RESUMO
Key Clinical Message: Venous spasm is an important reason for complicated or failed implantations of cardiac implantable electronic devices. Prevention or risk reduction of venous spasm during cardiac implantable electronic device implantation may be achieved by ultrasound or fluoroscopic imaging prior to puncture, cephalic vein cut-down, sufficient pre- and perioperative hydration, nitroglycerin injection and effective sedation, and analgesia. Abstract: This case report with literature review focuses on venous spasm as a potential cause for complicated implantations of cardiac implantable electronic devices. The case report is clinically relevant as it describes a progressive spasm affecting the axillary and the subclavian vein. A 66-year-old female complained of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) and atypical atrial flutter despite interventional and medical treatment. As an ultimate treatment, she was scheduled for pacemaker implantation and atrioventricular node ablation. Several puncture attempts of the axillary vein failed. Despite venous blood aspiration, no guidewires could be advanced into the axillary vein. We performed a first venogram revealing significant spasm of the axillary vein. Another failed venous puncture occurred after change of access site to the subclavian vein. A second venogram displayed progression of the spasm, now affecting both the axillary and the subclavian veins. Normal saline perfusion was administered as well as intravenous isosorbide. Unfortunately, a repeated venogram after 15 min waiting time showed persistence of the spasm, still affecting both veins. The procedure was discontinued as the patient became uncomfortable. Venous spasm is an important reason for complicated or failed implantations of cardiac implantable electronic devices. Commonly used medical prevention and treatment are intravenous fluids and nitroglycerin. Prevention or risk reduction of venous spasm during cardiac implantable electronic device implantation may be achieved by ultrasound or fluoroscopic imaging prior to puncture, cephalic vein cut-down, sufficient pre- and perioperative hydration, nitroglycerin injection and effective sedation and analgesia.
RESUMO
AIMS: Catheter ablations of complex cardiac arrhythmias are currently guided by electro-anatomic mapping systems. The aim of this study was to compare two different approaches: remotely supported nurse-led electro-anatomic mapping with standard onsite engineer support. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective observational study, 166 patients with complex and non-complex procedures were included. 82 patients benefited from electro-anatomic mapping with remotely supported nurse-led mapping (mean age: 62±16years), while the approach for 84 patients was with standard onsite engineer support (mean age: 56±19 years). Procedural characteristics, acute results and complication rates were compared between both groups and showed similar results.Complex and non-complex procedures were conducted in both groups, including left atrial and ventricular procedures. As ventricular tachycardia and accessory pathway ablations were more frequently conducted with standard onsite engineer support, we separately analyzed the largest subgroup, 105 patients with atrial fibrillation, left atrial flutter and left atrial tachycardia. Patients in this subgroup had comparable baseline characteristics, procedure times and procedural success. Nevertheless, there were longer ablation times and more utilization of fluoroscopy in the onsite group, most likely due to more complex procedures. CONCLUSION: Our results underline the practicality of remotely supported nurse-led electro-anatomic mapping. The latter approach proved to be a safe alternative to onsite engineer support. Due to its advantages, particularly for insular settings, it will likely play a greater role in the future.