Bone marrow Ki-67 index is of prognostic value in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Ki-67 is an index of proliferative activity and is an established predictive and prognostic marker in multiple malignancies. However, its prognostic relevance in multiple myeloma (MM) is unclear. We investigated the relationship between Ki-67 expression and survival outcomes in MM in the era of novel therapies. METHODS: We interrogated our database to identify patients with MM, newly diagnosed between July 1, 2013 and December 31, 2020, with Ki-67 expression assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on bone marrow biopsies. Using an established threshold of 5% we defined Ki-67low (≤5%) and Ki-67high (>5%) subgroups for association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 167 patients included: 53 (31.7%) had Ki-67high and 114 had Ki-67low. More patients with R-ISS 3 had Ki-67high (22.2% vs. 9.7%). The gain of 1q21 was overrepresented in the Ki-67high group (28% vs. 8%). Median PFS in the Ki-67low group was 3.1 years, and in the Ki-67high group 1.6 years (log-rank p < .001, HR: 1.9). Median OS was not reached in the Ki-67low vs. 4.8 years in the Ki-67high cohort (HR: 1.9; log-rank test: p = .018). In the multivariable modeling, after adjusting for other risk factors, HR for Ki-67high versus Ki-67low was 2.4 (p < .001) for PFS and 2.1 (p = .026) for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that a high Ki-67 index (>5%) is an independent prognostic marker associated with worse OS and PFS in newly diagnosed MM. IHC staining for Ki-67 on bone marrow biopsies could be easily adopted as a prognostic biomarker for MM in economically constrained healthcare settings.

Outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma harboring chromosome 1q gain/amplification in the era of modern therapy.

Chromosome 1q gain/amplification (1q +) has been reported to be associated with inferior outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Big therapeutic advances have shifted the treatment landscape by introducing monoclonal antibodies. There is a relative lack of data on outcomes in patients harboring this alteration in the era of monoclonal antibodies. Baseline characteristics and therapy-related data from newly diagnosed MM patients harboring 1q + detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were collected in a single institution. Among 34 identified subjects, the presence of elevated LDH was found to be associated with shorter overall survival (OS), and increased bone marrow plasma cell percentage (≥ 60%) was associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS). 1q + copy number more than three was associated with both shorter OS and PFS. Additionally, the administration of lenalidomide was associated with superior OS. The use of autologous stem cell transplantation, bortezomib, or daratumumab, was found to have no prognostic benefits in our sample. Lenalidomide may be an optimal therapeutic choice for this population, and future larger studies are warranted to confirm this benefit and further investigate the role of monoclonal antibodies in this subpopulation.

Current antibody-based therapies for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Despite continued and considerable progress following the introduction of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents, multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease, and new therapeutic strategies are urgently needed. Monoclonal antibodies represent a well-established targeted approach to the treatment of MM, with selective killing properties and limited off-target toxicity. Since their approval, the anti-CD38 agent daratumumab, the anti-SLAMF7 agent elotuzumab, and most recently the anti-CD38 agent isatuximab have led to pivotal improvements in the treatment of double-refractory MM; currently, they are on their way to becoming integral parts in the up-front care of patients who have newly diagnosed MM, with daratumumab already approved in this setting. Several other antibody-based strategies are undergoing clinical assessment in MM. Although the investigation of checkpoint inhibitors in MM has been halted, bispecific T-cell engagers and especially antibody-drug conjugates demonstrate encouraging efficacy and manageable toxicity in triple class-refractory MM. The accelerated approval of belantamab mafodotin represents an important milestone in antibody development; its ability to target B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) in advanced disease is now established. Here, we present an overview of the currently available monoclonal antibody treatments in MM and discuss the clinical value, significant potential, and possible limitations of these immunotherapeutic approaches to driving deeper responses and achieving longer overall survival among patients with a challenging disease.

Investigational agents in immunotherapy: a new horizon for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

The treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has gone through several major advances over the last 5 years with the introduction of next generation proteasome inhibitors (PI; carfilzomib, ixazomib) and immunomodulatory derivatives (IMiD; pomalidomide), with these new agents having a substantial impact on patient outcome. However, despite these advances, MM remains a highly resistant disease given its propensity for clonal heterogeneity and its complex interaction with the surrounding bone marrow microenvironment. Almost all patients eventually relapse despite therapeutic responses to a PI, IMiD or both. With the regulatory approval of the monoclonal antibodies Daratumumab and Elotuzumab in 2015, impressive and durable responses are being observed, even in heavily pre-treated patients who have exhausted other therapeutic options, suggesting immunological approaches in this setting have real merit. This review will focus on newer monoclonal antibodies and chimeric-antigen receptor (CAR) T cell strategies currently under investigation and in various stages of clinical development.

Current use of monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common haematological malignancy after non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Despite the improvement in outcomes over the last decade with the introduction of novel therapies, such as immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs), MM remains an incurable disease. Patients who are both refractory to IMiDs and PIs carry a particularly dismal prognosis. The development of targeted therapy in the form of monoclonal antibodies has shifted the treatment paradigm of this disease, resulting in unprecedented response rates, even among the highest-risk patients. In this review, we will summarize the mechanism of action and provide an overview of the clinical trials that have led to the US Food and Drug Administration approval of Daratumumab and Elotuzumab, and their current use in the treatment of MM.

Pomalidomide and dexamethasone in the treatment of AL amyloidosis: results of a phase 1 and 2 trial.

The objectives of a phase 1/2 trial of pomalidomide with dexamethasone for the treatment of light chain (AL) amyloidosis were to determine the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase 2 dose, and hematologic and clinical response. A 3+3 dose-escalation phase (15 patients) was followed by an expansion cohort (12 patients) enrolled at the MTD. Pomalidomide was administered at 2 and 3 mg on days 1 to 28 (cohorts 1 and 2) and 4 mg on days 1 to 21 (cohort 3) every 28 days, with weekly dexamethasone at a dose of 20 mg. Twenty-seven patients with previously treated AL were enrolled, 15 during dose escalation (6 at 2 mg, 3 at 3 mg, and 6 at 4 mg) and 12 during dose expansion (all at 4 mg). One patient experienced dose-limiting toxicity at 4 mg; the MTD was determined as 4 mg. The most common grade ≥3 drug-related adverse events included myelosuppression and fatigue. Overall, hematologic response (HR) was 50% in 24 evaluable patients. The median time to best HR was 3 cycles, and median duration of HR was 15 months. Median overall survival has not yet been reached, with a median follow-up of 17.1 months and median event-free survival of 17.8 months. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01570387.

Development of extramedullary myeloma in the era of novel agents: no evidence of increased risk with lenalidomide-bortezomib combinations.

Proteasome inhibitors (PI) and immunomodulatory agents (IMIDs) have improved the overall survival (OS) of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), but concerns have been raised about increased incidence of extramedullary disease (EMD) after the combined use of PIs and IMIDs for upfront therapy. We evaluated whether the addition of lenalidomide to bortezomib-based front-line regimens precipitated earlier development of EMD. We reviewed the charts of 117 MM patients (median follow-up from diagnosis 6·1 years; range 0·1-10·2 years) enrolled in eight clinical trials of first-line treatment with bortezomib-based regimens, with or without lenalidomide. We assessed development of EMD as extraosseous (distant from bone) or osseous (originating from bone) plasmacytomas. The primary endpoint was time from diagnosis until development of EMD, based on imaging, biopsy and/or physical examination. Any form of EMD at progression was observed in 40 (34·2%) patients, including 21 (18%) osseous, 8 (7%) extraosseous and 11 (9%) both osseous and extraosseous. Median OS was 0·9 years (range 0·1-4·8 years) after extraosseous EMD development. Sensitivity analyses with follow-up times truncated at 5 years detected no statistically significant difference in rates of any EMD form between the two groups (P > 0·2 for each comparison). Therefore, we observed no evidence that bortezomib-lenalidomide-based front-line therapy precipitates earlier EMD.

Incidence and clinical features of extramedullary multiple myeloma in patients who underwent stem cell transplantation.

Extramedullary disease (EMD), defined as an infiltrate of clonal plasma cells at an anatomic site distant from the bone marrow, is an uncommon manifestation of multiple myeloma. Six hundred and sixty-three consecutive patients with multiple myeloma who underwent stem cell transplantation between January 2005 and December 2011 were assessed for the presence of EMD. A cohort of 55 patients with biopsy-proven EMD was identified, comprising 8·3% of the total study population. EMD was present at the time of diagnosis in 14·5% of cases and at the time of relapse in 76% of patients. The most common EMD presentations at relapse were liver involvement and pleural effusions. EMD specimens had high expression of CD44 (92%) and moderate expression of CXCR4. The median overall survival from time of myeloma diagnosis was 4·1 years (95% CI: 3·1, 5·1) and the median overall survival from time of EMD diagnosis was 1·3 years (95% CI: 0·8, 2·3). This report demonstrates that the incidence of EMD has not increased with the introduction of novel agents and stem cell transplantation. The most common EMD presentations in the relapsed setting were liver and pleural fluid. The presence of CD44 and CXCR4 expression may represent new markers of EMD that warrant further investigation.

Treatment of AL amyloidosis in the era of novel immune and cellular therapies.

Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a plasma cell disorder distinguished from multiple myeloma (MM) by the degree of organ involvement due to tissue deposition of misfolded proteins. Treatments for AL amyloidosis have largely been borrowed from those developed for patients with MM. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has historically been associated with the best outcomes. The recent incorporation of daratumumab into up front therapy represents a significant advance and has changed the treatment paradigm, calling into question the role of ASCT. The development of very active novel immune and cellular therapies, specifically B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed therapies, has similarly been transformative for patients with MM and is now being studied in patients with AL amyloidosis. These include chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, bispecific antibodies, and antibody drug conjugates. Although limited, preliminary data in patients with relapsed and refractory AL amyloidosis are showing promising results, and it is expected that the treatment landscape for AL amyloidosis will continue to evolve. Particular attention to safety, potential for organ recovery, and quality of life will be important when evaluating new treatments and/or treatment paradigms.

Efficacy of Selinexor in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Patients with del17p and Other High-Risk Abnormalities (A Retrospective Single-Center Study).

Selinexor (Seli) is a first-in-class, oral selective inhibitor of the nuclear export protein, exportin-1 (XPO1). Seli exhibits its antitumor effect through the blockage of XPO1, which increases nuclear retention of tumor suppressor proteins (TSPs), including p53, thereby limiting the translation of oncogenes, triggering cell cycle arrest and the death of malignant cells. Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients with del17p are deficient in TP53 and have a particularly poor prognosis. Given its unique mechanism of action, we investigated whether Seli has increased efficacy in RRMM patients with del17p compared to other high-risk cytogenetics (OHRC). This is an IRB-approved observational study of RRMM patients with high-risk cytogenetics (del17p, t (4;14), t (14;16) or gain 1q) or standard-risk cytogenetics treated at the Levine Cancer Institute (LCI) with a Seli-based regimen between January 2019 and December 2022. Time-to-event endpoints (PFS, OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods. Log-rank tests compared time-to-event endpoints between cohorts [del17p vs. OHRC vs. standard risk]. We identified 40 RRMM patients with high-risk cytogenetics, including 16 patients with del17p and 24 patients with OHRC, as well as 20 with standard-risk cytogenetics. The median age was 62.5 vs. 69 vs. 65.5 years (del17p group vs. OHRC vs. standard risk). The median prior line of therapies was five (range: 3-16) with similar rates of prior autologous stem cell transplant in all arms (68.8% vs. 62.5% vs. 70.0%). The most frequently used regimens were Seli-Pomalidomide-dexamethasone(dex) or Seli-Carfilzomib-dex (Seli-Kd) in the del17p group and Seli-Kd in the OHRC and standard-risk groups. The median time to start the Seli-based regimen after initial MM diagnosis was 5.6 years for the del17p group, 4.1 years in OHRC, and 4.8 years in the standard-risk group. The median follow-up time after the start of the Seli-based regimen was 10.5 months (mos) in the del17p group, 8.4 mos in OHRC, and 10.3 mos in the standard-risk group. In the del17p group, 50% had an objective response, 41.7% in the OHRC, and 35% in the standard-risk group (p = 0.71). Depth of response was also similar across the arms (12.5% vs. 12.5% vs. 10.0% VGPR p = 0.99). The median OS was 10.9 mos in the del17p group, 10.3 mos in the OHRC, and 10.3 mos in the standard-risk group (p = 0.92). The median OS was 15.5 mos for patients who received Seli as a bridging therapy versus 9 mos for Seli use for other reasons rather than as a bridge. Overall, Seli-based regimens showed promising responses even in this heavily pretreated population. Our analysis suggests that Seli-based regimens lead to similar outcomes among RRMM patients with del17p, OHRC, and standard-risk cytogenetics. This contrasts with previously reported outcomes using combinations of novel therapies in this population, where the del17p patients often have a poorer prognosis. Interestingly, our data suggest that Seli is a particularly effective bridging modality for patients preparing for CAR-T cell therapies in our population. Further investigation into this population is warranted, including in earlier lines of therapy, in hopes of seeing a more durable response.

The effectiveness and safety of fixed low-dose prothrombin complex concentrates in patients requiring urgent reversal of warfarin.

BACKGROUND: A rapid method of reversal is required for patients on warfarin who suffer acute bleeding or require emergency surgery. Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) have recently been recommended by the Canadian Blood Services for use at a fixed low dose of 1000 IU of Factor (F)IX activity. The main goal of this study was to investigate both the effectiveness and the safety of fixed low-dose PCCs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed charts from 103 patients who received PCCs for reversal of warfarin therapy. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were treated with PCC at a single fixed dose of 1000 IU of F IX activity. Fifty patients (48.5%) had a final international normalized ratio (INR) response of not more than 1.5 and an additional 45 patients (43.7%) had a final INR response between 1.6 and 2.0. However, 86 patients (83.5%) had an excellent clinical response consisting of control of bleeding without the requirement of additional measures. In a multivariable model, patients who received fresh-frozen plasma and patients who were given doses greater than 1000 IU of PCC were both identified as predictors of a poor clinical response (odds ratio [OR] 3.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-15.89, p = 0.11; and OR 10.8, 95% CI 2.08-56.28, 95% CI, p = 0.005, respectively). There were five adverse events up to 30 days after PCC use. CONCLUSION: At a fixed dose of 1000 IU of F IX activity, PCC seems to be effective and safe but randomized controlled trials, specifically examining different doses of PCC, are required to confirm the above observations.

Retrospective Review of Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients With COVID-19 Infection (Two-Center Study).

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has profound effects on patients with multiple myeloma (MM) mainly due to underlying immune dysfunction and associated therapies leading to increased susceptibility to infections. The overall risk of morbidity and mortality (M&M) in MM patients due to COVID-19 infection is unclear with various studies suggesting case fatality rate of 22% to 29%. Additionally, most of these studies did not stratify patients by their molecular risk profile. METHODS: Here, we aim to investigate the effects of COVID-19 infection with associated risk factors in MM patients and the effectiveness of newly implemented screening and treatment protocols on outcomes. After obtaining institutional review board approvals from each participating institution, we collected data from MM patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 1, 2020, to October 30, 2020, at 2 myeloma centers (Levine Cancer Institute & University of Kansas medical center). RESULTS: We identified a total of 162 MM patients who had COVID-19 infection. The majority of patients were males (57%) with a median age of 64 years. Most patients had an associated comorbid condition. Their myeloma disease status and prior autologous stem cell transplant at the time of infection had no impact on hospitalization or mortality. In univariate analysis, chronic kidney disease, hepatic dysfunction, diabetes, and hypertension were associated with an increased risk of hospitalization. In multivariate analysis regarding survival, increased age and lymphopenia were associated with increased COVID-19-related mortality. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the use of infection mitigation measures in all MM patients, and adjustment of treatment pathways in MM patients diagnosed with COVID-19.

Standardizing Clinical Workflow for Assessing Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: Minimal residual disease (MRD) status is an established prognostic biomarker for patients with multiple myeloma. Commonly used MRD testing techniques such as next generation sequencing or next generation flow cytometry can detect as little as one or two multiple myeloma plasma cells in 106 normal bone marrow cells. Early pull of bone marrow aspirates (BMA), necessary to achieve such level of sensitivity, can be difficult to secure in routine clinical practice due to the competing need for early pull samples for clinical response assessment, therefore introducing the risk of analytical interference during MRD testing. METHODS: To overcome this challenge, we standardized our workflow for collecting specimens by using a technical first pull after needle repositioning for MRD testing. To capture a comprehensive picture of MRD assay performance and specimen adequacy, we tested for MRD on 556 technical first pull bone marrow aspirates by next generation flow cytometry. Among the specimens, several key multiple myeloma treatment milestones were represented: end of induction therapy, two to three months post-autologous stem cell transplant, early and late stages of maintenance therapy. RESULTS: By using the technical first pull bone marrow aspirate, we achieved an analytical assay input of 10 million nucleated cells for 97.5% of specimens. Our analytical sensitivity reached 10-6; (i.e., 10 multiple myeloma plasma cells in 10 × 106 bone marrow cells). Twenty-four percent of specimens were significantly hemodiluted. Low assay input or hemodilution quantifiably lowered the assay sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Specimen adequacy is, therefore, an important metric to incorporate into MRD status reporting.

A Clinical and Correlative Study of Elotuzumab, Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (Elo-KRd) for Lenalidomide Refractory Multiple Myeloma in First Relapse.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in first relapse remains a challenge. This phase II study combined elotuzumab (Elo) with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) for treatment of MM in first relapse with the aim of improving efficacy. METHODS: Enrolled patients received Elo-KRd induction for 4 cycles, and Elo-lenalidomide maintenance until progression. The primary endpoint was VGPR or better (≥VGPR) postinduction. Secondary endpoints were MRD by flow cytometry, OS, PFS, and safety. Correlatives included characterization of the impact of Elo-KRd on NK and T cell subsets via flow cytometry. Target accrual of 40 patients was not met due to COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Of 15 patients enrolled, 10 (67%) had high-risk features (del17p, t[4;14], t[14;16], 1q gain/amplification, plasma cell leukemia, extramedullary MM, or functional high risk), 12 (80%) were lenalidomide-refractory, and 5 (33.3%) bortezomib-refractory. Postinduction ≥VGPR was 7/15 (46.7%) and MRD-negative (10-5) rate 20%. Overall response during study was 80%, including ≥VGPR as best response of 53.3%. At median follow-up of 28.2 (range, 3.8 to 44.2) months, the median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI 1.9, 18), and median OS not reached (95% CI 10.1, NA). No new safety concerns were reported. Elo-KRd treatment did not augment NK cell distribution or activity in blood or bone marrow. Effector CD4+ and CD8+ T cells significantly decreased postinduction, with concomitant acquisition of T central memory phenotype, particularly at a high rate in ≥VGPR group. CONCLUSION: A short course of Elo-KRd induction followed by Elo-lenalidomide maintenance demonstrated activity in predominantly lenalidomide-refractory and / or high-risk MM. The results with this well-tolerated combination are comparable to other contemporary approved triplet combinations.

Smoldering multiple myeloma - Past, present, and future.

Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) routinely precedes the development of multiple myeloma. While some patients experience aggressive disease, others have more indolent courses akin to those with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Much effort has been made to understand the pathobiological basis of this heterogeneity. Scientific advancements have led to the emergence of various clinical and genomic markers of relevance, translating into evolution of disease definitions over time. More recently, the interest in manipulation of biological pathways has intensified in a bid to stall or halt disease progression. Studies with lenalidomide have exemplified the promise of early intervention, whereas numerous therapeutic approaches remain the subject of ongoing clinical investigation. This review summarizes the historic progress made in defining SMM as a distinct clinicopathologic entity, provides a critical appraisal of the evidence guiding risk assessment, and suggests a pragmatic approach to its modern-day management. Finally, an overview of developments on the horizon is also provided.

The use of PYP scan for evaluation of ATTR cardiac amyloidosis at a tertiary medical centre.

Cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) is an often underdiagnosed disease that can lead to significant morbidity and mortality for patients. In recent years, technetium-99m pyrophosphate scintigraphy (PYP) imaging has become a standard of care diagnostic tool to help clinicians identify this disease. With newly emerging therapies for ATTR cardiomyopathy, it is critical to identify patients who are eligible for therapy as early as possible. At our institution, we sought to describe the frequency of PYP scanning and how it has impacted the management of a patient suspected to have amyloid cardiomyopathy. Between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2020, we identified 273 patients who completed PYP scanning for evaluation of cardiac amyloidosis at Tufts Medical Center, a tertiary care centre. We reviewed pertinent clinical data for all study subjects. A PYP scan was considered positive when the heart to contralateral lung ratio was greater than or equal to 1.5, with a visual grade of 2 or 3, and confirmation with single-photon emission computerised tomography (SPECT) imaging. In total there were 55 positive, 202 negative, and 16 equivocal PYP scans. Endomyocardial biopsies were rarely performed following PYP results. Of the seven patients with a positive PYP scan who underwent biopsy, five were positive for ATTR amyloid; of the patients with a negative scan who were biopsied, none were positive for ATTR amyloidosis and two were positive for amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. The biomarkers troponin I, B-type naturietic peptide (BNP), and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP), as well as the interventricular septal end-diastolic thickness (IVSd) seen on echocardiogram, were all found to be statistically higher in the PYP positive cohort than in the PYP negative cohort using Mann-Whitney U statistical analysis. In total, 27 out of the 55 patients with a positive PYP scan underwent therapy specific for cardiac amyloid. In conclusion, this study reinforces the clinical significance of the PYP scan in the diagnosis and management of cardiac amyloidosis. A positive scan allowed physicians to implement early amyloid-directed treatment while a negative scan encouraged physicians to pursue an alternative diagnosis.