Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Anaesthesia ; 71(7): 798-805, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26879007

RESUMO

We compared the effects on microvascular reactivity of hydroxyethylstarch (Volulyte(®) ) and gelatin (Geloplasma(®) ) during acute haemodilution. The hypothesis was that Volulyte would provide better microvascular reactivity than Geloplasma. Forty patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery were randomly assigned to receive either Volulyte or Geloplasma as the exclusive priming solution of the cardiopulmonary bypass. To evaluate microvascular reactivity, postocclusive reactive hyperaemia was examined before and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Microvascular reactivity assessments included the rate of the occlusion and reperfusion slopes and reperfusion times. After cardiopulmonary bypass, increases in reperfusion time were significantly smaller in the Volulyte group (3 (-27 to 9 [-35 to 33]%) vs 29 (-17 to 76 [-34 to 137]%) in the Geloplasma group, p = 0.02 between groups). Rate of reperfusion increased in the Volulyte group (26 (-17 to 43 [-59 to 357])%), whereas it decreased in the Geloplasma group (-22 (-47 to 16 [-84 to 113])%), p = 0.02 between groups. The shorter reperfusion times and increased reperfusion rate suggest that Volulyte maintains better microvascular reactivity than Geloplasma.


Assuntos
Ponte Cardiopulmonar , Gelatina/farmacologia , Hemodiluição/métodos , Derivados de Hidroxietil Amido/farmacologia , Microvasos/efeitos dos fármacos , Substitutos do Plasma/farmacologia , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa