Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
COPD ; 14(6): 573-580, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28891722

RESUMO

The study aimed to assess the preferences of expert physicians about the requirements for inhalation devices for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to identify the most relevant advantages and disadvantages to their prescription. In a two-round Delphi survey, 96 Spanish COPD-expert pulmonologists completed an internet-based questionnaire to evaluate the degree of importance of the characteristics of the inhaler devices in their choice for COPD. The requirements needed for use in COPD were that the device permits a high pulmonary deposit of the drug, allowed its dispensation at low inspiratory flows, did not require hand-mouth coordination, generated an exact and reproducible dose, its operation was easy to teach, provided the perception of a correct inhalation, had an intuitive use mechanism and security mechanisms to prevent overdosing and generates a reduced oropharyngeal deposit (very good consensus). Modulite®, Respimat® and NEXThaler® were associated with high pulmonary deposit, and Respimat® showed correct dispensation at low inspiratory flows. All dry-powder inhaler devices were associated with the advantage of not requiring coordination, and Respimat® was the only device considered as difficult to teach by more than 50% of the experts. Breezhaler® and Genuair® were positively associated with patients' awareness of correct inhalation, whereas Spiromax® stood out for its intuitive use mechanism. In conclusion, our study contributes to defining the inhaler device properties required for their use in patients with COPD, and to identify the devices that, in the opinion of experts, best meet each requirement.


Assuntos
Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores/normas , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Medicamentos para o Sistema Respiratório/administração & dosagem , Administração por Inalação , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Técnica Delphi , Overdose de Drogas/prevenção & controle , Inaladores de Pó Seco , Feminino , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Inaladores Dosimetrados , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Destreza Motora , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Pneumologistas , Espanha , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Respir Med ; 102(4): 593-604, 2008 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18083019

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Incorrect usage of inhaler devices might have a major influence on the clinical effectiveness of the delivered drug. This issue is poorly addressed in management guidelines. METHODS: This article presents the results of a systematic literature review of studies evaluating incorrect use of established dry powder inhalers (DPIs) by patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). RESULTS: Overall, we found that between 4% and 94% of patients, depending on the type of inhaler and method of assessment, do not use their inhalers correctly. The most common errors made included failure to exhale before actuation, failure to breath-hold after inhalation, incorrect positioning of the inhaler, incorrect rotation sequence, and failure to execute a forceful and deep inhalation. Inefficient DPI technique may lead to insufficient drug delivery and hence to insufficient lung deposition. As many as 25% of patients have never received verbal inhaler technique instruction, and for those that do, the quality and duration of instruction is not adequate and not reinforced by follow-up checks. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates that incorrect DPI technique with established DPIs is common among patients with asthma and COPD, and suggests that poor inhalation technique has detrimental consequences for clinical efficacy. Regular assessment and reinforcement of correct inhalation technique are considered by health professionals and caregivers to be an essential component of successful asthma management. Improvement of asthma and COPD management could be achieved by new DPIs that are easy to use correctly and are forgiving of poor inhalation technique, thus ensuring more successful drug delivery.


Assuntos
Antiasmáticos/administração & dosagem , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Cooperação do Paciente , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Administração por Inalação , Adolescente , Adulto , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Criança , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Autoadministração , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Respir Med ; 107(4): 495-502, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23290591

RESUMO

This brief overview of the factors determining lung deposition of aerosols provides background information required by health care providers when instructing patients to use their prescribed inhalers. We discuss differences in the optimal inhalation manoeuvres for each type of aerosol generator and the difficulties patients face. Provision of short, clear instructions with demonstration of critical steps and checking technique during later clinical visits are necessary if these aerosolised medications are to be fully beneficial.


Assuntos
Antiasmáticos/administração & dosagem , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Administração por Inalação , Aerossóis/administração & dosagem , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Inaladores de Pó Seco , Desenho de Equipamento , Humanos , Erros de Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Inaladores Dosimetrados , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa