Torc1/Torc2 inhibitor, Palomid 529, enhances radiation response modulating CRM1-mediated survivin function and delaying DNA repair in prostate cancer models.

BACKGROUND: P529, a Torc1/Torc2 inhibitor, has demonstrated its potential as a radiosensitizer. However the molecular mechanisms underlying this phenomenon still need to be elucidated. Aim of this study is to dissect molecular mechanisms regulating the radiosensitizing properties of P529 in a wide panel of prostate cancer models. METHODS: Six tumor cell lines and xenograft models were used for in vitro and in vivo studies. Clonogenic survival, apoptotic, autophagic, and senescence assays were used to examine the effects of ionizing radiation (IR) alone and in combination with P529. CRM1, survivin, GSK-3ß, and DNA-DSBs expression and modulation, upon P529 and RT, were monitored by western blot. In vivo treatment response upon P529, irradiation or combination of P529 with IR was monitored by tumor volume, time to progression (TTP), and immunohistochemical analysis. RESULTS: P529 treatment induced significantly more apoptosis and DNA double-strand break (DSB) when combined with radiotherapy resulting in cellular radiosensitization and growth delay of irradiated tumor xenografts. Upon P529 treatment Rad51, DNA-PKcs, and Ku70 protein expression was downregulated, indicating delayed DNA double-strand damage repair. The radiosensitizing properties of P529 were partially linked to GSK-3ß, cyclin-D1, and c-myc modulation with associated inhibition of CRM1-mediated nuclear export of survivin. Importantly, autophagy and tumor senescence were involved in the enhanced P529 radioresponse. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired DNA double-strand damage repair, inhibition of CRM1-mediated nuclear export of survivin, modulation of cyclin-D1 and c-myc with associated pro-apoptotic and autophagic and senescent events explain the radiosensitizing properties of P529 in preclinical models of prostate cancer.

Intravesical instillations with polydeoxyribonucleotides reduce symptoms of radiation-induced cystitis in patients treated with radiotherapy for pelvic cancer: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Chronic radiation cystitis (CRC) is a serious complication that can arise in patients with pelvic malignancies treated with radiotherapy. Polydeoxyribonucleotides (PDRNs) are known to reduce inflammation and improve tissue perfusion and angiogenesis. In this manuscript, we describe our observational experience regarding intravesical instillation of PDRNs in improving symptoms of CRC in subjects unresponsiveness to conventional medical therapy. METHODS: Eight patients with persistent and/or worsening CRC symptoms, despite conventional therapy, received biweekly intravesical instillation of PDRNs for two consecutive months. Symptoms were scored according to the Late Effects of Normal Tissues-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (LENT-SOMA) scale, before, at the end, and after 4 months following the PDRNs treatment. RESULTS: Four months after instillations, a significant improvement in the subjective perception of CRC symptoms was experienced by participants. The mean LENT-SOMA score was reduced from 1.16+0.26 before to 0.34+0.035 after 4 months from instillations (p<0.001). No adverse effect related to instillations was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Subjective perception of persistent and/or worsening CRC symptoms, despite conventional therapy, is improved after intravesical instillation with PDRNs without adverse events. Even though we deduced suggestive insights, the results need to be collected and verified from a large-scale study.

Are we ready for a paradigm shift from high-dose conventional to moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy in intermediate-high risk prostate cancer? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.

AIM: to evaluate efficacy and late toxicity of moderate hypofractionated (HFRT) over high-dose (>76 Gy) conventional radiotherapy (CRT) in a non-inferiority perspective. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. HFRT regimens were deemed non-inferior to high-dose CRT if the computed CI for the overall RR did not exceed the non-inferiority margin of 7%. RESULTS: When the prespecified margin, corresponding to a critical RR of 0.930 for CCS, OS and BFS, was used all efficacy outcomes satisfied the criteria for the non-inferiority analysis indicating the non-inferiority of HFRT regimens over high-dose CRT in the medium term period. Differently, the evidence concerning the late toxicity was inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Noninferiority analysis indicates that moderate HFRT regimes are non-inferior over high-dose CRT in the medium-term. Inconclusive is the evidence for the late toxicity. Longer follow-up will provide a more clear answer concerning the non-inferiority of HFRT regimens in the long-term period.

Oral Platelet Gel Supernatant Plus Supportive Medical Treatment Versus Supportive Medical Treatment in the Management of Radiation-induced Oral Mucositis: A Matched Explorative Active Control Trial by Propensity Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: In this active control trial, the rate of radio-induced WHO grade 3/4 oral mucositis and the change in quality of life, assessed by OMWQ-HN, were measured in subjects with head and neck cancer treated by platelet gel supernatant (PGS) and supportive medical treatment versus subjects treated by supportive medical treatment alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with nonmetastatic head and neck cancer underwent curative or adjuvant radiotherapy. All patients underwent supportive medical treatment and/or PGS at the beginning and during radiotherapy. Sixteen patients received PGS in association with supportive medical treatment. To obtain 2 groups virtually randomized for important clinical characteristics subjects were matched, by propensity analysis, with a group of subjects (64 patients) treated with supportive medical treatment alone. RESULTS: Subjects treated with standard supportive treatment experienced significant higher WHO grade 3/4 toxicity (55%; 35/64) than subjects treated by PGS (13%; 3/16). The reduced toxicity found in PGS group paralleled with the evidence that they developed later symptoms with respect to controls. The Cox proportional hazard model indicated that patients treated with standard supportive medical treatment experienced 2.7-fold increase (hazard ratio=2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-5.7) in the occurrence of WHO grade 3/4 toxicity. PGS group significantly experienced higher quality of life than control groups as measured by OMWQ-HN. A significant decrease in the opioid analgesics usage was found in the PGS group. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data should be interpreted with caution and could serve as a framework around which to design future trials.

Treatment of Solitary Painful Osseous Metastases with Radiotherapy, Cryoablation or Combined Therapy: Propensity Matching Analysis in 175 Patients.

PURPOSE: aim of this study was to identify outcomes in pain relief and quality of life in patients with a solitary painful osseous metastasis treated by radiotherapy, cryoablation or the combination using a propensity score matching study design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 175 patients with painful bone metastases were included in the study. Twenty-five of them underwent a radiation course (20 Gy in five daily fractions) 15 days after the cryoablation. These subjects were retrospectively matched by propensity analysis with a group of subjects treated by radiotherapy (125 subjects) and with a group treated byCryoablation (25 subjects). The pain relief in terms of complete response, rate of subjects requiring analgesics after treatments and the changes in self-rated quality of life were measured. Informed consent was obtained from the subject and the study was approved by the local Ethical Committee. RESULTS: An higher proportion of subjects treated by cryoablation (32%) or cryoablation followed by RT (72%;) experienced a complete response compared with patients treated by radiotherapy alone (11.2%). After Bonferroni correction strategy, the addition of radiotherapy to cryoablation significantly improved the rate of complete response compared with cryoablation alone (p = 0.011) and this paralleled with an improved self-rated quality of life. Seventeen subjects (13.6%) of patients in the radiotherapy group, 9 (36%) in the cryoablation group, and 19 (76)% in the cryoablation- radiotherapy group did not require narcotic medications. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of radiotherapy to cryoablation favorably impacts on perceived pain, with a favorable toxicity profile. However, our data should be interpreted with caution and could serve as a framework around which to design future trials.