Estimates of the incidence and costs associated with handlebar-related injuries in children.

BACKGROUND: The US Consumer Product Safety Commission is considering handlebar regulation regarding impact performance to address the risk of abdominal and pelvic organ injuries in bicyclists. OBJECTIVE: To provide national estimates of incidence and costs of handlebar-related abdominal and pelvic organ injuries. DESIGN AND SETTING: Censuses of hospital discharge data from 19 states were extrapolated to determine national estimates. The percentage of abdominal and pelvic injuries associated with handlebars was estimated based on a case series from a pediatric trauma center. Costs were estimated using standard methods. PARTICIPANTS: All subjects younger than 20 years treated as inpatients and discharged from acute care hospitals for non-motor vehicle bicycle-related injury in 19 states in 1997 and at a pediatric trauma center located in one of the states between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of bicycle-related handlebar abdominal and pelvic organ injury, total hospital charges, lifetime medical payments, lifetime productivity loss, and lifetime monetized quality-adjusted life-years. RESULTS: An estimated 1147 subjects (95% confidence interval, 1082-1215; 1.49 per 100 000 subjects 19 years and younger) in the United States had serious non-motor vehicle-involved bicycle-related abdominal or pelvic organ injury leading to hospitalization in 1997, and 886 (95% confidence interval, 828-944; 1.15 per 100 000 subjects 19 years and younger) of these injuries likely were associated with handlebars. The estimated national costs associated with handlebar-related abdominal and pelvic organ injuries were $9.6 million in total hospital charges, $10.0 million in lifetime medical costs (including claims processing), $11.5 million in lifetime productivity losses, and $503.9 million in lifetime monetized quality-adjusted life-years. CONCLUSIONS: Handlebar-related abdominal and pelvic organ injuries pose a serious health risk to children and result in substantial health care costs. Requirements for safer handlebar designs may provide one avenue to achieve a health and economic benefit.

Optimal driving conditions are the most common injury conditions for child pedestrians.

OBJECTIVES: Motor vehicle-pedestrian crashes are one of the leading causes of serious injury in children. Prior studies have focused on child and traffic factors contributing to these crashes. The objective of the current study was to examine the role of driving conditions on the occurrence of motor vehicle crashes involving child pedestrians. METHODS: Detailed information was abstracted for the period January 1994 to December 1999 from the Philadelphia Police Department accident reports for all pediatric (age <18 years) pedestrian crashes in a single, urban county. Data included pedestrian age, road and weather conditions, illumination, pedestrian location, and intent, time of day, and date of incident. RESULTS: For the 6-year period of review, there were 3823 children under 18 years of age struck by motor vehicles (range 518 to 726 crashes per year), representing an average of 1.7 per day and a rate of 181 crashes per 100,000 children per year. The mean age was 7.9 years +/- 3.9 (range 1 to 17 years). Crashes occurred when the street was dry (>90%), with no adverse weather conditions (>90%), and during daylight hours or under streetlights (>92%). The most frequent day of the week was Friday (18.1%). The most common time of day was 3:00 to 6:00 PM (38.7%). The spring months (39.1%) predominated, with May (14.0%) being the most common month and January the least. When the circumstances were known, children were struck crossing in midblock 87.9% of cases and crossing behind a vehicle 38.8% of the time; only 4.8% were struck while playing in the street. Injuries as reported by the police exceeded minor in 32.3% with an overall fatality rate of 0.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Urban pediatric pedestrian crashes are common and occur most frequently during optimal driving conditions (good lighting, a dry road, and good weather). The data also suggest that pedestrian crashes are related to the saturation of the streets with children (optimal play conditions) compounded by poor street-crossing technique. Prevention efforts should reinforce the fact that optimal driving conditions are also likely to represent optimal conditions for child play and may increase the risk for pediatric pedestrian injuries through increased exposure.

Assessment of pain after injury in the pediatric patient: child and parent perceptions.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Pain is an inevitable consequence of injury. Accurate assessment and treatment of a child's pain after injury is essential. This study sought to describe children's pain with injury and to elucidate the concordance of parental and self-reported pain in a pediatric traffic-injured population. METHODS: Children (5 to 17 years) admitted for traffic-related injuries and 1 parent were invited to participate in the study. Consented participants were interviewed within 1 month of injury. Participants were asked to rate current and worst pain on 2 validated pediatric pain assessment scales (Bieri Faces Pain Scale and Color Analogue Scale). Demographic, crash, and injury data were abstracted from the medical record. RESULTS: Data from 276 child-parent dyads show that most children reported clinically significant pain initially after injury. Greater "worst pain" ratings did not correlate with injury severity but were associated with loss of consciousness and extremity fracture. Generally, parent-report of child's pain was concordant with child self-report. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the feasibility of pain assessment for pediatric injury using 2 validated scales and the appropriateness of parental report when the child is not able to provide self-report. Because pain was not correlated with injury severity, pain assessment and intervention for all children with traumatic injuries is strongly recommended.

Acute stress disorder symptoms in children and their parents after pediatric traffic injury.

OBJECTIVE: The American Academy of Pediatrics highlights the important role of pediatricians in recognizing adverse child responses to tragic events, such as traffic crashes. One challenge in effectively identifying children and their parents with troubling psychological responses to trauma is that little is known about the normal range of acute psychological responses in children and their parents in the immediate aftermath of traumatic events, making identification of adverse child responses difficult. Within the first month after a traumatic event, individuals may display reexperiencing, avoidance, and hyperarousal symptoms as well as dissociation (eg, feelings of unreality or emotional numbing). The presence of these responses, collectively known as acute stress disorder (ASD), alerts providers to those who may be at risk for ongoing difficulties. For beginning to develop an evidence base to guide pediatric care providers in addressing acute traumatic responses, the aim of the current investigation was to describe systematically the range and type of symptoms of ASD in children and their parents after pediatric traffic injury. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted of traffic-injured children, who were 5 to 17 years of age and admitted to the hospital for treatment of injuries from traffic crashes, and their parents. All children who met eligibility criteria between July 1999 and May 2000 were invited to participate in the study. After consent/assent was obtained, children and their custodial parents (or guardians) were interviewed within 1 month after injury via a structured assessment to determine the circumstances of the crash and the presence of ASD symptoms. Relevant demographic and clinical information (eg, age, race, gender, date of injury) was abstracted from the medical records of subjects. A survey instrument to assess the presence of ASD symptoms was completed by both the child and his or her guardian. All children completed the Child Acute Stress Questionnaire, and all parents completed the Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire. Responses were scored for the presence of dissociation, reexperiencing, avoidance, and/or hyperarousal symptoms as well as broad distress (symptoms present in every category). RESULTS: Symptoms of ASD were commonly observed in the children and parents. Eighty-eight percent of children and 83% of parents reported having at least 1 clinically significant symptom; this affected 90% of the families. Broad distress was observed for a large minority: 28% of children and 23% of parents. No statistically significant association was found between child broad distress and either child age (r = -0.12) or child injury severity score (r = -0.05). chi(2) analyses revealed no significant association between broad distress and child gender, child race, or mechanism of injury. No statistically significant association was found between parent broad distress and child age (r = -0.06) or child injury severity score (r = 0.09). chi(2) analyses revealed no significant association between parent broad distress and child gender or parent presence at the crash scene. Associations were found between parent broad distress and race in that fewer white parents reported broad distress. In addition, mechanism of injury was associated with parent broad distress: more parents reported broad distress when their children were involved in pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes, and fewer parents reported broad distress when their children were injured in a bicycle fall. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric care providers can expect to see some ASD symptoms in most children and parents in the immediate aftermath of traffic-related injury. Brief education is appropriate to explain that these symptoms are normal reactions that are likely to resolve. If symptoms persist for >1 month or are particularly distressing in their intensity, then referral for psychological care may be necessary for treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. Given the high prevalence of pediatric traffic crashes and the underdiagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder, probing for recent crash exposure might be appropriate during routine child health maintenance. The following are recommendations for pediatricians: 1) routinely call the family several days and 1 to 2 weeks after a traffic injury and ask about behavioral symptoms and family function; 2) make use of the ongoing physician-patient relationship to explore symptom presence and intensity and any functional impairment in the injured child; a brief office visit with the child and parents could serve this purpose; 3) be sure to explore the effect that the child's injury has had on the family; remember that the parent's experience posttraumatic stress symptoms after pediatric traffic-related injuries and these symptoms may limit the parent's ability to support the child; 4) provide supportive care and give families the opportunity to discuss the crash and their current feelings; do not force families to talk about the crash; 5) although any child in a traffic crash or his or her parent is at risk for posttraumatic symptomatology, regardless of injury severity, particular attention should be paid to the parents of child pedestrians who are struck by motor vehicles. These parents experience posttraumatic symptoms more commonly than parents of children in other traffic crashes.