Comparative in vitro study on the local tolerance and efficacy of benzalkonium chloride, myristalkonium chloride and nonoxynol-9 as active principles in vaginal contraceptives.

BACKGROUND: Spermicides have been identified as a potentially attractive alternative to hormonal contraceptives and/or intrauterine devices. Thus, this study aimed evaluating the efficacy and local tolerance of benzalkonium chloride (BKC) and myristalkonium chloride (MKC) contained in Pharmatex® vaginal formulations and compare them with nonoxynol-9 (N-9), the most common active ingredient in topical vaginal contraceptives. METHODS: Human normozoospermic samples were assessed for motility, viability, acrosome status and penetration ability after exposure to control, N-9 or different BKC and MKC doses for 0 and 10 minutes. Local tolerance on HeLa cells was evaluated by the Trypan-blue and MTT assays. RESULTS: Exposure to BKC and MKC reduced acrosome integrity while promoting total immobilisation and complete loss of sperm viability (p < .001, n = 15). Both compounds also compromised sperm penetration ability upon exposure (p < .001, n = 15). N-9 induced the same outcomes (p < .001, n = 15); nevertheless, it was more toxic to HeLa cells than BKC and MKC (p < .05, n = 14). CONCLUSIONS: BKC and MKC present strong in vitro spermicidal activity at lower doses than N-9 and were better tolerated after immediate exposure than N-9. Available Pharmatex® galenic formulations were as effective as products based on N-9.

Efficacy, safety and acceptability of a benzalkonium chloride spermicide cream in women aged 40 years and over needing contraception: A prospective multicentre study.

OBJECTIVE: This multicenter prospective study (BZK40+) aims to determine the efficacy and tolerance of a benzalkonium chloride-containing spermicide as contraceptive among women aged 40 and over. PROCEDURE: Fertile women enrolled in this open single-arm study were instructed to systematically use the benzalkonium chloride spermicide before each intercourse. At the end of a 6-month mandatory period, participants were given the option of continuing the study for a further 6 months. The primary endpoint for contraceptive efficacy was the Pearl Index (PI) up to 12 months of typical use. MAIN FINDINGS: A total of 151 women (mean age: 45.9 years) were enrolled, 144 (95.4%) completed the initial 6-month period and 63 (41.7%) completed the optional 6-month period. The median number of intercourses ranged from 3 to 5 per month. The spermicide was applied before 96.3% of the 5,895 sexual intercourses. The PI up to 12 months of typical use was 0 pregnancies (95% confidence interval: 0-2.88). The cumulative treatment exposure was 1249.7 women-months. CONCLUSION: This first study in women aged 40 years and over shows that benzalkonium chloride spermicide (Pharmatex®) is effective, well tolerated and well accepted in this population. Although very interesting, these results with a PI equal to zero are surprising and not in accordance with the low efficacy of spermicides in the overall population according to the WHO. So, our results should be interpreted with caution and confirmed by future research. Clinical trial registration number (EudraCT): 2016-004,188-38.

25 mm Hg versus 35 mm Hg elastic compression stockings to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome after deep vein thrombosis (CELEST): a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal strength of compression needed to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) after a proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is debated. We aimed to assess whether 25 mm Hg elastic compression stockings (ECS) are non-inferior to 35 mm Hg ECS in preventing PTS after a DVT. METHODS: In this multicentre, double-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial, we enrolled adults (≥18 years) with a first ipsilateral proximal DVT attending 46 French vascular medicine hospital departments or private practices. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1, stratified by centre, age, and sex; with varying block sizes of two and four) to wear 25 mm Hg or 35 mm Hg ECS for 2 years. The primary outcome was the cumulative rate of PTS 2 years after inclusion, defined by a Villalta scale (≥5). Efficacy was assessed by intention-to-treat and in eligible participants who had complete primary outcome data. A per-protocol analysis was also conducted among compliant patients as a secondary outcome measure. Safety was assessed in all participants who used ECS at least once, and for which we have at least some tolerance information during follow-up. The margin for non-inferiority was 12·5%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01578122, and has been completed. FINDINGS: Between June 28, 2012, and July 21, 2017, we enrolled 341 eligible participants who consented to randomisation. 233 (68%) were men and median age was 59 years (IQR 45-70). Collection of ethnicity and race as a routine research variable is not authorised in France. Median follow-up was 735 days (IQR 721-760). 249 (73%) had complete data at 2 years. For the primary analysis, 40 (31%) of 129 participants with complete data in the 25 mm Hg ECS group and 40 (33%) of 120 in the 35 mm Hg group had PTS (absolute difference -2·3% [90% CI -12·1 to 7·4], pnon-inferiority=0·0062; relative risk 0·93, 95% CI 0·65 to 1·33). Results remained similar after imputation of missing data in patients we were authorised to do so: the cumulative proportion of PTS was 45 (29%) of 154 in the 25 mm Hg ECS group versus 52 (35%) of 148 in the 35 mm Hg ECS group (relative risk 0·83, 95% CI 0·60 to 1·16). Absolute difference was -5·9%, (90% CI -14·7 to 2·9), p=0·0003 for non-inferiority. Adherence was optimal (>80% and modified GIRERD score of 0-2) for 75 (51%) of 146 patients assigned to 25 mm Hg ECS and for 56 (42%) of 134 patients assigned to 35 mm Hg ECS (p=0·11). Regarding major adverse events related to ECS, there were no between-group differences in rates of deep vein thrombosis (0 vs 1 [0·6%]), ipsilateral leg ulcer (0 vs 1 [0·6%]), infection (0 vs 0), or death (0 vs 0) between the 169 patients evaluated in the 25 mm Hg ECS group and the 159 patients in the 35 mm Hg ECS group. Two (1%) of 328 patients who ever wore ESC developed ECS-related serious adverse events, one distal DVT and one leg ulcer (both in the 35 mm Hg ECS group). In the 25 mm Hg group, 6 patients died, 14 had a venous thromboembolic recurrence (proximal DVT or pulmonary embolism), and 7 had a major bleed. In the 35 mm Hg group, 5 patients died, 10 had a venous thromboembolic recurrence (proximal DVT or pulmonary embolism), and 6 had a major bleed. INTERPRETATION: Although we did not reach the prespecified sample size, our results suggest that 25 mm Hg ECS are non-inferior to 35 mm Hg ECS in preventing PTS. Larger more powerful studies are needed. FUNDING: Laboratoires Innothera, France.

Compression stockings to prevent postthrombotic syndrome: Literature overview and presentation of the CELEST trial.

Postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a burdensome and costly complication of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) that develops in 20%-40% of patients within 2 years after proximal DVT. In the absence of effective curative treatment, management of PTS relies on its prevention after DVT. The effectiveness of elastic compression stockings (ECS) to prevent PTS is uncertain. We present an overview of published studies assessing the efficacy of ECS to prevent PTS and present the protocol for the CELEST clinical trial. While previous open-label randomized trials have reported a 50% risk reduction in PTS in patients treated with >30 mm Hg ankle pressure ECS, a large double-blind trial reported no effect of ECS. We discuss the main potential limitations of these trials, including a placebo effect and suboptimal compliance to ECS. We present the protocol of the CELEST double-blind randomized trial comparing 2 years of high strength (ankle pressure 35 mm Hg) versus lower strength (ankle pressure 25 mm Hg) ECS in the prevention of PTS after a first acute symptomatic, unilateral, proximal DVT. The use of lower-strength ECS than that used in previous studies should favor compliance. CELEST may provide important evidence about the efficacy of ECS in the prevention of PTS after DVT. The results will be interpreted in the light of results from recent clinical trials assessing ECS for PTS prevention that reported that the duration of ECS use should be tailored to the individual, if ECS are efficacious in the prevention of PTS.

Is Nonmicronized Diosmin 600 mg as Effective as Micronized Diosmin 900 mg plus Hesperidin 100 mg on Chronic Venous Disease Symptoms? Results of a Noninferiority Study.

BACKGROUND: Phlebotonics have beneficial effects on some symptoms related to chronic venous disease (CVD) of the lower limbs. The most commonly used one is diosmin, available in a pure semisynthetic form or as a micronized purified flavonoid fraction. Patients and Methods. The primary objective of this single-blind, randomized, parallel-group, prospective study was to assess the clinical noninferiority of nonmicronized diosmin 600 mg once daily (D-group) compared to micronized diosmin 900 mg plus hesperidin 100 mg once daily (D/H-group) over a 6-month treatment period. Adult patients with a symptomatic CVD of the lower limbs (C0-C3 grade; 20-60 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS)) were included. The primary endpoint was the change (from baseline to last postbaseline value) of the intensity of the lower-limb symptoms on VAS. RESULTS: 114 patients (mean age, 44.4 years; women, 90.4%) were randomized in the per-protocol analysis (D-group, n = 57; D/H-group, n = 57; D/H-group, p < 0.0001) in the D-group and -22.8 mm (p < 0.0001) in the D-group and -22.8 mm (p < 0.0001) in the D-group and -22.8 mm (. CONCLUSION: Nonmicronized diosmin 600 mg was proven to have a noninferior efficacy compared to micronized diosmin 900 mg plus hesperidin 100 mg, associated with greater ease in swallowing the tablet.

Anti-inflammatory and antiradical effects of a 2% diosmin cream in a human skin organ culture as model.

BACKGROUND: Diosmin, a naturally occurring flavonoid, is considered as a vascular-protective agent and is used orally to treat chronic venous insufficiency. It exhibits anti-inflammatory and free radical scavenging properties, but, like many other flavonoids, it is poorly absorbed in the small intestine. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate the skin protective effects of a diosmin-based cream, using skin organ culture as model. METHODS: Fragments of human skin explants, cultured ex vivo, were allocated to four treatment groups: no cream, no cream + stress, placebo cream + stress, and 2% diosmin cream + stress. Stress was induced by exposure to either substance P (anti-inflammatory effects' assessment) or UVB irradiation (free radical scavenging effects' assessment). Vascular dilation and the pro-inflammatory mediator IL-8 release were determined in the first model, whereas hydrogen peroxide level and the number of cyclobutane pyrimidine-positive cells were evaluated in the second model. RESULTS: In the substance P-induced inflammation model, 2% diosmin cream exhibited significant vasoconstrictive (proportion of dilated capillaries: -29%, capillary luminal area: -49% vs no cream + stress) and anti-inflammatory (IL-8 release: -36% vs no cream + stress) effects. In the UVB irradiation model, 2% diosmin cream significantly reduced hydrogen peroxide production and cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer formation (-45% and -36% vs no cream + stress, respectively). These effects were not observed with placebo cream. CONCLUSION: Diosmin administered topically may protect skin against the biological effects of various exogenous or endogenous stresses, such as those involved in chronic venous disease.

RALGA (Diacneal) decreases melanin content in a human skin model.

BACKGROUND: Retinaldehyde and glycolic acid RALGA (Diacneal) are both effective in the topical treatment of acne. A decrease in the postinflammatory pigmentation has been observed after application of Diacneal during 3 months. AIM: To verify the effect of this association on pigmentation using an original model of surviving human skin. METHODS: Human skin explants were maintained alive in organ culture for 14 days. Diacneal was applied every day. Pigmentation of skin, depending on the transfer of melanosomes from melanocytes to keratinocytes, was visualized histologically by Fontana-Masson staining. The number of melanocytes was determined after the DOPA reaction. RESULTS: A decrease in melanin content was shown after application of Diacneal. The number of melanocytes was not modified. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that RALGA (Diacneal) may be of interest to prevent the postinflammatory pigmentation of acne.

Ultrasound imaging demonstration of the improvement of non-ablative laser remodeling by concomitant daily topical application of 0.05% retinaldehyde.

BACKGROUND: Retinaldehyde has been proven to be effective in the reduction of facial wrinkles. It has also demonstrated its usefulness when used before and after laser skin resurfacing. OBJECTIVE: A monocentric, comparative, randomized, double-blind study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of retinaldehyde versus excipient in combination with non-ablative laser remodeling treatment. METHODS: A total of 16 female patients (mean age 45 years) were enrolled for neck line and forehead rhytid treatment. They were randomly assigned into two groups. The RAL group (eight patients) was treated with a non-ablative laser (1540 nm Er:glass, 10 J/cm2 per pulse, three pulses, 2 Hz repetition rate, 4 mm spot, +5 degrees C cooling) and daily topical application of 0.05% retinaldehyde immediately after the first laser treatment and up to 3 months after the fifth treatment. The CTRL group (eight patients) was treated under similar conditions, except with a daily application of excipient. The thickness of the skin (forehead and neck) was measured by ultrasound imaging before the first treatment, 1 month after the third treatment, 1 month after the fifth treatment and 3 months after the fifth treatment. RESULTS: An increase of dermal thickness was observed for all patients treated by laser (groups RAL and CTRL) on the forehead and neck. However, the increase was greater for the RAL group (retinaldehyde) when compared with the CTRL group (excipient). Three months after the fifth treatment, the increase in dermal thickness (%) was, respectively, 5.27 versus 1.13 for the forehead and 10.54 versus 3.57 for the neck. The difference between groups was statistically significant in favor of the retinaldehyde group for the forehead (p<0.05) and of limited significance for the neck (p=0.08). CONCLUSION: When considering the reduced number of patients in each group, the statistical analysis demonstrates an evident advantage of using retinaldehyde versus excipient. This study demonstrates that irradiation with a 1540 nm Er:glass laser can be potentiated with concomitant daily topical application of 0.05% retinaldehyde.

The Cardiff Acne Disability Index: cultural and linguistic validation in French.

BACKGROUND: The Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) evaluates the impact of acne on the patient's life. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to translate the CADI into French and to validate the French version. METHOD: The CADI was translated into French following international methodological recommendations (translation, quality control, back-translation and pilot test). RESULTS: Compatibility difficulties between the cultural background of UK and France were identified and resolved by the translation process, which should guarantee that specific words and phrases reflect the cultures in the respective countries. A pilot test in volunteers demonstrated the clarity and understandability of the questions across social classes and ages. A preliminary test-retest comparison of the final scale showed sufficient reliability, with a correlation coefficient of 0.90 for the total CADI score of the French version. Moreover, the good internal consistency of the scale was demonstrated with a Cronbach alpha of 0.87. CONCLUSION: The CADI, a valuable tool for assessing the impact of acne on a patient's life, can now be used in French.

Risk factors for adverse events in analgesic drug users: results from the PAIN study.

BACKGROUND: The relative influence of various risk factors for adverse events (AE) in analgesics users have never been precisely quantified. Advantage was taken of data generated in the paracetamol, aspirin and ibuprofen new tolerability (PAIN) study, a large randomized double-blinded trial of paracetamol, aspirin or ibuprofen for common pain in general practice to attempt this. OBJECTIVE: Identify and quantify factors associated with the occurrence of AE in users of analgesic drugs. METHOD: Multivariate logistic regression analysis of potential risk factors for all AE, clinically significant AE (SAE) and clinically significant gastro-intestinal AE (GI SAE). RESULTS: Of the 8677 patients included in the study, 8633 contributed data. The main risk factors for SAE were indication: compared to those treated for musculoskeletal pain, patients treated for menstrual pain had an odds ratio (95% Confidence Interval) of 0.4 (0.2-0.7), sore throat 0.6 (0.5-0.8), cold and flu 0.7 (0.6-0.8), headache 0.8 (0.7-1.0); concomitant use of medication contra-indicated in the drugs' labeling (OR: 2.2; 1.6-2.9); increasing number of other concomitant medications: 1: OR 1.5 (1.3-1.8); 2-3: OR 1.9 (1.6-2.3); more than 3: OR (2.7; 2.1-3.5); treatment with aspirin: OR 1.4; (1.2-1.6) but not ibuprofen: OR 0.9; (0.8-1.1) compared to paracetamol; history of previous GI disorder OR 1.4 (1.0-1.8); female gender: OR 1.3 (1.1-1.4). Age was not significantly associated with AE in the multivariate analysis. Risk factors for all AE and GI SAE were mostly the same as for significant AE, but there were fewer GI SAE with ibuprofen than with paracetamol (OR 0.8; 0.6-0.9). CONCLUSION: Apart from the analgesic used and its indication, the main risk factors identified for AE in users of first-line analgesics for common pain were the number and nature of concomitant medication.