Right coronary sinus aneurysm repair.

In this case report, we describe the surgical treatment of a right coronary sinus aneurysm. A 69-year-old male patient was screened because of palpitations. He was finally diagnosed with an aneurysm of the sinus of Valsalva of the right coronary cusp. According to current aortic guidelines, surgical reconstruction was proposed. The patient underwent a cardiac operation through a median sternotomy under routine cardiopulmonary bypass. After aortic cross-clamping, the aorta was opened and the connection between the aorta and the aneurysm was clearly visualized, underneath the ostium of the right coronary artery. After excision of the right coronary button and the remaining right coronary sinus wall, this sinus was reconstructed with a Dacron graft, with subsequent coronary reimplantation. The postoperative course was uneventful. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 7. A complete sinus reconstruction was preferred over local patching of the defect because of the proximity of the aneurysm sac to the right coronary artery and the fragile, thin aortic tissue just underneath the coronary ostium.

Early Conduction Disorders After Aortic Valve Replacement With the Sutureless Perceval Prosthesis.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to determine the incidence of postoperative conduction disorders and need for pacemaker (PM) implantation after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the Perceval prosthesis (Livanova, Saluggia, Italy). METHODS: From January 2007 to December 2017, 908 patients underwent AVR with Perceval S in 5 participating centers. Study end points focused on electrocardiographic changes after AVR and the incidence of new PM implantation in 801 patients after exclusion of patients with previous PM (n = 48) or patients undergoing tricuspid (n = 28) and/or atrial fibrillation ablation (n = 31) surgery. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for PM need. RESULTS: Mean age was 79.7 ± 5.2 years, and 476 (59.4%) were women. Median logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (2011 revision) score was 4.1% (interquartile range, 2.6%-6.0%). Isolated AVR was performed in 441 patients (55.1%). Associated procedures were coronary artery bypass grafting in 309 (38.6%) and mitral valve surgery in 51 (6.4%). Overall 30-day mortality was 3.9% and was 2.8% for isolated AVR. Electrocardiographic changes included a significant increase of left bundle branch block from 7.4% to 23.7% (P < .001) and development of complete atrioventricular block requiring PM implantation in 9.5%. Multivariable analysis revealed independent of a learning period (odds ratio [OR], 1.91; 95% confidence limits (CL), 1.16-3.13; P = .011), preexisting right-bundle branch block (OR, 2.77; 95% CL, 1.40-5.48; P = .003), intraoperative prosthesis repositioning (OR, 6.70; 95% CL, 1.89-24.40; P = .003), and size extra large (OR, 6.81; 95% CL, 1.55-29.96; P = .011) as significant predictors of PM implantation. CONCLUSIONS: In a challenging elderly population, use of the Perceval S for AVR provides low operative mortality but at the risk of an increased PM implantation rate. Besides preexisting right bundle branch block, the significant effect of size extra large, an increased valve size/body surface area ratio, and need for intraoperative repositioning on PM rate are underscoring the reappraisal of the annular sizing policy.