First validation of the childhood lupus low disease activity state (cLLDAS) definition in a real-life longitudinal cSLE cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To validate the childhood lupus low disease activity state (cLLDAS) definition in cSLE by describing differences in time to reach first adult LLDAS (aLLDAS) versus cLLDAS. Secondly, to analyse positive and negative predictors for maintaining cLLDAS for at least 50% of follow-up time (cLLDAS-50) and for the occurrence of damage. METHODS: Prospective longitudinal data from a cSLE cohort were analysed. Used definitions were: aLLDAS according to Franklyn, cLLDAS by cSLE treat-to-target (T2T) Task Force, disease activity score by SLEDAI -2 K and damage by SLICC damage index. RESULTS: Fifty cSLE patients were studied, with a median follow-up of 3.1 years. Each patient reached aLLDAS and cLLDAS at least once. Mean time to reach first aLLDAS/cLLDAS was 8.2/9.0 months, respectively. For 22/42 patients the mean steroid-dose related delay to reach first cLLDAS was 6.2 months. 58% of patients were able to maintain cLLDAS-50. Time to first cLLDAS (OR 0.8, p = 0.013) and higher number of flares (OR 0.374, p = 0.03) were negative predictors to maintain cLLDAS-50. Damage occurred in 34% of patients (23.5% steroid-related), in 64.7% within one year after diagnosis. African/Afro-Caribbean ethnicity, neuropsychiatric involvement and ever use of a biologic were significant predictors for damage. CONCLUSION: Time to reach cLLDAS in cSLE differs from time to (a)LLDAS, which validates the new cLLDAS definition. Attaining cLLDAS-50 was difficult in real-life. This cohort shows the high risk for early damage in cSLE. T2T with earlier focus on steroid-tapering and starting steroid-sparing drugs seems important to prevent (steroid-related) damage in cSLE.

Monitoring of Adverse Events and Safety in Autoinflammatory Diseases: Real-Life Data from the Eurofever Registry.

OBJECTIVES: The study is aimed to evaluate the impact of safety events in the Eurofever registry for Autoinflammatory diseases. METHODS: This was a retrospective and longitudinal observational multicentre study. Data were retrieved from the international registry Eurofever, starting patients' enrolment since 2009. All moderate, severe, or very severe AEs reported by treating physician in Eurofever were analyzed regardless of a possible suspected causal relationship to any therapies and according to the latest release of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. RESULTS: Complete information on safety were available in 2464 patients enrolled in the registry. In 1499 of them retrospective data encompassing the period from disease onset to enrolment were available, whereas 965 consecutive patients entered in the longitudinal part of the study. A total of 479 AEs have been reported in 275 patients. Eighty-two AEs were reported as serious and 99 were drug-related according to the physicians. Infections or infestations (94; 19.6%), gastrointestinal disorders (66; 13.8%), nervous system disorders (41; 8.6%) and systemic disorders or administration site reactions (35; 7.3%) were the most frequent reported events. The highest absolute number of drug-related AEs were related to biologic DMARDs (40/99 reports, 40,4%) and colchicine (31/99 reports, 31.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Present study shows the importance of a longitudinal and homogeneous registration of the AEs in rare conditions, with a particular focus on the safety profile of the treatments used in these conditions.

Comparing the haemodynamic effects of high- and low-dose opioid anaesthesia: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Post-induction hypotension (MAP < 65 mmHg) occurs frequently and is usually caused by the cardiovascular adverse effects of the anaesthetic induction drugs used. We hypothesize that a clinically significant difference in the incidence and severity of hypotension will be found when different doses of propofol and remifentanil are used for induction of anaesthesia. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial wherein four groups (A-D) of patients received one out of four different combinations of propofol and remifentanil, titrated to a predicted equipotency in probability of tolerance to laryngoscopy (PTOL) according to the Bouillon interaction model. In group A, a high dose of propofol and a low dose of remifentanil was administered, and across the groups this ratio was gradually changed until it was reversed in group D. Mean and systolic arterial blood pressure (MAP, SAP) were compared at four time points (Tbaseline, Tpost-bolus, T3min, Tnadir) within and between groups Heart rate, bispectral index (BIS) and the incidence of hypotension were compared. RESULTS: Data from 76 patients was used. At Tpost-bolus a statistically significant lower MAP and SAP was found in group A versus D (p = 0.011 and p = 0.002). A significant higher heart rate was found at T3min and Tnadir between groups A and B when compared to groups C and D (p = < 0.001 and p = 0.002). A significant difference in BIS value was found over all groups at T3min and Tnadir (both p < 0.001). All other outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSION: Induction of anaesthesia with different predicted equipotent combinations of propofol and remifentanil did result in statistically different but clinically irrelevant differences in haemodynamic endpoints during induction of anaesthesia. Our study could not identify preferable drug combinations that decrease the risk for hypotension after induction, although they all yield a similar predicted PTOL.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Adalimumab in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Clinical Care Data.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic autoimmune disorder that primarily affects the joints in children. Notably, it is known to co-occur with uveitis. Adalimumab, a monoclonal anti-TNF antibody, is effective in treating both conditions. A deeper understanding of the pharmacokinetics (PK) of adalimumab in JIA is crucial to advance in more personalized treatment approaches. The objective of this study is to evaluate the population PK profile of adalimumab in JIA and to explain causes for its variability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adalimumab and antidrug antibody concentrations were retrospectively retrieved from the charts of patients with JIA. Initially, five literature-based population PK models of adalimumab were evaluated to assess their ability to describe the observed concentration-time profiles in the JIA cohort. These models included one specifically for the pediatric Crohn's disease population and four derived from studies in adult populations in healthy subjects and rheumatoid arthritis patients. Subsequently, a novel population PK model tailored to the JIA population was developed using NONMEM software. Monte Carlo simulations were then conducted utilizing the final PK model to visualize the concentration-time profile of adalimumab in patients with JIA and the impact of covariates. RESULTS: A cohort of 50 patients with JIA with 78 available adalimumab samples was assessed. The mean age was 11.8 ± 3.9 years, with a median body weight of 49 kg (interquartile range 29.4-59.8 kg). All literature models adequately described the concentration-time profiles in JIA. The best model, which was developed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis during the maintenance phase of treatment, served as a basis for estimating clearance in JIA, resulting in a value of 0.37 L per day per 70 kg. Patient body weight, antidrug antibodies, methotrexate use, CRP level, and comorbidity of uveitis were found to have a significant impact on adalimumab clearance, and these reduced the inter-patient variability from 58.6 to 28.0%. On steady state in the simulated patient population, the mean trough level was 7.4 ± 5.5 mg/L. The two dosing regimens of 20 and 40 mg every other week, based on patients' body weight, resulted in comparable simulated overall drug exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Five literature models effectively described adalimumab PK in this pediatric cohort, highlighting the potential for extrapolating existing models to the pediatric population. The new JIA model confirmed the effect of several known covariates and found a novel association for drug clearance with methotrexate use (lower) and uveitis (higher), which might have clinical relevance for personalized dosing in JIA.

Impact of gastrointestinal and urological symptoms in children with myotonic dystrophy type 1.

Gastrointestinal and urological symptoms are frequently reported by people with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) but have remained understudied. In a cross-sectional study, frequency, nature, treatment and impact of gastrointestinal and urological symptoms in children with DM1 aged 5-18 years were assessed. We included 58 children (30 males, 28 females) with a mean age of 13 years; 74.1 % reported at least one gastrointestinal symptom. Abdominal pain was the most frequently reported symptom (51.7 %), followed by dysphagia (41.8 %), diarrhoea (36.2 %), encopresis (36.0 %), constipation (32.7 %), bloating and flatulence (both 25.9 %). The most frequently reported urological symptoms were difficulty with toilet training (59.3 %), urinary incontinence (22.0 %), enuresis nocturna (10.3 %) and voiding (23.5 % hesitancy, 4.8 % intermittency and 13.8 % dysuria). The majority considered urological and gastrointestinal symptoms to have a negative influence on their daily life; 22.4 % of parents reported severe influence on daily family life (shame, social restrictions, school absence and concerns for their children's future). Considering the high prevalence of urological and gastrointestinal symptoms in children with DM1 and their influence on daily life it is key to correctly recognize, diagnose and treat these symptoms. We recommend screening for gastrointestinal and urological symptoms in the standard of care for children with DM1.

Increasing the etanercept dose in a treat-to-target approach in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: does it help to reach the target? A post-hoc analysis of the BeSt for Kids randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Etanercept has been studied in doses up to 0.8 mg/kg/week (max 50 mg/week) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients. In clinical practice higher doses are used off-label, but evidence regarding the relation with outcomes is lacking. We describe the clinical course of JIA-patients receiving high-dose etanercept (1.6 mg/kg/week; max 50 mg/week) in the BeSt for Kids trial. METHODS: 92 patients with oligoarticular JIA, RF-negative polyarticular JIA or juvenile psoriatic arthritis were randomised across three treat-to-target arms: (1) sequential DMARD-monotherapy (sulfasalazine or methotrexate (MTX)), (2) combination-therapy MTX + 6 weeks prednisolone and (3) combination therapy MTX + etanercept. In any treatment-arm, patients could eventually escalate to high-dose etanercept alongside MTX 10mg/m2/week. RESULTS: 32 patients received high-dose etanercept (69% female, median age 6 years (IQR 4-10), median 10 months (7-16) from baseline). Median follow-up was 24.6 months. Most clinical parameters improved within 3 months after dose-increase: median JADAS10 from 7.2 to 2.8 (p = 0.008), VAS-physician from 12 to 4 (p = 0.022), VAS-patient/parent from 38.5 to 13 (p = 0.003), number of active joints from 2 to 0.5 (p = 0.12) and VAS-pain from 35.5 to 15 (p = 0.030). Functional impairments (CHAQ-score) improved more gradually and ESR remained stable. A comparable pattern was observed in 11 patients (73% girls, median age 8 (IQR 6-9)) who did not receive high-dose etanercept despite eligibility (comparison group). In both groups, 56% reached inactive disease at 6 months. No severe adverse events (SAEs) occurred after etanercept dose-increase. In the comparison group, 2 SAEs consisting of hospital admission occurred. Rates of non-severe AEs per subsequent patient year follow-up were 2.27 in the high-dose and 1.43 in the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: Escalation to high-dose etanercept in JIA-patients who were treated to target was generally followed by meaningful clinical improvement. However, similar improvements were observed in a smaller comparison group who did not escalate to high-dose etanercept. No SAEs were seen after escalation to high-dose etanercept. The division into the high-dose and comparison groups was not randomised, which is a potential source of bias. We advocate larger, randomised studies of high versus regular dose etanercept to provide high level evidence on efficacy and safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register; NTR1574; 3 December 2008; https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/26585 .