRs 1.61 (1.53-1.70), 1.30 (1.24-1.37), and 1.08 (1.04-1.13), and being released at scene adjusted RRs 1.11 (1.08-1.13), 1.03 (1.01-1.04), and 1.05 (1.03-1.07). CONCLUSION: More than one-third of the study population had a history of mental illness. These patients received a significantly lighter EMS response than patients with no history of mental illness. They were significantly more likely to use the emergency care system again if released at scene. This risk increased with the increasing severity of the mental illness.

Users' Experiences With Home Mechanical Ventilation: A Review of Qualitative Studies.

BACKGROUND: Users of home mechanical ventilation encounter major psychological and physiologic challenges. To ensure well-functioning home mechanical ventilation, users' experiences of care and treatment are important knowledge to supplement clinical perspectives. This systematic review aimed to summarize current qualitative evidence regarding experiences of home mechanical ventilation users. METHODS: By following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines, 9 databases were systematically searched. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria after title and/or abstract screening and full-text assessment. These were appraised by using the Relevance, Appropriateness, Transparency, Soundness checklist. Thematic analysis guided data extraction and identification of the findings. The Confidence in the Evidence for Reviews of Qualitative Research tool was applied to assess the confidence of the findings. RESULTS: The review showed high confidence in 4 findings: an increase in quality of life, feeling forced to accept home mechanical ventilation, collaboration between home-care assistants and users of home mechanical ventilation is challenging, and information about the technology from a user's perspective. The review showed moderate confidence in 2 findings: living at home is pivotal for a normalized everyday life, and home mechanical ventilation causes a life with continued worries and uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: According to the users, treatment by home mechanical ventilation resulted in increased well-being and facilitated a community- and home-based lifestyle compared with institutional-based treatment. However, the users also expressed difficulties in coming to terms with the necessary extensive surveillance, which gave rise to a sense of undermined autonomy and self-determinism as well as continued worries and uncertainty. The users called this situation dependent independency. As a result of the review we call for an increased focus on a patient-centered treatment and care.

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of fining non-attendance at public hospitals: a randomised controlled trial from Danish outpatient clinics.

OBJECTIVES: Fines have been proposed as means for reducing non-attendance in healthcare. The empirical evidence of the effect of fines is however limited. The objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of fining non-attendance at outpatient clinics. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: 1:1 randomised controlled trial of appointments for an outpatient clinic, posted to Danish addresses, between 1 May 2015 and 30 November 2015. Only first appointment for users was included. Healthcare professionals and investigators were masked. INTERVENTION: A fine of DKK250 (€34) was issued for non-attendance. Users were informed about the fine in case of non-attendance by the appointment letter, and were able to reschedule or cancel until the appointment. A central administration office administered the fine system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were non-attendance of non-cancelled appointments, fine policy administration costs, net of productivity consequences and probability of fining non-attendance being cost-effective over no fining for a range of hypothetical values of reduced non-attendance. RESULTS: All of the 6746 appointments included were analysed. Of the 3333 appointments randomised to the fine policy, 130 (5%) of non-cancelled appointments were unattended, and of the 3413 appointments randomised to no-fine policy, 131 (5%) were unattended. The cost per appointment of non-attendance was estimated at DKK 56 (SE 5) in the fine group and DKK47 (SE 4) in the no-fine group, leading to a non-statistically significant difference of DKK10 (95% CI -9 to 22) per appointment attributable to the fine policy. The probability of cost-effectiveness remained around 50%, irrespective of increased values of reduced non-attendance or various alternative assumptions used for sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: At a baseline level of around 5%, fining non-attendance does not seem to further reduce non-attendance. Future studies should focus on other means for reduction of non-attendance such as nudging or negative reinforcement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN61925912.