A text-mining approach to study the real-world effectiveness and potentially fatal immune-related adverse events of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in older patients with stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to investigate the impact of age on the effectiveness and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of programmed death-(ligand)1 [PD-(L)1] inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using a novel text-mining technique. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with stage III/IV NSCLC treated with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab and durvalumab) at Leiden University Medical Centre and Haga Teaching hospital, (both in The Netherlands) from September 2016 to May 2021. All the relevant data was extracted from the structured and unstructured fields of the Electronic Health Records using a novel text-mining tool. Effectiveness [progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)] and safety (the incidence of nine potentially fatal irAEs and systemic corticosteroid requirement) outcomes were compared across age subgroups (young: < 65 years, Middle-aged: 65-74 years, and old: ≥ 75 years) after adjustment for confounding. RESULTS: Of 689 patients, 310 patients (45.0%) were < 65 years, 275 patients (39.9%) were aged between 65 and 74 years, and 104 patients (15.1%) were ≥ 75 years. There was no significant difference between younger and older patients regarding PFS (median PFS 12, 8, 13 months respectively; Hazard ratio (HR)middle-aged = 1.14, 95% CI 0.92-1.41; HRold = 1.10, 95% CI 0.78-1.42). This was also the case for OS (median OS 19, 14, 18 months respectively; HRmiddle-aged = 1.22, 95% CI 0.96-1.53; HRold = 1.10, 95% CI 0.79-1.52). Safety analysis demonstrated a higher incidence of pneumonitis among patients aged 65-74. When all the investigated irAEs were pooled, there was no statistically significant difference found between age and the incidence of potentially fatal irAEs. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PD-(L)1 inhibitors is not associated with age related decrease of PFS and OS, nor with increased incidence of serious irAEs compared to younger patients receiving these treatments. Chronological age must therefore not be used as a predictor for the effectiveness or safety of ICIs.

Women on diuretics have a higher risk of hospital admission because of hyponatremia than men.

PURPOSE: Recent studies suggest that women are more susceptible to diuretic-induced hyponatremia resulting in hospital admission than men. The aim of this study was to confirm whether these sex differences in hyponatremia-related hospital admissions in diuretic users remain after adjusting for several confounding variables such as age, dose, and concurrent medication. METHODS: In a case-control design nested in diuretic users, cases of hyponatremia associated hospital admissions between 2005 and 2017 were identified from the PHARMO Data Network. Cases were 1:10 matched to diuretic users as controls. Odds ratios (OR) with 95%CIs were calculated for women versus men and adjusted for potential confounders (age, number of diuretics, other hyponatremia-inducing drugs, chronic disease score) using unconditional logistic regression analysis. A subgroup analysis was performed for specific diuretic groups (thiazides, loop diuretics and aldosterone antagonists). RESULTS: Women had a statistically significantly higher risk of a hospital admission associated with hyponatremia than men while using diuretics (OR 1.86, 95%CI 1.64-2.11). Adjusting for the potential confounders resulted in an increased risk for women compared to men (ORadj 2.65, 95% CI 2.31-3.04). This higher risk in women was also seen in the three subgroup analyses after adjustment. CONCLUSION: Our findings show a higher risk of hyponatremia-related hospital admission in women than men while using diuretics. Further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanism of this sex difference to be able to provide sex-specific recommendations.

Hypokalaemia in patients treated with intravenous flucloxacillin: Incidence and risk factors.

INTRODUCTION: Hypokalaemia is a potentially life-threatening adverse event of flucloxacillin with unknown incidence. The risk of flucloxacillin-induced hypokalaemia has recently been suggested to be increased among females compared to males. The aim of this study is to describe the incidence and to determine the influence of sex and other risk factors on flucloxacillin-induced hypokalaemia. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre cohort study was performed. Patients treated with intravenous flucloxacillin for >24 hours between January 2017 and October 2020, a baseline potassium level of ≥3.5 mmol/L and potassium measurement during treatment were included. The primary endpoint was incidence of hypokalaemia defined as the percentage of patients with a potassium measurement <3.5 mmol/L during flucloxacillin treatment. Logistic regression modelling was used to establish risk factors for hypokalaemia. RESULTS: A total of 835 patients were included, 58.2% male and median age 71.0 years (interquartile range 61.0-81.0). The incidence of hypokalaemia was 23.7% (28.4% in females vs 20.4% in males). A dose-dependent relation between sex and the incidence of hypokalaemia was found. The risk of hypokalaemia was 4.41 (95% confidence interval 1.47-13.24) times higher in females compared to males when receiving a flucloxacillin dose of >8 g/24 h. No sex differences were found for lower daily doses. Other risk factors for hypokalaemia were older age, concomitant antibiotic use, lower bodyweight, lower baseline plasma potassium concentration and longer treatment duration. CONCLUSION: Hypokalaemia is a frequent complication in patients treated with intravenous flucloxacillin. Females receiving >8 g intravenous flucloxacillin per day are more prone to develop hypokalaemia compared to males.

Women are started on a lower daily dose of metoprolol than men irrespective of dose recommendations: A potential source of confounding by contraindication in pharmacoepidemiology.

PURPOSE: Current guidelines have no sex-specific dosage advice for metoprolol. To evaluate whether women and men are prescribed the same dose a cohort analysis was performed in the population-based Rotterdam Study (RS). Results were replicated in the Integrated Primary Care Information (IPCI) database of automated general practice data. METHODS: The mean daily starting doses of metoprolol in both sexes were compared with independent-samples t-tests and a linear regression analysis was used to adjust in the RS for co-variables, notably, cardiovascular comorbidity, migraine, age, SBP, DBP, BMI, socioeconomic status, use of other antihypertensive drugs, smoking, and alcohol. In the IPCI-database, adjustment was for age only. RESULTS: The mean daily starting dose was statistically significantly lower in women than in men in both the RS and IPCI database, with a mean difference of 4.8 mg (95%CI -7.8, -1.8) and 4.6 mg (95%CI -5.3,-4.0), respectively. Statistical significance remained after adjustment in both databases. CONCLUSIONS: Women received lower starting doses of metoprolol than men in two independent data collections despite non-sex specific cardiovascular guideline recommendations. This example of real-life pharmacotherapy can lead to a form of confounding by contraindication in pharmacoepidemiology.

Use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Bone Mineral Density Change: A Population-Based Longitudinal Study in Middle-Aged and Elderly Individuals.

BACKGROUND: Longitudinal studies showed conflicting results regarding the association between use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and bone mineral density (BMD). Therefore, we investigate the association between-duration of-SSRI use and BMD, and change in BMD ([INCREMENT]BMD). METHODS: Data from the population-based Rotterdam Study cohort (1991-2008) were used. In total, 4915 men and 5831 postmenopausal women, aged 45 years and older, were included, having measurement visits at 4- to 5-year intervals. Multivariable linear mixed models were applied to examine the association between SSRI use, based on pharmacy records, duration of SSRI use, and repeated measures of BMD, and changes in BMD, compared with nonuse. Femoral neck BMD (grams per centimeters squared) was measured at 4 visits, comprising 19,861 BMD measurements. Three [INCREMENT]BMD periods were examined, comprising 7897 [INCREMENT]BMD values. Change in BMD was expressed in the annual percentage [INCREMENT]BMD between 2 consecutive visits. RESULTS: In men and women, we observed no association between SSRI and BMD when compared with nonuse (women: mean difference, 0.007 g/cm; 95% confidence interval, -0.002 to 0.017; P = 0.123). We did not find an association between duration of SSRI use and [INCREMENT]BMD (women: annual percentage change, -0.081; 95% confidence interval, -0.196 to 0.033; P = 0.164). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, use of SSRIs is not associated with BMD or [INCREMENT]BMD, after taking duration of treatment into account, in middle-aged and elderly individuals. Therefore, our results question previously raised concerns on the adverse effects of SSRIs on BMD.

Antidepressant Use Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Developing Microbleeds.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Serotonin-specific antidepressants may increase the risk of adverse bleeding events. In a previous cross-sectional study, we did not observe an association between antidepressant use and presence of subclinical cerebral bleedings. In this study, we investigated longitudinally whether antidepressant use is associated with an increased risk of new subclinical cerebral microbleeds. METHODS: In total, 2559 participants aged ≥45 years of the population-based Rotterdam Study, all without microbleeds at baseline, underwent baseline and repeat brain magnetic resonance imaging between 2005 and 2013 (mean time interval, 3.9 years; SD, 0.5) to determine the incidence of microbleeds. Antidepressant use (yes versus no) was assessed between baseline and follow-up scan. In additional analyses, antidepressants were classified as low, intermediate, or high affinity for the serotonin transporter, and alternatively as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. We used multivariable logistic regression models to investigate the association of antidepressants with incident microbleeds. RESULTS: Antidepressant use was associated with a higher cerebral microbleed incidence (odds ratio, 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-3.76) than nonuse. When stratified by affinity for the serotonin transporter, intermediate serotonin affinity antidepressant use was associated with an increased risk of developing microbleeds (odds ratio, 3.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-6.17). Finally, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use were both associated with increased microbleed incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant use was associated with an increased risk of developing microbleeds. Our results may support findings from previous clinical studies about increased intracranial and extracranial bleeding risk in antidepressant users.

Use of antidepressants and the risk of myocardial infarction in middle-aged and older adults: a matched case-control study.

PURPOSE: Antidepressants, specifically selective serotonin reuptake-inhibiting antidepressants (SSRIs), decrease platelet activation and aggregation in in vitro experiments and could therefore decrease the risk of myocardial infarction (MI). However, prior studies addressing this hypothesis showed contradictory results. Our purpose was to investigate the association between the use of any antidepressant drug and incident MI among middle-aged and older adults. METHODS: We embedded a case-control study in the prospective Rotterdam Study (1991-2011). Controls were matched to MI cases based on sex and age at the same calendar date, and confounding factors were taken into account as time-varying covariates. The relative risk of MI during current and past use of an antidepressant was analyzed with conditional logistic regression with never use of antidepressant drugs as the reference category. RESULTS: A total of 744 out of a cohort of 9499 study participants developed MI during follow-up. After statistical adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors and depression, current use of any antidepressant was associated with a lower risk of MI (odds ratio (OR), 0.71; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.51-0.98) compared with never use of any antidepressant. SSRI use showed the lowest relative risk (OR, 0.65; 95 % CI, 0.41-1.02), albeit marginally not statistically significant. Past use of any of the antidepressant classes was not associated with a lower risk of MI. CONCLUSIONS: Current use of antidepressants was associated with a lower risk of MI. Of the different classes, the use of SSRIs showed the lowest risk of MI, and therefore confirming the research hypothesis.

The rs13064411 polymorphism in the WDR52 gene, associated with PCSK9 levels, modifies statin-induced changes in serum total and LDL cholesterol levels.

OBJECTIVE: Recently, the minor allele of the rs13064411A>G polymorphism in the WD repeat domain 52 (WDR52) gene was associated with increased statin-induced proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) levels and with LDL cholesterol response to statins. PCSK9 promotes LDL receptor degradation, leading to increased serum LDL cholesterol. We investigated whether the polymorphism was associated with cholesterol response to statins. METHODS: We identified 1105 current, 322 past, and 4831 never statin users during follow-up in the prospective population-based Rotterdam Study. The mean delta total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol levels between current and no current statin users with the same number of minor alleles were analyzed using random-effect repeated measurements. We adjusted for age, sex, number of cholesterol measurements, and follow-up time. RESULTS: Compared with no users with the same genotype, current statin users carrying a minor allele showed a statistically significantly lower delta total and LDL cholesterol compared with reference homozygous major allele carriers [total: Δ=0.551 mmol/l (AG+GG) vs. Δ=0.732 mmol/l (AA), Pinteraction: 5.2×10(-7); LDL: Δ=0.566 mmol/l (AG+GG) vs. Δ=0.720 mmol/l (AA), Pinteraction: 1.8×10(-5)]. The effect was stronger in women (Pinteraction: 2.0×10(-5) for LDL cholesterol, 8.0×10(-6) for total cholesterol) and in high-dose users (defined daily doses>1.00) (Pinteraction: 7.0×10(-5) for LDL cholesterol, Pinteraction: 0.081 for total cholesterol). The polymorphism was not associated with HDL cholesterol in current statin users, or with total, LDL and HDL cholesterol in never statin users. CONCLUSION: The minor G allele of the rs13064411 polymorphism, associated with statin-induced PCSK9-levels, was associated with a decreased LDL-lowering and total cholesterol-lowering response to statins.

Assessing Prolongation of the Heart Rate Corrected QT Interval in Users of Tricyclic Antidepressants: Advice to Use Fridericia Rather Than Bazett's Correction.

A prolonged heart rate corrected QT interval (QTc) increases the risk of sudden cardiac death. Some methods of heart rate correction (notably Bazett) overestimate QTc in people with high heart rates. Studies suggest that tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) can prolong the QTc and increase heart rate. Therefore, we aimed to study whether TCA-induced QTc prolongation is a false-positive observation due to overestimation at high heart rates. For this, we included 12,734 participants from the prospective population-based Rotterdam Study, with a total of 27,068 electrocardiograms (ECGs), of which, 331 during TCA use. Associations between use of TCAs, QTc, and heart rate were studied with linear repeated measurement analyses. QT was corrected for heart rate according to Bazett (QTcBazett), Fridericia (QTcFridericia), or a correction based on regression coefficients obtained from the Rotterdam Study data (QTcStatistical). On ECGs recorded during TCA use, QTcBazett was 6.5 milliseconds (95% confidence interval, 4.0-9.0) longer, and heart rate was 5.8 beats per minute (95% confidence interval, 4.7-6.9) faster than during nonuse. QTcFridericia and QTcStatistical were not statistically significantly longer during TCA use than during nonuse. Furthermore, QTcBazett was similar for ECGs recorded during TCA use and nonuse after statistical adjustment for heart rate. According to our results, TCA use does not seem to be associated with QTc prolongation. Therefore, the current advice of regulatory authorities to restrict the use of these drugs and to do regular checkups of the QTc may need to be revised. Other formulas, like Fridericia's, might be preferred.

Use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and the heart rate corrected QT interval in a real-life setting: the population-based Rotterdam Study.

AIMS: Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs), specifically citalopram and escitalopram, are thought to cause QTc prolongation, although studies have shown contradictory results. Nevertheless, a maximum citalopram dosage of 20 mg in high risk patients (e.g. >60 years of age) is recommended. We aimed to investigate the association between use of (individual) SSRIs and QTc in a population-based study in older adults. METHODS: This study, which was part of the prospective Rotterdam Study (period 1991-2012), included participants with up to five electrocardiograms (ECGs). We used linear mixed models to compare QTc F (QT corrected according to Fridericia) measured during use of individual SSRIs with QTc F measured during non-use of any antidepressant. For citalopram, analyses were additionally restricted to a maximum dosage of 20 mg in participants aged 60 years and older. RESULTS: We included 12 589 participants with a total of 26 620 ECGs of which 436 ECGs were made during SSRI use. The mean QTc F was similar during use of any drugs from the SSRI class and during non-use. After stratifying to individual SSRIs, ECGs recorded during use of citalopram had the longest QTc compared with ECGs recorded during non-use (+12.8 ms, 90% CI 7.5, 18.2). This result remained similar in the analysis comprising participants aged 60 years and older with a maximum prescribed daily dosage of 20 mg citalopram. CONCLUSIONS: Although no SSRI class effect was observed, use of citalopram was associated with a longer QTc F, even after considering the recommended restrictions. Other SSRIs may not give a clinically relevant QTc F prolongation.

Prescription and indication trends of antidepressant drugs in the Netherlands between 1996 and 2012: a dynamic population-based study.

PURPOSE: Antidepressant drug use increases worldwide. It is pivotal to closely monitor the use of antidepressants and to determine in what subpopulations the rise is most substantial. In a Dutch primary care database, we aimed to investigate the (sex- and age-specific) prevalence and incidence of antidepressant prescription and to monitor the indication of incident prescriptions over a 17-year period (1996-2012). METHODS: This study, embedded in the Integrated Primary Care Information database, included all patients aged 10 years or older. Per calendar year, prevalence and incidence of antidepressant drug prescription were calculated by drug class (tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and others), sex, and age. The indication of incident prescriptions (e.g., depression, anxiety, sleep disorders, and neuropathic pain) was determined based on the International Classification of Primary Care codes. RESULTS: In total, 1.49 million patients were included. For all antidepressants together, the prevalence increased over time. However, incident prescription of specific SSRIs decreased from 2000 onward. During the study period, incidence and prevalence were higher in older and female patients. The increase in prevalence and the decrease in incidence were more pronounced in females than that in males. Furthermore, antidepressants were increasingly prescribed for indications such as neuropathic pain and sleep disorders. CONCLUSIONS: In Dutch primary care, prevalent prescription of antidepressants continued to increase, but incident prescription of particular SSRIs decreased from 2000 onward. In later years, antidepressants were less frequently prescribed for depression-related indications in incident users.

Inhibition of serotonin reuptake by antidepressants and cerebral microbleeds in the general population.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Serotonin reuptake inhibiting antidepressants decrease platelet aggregation. This may cause an increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. However, the risk of subclinical microbleeds, which are highly prevalent in middle-aged and elderly people, is unknown. We studied whether serotonin reuptake inhibiting antidepressants increase the frequency of cerebral microbleeds and secondarily whether they lower the presence of ischemic vascular damage. METHODS: Within the population-based Rotterdam Study, information on antidepressant use was obtained from continuously monitored pharmacy records. Brain MRI was available in 4945 participants (55% women, mean age 64 years) between 2005 and 2011. We categorized antidepressants based on affinity for the serotonin transporter: high, intermediate, or low. Microbleeds (presence and location) and ischemic lesions (lacunes, white matter lesions) were rated on MRI. Logistic and linear regression, adjusted for age, sex, depressive symptoms, and cardiovascular risk were used to study the association of antidepressants with microbleeds and ischemic vascular lesions. RESULTS: Antidepressant use with strong serotonin reuptake inhibition was not associated with microbleed presence (odds ratio compared with nonuse, 1.03; confidence interval, 0.75-1.39) irrespective of microbleed location in the brain. Exclusion of antithrombotic users or persons with cortical infarcts did not change our results. Furthermore, serotonin reuptake inhibition was not related to ischemic vascular brain damage. CONCLUSIONS: In the general population, use of serotonin reuptake inhibiting antidepressants is not related to presence of cerebral microbleeds. This strengthens the idea that the platelet inhibitor effects of antidepressant drugs with affinity for serotonin are minimal and further supports the safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for nongastrointestinal bleedings.

The SLCO1B1 c.521T>C polymorphism is associated with dose decrease or switching during statin therapy in the Rotterdam Study.

OBJECTIVE: The SLCO1B1 c.521T>C polymorphism is associated with statin plasma levels and simvastatin-induced adverse drug reactions. We studied whether the c.521T>C polymorphism is associated with dose decreases or switches to other cholesterol-lowering drugs during simvastatin and atorvastatin therapy, because these events are indicators of adverse drug reactions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 1939 incident simvastatin and atorvastatin users in the Rotterdam Study, a population-based cohort study. Associations were studied using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Meta-analysis was performed with data from the Utrecht Cardiovascular Pharmacogenetics study. RESULTS: Simvastatin users with the c.521 CC genotype had a significantly higher risk of a dose decrease or switch than users with the TT genotype [hazard ratio (HR) 1.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-2.88]. Female sex, age below 70 years, and low starting dose were risk factors. In atorvastatin users with starting dose of more than 20 mg, the risk of a dose decrease or switch was higher in users carrying a C allele than in users with the TT genotype (HR 3.26, 95% CI 1.47-7.25). In the meta-analysis the association in simvastatin users remained, with a significantly higher risk of a dose decrease or switch in simvastatin users with two minor alleles (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.05-2.73). For atorvastatin users no significant association was found. CONCLUSION: In simvastatin users in the Rotterdam Study, we demonstrated an association between the c.521T>C polymorphism and dose decrease or switching, as indicators of adverse drug reactions, and provided risk factors for this association. For atorvastatin, an association was found in users with a starting dose of more than 20 mg.

Making Drug Approval Decisions in the Face of Uncertainty: Cumulative Evidence versus Value of Information.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the criticality and complexity of decision making for novel treatment approval and further research. Our study aims to assess potential decision-making methodologies, an evaluation vital for refining future public health crisis responses. METHODS: We compared 4 decision-making approaches to drug approval and research: the Food and Drug Administration's policy decisions, cumulative meta-analysis, a prospective value-of-information (VOI) approach (using information available at the time of decision), and a reference standard (retrospective VOI analysis using information available in hindsight). Possible decisions were to reject, accept, provide emergency use authorization, or allow access to new therapies only in research settings. We used monoclonal antibodies provided to hospitalized COVID-19 patients as a case study, examining the evidence from September 2020 to December 2021 and focusing on each method's capacity to optimize health outcomes and resource allocation. RESULTS: Our findings indicate a notable discrepancy between policy decisions and the reference standard retrospective VOI approach with expected losses up to $269 billion USD, suggesting suboptimal resource use during the wait for emergency use authorization. Relying solely on cumulative meta-analysis for decision making results in the largest expected loss, while the policy approach showed a loss up to $16 billion and the prospective VOI approach presented the least loss (up to $2 billion). CONCLUSION: Our research suggests that incorporating VOI analysis may be particularly useful for research prioritization and treatment implementation decisions during pandemics. While the prospective VOI approach was favored in this case study, further studies should validate the ideal decision-making method across various contexts. This study's findings not only enhance our understanding of decision-making strategies during a health crisis but also provide a potential framework for future pandemic responses. HIGHLIGHTS: This study reviews discrepancies between a reference standard (retrospective VOI, using hindsight information) and 3 conceivable real-time approaches to research-treatment decisions during a pandemic, suggesting suboptimal use of resources.Of all prospective decision-making approaches considered, VOI closely mirrored the reference standard, yielding the least expected value loss across our study timeline.This study illustrates the possible benefit of VOI results and the need for evidence accumulation accompanied by modeling in health technology assessment for emerging therapies.

Thiazide-associated hyponatremia: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Hyponatremia is one of the most common adverse reactions to thiazide diuretics. In the present study, we analyzed differences in thiazide-associated hyponatremia between men and women and between different categories of age, body mass index (BMI), daily thiazide dose, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 13,325 individuals 45 years and older living in a suburb of Rotterdam, as part of the Rotterdam Study. PREDICTOR: Exposure to thiazide diuretics. OUTCOMES: The association between thiazide exposure and hyponatremia (defined as sodium level ≤135 mmol/L; mild hyponatremia, 130-≤135 mmol/L; moderate, >125-<130 mmol/L; and severe, ≤125 mmol/L) was studied in a period covering more than 10 years using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. RESULTS: 718 participants used thiazides at baseline, and 2,738 participants started on thiazide therapy during follow-up. 522 participants developed hyponatremia, of whom 32.4% were exposed to thiazide diuretics at the time of hyponatremia. Thiazide exposure was associated with an almost 5 times higher risk of hyponatremia than no exposure (HR, 4.95; 95% CI, 4.12-5.96). The risk of mild hyponatremia was more than 4.5 times higher in thiazide-exposed individuals; risks of moderate and severe hyponatremia were both 8 times higher in individuals exposed to thiazides. Age and BMI (but not sex [P = 0.8] or estimated glomerular filtration rate [P = 0.2]) significantly modified this risk of thiazide-associated hyponatremia (P < 0.05). LIMITATIONS: Some cases of severe hyponatremia may have been missed if patients were admitted to the hospital without assessment of serum sodium in the general practitioner's laboratory. Nonproportionality of hazards in the first period was explained as possible "depletion of susceptibles" in this closed cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Thiazide use is associated with a substantially increased risk of hyponatremia. Age and BMI significantly influenced the thiazide-associated risk of hyponatremia.

Association between genetic variation in the ABCB1 gene and switching, discontinuation, and dosage of antidepressant therapy: results from the Rotterdam Study.

The objective of this study was to investigate whether polymorphisms in the ABCB1 gene were associated with switching, with discontinuation of antidepressants within 45 days after starting therapy, and/or with dose change in a large prospective population-based cohort study. Between April 1, 1991, and December 31, 2007, there were 1257 incident users of antidepressants with known ABCB1 genotypes (1236C>T, 2677G>T/A, 3435C>T) in the population-based Rotterdam Study. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the genotype and haplotype effect on the risk of switching and discontinuation. In addition, the association between the haplotypes and the prescribed drug dosage was assessed per drug class. The separate polymorphisms in the ABCB1 gene were associated with increased risks of switching and discontinuation but reached only statistical significance for the association between the 3435C>T polymorphism and switching. In a model adjusted for age and sex, homozygous carriers of the T-T-T haplotype had an increased risk of switching (odds ratio, 4.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-13.7; P = 0.017) and discontinuation (odds ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-2.22; P = 0.063). Explained variance was 10.4% for switching and 2.5% for discontinuation. In contrast, no association was observed between the T-T-T haplotype and the prescribed dosage. In summary, this study showed that genetic variation in the ABCB1 gene might play a role in the risk of switching and discontinuation of antidepressant therapy but the clinical relevance is limited.

Exposure to phototoxic NSAIDs and quinolones is associated with an increased risk of melanoma.

PURPOSE: Ultraviolet radiation exposure is the most important exogenous risk factor for cutaneous malignancies. It is possible that phototoxic drugs promote the development of cutaneous melanoma (CM) by intensifying the effect of ultraviolet light on the skin. We investigated the association between the use of common systemic phototoxic drugs and development of CM. METHODS: This study was a case-control study in a Dutch population-based cohort. The drug dispensing data was obtained from PHARMO, a Dutch drug dispensing and hospital admissions registry, and linked to PALGA, the nationwide pathology network of the Netherlands. The cases were patients diagnosed with pathologically confirmed primary CM between 1991 and 2004. Controls were sampled from the PHARMO population. Exposure to systemic phototoxic drugs was measured and included antimicrobial agents, diuretics, antipsychotic drugs, antidiabetic drugs, cardiac drugs, antimalarials and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). A multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to study the association between exposure to phototoxic drugs and CM. RESULTS: The study population included 1,318 cases and 6,786 controls. Any phototoxic drug during the study period was dispensed for 46 % of the cases and 43 % of the controls (p = 0.012). The use of quinolones [odds ratio (OR) 1.33, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.76] and propionic acid derivative NSAIDs (OR 1.33, 95 % CI 1.14-1.54) had a positive association with CM. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the use of phototoxic drugs is associated with an increased risk of developing CM. Even a short-term use of phototoxic quinolones and propionic acid derivative NSAIDs may increase the risk for CM. Patient education to promote sun-protective behaviour is essential to avoid immediate adverse effects and possible long-term effects of phototoxic drugs.

Medication optimization in older adults with advanced cancer and a limited life expectancy: A prospective observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Polypharmacy is common in older adults with cancer and is associated with drug related problems (DRPs) and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM). We introduced a medication optimization care pathway for older adults with advanced cancer and a limited life expectancy and studied the prevalence of DRPs and PIMs as well as the adherence to medication-related recommendations and the patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A medication review was performed in patients aged ≥65 years with polypharmacy and a life expectancy of <24 months. Recommendations on adjustments of medication were discussed in a multidisciplinary team including a pharmacist, an oncologist, and a geriatrician. Implementation of the recommendations was left to the discretion of the oncologist. Four weeks after the implementation, the patient filled a questionnaire to assess satisfaction. RESULTS: One hundred twenty patients were included. The mean age was 75 years and 39% were female. A mean of 12 medications was used. The median number of DRP was 6.0 per patient and median number of PIMs was 3.0 per patient. Overtreatment accounted for 26% of DRP and the most frequently involved drug classes were antihypertensive medication (22%), non-opioid analgesics (22%), and antilipemics (12%). The multidisciplinary team accepted 78% of the recommendations of the pharmacist and the oncologist implemented 54% of the recommendations. Overall, patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the intervention. DISCUSSION: DRPs and PIMs are highly prevalent in this population and can be reduced by a multidisciplinary medication optimization intervention. Patients appreciate the medication optimization intervention and are satisfied with the intervention.

Rapid Response to Remdesivir in Hospitalised COVID-19 Patients: A Propensity Score Weighted Multicentre Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Remdesivir is a registered treatment for hospitalised patients with COVID-19 that has moderate clinical effectiveness. Anecdotally, some patients' respiratory insufficiency seemed to recover particularly rapidly after initiation of remdesivir. In this study, we investigated if this rapid improvement was caused by remdesivir, and which patient characteristics might predict a rapid clinical improvement in response to remdesivir. METHODS: This was a multicentre observational cohort study of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 who required supplemental oxygen and were treated with dexamethasone. Rapid clinical improvement in response to treatment was defined by a reduction of at least 1 L of supplemental oxygen per minute or discharge from the hospital within 72 h after admission. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted logistic regression modelling was used to assess the association between remdesivir and rapid clinical improvement. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital mortality, ICU admission rate and hospitalisation duration. RESULTS: Of 871 patients included, 445 were treated with remdesivir. There was no influence of remdesivir on the occurrence of rapid clinical improvement (62% vs 61% OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.79-1.40; p = 0.76). The in-hospital mortality was lower (14.7% vs 19.8% OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.48-1.02; p = 0.06) for the remdesivir-treated patients. Rapid clinical improvement occurred more often in patients with low C-reactive protein (≤ 75 mg/L) and short duration of symptoms prior to hospitalisation (< 7 days) (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.07-7.56). CONCLUSION: Remdesivir generally does not increase the incidence of rapid clinical improvement in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, but it might have an effect in patients with short duration of symptoms and limited signs of systemic inflammation.