Role of cytokine hemoadsorption in cardiopulmonary bypass-induced ventricular dysfunction in a porcine model.

Little is known about the effect of cardiopulmonary bypass alone on cardiac function; in an attempt to illuminate this relationship and test a possible mechanism, we used Cytosorb, a device capable of removing virtually all types of circulating cytokines to test the hypothesis that hemoadsorption of cytokines during bypass attenuates bypass-induced acute organ dysfunction. Twelve Yorkshire pigs (50-65 kg) were instrumented with a left ventricular conductance catheter. Baseline mechanics and cytokine expression (tumor necrosis factor [TNF], interleukin-6 [IL-6], and interleukin-10) were measured before and hourly after 1 hour of normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. Animals underwent bypass without (cardiopulmonary bypass [CPB], n = 6) or with (CPB+HA, n = 6) the CytosorbTM device. Data were compared with "historical" controls (n = 6) that were similarly instrumented but underwent observation instead of bypass. Five hours after separation from bypass (or observation), animals were euthanized. Myocardial water content was determined postmortem. Neither TNF nor IL-6 was significantly elevated in either experimental group versus controls at any time point. Preload recruitable stroke work and dP/dtmax were significantly depressed immediately after separation from bypass in both CPB+HA and CPB and remained depressed for the duration of the experiment. Although Tau remained unchanged, dP/dTmin was significantly diminished in both bypass groups at all time points after separation from bypass. Cytokine hemoadsorption had no effect on any measurable index of function. Differences in postmortem data were not evident between groups. One hour of normothermic CPB results in a significant and sustained decline in left ventricular function that appears unrelated to changes in cytokine expression. Because we did not appreciate a significant change in cytokine concentrations postbypass, the capacity of cytokine hemoadsorption to attenuate CPB-induced ventricular dysfunction could not be assessed.

Limitation of thrombin generation, platelet activation, and inflammation by elimination of cardiotomy suction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting treated with heparin-bonded circuits.

OBJECTIVE: Reports evaluating the efficacy of heparin-bonded circuits to blunt inflammation, platelet dysfunction, and thrombin generation in response to cardiopulmonary bypass have varied. We hypothesized that this variability may in part be related to the use of cardiotomy suction, which has been demonstrated to reintroduce procoagulant and proinflammatory factors into the systemic circulation during cardiopulmonary bypass. A prospective, randomized study was undertaken to evaluate the specific effects of cardiotomy suction. METHODS: Thirty-six patients undergoing first-time, nonemergency coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: group I, non-heparin-bonded circuits with the use of cardiotomy suction (n = 12); group II, Duraflo II (BCR-3500; Jostra Bentley Corp, Irvine, Calif) heparin-bonded circuits with cardiotomy suction (n = 12); and group III, Duraflo II heparin-bonded circuits without cardiotomy suction (n = 12). Thrombin generation, neutrophil activation (polymorphonuclear elastase), platelet activation (beta-thromboglobulin), and neuronal injury (neuron-specific enolase) were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays after cardiopulmonary bypass and compared with prebypass levels. Results are presented as mean +/- SEM. RESULTS: Prebypass levels of all markers were similar among treatment groups. However, postbypass levels were significantly and consistently highest in group I relative to groups II and III. Thrombin generation levels were 5.0 +/- 0.9 nmol/L in group I, 3.0 +/- 0.6 nmol/L in group II, and 1.5 +/- 0.1 nmol/L in group III (P <.05 vs group II and P <.001 vs group I). Polymorphonuclear elastase levels were 307 +/- 64 microg/L in group I, 128 +/- 24 microg/L in group II (P <.05 vs group I), and 75 +/- 14 microg/L in group III (P <.001 vs group I). beta-Thromboglobulin levels were 2692 +/- 401 IU/mL in group I, 912 +/- 99 IU/mL in group II (P =.001 vs group I), and 646 +/- 133 IU/mL in group III (P =.001 vs group I). Neuron-specific enolase levels were 9.8 +/- 0.9 ng/mL in group I, 10.5 +/- 1.6 ng/mL in group II, and 4.2 +/- 0.5 ng/mL in group III (P =.001 vs groups I and II). CONCLUSIONS: Use of cardiotomy suction resulted in significant increases in thrombin, neutrophil, and platelet activation, as well as the release of neuron-specific enolase, after cardiopulmonary bypass. Limiting increases in these markers would be best accomplished by eliminating cardiotomy suction and routinely using heparin-bonded circuits whenever possible.

Unique considerations for the spinal cord injured patient undergoing cardiac surgery utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass.

A 37-year-old male with mitral valve regurgitation presented for mitral valve replacement. He has been a C5 quadriplegic for 13 years. The patient had been discharged 2 months before to this admission after a complicated hospital course for Staphylococcus aureus infection of the left hip. His course was complicated by adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring prolonged intubation, acute renal failure (ARF) requiring dialysis, 10-day coma, and bacterial endocarditis now requiring mitral valve replacement. After initial stabilization with antibiotics and gradual improvement of the multiorgan system failure, the patient presented for valve replacement and worsening congestive heart failure (CHF). Para- and quadriplegic patients rarely undergo cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The explanation for this low incidence of heart surgery in this patient population ranges from physiologic changes from the spinal cord injury to their relatively short life span. Therefore, there is no vast knowledge of how these patients with spinal cord injury will physiologically respond to CPB. Chronic paraplegia presents unique anesthetic and perfusion challenges. General anesthesia for a patient with prolonged spinal cord damage can be difficult because of dysreflexia, muscle wasting, and potassium changes with depolarizing muscle relaxants. For the perfusionist, chronic paraplegia also accentuates hemodynamic responses to nonpulsatile flow with low peripheral vascular resistance common and difficult to treat. Dramatic increases in circulating catecholamine levels are a secondary result of the initiation of CPB that can cause a hypo- and hypertensive state. Depending on the level of spinal cord injury, one might expect acute hypo- or hypertension with the various phases of open-heart surgery and CPB. A viscous circle may occur because the hypertensive state is exaggerated because of inhibitory signals not passed below the spinal cord lesion and, therefore, the vasoconstrictive reflex continues unabated. The attack usually occurs abruptly and can lead to cerebrovascular hemorrhage and death if not controlled. Fortunately, we found this patient did not develop mass autonomic dysreflexia and was not difficult to wean from CPB. The problems associated with spinal cord injury present potential complications to this patient population. Numerous triggering mechanisms may lead to a variety of clinical complications. Consideration of a response/ treatment management plan for potential problems must be exercised by the surgical team.

Does the type of surgery effect systemic response following cardiopulmonary bypass?

BACKGROUND: Clinical studies conducted to elucidate the systemic response to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) did not differentiate possible effect of different types of cardiac surgical pathologies and operations on outcomes and have typically combined different procedures. We hypothesized that valve surgery induces more prominent systemic reaction compared to isolated on-pump CABG. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients undergoing primary on-pump CABG (Group 1, n = 14) or valve surgery with or without CABG (Group 2, n = 13) were prospectively enrolled. Heparin-bonded circuits were used in all patients. Cardiotomy suction was only used in Group 2. Clinical and laboratory markers were evaluated. RESULTS: Clinical measurements, including chest tube output, blood transfusion requirement, inotropic support requirement, and duration of ICU stay were not significantly different. Thrombin generation (PF-1.2) was significantly higher in Group 2 (p = 0.001). tPA was also significantly higher in Group 2 at 15 and 60 minutes on CPB (p < 0.01). Group 2 had significantly higher inflammatory response shown by elevation of IL6 (p = 0.005). Neuronal injury markers, S100beta and NSE, were significantly higher at the termination of CPB in Group 2 (p < 0.01). At no point of time course for any marker, Group 1 had significantly higher response compared to Group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Valve surgery induced more prominent systemic response than CABG. The possible explanations include the difference in baseline disease pathophysiology, and/or difference associated with the procedures such as open systems and use of cardiotomy suction. Future clinical studies assessing systemic response to CPB and therapies to blunt these need consider and account for these observed differences.