Safety outcomes with high-dose daptomycin in patients with acute kidney injury and/or end-stage renal disease.

WHAT IS KNOWN: Daptomycin is associated with a number of adverse effects including eosinophilic pneumonia, hypersensitivity reaction, myopathy, rhabdomyolysis, headache and transaminitis. The adverse effects of high-dose daptomycin have not been fully evaluated in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and characteristics of significant adverse effects in patients receiving high-dose daptomycin with severe renal dysfunction. METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective study was conducted to assess safety outcomes of high-dose daptomycin in patients with an estimated creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min. Adult patients aged 18 to 89 years admitted between 1 July 2015 and 1 July 2019 were eligible for inclusion. Patients must have received definitive daptomycin therapy with doses greater than or equal to 7.5 mg/kg based on actual body weight. The primary outcome was overall incidence of creatine phosphokinase (CK) elevation, myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 74 patients who received daptomycin therapy were screened with 50 included in the study. The population was well distributed in terms of gender (48% male, n = 24) with a median age of 61 (IQR, 48-67) years. The primary indication for daptomycin use was Gram-positive bacteremia. The median daptomycin dose was 750 (IQR, 600-875) mg, or 8.46 (IQR, 7.92-9.96) mg/kg based on actual body weight, with a median patient weight of 81 (IQR, 65-113) kg. The median duration of therapy was 27 (IQR, 14-42) days. One patient experienced significant CK elevation while on daptomycin therapy with rhabdomyolysis; however, daptomycin was continued as there was an alternative explanation for an elevated CK. One patient experienced daptomycin discontinuation due to CK elevation without meeting the definition for significant CK elevation. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: In a cohort of patients with severe renal dysfunction treated with daptomycin 7.5 mg/kg or greater, significant CK elevation on daptomycin therapy was infrequently observed. Future research should confirm these findings, with special consideration for higher mg/kg dosages and/or obese populations.

Pharmacy students' perspectives on the initial implementation of a teaching electronic medical record: results from a mixed-methods assessment.

BACKGROUND: Electronic medical records (EMRs) have been used for nearly three decades. Pharmacists use EMRs on a daily basis, but EMRs have only recently been incorporated into pharmacy education. Some pharmacy programs have implemented teaching electronic medical records (tEMRs), but best practices for incorporating tEMRs into pharmacy education remain unknown. The objectives of this study were to 1) assess pharmacy students' views and experiences with a tEMR; and 2) identify current learning activities and future priorities for tEMR use in pharmacy education. METHODS: We used a mixed-methods approach, including three, two-hour student focus groups and a 42-item web-based survey to examine student perspectives of the tEMR. All first, second, and third year professional pharmacy students were eligible to participate in the survey and a focus group. Web-based survey items were measured on a 7-point Likert scale, and quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics. Two researchers independently coded transcripts using both deductive and inductive approaches to identify emergent themes. These analysts met and resolved any coding discrepancies via consensus. RESULTS: Focus groups were conducted with 22 total students, with 6-8 students represented from each year of pharmacy training. The survey was completed by 156 students: 47 first year, 55 second year, and 54 third year. Overall, 48.7% of survey respondents altogether agreed or strongly agreed that using the tEMR enhanced their learning in pharmacy classes and laboratories. Qualitative data were organized into four major themes regarding tEMR adoption: current priorities for use within the pharmacy curriculum; tEMR benefits; tEMR barriers; and future priorities for tEMR use to prepare students for pharmacy practice. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals pharmacy students' perspectives and attitudes towards using a tEMR, the types of classroom activities that incorporate the tEMR, and students' future suggestions to enhance the design or application of the tEMR for their learning. Our research findings may aid other pharmacy programs and promote more effective use of tEMRs in pharmacy education. In the long-term, this study may strengthen pharmacy education on EMRs and thus increase the efficacy and safety of pharmacists' EMR use for patients' medication management.

A mixed-methods study of pharmacy instructors' early experiences with a teaching electronic medical record.

INTRODUCTION: As use of electronic medical records (EMRs) increases in healthcare, multiple accreditation organizations recommend training future clinicians on EMRs as part of the academic curriculum. Therefore, some pharmacy programs now utilize an academic EMR. Our objective was to examine pharmacy instructors' early experiences with a commercially available teaching EMR (tEMR) in order to identify current and future priorities along with benefits and barriers to academic EMR use in pharmacy education. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews and a web-based survey with pharmacy instructors. Interview and survey data analyses consisted of hybrid inductive/deductive approaches to coding data and descriptive statistics, respectively. We mapped themes to the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process (PPCP). RESULTS: Seven instructors participated in interviews, and 10 completed the survey. We identified 25 interview themes that were generally congruent with survey responses. A noted benefit of the tEMR was providing a large repository of real-life patient data. Instructors' current priorities for tEMR activities primarily aligned with "collect," "assess," and "plan" steps of the PPCP. One reported barrier was insufficient training regarding the tEMR capabilities. Instructors offered innovative ideas for future academic EMR use, including pharmacokinetics, incident reporting, and longitudinal cases. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings are most applicable to pharmacy programs in the early stages of academic EMR adoption. We identified opportunities for pharmacy programs to facilitate innovative, future use of academic EMRs, including curriculum planning, so pharmacy students gain experience using EMR functions for each PPCP step and develop more advanced EMR skills.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on training of pharmacy residents and fellows: Results from a national survey of postgraduate pharmacy trainees.

PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted the activities of healthcare workers, including postgraduate pharmacy trainees. Quality training experiences must be maintained to produce competent pharmacy practitioners and maintain program standards. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of postgraduate pharmacy trainees in the United States was conducted to evaluate training experience changes and assess perceived impacts on residents and fellows following the COVID-19 pandemic's onset. RESULTS: From June 4 through June 22, 2020, 511 pharmacy trainees in 46 states completed the survey. Participants' median age was 26 (interquartile range [IQR], 25-28) years, with included responses from postgraduate year 1 residents (54% of sample), postgraduate year 2 residents (40%), and postgraduate fellows (6%). Compared to experiences prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, fewer trainees conducted direct patient care (38.5% vs 91.4%, P < 0.001), more worked from home (31.7% vs 1.6%, P < 0.001), and less time was spent with preceptors per day (2 [IQR, 2-6] hours vs 4 [IQR, 1-4] hours, P < 0.001). Sixty-five percent of respondents reported experiencing changes in their training program, 39% reported being asked to work in areas outside of their routine training experience, and 89% stated their training shifted to focus on COVID-19 to some degree. Most respondents perceived either major (9.6%) or minor (52.0%) worsening in quality of experience, with major and minor improvement in quality of experience reported by 5.5% and 8.4% of respondents, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pharmacy resident/fellow experiences were perceived to have been extensively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in varying ways. Our findings describe shifts in postgraduate training and may aid in the development of best practices for optimizing trainee experiences in future crises.