Prevalence and characterization of frailty, depression, and cognitive impairment in patients listed for heart transplantation: Results of the FELICITAR prospective registry.

INTRODUCTION: It is recommended to assess frailty prior to heart transplantation (HT). Our objective was to assess the prevalence of frailty in patients listed for HT. METHODS: The FELICITAR registry (Frailty Evaluation after List Inclusion, Characteristics and Influence on TrAnsplantation And Results) is a prospective registry that includes patients listed for HT in three centers, from January 2017 to April 2019. We assessed the presence of frailty, depression, cognitive impairment, and quality of life when included. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were included. Of this group, 30.6% were frail, 55 (56.1%) had depression (treated only in nine patients), and 51 (54.8%) had cognitive impairment. Compared with non-frail patients, frail patients were more frequently hospitalized when included in HT waiting list (P = .048), had a lower upper-arm circumference (P = .026), had a lower Barthel index (P = .001), more anemia (P = .010), higher rates of depression (P = .001), poorer quality of life (P = .001), and lower hand-grip strength (P < .001). In multivariate analysis hand-grip strength (odds ratio .91; 95% confidence interval .87-.96, P < .001) and Barthel index (odds ratio .90; 95% confidence interval .82-.99, P = .024) were associated with frailty. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty, depression, and cognitive impairment are common in patients included in HT waiting list. Frailty is strongly associated with hand-grip strength.

Young athletes' ECG: Incomplete right bundle branch block vs crista supraventricularis pattern.

BACKGROUND: Incomplete right bundle branch block (IRBBB) is prevalent among athletes, but its etiology remains to be clearly elucidated and the commonly advocated mechanism, an intraventricular conduction delay, does not explain all cases. In the general population, an apparently similar phenomenon but with different pathophysiology and potential consequences, "crista supraventricularis pattern" (CSP, defined as QRS ≤ 100 ms, S wave <40 ms in I or V6 together with an RSR´ pattern in lead-V1) has been described. Yet, this manifestation has not been studied in athletes. Given that IRBBB can be associated with some serious conditions (including Brugada syndrome, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, or atrial septal defects) the differentiation between IRBB and CSP could enhance the accuracy of the pre-participation screening (PPS). We thus aimed to determine the prevalence of CSP in young athletes. METHODS: Observational study of standard 12-lead resting ECG in a cohort of children (5-16 years) attending a PPS program (August 2018-May 2019). RESULTS: 6,401 children (mean ± SD age 11.2 ± 2.9 years, 99.2% Caucasian, 93.8% male, 97.2% soccer players) were studied. We found CSP in 850 participants (prevalence = 13.3% [95% confidence interval 12.5-14.1]) whereas 553 (8.6%) had IRBBB. The proportion of athletes showing an S1S2S3 pattern was higher in those with CSP compared with the other QRS morphologies (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: CSP might have been overlooked in previous reports of sports PPS for children and misdiagnosed as IRBBB, as the proportion of the former condition was higher. Our findings might add useful information to improve the interpretation of the young athletes' ECG and thus the diagnostic value of PPS.

Prognostic of Interatrial Block after an Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: The influence of interatrial block (IAB) in the prognosis after an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prognostic impact of IAB after an acute STEMI regarding long-term mortality, development of atrial fibrillation, and stroke. METHODS: Registry of 972 consecutive patients with STEMI and sinus rhythm at discharge, with a long-term follow-up (49.6 ± 24.9 months). P wave duration was analyzed using digital calipers, and patients were divided into three groups: normal P wave duration (<120 ms), partial IAB (pIAB) (P wave ≥120 ms and positive in inferior leads), and advanced IAB (aIAB) (P wave ≥120 ms plus biphasic [positive/negative] morphology in inferior leads). RESULTS: Mean age was 62.6 ± 13.5 years. A total of 708 patients had normal P wave (72.8%), 207 pIAB (21.3%), and 57 aIAB (5.9%). Patients with aIAB were older (mean age 73 years) than the rest (62 years in the other two groups, p < 0.001). They also had a higher rate of hypertension (70 vs. 55% in pIAB and 49% in normal P wave, p = 0.006) and higher all-cause mortality (26.3 vs. 12.6% in pIAB and 10.3% in normal P wave, p = 0.001). However, multivariable analysis did not show an independent association between IAB and prognosis. CONCLUSION: About a quarter of patients discharged in sinus rhythm after an acute STEMI have IAB. Patients with aIAB have a poor prognosis, although this is explained mainly by the association of aIAB with age and other variables.

Prognostic Implications of High-Degree Atrio-Ventricular Block in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Contemporary Era.

BACKGROUND: High-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) is a known complication of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to determine the prevalence and prognostic impact of HAVB in a contemporary cohort of STEMI. METHODS: Data were collected from the DIAMANTE registry that included STEMI patients admitted to our cardiac intensive care unit treated with urgent reperfusion. We studied the clinical characteristics and evolution in patients with and without HAVB at admission. RESULTS: From 1109 consecutive patients, HAVB was documented in 95 (8.6%). The right coronary artery was the culprit vessel in 84 patients with HAVB (88.4%). The independent predictors of HAVB were: male sex (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-2.9), age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05), involvement of right coronary artery (OR 12.4, 95% CI 7.6-20.2), and creatinine value (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.0). A transient percutaneous pacemaker was used in 37 patients with HAVB (38.9%). Patients with HAVB had higher mortality that patients without HAVB (15.8% vs. 4.1%, p < 0.001); however, in multivariate analysis, HAVB was not an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: HAVB was seen in 9% of STEMI patients and was particularly frequent in elderly males with renal failure. Patients with HAVB had a poor prognosis during hospitalization, but HAVB was not an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality.

Frailty Is Common in Heart Transplant Candidates But Is Not Associated With Clinical Events and Is Reversible After Heart Transplantation.

Assessment of frailty before heart transplant (HT) is recommended but is not standard in most HT protocols. Our objective was to evaluate frailty at inclusion in HT list and during follow-up and to assess the influence of baseline frailty on prognosis. A prospective multicenter study in all adults included in the nonurgent HT waiting list. Frailty was defined as Fried's frailty phenotype score ≥3. Mean follow-up was 25.9 ± 1.2 months. Of 99 patients (mean age 54.8 [43.1 to 62.5] years, 70 men [70.7%]), 28 were frail (28.3%). A total of 85 patients received HT after 0.5 ± 0.01 years. Waiting time was shorter in frail patients (0.6 years [0.3 to 0.8] vs 0.2 years [0.1 to 0.4], p = 0.001) because of an increase in priority. Baseline frailty was not associated with overall mortality, (hazard ratio 0.99 [95% confidence interval 0.41 to 2.37, p = 0.98]). A total of 16 transplant recipients died (18.8%). Of the remaining 69 HT recipients, 65 underwent frailty evaluation during follow-up. Patients without baseline frailty (n = 49) did not develop it after HT. Of 16 patients with baseline frailty, only 2 were still frail at the end of follow-up. Frailty is common in HT candidates but is reversible in most cases after HT and is not associated with post-transplant mortality. Our results suggest that frailty should not be considered an exclusion criterion for HT.

Prevalence, Characteristics, and Prognostic Relevance of Donor-Transmitted Coronary Artery Disease in Heart Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: The reported prevalence of donor-transmitted coronary artery disease (TCAD) in heart transplantation (HT) is variable, and its prognostic impact remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to characterize TCAD in a contemporary multicentric cohort and to study its prognostic relevance. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients >18 years old who underwent HT in 11 Spanish centers from 2008 to 2018. Only patients with a coronary angiography (c-angio) within the first 3 months after HT were studied. Significant TCAD (s-TCAD) was defined as any stenosis ≥50% in epicardial coronary arteries, and nonsignificant TCAD (ns-TCAD) as stenosis <50%. Clinical outcomes were assessed by means of Cox regression and competing risks regression. Patients were followed-up for a median period of 6.3 years after c-angio. RESULTS: From a cohort of 1,918 patients, 937 underwent c-angio. TCAD was found in 172 patients (18.3%): s-TCAD in 65 (6.9%) and ns-TCAD in 107 (11.4%). Multivariable Cox regression analysis did not show a statistically significant association between s-TCAD and all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 1.44; 95% CI: 0.89-2.35; P = 0.141); however, it was an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.20-4.19; P = 0.011) and the combined event cardiovascular death or nonfatal MACE (adjusted HR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.52-3.85; P < 0.001). No statistically significant impact of ns-TCAD on clinical outcomes was detected. The results were similar when reassessed by means of competing risks regression. CONCLUSIONS: TCAD was not associated with reduced survival in patients alive and well enough to undergo post-HT angiography within the first 3 months; however, s-TCAD patients showed increased risk of cardiovascular death and MACE.

Influence of left ventricular systolic function on the long-term benefit of beta-blockers after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

INTRODUCTION: Beta-blockers are recommended after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but their benefit in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is unclear. METHODS: Consecutive patients discharged in sinus rhythm after STEMI between January 2010 and April 2015 were followed until December 2017. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in 969 (99.7%, including 112 with rescue PCI) and three (0.3%) received only thrombolytic therapy without rescue PCI. RESULTS: Of these 972 patients, mean age 62.6±13.5 years, 212 (21.8%) were women and 835 (85.9%) were prescribed beta-blockers at discharge. Patients who did not receive beta-blockers had more comorbidities than those who did, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (14.6% vs. 4.2%), anemia (8.0% vs. 3.7%), and cancer (7.3% vs. 2.8%), and more frequently had inferior STEMI (75.9% vs. 56.0%) and high-grade atrioventricular block (13.1% vs. 5.3%) (all p<0.01). After a mean follow-up of 49.6±24.9 months, beta-blocker treatment at discharge was independently associated with lower mortality (HR 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.96, p=0.03). This effect was present in 192 patients with LVEF ≤40% (HR 0.57, 95% 95% CI 0.34-0.97, p=0.04) but was not clear in 643 patients with LVEF >40% (HR 0.67, 95% 95% CI 0.25-1.76, p=0.42). CONCLUSION: In the LVEF >40% group, the results raise reasonable doubts about the real benefit of systematic use of beta-blockers as treatment for these patients. These findings reinforce the need for large randomized clinical trials within this group of patients.

Spanish Heart Transplant Registry. 32nd Official Report of the Heart Failure Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The present report updates the main characteristics and outcomes of heart transplants in Spain to 2020. METHODS: We describe the main features of recipients, donors, surgical procedure, and immunosuppression in 2020. We also analyze the temporal trends of these characteristics and outcomes (survival) for the period 2011 to 2019. RESULTS: In 2020, 278 heart transplants were performed (7.3% decrease vs 2019). The findings in 2020 confirmed previous observations of an increase in pretransplant sternotomy, a slight decrease in urgent transplants carried out with ventricular assist devices, a slight decrease in donor age, an increase in the use of allografts with previous arrest, and a decrease in ischemia time. Survival continued to improve in recent triennia, reaching 82.0% at 1 year in the period 2017 to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: The slight decrease in the number of heart transplants performed in 2020 in Spain, most likely due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, did not change the main characteristics of the procedure. No change was observed in the tendency to improved survival.

Cold ischemia >4 hours increases heart transplantation mortality. An analysis of the Spanish heart transplantation registry.

BACKGROUND: Cold ischemia time (CIT) has been associated to heart transplantation (HT) prognosis. However, there is still uncertainty regarding the CIT cutoff value that might have relevant clinical implications. METHODS: We analyzed all adults that received a first HT during the period 2008-2018. CIT was defined as the time between the cross-clamp of the donor aorta and the reperfusion of the heart. Primary outcome was 1-month mortality. RESULTS: We included 2629 patients, mean age was 53.3 ± 12.1 years and 655 (24.9%) were female. Mean CIT was 202 ± 67 min (minimum 20 min, maximum 600 min). One-month mortality per CIT quartile was 9, 12, 13, and 19%. One-year mortality per CIT quartile was 16, 19, 21, and 28%. CIT was an independent predictor of 1-month mortality, but only in the last quartile of CIT >246 min (odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.49-3.08, p < .001). We found no relevant differences in CIT during the study period. However, the impact of CIT in 1-month and 1-year mortality decreased with time (p value for the distribution of ischemic time by year 0.01), particularly during the last 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although the impact of CIT in HT prognosis seems to be decreasing in the last years, CIT in the last quartile (>246 min) is associated with 1-month and 1-year mortality. Our findings suggest the need to limit HT with CIT > 246 min or to use different myocardial preservation systems if the expected CIT is >4 h.

Safety of sacubitril/valsartan initiated during hospitalization: data from a non-selected cohort.

AIMS: Sacubitril/valsartan is safe when initiated during hospitalization in a clinical trial setting. Its safety in real-life population is not stablished. We compared the initiation of sacubitril/valsartan during hospitalization in a non-selected population, in the PIONEER-HF trial, and in non-selected outpatients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Multicentre registry included 527 patients: 100 were started on sacubitril/valsartan during hospitalization (19.0%) and 427 as outpatients (81.0%). Compared with those in the pivotal trial, inpatients in our cohort were older (71 ± 12 vs. 61 ± 14 years; P < 0.001); had more frequently Functional Class II (41 [41.0%] vs. 100 [22.7%]; P < 0.001), higher levels of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (4044 [1630-8680] vs. 2013 [1002-4132] pg/mL; P < 0.001), better glomerular filtration rate (63.5 [51.0-80.0] vs. 58.4 [47.5-71.5] mL/min; P = 0.01), and higher systolic blood pressure (121 [110-136] vs. 118 [110-133] mmHg; P = 0.03); and received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers more frequently (92 [92.0%] vs. 208 [52.7%]; P < 0.001). Compared with non-selected outpatients, inpatients were older (71 ± 12 vs. 68 ± 12 years, P = 0.02), had more frequent Functional Class III-IV (58 [58.0%] vs. 129 [30.3%], P < 0.001), had higher levels of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (4044 [1630-8680] vs. 2182 [1134-4172]; P < 0.001), and were receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers target dose less frequently (55 [55.0%] vs. 335 [78.5%]; P < 0.001). They also started sacubitril/valsartan with a low dose (50 mg/12 h) more frequently (80 [80.0%] vs. 209 [48.8%], P < 0.001). The initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in outpatients was an independent predictor of high-dose use (OR 3.1; 95% confidence interval 1.7-5.6, P < 0.001). The follow-up time in both cohorts, including all patients enrolled, was similar (7.0 ± 0.1 vs. 7.2 ± 2.6 months, P = 0.72). All-cause admissions during follow-up were more frequent in inpatients (30 [30.0%] vs. 68 outpatients [15.9%], P = 0.001), with no relevant differences in all-cause mortality. There was no significant difference in sacubitril/valsartan withdrawal rate (17 inpatients [17.0%] vs. 49 outpatients [11.5%], P = 0.13). The incidence of adverse effects was also similar: hypotension (16 inpatients [16.0%] vs. 71 outpatients [16.7%], P = 0.88), worsening renal function (7 inpatients [7.0%] vs. 29 outpatients [6.8%], P = 0.94), and hyperkalaemia (1 inpatient [1.0%] vs. 21 outpatients [4.9%], P = 0.09). We did not register any case of angioedema. CONCLUSIONS: It is safe to initiate sacubitril/valsartan during hospitalization in daily clinical practice. Inpatients have a higher risk profile and receive low starting doses more frequently than outpatients.

Prognostic Impact of Age and Hemoglobin in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Reperfusion Therapy.

Advanced age and low hemoglobin levels have been associated with a poor prognosis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We studied 1,111 patients with STEMI who received reperfusion treatment (1,032 [92.9%] primary angioplasty and 79 [7.1%] fibrinolysis without rescue percutaneous coronary intervention). Mean age was 64.1 ± 14.0 years, and 23.2% were women. Patients in the last age quartile (>76 years) were more frequently women, presented more risk factors (except smoking), received thrombolysis less frequently, had less complete revascularization, and presented more complications and higher mortality. Hemoglobin level at admission was associated with age and ranged from 14.8 ± 1.5 g/dl in the first quartile to 13.2 ± 1.8 g/dl in the last, p <0.001. Multivariate analysis identified age as a predictor of in-hospital and long-term mortality (odds ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00 to 1.07, hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.08). Hemoglobin levels were associated with better survival (odds ratio 0.8, 95% CI 0.6 to 0.9, hazard ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.92). The other predictors of inhospital mortality were Killip class, chronic kidney disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, significant pericardial effusion, and ventricular arrhythmias. The association of hemoglobin with hospital mortality was seen in men and in women ≥65 years. In men ≥65 years, this association was also present in those with hemoglobin levels in the normal range. In conclusion, in patients with STEMI, hemoglobin is an independent predictor of inhospital and long-term mortality, especially in those aged ≥65 years. This association is also present in men ≥65 years with normal hemoglobin levels.

Sex differences in acute myocardial infarction: Is it only the age?

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that, after an acute myocardial infarction, women have worse prognosis than males. However, it is not clear if female sex is an independent predictor of mortality risk. Our aim was to analyse sex influence on the prognosis of these patients. METHODS: Retrospective registry of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) from January 2010 to April 2015. RESULTS: From 1111 patients, 258 (23.2%) were women. Compared with men, they presented higher risk profiles with older age (70.1±14.4years vs. 62.3±13.4, P<0.001), more cardiovascular risk factors (except smoking), longer time from symptoms onset to hospital arrival (5.2±4.1h vs. 4.2±3.7), higher Killip classification (1.6±1.1 vs. 1.4±0.8), fewer complete revascularizations (175 [67.8%] vs. 662 [77.9%] in men) and higher in-hospital mortality (26 [10.1%] vs. 34 [4.0%]); all p values <0.003. At discharge, women less frequently received ACE inhibitors (189 [81.1%] vs. 702 [85.8%], p=0.045) and presented more major adverse events (death, bleeding, infection, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis or heart failure) during the first month after discharge (10.5% vs. 4.5%, p<0.001) and higher long-term mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.2). After adjusting by age, most of the differences disappeared, and sex was not an independent factor of in-hospital (odds ratio 1.71, 95% CI 0.97-2.99) or long-term mortality (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.7-1.5). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute STEMI, the association of female sex with poor prognosis is mainly explained by age. Sex does not seem to be an independent prognostic factor.

Very low risk ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction? It exists and may be easily identified.

BACKGROUND: Early discharge protocols have been proposed for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) low risk patients despite the existence of few but significant cardiovascular events during mid-term follow-up. We aimed to identify a subgroup of patients among those considered low-risk in which prognosis would be particularly good. METHODS: We analyzed 30-day outcomes and long-term follow-up among 1.111 STEMI patients treated with reperfusion therapy. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis identified seven variables as predictors of 30-day outcomes: Femoral approach; age>65; systolic dysfunction; postprocedural TIMI flow<3; elevated creatinine level>1.5mg/dL; stenosis of left-main coronary artery; and two or higher Killip class (FASTEST). A total of 228 patients (20.5%), defined as very low-risk (VLR), had none of these variables on admission. VLR group of patients compared to non-VLR patients had lower in-hospital (0% vs. 5.9%; p<0.001) and 30-day mortality (0% vs. 6.25%: p<0.001). They also presented fewer in-hospital complications (6.6% vs. 39.7%; p<0.001) and 30-day major adverse events (0.9% vs. 4.5%; p=0.01). Significant mortality differences during a mean follow-up of 23.8±19.4months were also observed (2.2% vs. 15.2%; p<0.001). The first VLR subject died 11months after hospital discharge. No cardiovascular deaths were identified in this subgroup of patients during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: About a fifth of STEMI patients have VLR and can be easily identified. They have an excellent prognosis suggesting that 24-48h in-hospital stay could be a feasible alternative in these patients.

Predictors of high Killip class after ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in the era of primary reperfusion.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION: Outcome after ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), has improved but patients with high Killip class still have a poor prognosis, and those ≥II need a closer monitoring in a specialized cardiac care unit. PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the predictors of Killip class in a group of patients admitted for acute STEMI. METHODS: Non-interventional registry in a Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. Patients were consecutively included from January 2010 to April 2015, and multivariate analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of high Killip Class. RESULTS: We included 1111 patients, mean age was 64.0±14.0years and 258 (23.2%) were female. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 991 (89.2%), and 120 (10.8%) only received thrombolysis as acute reperfusion therapy. A total of 230 (20.7%) were in class II or higher. The independent predictors of Killip≥II were (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]): older age (2.1 [1.4-3.0]), female sex (1.6 [1.1-2.2]), diabetes (1.4 [1.0-2.1]), prior heart failure (3.2 [1.4-7.2]), chronic kidney disease (2.0 [1.1-3.6]), anaemia (3.0 [2.0-4.5]), multivessel disease (1.6 [1.1-2.2]), anterior location (2.4 [1.8-3.4]), time of evolution>2h (1.6 [1.1-2.4]), and TIMI flow-grade<3 (1.8 [1.2-2.7]). In-hospital mortality increased with Killip class (I 1.5%, II 3.7%, III 16.7%, IV 36.7%). CONCLUSION: In patients with STEMI Killip class can be predicted with variables available when primary percutaneous coronary intervention is performed and is strongly associated with in-hospital prognosis.