Clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol for the treatment of bloodstream infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii during the COVID-19 era: a single center, observational study.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol (CFDC) in comparison with colistin (COL) for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) bloodstream infections (BSI). MATERIALS/METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including adults with CRAB-BSI. Outcomes were mortality, clinical cure and adverse events during therapy. The average treatment effect of CFDC compared to COL was weighted with the inverse-probability treatment weight (IPTW). RESULTS: Overall, 104 patients were included (50 CFDC, 54 COL), median age 66.5 years, median Charlson Comorbidity Index 5, septic shock in 33.6% of patients. Primary BSI accounted for 43.3% of cases, followed by ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (26%), catheter-related BSI (20.2%) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) (9.6%). Although not significantly, mortality at all time points was lower for CFDC than COL, while clinical cure was higher in CFDC than COL (66% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.027). Adverse events were more frequent in COL than CFDC-group (38.8% vs. 10%, p < 0.0001), primarily attributed to acute kidney injury (AKI) in the COL group. Patients with bacteremic HAP/VAP treated with CFDC had a significant lower 30-d mortality and higher clinical cure than COL (p = 0.008 and p = 0.0008, respectively). Increment of CCI (p = 0.005), ICU (p = 0.025), SARS-CoV2 (p = 0.006) and ECMO (p < 0.0001) were independently associated with 30-d mortality, while receiving CFDC was not associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: CFDC could represent an effective and safe treatment option for CRAB BSI, especially in patients with bacteremic HAP/VAP and frail patients where the risk of acute renal failure during therapy should be avoided.

The long-term effect on surgery-free survival of biological compared to conventional therapy in Crohn's disease in real world-data: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of biological drugs has led to great expectations and growing optimism in the possibility that this new therapeutic strategy could favourably change the natural history of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and, in particular, that it could lead to a significant reduction in surgery in the short and long term. This study aims to assess the impact of biological versus conventional therapy on surgery-free survival time (from the diagnosis to the first bowel resection) and on the overall risk of surgery in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) who were never with the surgical option. METHODS: This is a retrospective, double-arm study including CD patients treated with either biological or conventional therapy (mesalamine, immunomodulators, antibiotics, or steroids). All CD patients admitted at the GI Unit of the S. Salvatore Hospital (L'Aquila. Italy) and treated with biological therapy since 1998 were included in the biological arm. Data concerning the CD patients receiving a conventional therapy were retrospectively collected from our database. These patients were divided into a pre-1998 and post-1998 group. Our primary outcome was the evaluation of the surgery-free survival since CD diagnosis to the first bowel resection. Surgery-free time and event incidence rates were calculated and compared among all groups, both in the original population and in the propensity-matched population. RESULTS: Two hundred three CD patients (49 biological, 93 conventional post-1998, 61 conventional pre-1998) were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimate shows that patients in the biological arm had a longer surgery-free survival compared to those in the conventional arm (p = 0.03). However, after propensity matching analysis, conducted on 143 patients, no significant difference was found in surgery-free survival (p = 0.3). A sub-group analysis showed shorter surgery-free survival in patients on conventional therapy in the pre-biologic era only (p = 0.02; Hazard Ratio 2.9; CI 1.01-8.54) while no significant difference was found between the biologic and conventional post-biologic groups (p = 0.15; Hazard Ratio 2.1; CI 0.69-6.44). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the introduction of biological therapy has only a slight impact on the eventual occurrence of surgery in CD patients over a long observation period. Nevertheless, biological therapy appears to delay the first intestinal resection.

The connection between diverticulosis and colonic superficial neoplastic lesions in patients who underwent screening colonoscopy.

PURPOSE: If could be a potential pathophysiological connection between colonic diverticula and colonic superficial neoplastic lesions, beyond the shared risk factors, has been a subject of debate in the last years. This study tries to evaluate the association between diverticulosis and colonic neoplastic lesions. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study including asymptomatic patients who underwent a screening colonoscopy (patients with a positive fecal occult blood test under the regional program of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening), surveillance after polypectomy resection, or familiarity (first-degree relatives) between 2020 and 2021 to evaluate the association between diverticula and colonic polyps. A multivariate analysis with multiple logistic regression and odds ratio (OR) to study the independent association between adenomas and adenocarcinomas was performed. RESULTS: One thousand five hundred one patients were included. A statistically significant association between adenomas or CRC alone and colonic diverticula was found (p = 0.045). On a multivariate analysis of demographic (age, gender) and clinical parameters (familiarity for diverticula and adenoma/CRC), only age was significantly associated with the development of colorectal adenomas or cancer (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a statistically significant association between diverticula and colonic adenomas. However, it is impossible to establish a cause-effect relationship due to the intrinsic characteristics of this study design. A study with a prospective design including both patients with diverticulosis and without colonic diverticula aimed at establishing the incidence of adenoma and CRC could help to answer this relevant clinical question, since a potential association could indicate the need for closer endoscopic surveillance.

Is mesalazine treatment effective in the prevention of diverticulitis? A review.

Diverticulitis is the most severe form of Diverticular disease (DD). An effective treatment strategy for its prevention has not yet been defined. This review aimed to provide a viewpoint on the role of mesalazine, also note as 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), in the prevention of diverticulitis. A systematic electronic search of relevant articles was performed using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), open trials, and retrospective studies, published between January 1999 and January 2020, were identified. Twelve eligible studies that analyzed primary or secondary outcomes of diverticulitis were included. The population included patients with symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD), or patients with a history of diverticulitis. All studies compared 5-ASA to placebo, rifaximin, or other treatments. Two studies, including 359 patients, assessed the efficacy of 5-ASA in preventing the first appearance of diverticulitis in patients with SUDD. Of these, one showed that 5-ASA was effective, and one did not. Ten studies, including 2.995 patients, assessed the efficacy of 5-ASA treatment in preventing the recurrence of diverticulitis in patients with a history of diverticulitis. Four studies showed that 5-ASA had a certain degree of efficacy. All four RCTs demonstrated that 5-ASA did not significantly reduce the rate of diverticulitis recurrence. In a retrospective trial, 5-ASA was less effective than rifaximin in preventing diverticulitis recurrence. In an open trial, there was no difference between 5-ASA and probiotic treatment. Overall, there is currently conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of 5-ASA treatment in the prevention of diverticulitis and further RCTs are needed.

Early versus late surgery for ileo-caecal Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is almost inevitable in Crohn's disease. Surgery is usually performed for refractory or complicated disease: no studies appear to have been carried out, so far, to evaluate the potential benefits of performing surgery early in the course of the disease. AIM: To compare the long-term course of Crohn's disease following ileo-caecal resection performed at the time of diagnosis (early surgery) or during the course of the disease (late surgery). Patients and methods Overall 207 patients with ileo-caecal Crohn's disease at their first resection were reviewed: 83 patients underwent surgery at the time of diagnosis (early surgery), while 124 underwent surgery 54.2 months (range 1-438) after diagnosis (late surgery). The mean follow-up after surgery was 147 months (range 12-534). The primary endpoint was clinical recurrence, defined as need for corticosteroids for symptomatic disease in the presence of endoscopic and/or radiologic recurrence. Secondary endpoints were need for immunosuppressants and surgical recurrence. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Kaplan-Meier survival method and Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: Within 10 years after surgery, the cumulative probability of clinical recurrence was significantly lower in the early surgery group (Log Rank test P = 0.01). A trend was observed regarding the need for immunosuppressants (P = 0.05). No difference was observed regarding surgical recurrence. At multivariate analysis, early surgery was the only independent variable associated with a reduced risk of clinical recurrence (Hazard ratio, HR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.92, P = 0.02), but not with need for immunosuppressants and surgical recurrence (HR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.20 to 1.30, P = 0.15; HR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.33 to 1.35, P = 0.25, respectively). CONCLUSION: Early surgery prolongs clinical remission compared to surgery performed during the course of the disease, but the natural history of disease is not modified.

Infliximab in severe ulcerative colitis: short-term results of different infusion regimens and long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Severe ulcerative colitis is a life-threatening disorder, despite i.v. glucocorticoids treatment. Infliximab has been proposed as a safe rescue therapy. AIM: To evaluate short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of infliximab in severe refractory ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Eighty-three patients with severe ulcerative colitis (i.v. glucocorticoids treatment-refractory) were treated with infliximab in 10 Italian Gastroenterology Units. Patients underwent one or more infusions according to the choice of treating physicians. Short-term outcome was colectomy/death 2 months after the first infusion. Long-term outcome was survival free from colectomy. Safety data were recorded. RESULTS: Twelve patients (15%) underwent colectomy within 2 months. One died of Legionella pneumophila infection 12 days after infliximab. Early colectomy rates were higher in patients receiving one infusion (9/26), compared with those receiving two/more infusions (3/57, P = 0.001, OR = 9.53). Seventy patients who survived colectomy and did not experience any fatal complications were followed-up for a median time of 23 months; 58 patients avoided colectomy during the follow-up. Forty-two patients were maintained on immunosuppressive drugs. No clinical features were associated with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab is an effective and relatively safe therapy to avoid colectomy and maintain long-term remission for patients with severe refractory ulcerative colitis. In the short term, two or more infusions seem to be more effective than one single infusion.

Mucosal features and granulocyte-monocyte-apheresis in steroid-dependent/refractory ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Mucosa-infiltrated granulocyte neutrophils are an early characteristic of inflammation and the main histological feature of active ulcerative colitis. Mucosal healing has recently been indicated as an important tool in the evaluation of response to treatment. While several studies have stressed the efficacy of granulocyte-monocyte-apheresis in inducing clinical remission in active ulcerative colitis, few data are available on mucosal features. AIM: Aim of this study was to assess the effects of granulocyte-monocyte-apheresis on clinical and mucosal features in patients with ulcerative colitis, dependent upon or refractory to steroids. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From April 2004 to April 2005, 12 patients (5 females, 7 males, mean age 49 years, range 33-71 years), with mild-moderate ulcerative colitis (six left colitis, six pancolitis) dependent/refractory upon steroids were enrolled. Each patient was treated for a 5-week period with five cycles of granulocyte-monocyte-apheresis. Patients were evaluated at baseline and 1 week after the last apheresis by means of Global Physician Assessment, quality of life features, laboratory tests (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP, full blood count, faecal calprotectine), endoscopy and histology. RESULTS: At week 6 of follow-up, complete mucosal healing was observed in 3 out of 12 patients, partial mucosal healing in 8 patients and no change in 1 patient. Clinical response was complete in 8 out of 12 patients. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that granulocyte-monocyte-apheresis induces an improvement both in clinical and mucosal lesions in steroid-dependent/refractory ulcerative colitis. Of note, the reduction in granulocyte infiltration and the improvement in mucosal lesions are accompanied by a reduction in faecal calprotectine.

Seasonal variations in onset of symptoms in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Seasonal variations in onset of symptoms have been reported in ulcerative colitis but not in Crohn's disease. AIM.: To investigate whether our inflammatory bowel diseases patients presented seasonal variations in onset of symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases established between 1995 and May 2004, and consecutively observed from June 2003 to May 2004, were included in the study. Onset of symptoms (year, season and month) was recorded. Expected onsets with a uniform distribution during the year were calculated and compared to observed onsets. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: chi-square test, odds ratio (95% confidence interval). RESULTS: Overall 425 inflammatory bowel diseases patients were enrolled. Onset of symptoms (year and season) was established in 353/425 patients (83%; 150 Crohn's disease; 203 ulcerative colitis). Onset of symptoms in inflammatory bowel diseases patients as a whole occurred more frequently in spring-summer compared to autumn-winter (odds ratio 1.39; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.87; p<0.03). This variation was observed in Crohn's disease (odds ratio 1.59; 95% confidence interval 1.00-2.51; p<0.05) and a similar trend, although not significant, was observed in ulcerative colitis (odds ratio 1.27; 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.88; p=0.27). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that onset of Crohn's disease symptoms occurred more frequently during spring-summer. A similar trend was observed in ulcerative colitis. Environmental factors, such as associated infections, smoking, use of drugs and seasonal changes in immune function may be responsible for triggering the clinical onset of inflammatory bowel diseases.

Increased risk of breast cancer in first-degree relatives of Crohn's disease patients. An IG-IBD study.

BACKGROUND: Increased rates of colorectal cancer have been reported in patients with ulcerative colitis as well as with Crohn's colitis. This risk could be the result of shared genetic susceptibility and could be co-inherited rather than being just secondary to a long-standing, extensive mucosal inflammation. AIM: To assess the prevalence of all malignancies in first-degree relatives of Crohn's disease patients in order to establish whether any association exists. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 632 outpatients with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease and 632 control subjects were recruited. Information concerning the presence of malignancies was collected in 3,292 first-degree relatives of Crohn's disease patients and in 3,303 first-degree relatives of controls. RESULTS: Two hundred and fourteen (6.5%) subjects were found to be affected by malignancy in the first-degree relatives of Crohn's disease patients and 180 (5.5%) in the first-degree relatives of controls. Forty-seven (7.4%) of Crohn's disease patients had a first-degree relative with IBD, but none of them had cancer. The frequency of extra-intestinal malignancies was higher in first-degree relatives of Crohn's disease patients than in those of controls (p=0.011). Frequency of breast cancer in female relatives of Crohn's disease patients, mainly in mothers, was two-fold higher than that in controls (0.91% versus 0.42%; odds ratio=2.16; 95% confidence interval=1.14-4.08; p=0.015). The presence of breast cancer showed no association with any specific phenotype of disease in Crohn's patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results did not corroborate the hypothesis about a common genetic susceptibility between Crohn's disease and colorectal cancer. An unexpected finding was the more frequent occurrence of extra-digestive malignancies. The prevalence of breast cancer in first-degree relatives of Crohn's disease patients, in particular the mothers, was more than double than in those of controls. This association, if confirmed, would suggest that there may exist common genetic and/or environmental factors for Crohn's disease and breast cancer.

Appropriateness of immunosuppressive drugs in inflammatory bowel diseases assessed by RAND method: Italian Group for IBD (IG-IBD) position statement.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the explosion of biological therapies, the old immunosuppressants continue to play a pivotal role in the management of inflammatory bowel diseases. AIM: To assess the appropriateness of immunosuppressants-azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, cyclosporine A, tacrolimus (FK506), mycophenolate mofetil and thalidomide-in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease by using RAND/University of California Appropriateness Method. METHODS: The RAND method consists of a combination of evidence from the literature and experts' opinions. Appropriateness has been defined to mean that the expected health benefit exceeds the expected negative consequences by a sufficiently wide margin. A panel of 10 experts from the Italian Group for Inflammatory Bowel Disease has rated, in two rounds, on a scale from 1 to 9, the appropriateness of each indication selected by the Promoter Centre, on the basis of their own clinical experience. An indication was considered appropriate if the median of the panelists' ratings fell within the area 7-9, inappropriate in the area 1-3 and uncertain in the area 4-6. A total of 2781 indications were grouped into 13 categories (mild to moderate Crohn's disease; severe Crohn's disease; fistulizing Crohn's disease; steroid-dependant and -resistant Crohn's disease; maintenance of remission induced by medical treatment in Crohn's disease; maintenance of remission induced by surgery in Crohn's disease; mild to moderate ulcerative colitis; severe ulcerative colitis; steroid-dependant and -resistant ulcerative colitis; maintenance of remission induced by medical treatment in ulcerative colitis; extra-intestinal manifestations in inflammatory bowel disease; pregnancy and inflammatory bowel disease; azathioprine-resistant or -intolerant inflammatory bowel disease patients). RESULTS: Of the 2781 scenarios, 212 (7.6%) were rated appropriate, 645 (23.2%) uncertain and 1924 (69.2%) inappropriate. The most relevant results were: in steroid-dependant or -resistant Crohn's disease, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate were defined as appropriate in 25 (86.2%) and 14 (48.3%) of the 29 scenarios respectively; in Crohn's disease, azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine were defined as appropriate combined with Infliximab (bridge therapy); in steroid-dependant or -resistant ulcerative colitis, azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine were defined as appropriate in 45 (77.6%) out of 58 scenarios, while methotrexate was defined appropriate only after previous azathioprine failure; in severe ulcerative colitis, cyclosporine A was defined as appropriate only after previous failure with steroids; in azathioprine-intolerant or -resistant inflammatory bowel disease patients, methotrexate was appropriate in 20 (66.7%) out of 30 scenarios; it is inappropriate to stop azathioprine treatment before conception in the presence of active disease. The use of FK506, mycophenolate mofetil and Thalidomide resulted as inappropriate or uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study show that only azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate are appropriate in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. Cyclosporine A was found to be appropriate only in severe ulcerative colitis after the failure of steroids. FK506, mycophenolate mofetil and Thalidomide resulted as inappropriate but experience with these agents is somewhat limited.

Infliximab in the treatment of Crohn's disease: predictors of response in an Italian multicentric open study.

BACKGROUND: Almost 20% of patients with active Crohn's disease are refractory to conventional therapy. Infliximab is a treatment of proven efficacy in this group of patients and it is not clear which variables predict a good response. AIMS.: To evaluate the role of infliximab looking at the predictors of response in a large series of patients with Crohn's disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred and seventy-three patients with luminal refractory Crohn's disease (Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI)>220-400) (312 patients) or with fistulising disease (190 patients) or both of them (71 patients) were treated with a dose of 5 mg/kg in 12 Italian referral centres. The primary endpoints of the study were clinical response and clinical remission for luminal refractory and fistulising disease. We evaluated at univariable and multivariable analysis the following variables: number of infusions, sex, age at diagnosis, smoking habit, site of disease, previous surgery, extraintestinal manifestations and concomitant therapies, and type of fistulas. RESULTS: Patients with luminal refractory disease: 322 patients (84.1%) had a clinical response and 228 (59.5%) reached clinical remission. Patients with fistulising disease: 187 patients (72%) had a reduction of 50% of the number of fistulas and in 107 (41%) a total closure of fistulas was observed. For luminal disease, single infusion (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28-0.86) and previous surgery (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.93) predicted a worse response for fistulising disease. Other fistulas responded worse than perianal fistulas (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.303-1.097). CONCLUSION: In Crohn's disease infliximab is effective in luminal refractory and in fistulising disease. A single infusion and previous surgery predicted a worse response in luminal disease whereas perianal fistulas predicted a better response than other type of fistulas.

Review article: biological agents in the treatment of Crohn's disease.

The main aim of the management of Crohn's disease is to reduce inflammation. Current approaches with corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents, mesalazine and antibiotics have limited therapeutic benefit for many patients. Considerable progress has been made with regard to our knowledge of the basic mechanisms of the disease, which is associated with immunological imbalance characterized by an excess of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Recent advances in bio-technology have led to the development of many new therapeutic agents, so-called biological agents, which selectively target single key processes involved in the pathogenesis of the disease. A growing number of biological agents are under investigation in both randomized controlled trials and uncontrolled studies. The aim of this review is to provide the clinician with an insight into the randomized controlled trials published in the literature on the use of biological agents in the treatment of Crohn's disease.

Review article: prevention of postsurgical relapse and recurrence in Crohn's disease.

After first resection in Crohn's disease at 1 year 60-80% of patients have endoscopic recurrence, 10-20% have clinical relapse, and 5% have surgical recurrence.1, 2 This review focuses on the actual evidence on the prevention of recurrence and relapse dealing with risk factors and with drugs. Smoking is the only risk factor for Crohn's disease, that has been shown to be related to both endoscopic and surgical recurrence and relapse. Among the different drugs evaluated, some (Mesalamine and Metronidazole) have been shown to be effective, whereas others (immunosuppressive) need to be evaluated in further, new trials.

Two mesalazine regimens in the prevention of the post-operative recurrence of Crohn's disease: a pragmatic, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The role of mesalazine in preventing the clinical recurrence of Crohn's disease after surgery has been shown in a meta-analysis of all published studies. No clear relationship, however, has been shown between dosage and response. AIM: To evaluate whether 4.0 g/day of mesalazine may offer therapeutic advantages over 2.4 g/day in the prevention of both endoscopic and clinical post-operative recurrence of Crohn's disease. METHODS: The study was a double-blind, randomized, multi-centre, prospective, controlled clinical trial. Two hundred and six patients, submitted to first or second intestinal resection for Crohn's disease limited to the terminal ileum, with or without involvement of the caecum/ascending colon, were enrolled. Of these, 101 were randomly allocated to receive 4.0 g/day of mesalazine (Asacol, Giuliani SpA, Milan, Italy) and 105 to receive 2.4 g/day, starting 2 weeks after surgery. The primary outcome was endoscopic recurrence, at 12 months after surgery. Three different degrees of endoscopic recurrence were evaluated (endoscopic scores: > 0, > 1 and > 2). The secondary outcome was clinical recurrence, defined as a Crohn's disease activity index of more than 150 points or an increase in the Crohn's disease activity index of 100 points or more. For statistical analysis, chi-square, Wilcoxon and Cox regression model tests were used, when appropriate. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients in the 4.0 g/day group and 81 patients in the 2.4 g/day group were evaluable by endoscopy. Endoscopic recurrence of > 0 was significantly higher in the 2.4 g/day group than in the 4.0 g/day group (62% vs. 46%; P < 0.04). No difference was observed between the two groups with regard to the other two endoscopic outcomes (> 1 and > 2) or clinical recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: A 4.0 g/day regimen of mesalazine does not offer a clinically significant advantage over a 2.4 g/day regimen in the prevention of post-operative endoscopic and clinical recurrence of Crohn's disease at 1 year of follow-up.

Infliximab in refractory pouchitis complicated by fistulae following ileo-anal pouch for ulcerative colitis.

AIM: To determine the efficacy of infliximab in the treatment of chronic refractory pouchitis complicated by fistulae following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. METHODS: This open study included seven patients (four females, three males) with chronic refractory pouchitis complicated by fistulae. Pouchitis was diagnosed by clinical, endoscopic and histological criteria. The sites of the fistulae were as follows: pouch-bladder in one, vaginal in three, perianal in two, and both vaginal and perianal in one. Extra-intestinal manifestations (erythema nodosum, arthralgia) were present in four patients. Crohn's disease was carefully excluded in all patients after re-evaluation of the history, re-examination of the original proctocolectomy specimen and examination of the proximal small bowel. All patients had been treated with antibiotics and three with steroids. Patients received infliximab, 5 mg/kg, at 0, 2 and 6 weeks. Azathioprine (2.5 mg/kg) was also started for all patients as bridge therapy. Clinical response was classified as complete, partial or no response. Fistulae closure was classified as complete (cessation of fistulae drainage and total closure of all fistulae), partial (a reduction in the number, size, drainage or discomfort associated with fistulae) or no closure. The pouchitis disease activity index and quality of life were also used as outcome measures. RESULTS: Clinically, all patients improved. At the 10-week follow-up, six of the seven patients had a complete clinical response, and five had complete fistulae closure. At the 10-week follow-up, the median pouchitis disease activity index decreased from 12 (baseline) (range, 10-15) to 5 (range, 3-8); the median quality of life decreased from 37 points (range, 33-40) to 14 (range, 9-18). Erythema nodosum and arthralgia showed complete remission soon after the first infusion of infliximab. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results indicate that infliximab may be recommended for the treatment of refractory pouchitis complicated by fistulae following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis.

Rectal and colonic mesalazine concentration in ulcerative colitis: oral vs. oral plus topical treatment.

AIM: To measure mucosal concentrations of mesalazine in ulcerative colitis patients treated with oral mesalazine alone, compared to patients treated with both topical and oral mesalazine. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis were randomized to receive 2.4 g/day of oral mesalazine (11 patients) or 2.4 g/day oral plus 4 g/day of topical mesalazine (11 patients). After 2 weeks of treatment, endoscopic biopsies specimens were taken from the rectum and in descending colon just distal of the splenic flexure and stored to -80 degrees C for later assay (HPLC). Wilcoxon's rank sum test for unpaired data was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Mucosal levels of mesalazine in the rectum were significantly higher in patients who received oral plus topical treatment than in those who had oral treatment alone (52.1 ng/mg, range: 13.6-122.1 vs. 0.2 ng/mg, range: 0.2-9.7, respectively; P < 0.0001). Similarly, in the descending colon, the mucosal concentrations of mesalazine were significantly higher in patients who had oral plus topical treatment than in those receiving oral treatment alone (46.6 ng/mg, range: 6-112.6 vs. 15.9 ng/mg, range: 2.3-42.4, respectively; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Topical treatment of mesalazine significantly increases mucosal concentrations of mesalazine up to the splenic flexure, supporting the rationale to treat left-sided ulcerative colitis with topical formulations of mesalazine.

Efficacy of conventional immunosuppressive drugs in IBD.

The introduction and rapid diffusion of biological agents in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease had led us to believe that the old immunosuppressive drugs were destined to disappear. However, despite a decade of clinical experience in the use of biological agents, the old immunosuppressive drugs continue to play a pivotal role in the management of inflammatory bowel disease. Various factors may account for this change of view. Aim of the present review was to summarise key information currently available regarding the use of immunosuppressive drugs in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

Survival and causes of death in Italian patients with ulcerative colitis. A GISC nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Death rate for patients with ulcerative colitis has changed over last few decades. Recent studies indicate that cumulative long-term mortality is comparable to that in general population, and that deaths may depend on causes not strictly related to colonic disease. AIM: To evaluate overall and cause-specific mortality rate in a large group of Italian patients with ulcerative colitis. METHODS: A total of 2,066 ulcerative colitis patients aged >18 years consecutively diagnosed in twenty Italian Gastroenterology Units between 1964 and 1995 were followed-up from diagnosis until 1997. Standardised Mortality Ratios and Relative Survival Ratios were calculated. RESULTS: Overall mortality of patients with ulcerative colitis was comparable to that in general population with 93 deaths observed versus 92.1 expected (standardises mortality ratio, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-1.2). Significantly higher mortality was observed in patients under 30 years of age at diagnosis (standardised mortality ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-4.9), and in those diagnosed before 1974 (standardised mortality ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-5.7). Proctocolitis and complications from surgery were mentioned in 11 and 5 certificates, respectively. A significant excess of deaths was observed for colorectal cancer (colon: standardised mortality ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-6.9; rectum: standardised mortality ratio, 4.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-11.3), and haemolymphopoietic neoplasms (standardised mortality ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-6.1), in particular multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. A significant deficit of deaths was observed for cancer of the respiratory system (standardised mortality ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-1.0). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that, also in Italy, mortality of patients with ulcerative colitis is comparable to that in general population. Only 12% of deaths were due to ulcerative colitis itself, whereas 10% of deaths were attributed to colorectal cancer. Deaths from colorectal cancer occurred, on average, 9 years after diagnosis of ulcerative colitis, suggesting that the risk of cancer is not limited to patients with long-standing colitis. As to mortality for causes unrelated to colitis, there was an excess of deaths due to malignancies of the haemolymphopoietic system.

Management of refractory fistulizing pouchitis with infliximab.

UNLABELLED: This study provides the long-term follow-up data on the efficacy of infliximab in the treatment of chronic refractory pouchitis complicated by fistulae following ileo-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: Seven patients (4 F, 3 M) with chronic refractory pouchitis complicated by fistulae were included in an open study. Pouchitis was diagnosed by clinical plus endoscopical and histological criteria. Fistulae were: pouch-bladder in 1, vaginal in 3, perianal in 2, both vaginal and perianal in 1 patient. Extraintestinal manifestations were present in 4 patients. All the patients were refractory to antibiotics (3 patients also to steroids). Crohn's disease was carefully excluded in all patients after re-evaluation of the history, re-examination of the original proctocolectomy specimen, examination of the proximal small bowel. Patients received Infliximab 5 mg/kg at 0, 2 and 6 weeks. Azathioprine (2.5 mg/kg) was also started for all patients as bridge therapy. Clinical response was classified as complete, partial, and no response. Fistulae closure was classified as complete, partial, and no closure. The pouchitis disease activity index (PDAI) and quality of life (QoL) were also used as outcome measures. RESULTS: Clinically, all patients improved. At 10-week follow-up, 6 out of 7 patients had a complete clinical response, and 5 out of 7 patients had complete fistulae closure. At 10- week follow-up, median PDAI dropped from 12 (baseline) (range, 10-15) to 5 (range, 3-8); median QoL decreased from 37 (range, 33-40) to 14 points (range, 9-18), respectively. Extraintestinal manifestations (erythema nodosum and arthralgiae) completely remitted soon after the first infusion of infliximab. Clinical response and fistulae closure were maintained in the long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These results seem indicate that infliximab plus azathioprine may be recommended for the treatment of refractory pouchitis complicated by fistulae following IPAA for UC.