Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 171(1): 90-97, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38482959

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify dominant causative pathogens of chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. The secondary objective is to assess the cholesteatoma concurrence among this population. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective descriptive study. SETTING: Port Elizabeth Provincial Hospital, Eastern Cape, South Africa. METHODS: Aural swabs of purulent otorrhoea were collected from patients with CSOM attending the otorhinolaryngology outpatient department between April 2022 and June 2023. Samples were analyzed to determine the microbiological spectrum and evaluate antimicrobial sensitivities. Patient files were reviewed to identify cases with cholesteatoma. The study population size of 169 enabled representative results for a confidence interval of 90%. RESULTS: Patients were divided into 2 age categories: children (0-12 years) and adults (>12 years). Adults represented the majority of cases (76.9%) and females (58.6%) were affected more than males. Fungal isolates, Candida species and Aspergillus species, were the most common (20.8%). This was followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12.4%) and Staphylococcus aureus (11.8%). 3.6% of cases cultured Mycobacterial tuberculosis which was high compared to global estimates. Susceptibility patterns showed 94.3% sensitivity of fungal cultures to fluconazole. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 100% susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime, but only 76.2% sensitive to ciprofloxacin. Cholesteatoma concurrence was identified in 17.8%. CONCLUSION: CSOM remains a public health challenge. This study highlights the need to consider fungal etiology in instances where standard antibiotic treatments prove ineffective. Given the variety of cultured organisms and their susceptibility patterns, incorporating culture-directed therapy should be considered standard practice for chronic otorrhoea patients.


Assuntos
Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Otite Média Supurativa , Humanos , Otite Média Supurativa/microbiologia , Otite Média Supurativa/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Feminino , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Doença Crônica , Adulto , África do Sul , Adolescente , Recém-Nascido , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab ; 4(2): e00221, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33855221

RESUMO

Background: Calcium oxalate stones are the most common cause of nephrolithiasis in the United States. Smaller studies of <15 patients investigating ezetimibe, a selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor, have suggested increased urine oxalate levels with use of the drug. We attempt to better define this relationship of ezetimibe on urinary oxalate using a larger patient sample analysing multiple urine collections on and off treatment. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients from 01/2018 through 04/2019 evaluated for nephrolithiasis with use of ezetimibe documented in their medical record at Mayo Clinic Florida. Primary outcomes included increase in urinary oxalate with use of ezetimibe and reduction in urinary oxalate with discontinuation of medication. Results: Of 57 reviewed patients, 30 (53%) met inclusion criteria yielding 117 24-h urine measurements either on ezetimibe (72 measurements) or off ezetimibe (41 measurements). The mean urinary oxalate level off ezetimibe was 39.86 mg versus 40.45 mg with ezetimibe. After adjusting for age and sex, the estimated difference was 1.239 mg (95% CI, -4.856 to 7.335 mg; p = 0.93). A subset of six patients with urinary oxalate values both on and off ezetimibe showed a difference in 24-h urinary oxalate levels ranged from -16.40 to 14.95 mg (mean difference = 0.93 mg; median difference = 3.84 mg). Conclusion: Use of ezetimibe does not provide clear evidence of a difference in urinary oxalate levels.


Assuntos
Anticolesterolemiantes/efeitos adversos , Ezetimiba/efeitos adversos , Oxalatos/urina , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultados Negativos , Nefrolitíase/induzido quimicamente , Nefrolitíase/prevenção & controle , Nefrolitíase/urina , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa