Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 107(8): 488-94, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26228952

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Both the endoscopic and the percutaneous approach are widely accepted for the drainage of hilar tumors. Our primary objective was to report on the effectiveness and complications of these procedures. METHODS: Prospective observational analysis of the endoscopic and/or percutaneous management of all hilar tumors treated at a referral hospital from October 2011 until October 2014. Group A included patients treated endoscopically and group B included patients treated with percutaneous drainage. The following variables were assessed: Effective biliary drainage rate, survival time and complications. RESULTS: Group A comprised 40 patients and group B, 22 patients. Overall success rate in achieving effective biliary drainage was 85% in group A and 90.9% in group B (p = 0.78). Five patients required a combined approach. In group A, the rate of effective drainage in patients with Bismuth IV-type tumors was 58.3%, while it was 81.8% in patients in group B (p = 0.44). There was no difference in mean survival between both groups. For group A, complication rate was 11.5%, whereas it was 2.94% for group B (p = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic and percutaneous biliary drainage are both effective methods for the palliative treatment of patients with hilar tumors. However, for Bismuth IV-type strictures, percutaneous drainage proved to be safer and more effective.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/complicações , Ductos Biliares Intra-Hepáticos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Colestase Intra-Hepática/terapia , Drenagem/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colestase Intra-Hepática/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam ; 45(3): 198-202, 2015 09.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28590602

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: XSome authors have assessed the link between obesity and colon adenoma risk. Moreover, it has been reported that obesity could increase the risk of proximal adenoma development. Accordingly, obese patients may have a distinctive pattern of adenoma recurrence. AIM: To determine whether metachronous adenoma features differ between obese and non-obese subjects submitted to colonoscopy surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated all patients over 18 years old that underwent surveillance colonoscopy at our institution between June 2013 and June 2014. Date of prior colonoscopy was registered. A body mass index ≥ 30 was used to define obesity. Analysis looking for variables significantly associated with metachronous adenoma was performed. Metachronous adenoma rate was compared between obese and non-obese subjects, as well as size, location, morphological and histopathological characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 825 subjects were enrolled. Median time of surveillance colonoscopy was 38.9 months. Obesity was statistically more frequent in those subjects with metachronous adenomas (40% vs 25.71%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, obesity [OR 1.7 (1.01-2.9)] and age [OR 1.02 (1-1.05)] were independently associated with metachronous adenoma presence. Obesity was also significantly associated with a higher risk of right colon adenomas [OR 2.4 (1.76-3.26)] and advanced adenoma [OR 1.99 (1.29-3.06)]. The risk is significantly higher in men and in those with a family history of colorectal cancer/adenoma. CONCLUSION: Obesity was associated with a higher risk of metachronous adenomas on surveillance colonoscopy. A higher risk of right-sided lesions and advanced adenomas was also found in this population.


Assuntos
Adenoma/etiologia , Neoplasias do Colo/etiologia , Obesidade/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Índice de Massa Corporal , Colonoscopia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
3.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 84: 147-156, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37329748

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) flap is an alternative technique for autologous breast reconstruction. In contrast to other commonly used techniques, there is a paucity of literature on the safety and efficacy of the IGAP flap. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes and complications associated with the IGAP in autologous breast reconstructions to validate its safety. METHODS: A systematic review of literature was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Articles reporting post-operative outcomes of IGAP flaps in autologous breast reconstruction were included. A proportional meta-analysis of post-operative complications was performed to obtain their proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, which represented a total of 239 IGAP flaps in 181 patients The total flap loss rate was 3% (95% CI 0-8%), partial flap loss rate was 2% (95% CI 0-4%), haematoma rate was 3% (95% CI 0-7%), overall donor-site complication rate was 15% (95% CI 5-28%), overall recipient-site complication rate was 24% (95% CI 15-34%), and the overall complication rate was 40% (95% CI 23-58%). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides comprehensive knowledge on the safety and efficacy of the IGAP flap in autologous breast reconstruction. It evidences the IGAP flap in autologous breast reconstruction's overall safety and validates its role as an effective option in breast reconstruction.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Mamoplastia , Retalho Perfurante , Humanos , Feminino , Mamoplastia/métodos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/irrigação sanguínea , Microcirurgia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Artérias/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Retalho Perfurante/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 11(1): e4745, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36699227

RESUMO

Large arm defects remain a challenge to the reconstructive surgeon, as local and regional flaps are limited regarding size and free flaps have disadvantages such as poor color match, technical complexity, prolonged operative time, and the risk of total flap loss. Keystone flaps are fascia-based flaps and combine perforator-based vascularity with relative simplicity of nonmicrosurgical techniques and do not distort local anatomy in cases of malignant excision with wide defects. This article highlights the approach of a multistaged procedure to reconstruct a large arm defect using a keystone type I flap and a temporary synthetic skin substitute for closure in a patient referred to our department for wide resection of a large melanoma in situ on the posterior aspect of the left arm. The defect, measuring 14 cm × 8 cm, was initially reconstructed with a keystone type I flap. Part of the wound was temporarily covered with EpiGARD (Biovision GmbH, Ilmenau, Germany) to avoid excessive wound tension. One week later, the wound was partially narrowed, and a smaller EpiGARD was placed in office under local anesthesia. The multistaged approach was completed with direct closure 1 week later after removal of the smaller EpiGARD. No complications occurred and the result was satisfactory with a pleasing cosmetic result after an 8-month follow-up. In conclusion, the keystone flap allows reconstruction of large arm defects. Temporary synthetic skin substitute coverage can serve as a good addition for those cases where tension on the margins is observed at the price of a small in-office procedure.

5.
In Vivo ; 37(3): 1164-1172, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37103103

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: Cutaneous melanoma of the lip (LM) is a rare malignancy with a low overall survival (OS). Few studies exist in the literature to aid its diagnosis and treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the different treatment modalities by collecting cases from a single database and to provide current information on the epidemiologic characteristics of cutaneous lip melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The SEER database was searched for demographic, clinical-pathological, and therapeutic characteristics. The Kaplan-Meier model was used to analyze the overall survival (OS) of the study population, and survival curves were modelled. Univariable analysis between subgroups was carried out using the log-rank test. Surgery was further assessed with a multivariable cox regression, where the surgical procedure was adjusted for Breslow thickness. RESULTS: Patients aged 62.4 years on average, and 62.7% of them were males. A total of 386 melanomas of the cutaneous lip were identified. Mean OS was 155.1 months, median OS was 187 months, and 67.4% had localized disease. CONCLUSION: LM has a poor prognosis with a 5-year OS of 75.2%. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, with less invasive surgical approaches yielding a comparable overall survival to surgery with greater margins.


Assuntos
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Melanoma/epidemiologia , Melanoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Lábio/patologia , Prognóstico , Programa de SEER , Análise de Sobrevida , Melanoma Maligno Cutâneo
6.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(17)2022 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36077834

RESUMO

Pelvic exenteration and abdominoperineal resection are radical techniques commonly used for locally advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancy with high morbidity due to large pelvic defects. Flaps can help provide healthy, well-vascularized, non-irradiated tissues to fill pelvic dead space. We conducted a proportional meta-analysis to compare surgical outcomes of vertical rectus abdominus myocutaneous flap (VRAM) vs. gracilis flap for vulvo-perineal reconstruction following oncologic resection. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases. Proportional meta-analysis was performed to compare the surgical outcomes of using VRAM or gracilis flaps. Our review yielded 16 eligible studies. The pooled resolution rate of overall donor site complications for VRAM flap (pooled proportion = 0.576 [95% CI 0.387, 0.754]) was significantly higher than the pooled rate of overall donor site complications of gracilis flap (pooled proportion = 0.160 [95% CI 0.058, 0.295]). Partial and total flap necrosis were similar in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between minor and major complications for both flaps. Both flaps can be used safely for vulvo-perineal reconstruction following oncologic resection with similar recipient site outcomes, although the VRAM flap will have more donor site complications than the gracilis flap.

7.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(24)2022 Dec 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36551538

RESUMO

Introduction: Melanoma is an aggressive skin cancer. Large demographic and clinic-pathologic studies are required to identify variations of tumour behavior. The aim of our study was to offer updated epidemiologic data on the scalp and neck melanoma with an overall survival analysis. Method: The SEER database was searched for all scalp and neck melanoma in adult patients between 2000 and 2019. Demographic and clinic-pathologic variables were described. Their impact on overall survival was assessed with the log-rank test after Kaplan−Meier model. A multivariable cox-regression was conducted to identify predictors of decreased survival. A p-value of <0.005 was considered statistically significant. Results: 20,728 Melanomas of the scalp and neck were identified. Mean age was 62.5 years. Gender ratio was 76.3% males. 79% of the tumours were localized at diagnosis. Increasing age, male gender, tumour ulceration, high mitotic rate or nodular subtype were independent prognostic factors of decreased overall survival. Surgery with less than 1 cm margin is associated with the best overall survival in this cohort. No significant difference in OS was seen between less than 1 cm and 1 to 2 cm margins. Conclusion: Knowledge of negative prognostic factors might help identify subgroups at risk and adapt their oncologic treatment.

8.
J Clin Med ; 10(19)2021 Sep 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34640438

RESUMO

Reduction mammoplasty is the gold standard procedure for symptomatic breast hypertrophy and it is also used for contralateral breast symmetrisation following breast cancer surgery. We aim at introducing a new procedure, which uses an omega resection pattern to simplify the inferior pedicle breast resection technique. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent the omega resection reduction mammoplasty at the University Hospital of Basel between 2010 and 2020 was carried out. We collected patient demographics, surgical outcomes, operation time, type and frequency of complications at 12 months follow-up. Outcomes were compared with the most commonly used techniques. Additionally, we assessed if patients' and clinical characteristics augmented/diminished the complication rate. During the study period, 67 reduction mammaplasties were performed by a senior plastic surgeon (Mage = 42.5, SDage = 15.6; MBMI = 27.28, SDBMI = 3.4; 20% smokers). The average tissue removed was 826 g (ranging from 15 to 2307 g). In 10 breasts (15%) occurred minor complications. No major complications were reported. Operation time (M = 149 min; ranging from 87 to 270 min) was significantly shorter than the inferior, superomedial, and superior pedicle techniques. Univariate Odd Ratios showed that no-smoker status, a BMI in a normal range, resection weight between 500 g to 1500 g, NTN distance < 30 cm, removal of drains one day after the operation, ASA index of 2, inpatient clinic hospitalisation, and not undergoing other concomitant surgical operations were protective factors against the risk to develop complications. The omega resection pattern technique demonstrated to be an effective, safe, and fast mammoplasty reduction procedure for bilateral macromastia and unilateral symmetrizing procedures, even for large breasts, able to be adopted as a new valid alternative to the existing ones.

10.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 107(8): 488-494, ago. 2015. tab, ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS (Espanha) | ID: ibc-141645

RESUMO

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVO: existen dos técnicas válidas para el drenaje de los tumores hiliares: el abordaje endoscópico y el percutáneo. Nuestro objetivo primario fue reportar la efectividad y las complicaciones de estos procedimientos. MÉTODOS: análisis prospectivo observacional referido al manejo endoscópico y/o percutáneo de todos los tumores hiliares intervenidos en un hospital de tercer nivel desde octubre de 2011 a octubre de 2014. El grupo A representó a los pacientes abordados endoscópicamente, y el grupo B incluyó aquellos con drenaje percutáneo. Se analizaron las siguientes variables: tasa de drenaje biliar efectivo, tiempo de sobrevida y complicaciones. RESULTADOS: el grupo A tuvo 40 pacientes y el grupo B 22. La tasa de éxito global en lograr un drenaje biliar efectivo fue del 85% en el grupo A y del 90,9% en el grupo B (p = 0,78). En cinco pacientes se requirió un abordaje combinado. La efectividad del grupo A en el drenaje de pacientes con tumores tipo Bismuth IV fue del 58,3%, mientras que el grupo B alcanzó el 81,8% (p = 0,44). La sobrevida media de los pacientes no presentó diferencias estadísticas entre ambos grupos. En el grupo A la tasa de complicaciones alcanzó un 11,5% mientras que en el B fue de 2,94% (p = 0,41). CONCLUSIONES: el drenaje biliar endoscópico y el percutáneo son métodos efectivos en el tratamiento paliativo de los tumores hiliares. Sin embargo, en estenosis tipo Bismuth IV, el drenaje percutáneo resultó más efectivo y seguro


BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Both the endoscopic and the percutaneous approach are widely accepted for the drainage of hilar tumors. Our primary objective was to report on the effectiveness and complications of these procedures. METHODS: Prospective observational analysis of the endoscopic and/or percutaneous management of all hilar tumors treated at a referral hospital from October 2011 until October 2014. Group A included patients treated endoscopically and group B included patients treated with percutaneous drainage. The following variables were assessed: Effective biliary drainage rate, survival time and complications. RESULTS: Group A comprised 40 patients and group B, 22 patients. Overall success rate in achieving effective biliary drainage was 85% in group A and 90.9% in group B (p = 0.78). Five patients required a combined approach. In group A, the rate of effective drainage in patients with Bismuth IV-type tumors was 58.3%, while it was 81.8% in patients in group B (p = 0.44). There was no difference in mean survival between both groups. For group A, complication rate was 11.5%, whereas it was 2.94% for group B (p = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic and percutaneous biliary drainage are both effective methods for the palliative treatment of patients with hilar tumors. However, for Bismuth IV-type strictures, percutaneous drainage proved to be safer and more effective


Assuntos
Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/patologia , Ductos Biliares/anormalidades , Ductos Biliares/metabolismo , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Drenagem/enfermagem , Colangite/patologia , Colestase/metabolismo , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Ductos Biliares/citologia , Ductos Biliares/lesões , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/instrumentação , Drenagem/métodos , Colangite/complicações , Colestase/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa