The recent evolution of patient care rounds in pediatric teaching hospitals in the United States and Canada.

INTRODUCTION: National trends toward empowering and enabling patients and families to take a bigger role in their own medical care and enhanced collaboration between rounding stakeholders have effectuated a new rounding model in the pediatric inpatient setting known as 'Patient- and Family-Centered Rounds/I-PASS,' which has shown to decrease safety events and to improve stakeholders' experience with rounding. Other enhancements to the new model, such as the use of whiteboards, rounding checklists, and facecards, have all been applied to the new model to good effect. Another major enhancement to rounding of late has been the application of a schedule to rounds, which has increased the presence of the nurse and the family during rounds and has improved rounding efficiency without a negative effect on teaching. OBJECTIVE: We provide a review of the literature regarding this new rounding model and its effects in the pediatric inpatient setting, as well as a review of the enhancements that have been applied to the new model, the recognized barriers to the implementation of these rounding alterations and the ways in which those barriers have been overcome. CONCLUSIONS: In the pediatric inpatient setting, the 'Patient and Family-Centered Rounds/IPASS' rounding model, as well as enhancements to this new model such as rounding schedules, whiteboards, checklists and facecards, have had a positive effect on stakeholders' experience with rounding, increased patient safety and improved rounding efficiency.  Given these positive effects, these alterations to rounding should be promoted and sustained. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Rounding is when a medical care provider, or a team of providers, visits patients in the hospital in order to determine a plan of care and discuss that care with the patient and the patient's family. In teaching hospitals, this involves staff physicians, medical trainees and advanced practice providers. Rounding has changed in the recent past as evolving pressures have increasingly led these teams of providers to talk and make decisions about patients outside the patient's room, which lessens the patient's ability to contribute to decision-making. This also lessens the ability of the patient's nurse to contribute. The recognition of this problem has led to big changes in rounding in children's teaching hospitals, the biggest of which is called 'family-centered rounding.' This involves performing the entirety of rounds in the patients' rooms, directing the discussion toward them in language that they understand, with the active participation of everyone present, including the patient's nurse. Other changes in rounding, designed to improve patients' experiences and decrease medical errors, have made this new rounding model even better. Structured communication during rounds, communication aids such as whiteboards and checklists, and planned times for rounding on each patient ('scheduled rounding') have all successfully been used to improve patients' care and experience in the hospital. This article aims to inform the reader about family-centered rounds and other recent rounding transformations that have proven to increase patient safety and improve their experience while in the hospital, also noting barriers to these changes and how they have been overcome.

Association Between Rapid Response Algorithms and Clinical Outcomes of Hospitalized Children.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the implementation of clinical pathways, known as pediatric rapid response algorithms, within an existing rapid response system was associated with an improvement in clinical outcomes of hospitalized children. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients admitted to the PICU as unplanned transfers from the general medical and surgical floors at a single, freestanding children's hospital between July 1, 2017, and January 31, 2020. We examined the impact of the algorithms on the rate of critical deterioration events. We used multivariable Poisson regression and an interrupted time series analysis to measure 2 possible types of change: an immediate implementation effect and an outcome trajectory over time. RESULTS: We identified 892 patients (median age: 4 [interquartile range: 1-12] years): 615 in the preimplementation group, and 277 in the postimplementation group. Algorithm implementation was not associated with an immediate change in the rate of critical deterioration events but was associated with a downward rate trajectory over time and a postimplementation trajectory that was significantly less than the preimplementation trajectory (trajectory difference of -0.28 events per 1000 non-ICU patient days per month; 95% confidence interval -0.40 to -0.16; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Algorithm implementation was associated with a decrease in the rate of critical deterioration events. Because of the study's observational nature, this association may have been driven by unmeasured confounding factors and the chosen implementation point. Nevertheless, the results are a promising start for future research into how clinical pathways within a rapid response system can improve care of hospitalized patients.

Day of Illness and Outcomes in Bronchiolitis Hospitalizations.

BACKGROUND: Bronchiolitis is often described to follow an expected clinical trajectory, with a peak in severity between days 3 and 5. This predicted trajectory may influence anticipatory guidance and clinical decision-making. We aimed to determine the association between day of illness at admission and outcomes, including hospital length of stay, receipt of positive-pressure ventilation, and total cough duration. METHODS: We compiled data from 2 multicenter prospective studies involving bronchiolitis hospitalizations in patients <2 years. Patients were excluded for complex conditions. We assessed total cough duration via weekly postdischarge phone calls. We used mixed-effects multivariable regression models to test associations between day of illness and outcomes, with adjustment for age, sex, insurance (government versus nongovernment), race, and ethnicity. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) day of illness at admission for 746 patients was 4 (2-5) days. Day of illness at admission was not associated with length of stay (coefficient 0.01 days, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.05 to 0.08 days), positive-pressure ventilation (adjusted odds ratio: 1.0, 95% CI: 0.9 to 1.1), or total cough duration (coefficient 0.33 days, 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.67 days). Additionally, there was no significant difference in day of illness at discharge in readmitted versus nonreadmitted patients (5.9 vs 6.4 days, P = .54). The median cough duration postdischarge was 6 days, with 65 (14.3%) patients experiencing cough for 14+ days. CONCLUSIONS: We found no associations between day of illness at admission and outcomes in bronchiolitis hospitalizations. Practitioners should exercise caution when making clinical decisions or providing anticipatory guidance based on symptom duration.

Comparison of As-Needed and Scheduled Posthospitalization Follow-up for Children Hospitalized for Bronchiolitis: The Bronchiolitis Follow-up Intervention Trial (BeneFIT) Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Posthospitalization follow-up visits are prescribed frequently for children with bronchiolitis. The rationale for this practice is unclear, but prior work has indicated that families value these visits for the reassurance provided. The overall risks and benefits of scheduled visits have not been evaluated. Objective: To assess whether an as-needed posthospitalization follow-up visit is noninferior to a scheduled posthospitalization follow-up visit with respect to reducing anxiety among parents of children hospitalized for bronchiolitis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label, noninferiority randomized clinical trial, performed between January 1, 2018, and April 31, 2019, assessed children younger than 24 months of age hospitalized for bronchiolitis at 2 children's hospitals (Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, California) and 2 community hospitals (Intermountain Riverton Hospital, Riverton, Utah, and Packard El Camino Hospital, Mountain View, California). Data analysis was performed in an intention-to-treat manner. Interventions: Randomization (1:1) to a scheduled (n = 151) vs an as-needed (n = 153) posthospitalization follow-up visit. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was parental anxiety 7 days after hospital discharge, measured using the anxiety portion of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, which ranged from 0 to 28 points, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety. Fourteen prespecified secondary outcomes were assessed. Results: Among 304 children randomized (median age, 8 months; interquartile range, 3-14 months; 179 [59%] male), the primary outcome was available for 269 patients (88%). A total of 106 children (81%) in the scheduled follow-up group attended a scheduled posthospitalization visit compared with 26 children (19%) in the as-needed group (absolute difference, 62%; 95% CI, 53%-71%). The mean (SD) 7-day parental anxiety score was 3.9 (3.5) among the as-needed posthospitalization follow-up group and 4.2 (3.5) among the scheduled group (absolute difference, -0.3 points; 95% CI, -1.0 to 0.4 points), with the upper bound of the 95% CI within the prespecified noninferiority margin of 1.1 points. Aside from a decreased mean number of clinic visits (absolute difference, -0.6 visits per patient; 95% CI, -0.4 to -0.8 visits per patient) among the as-needed group, there were no significant between-group differences in secondary outcomes, including readmissions (any hospital readmission before symptom resolution: absolute difference, -1.6%; 95% CI, -5.7% to 2.5%) and symptom duration (time from discharge to cough resolution: absolute difference, -0.6 days; 95% CI, -2.4 to 1.2 days; time from discharge to child reported "back to normal": absolute difference, -0.8 days; 95% CI, -2.7 to 1.0 days; and time from discharge to symptom resolution: absolute difference, -0.6 days; 95% CI, -2.5 to 1.3 days). Conclusions and Relevance: Among parents of children hospitalized for bronchiolitis, an as-needed posthospitalization follow-up visit is noninferior to a scheduled posthospitalization follow-up visit with respect to reducing parental anxiety. These findings support as-needed follow-up as an effective posthospitalization follow-up strategy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03354325.

Use of simulation-based education: a national survey of pediatric clerkship directors.

OBJECTIVE: To document the prevalence of simulation-based education (SBE) for third- and fourth-year medical students; to determine the perceived importance of SBE; to characterize the barriers associated with establishing SBE. METHODS: A 27-item survey regarding simulation was distributed to members of the Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics (COMSEP) as part of a larger survey in 2012. RESULTS: Seventy-one (48%) of 147 clerkship directors (CD) at COMSEP institutions responded to the survey questions regarding the use of SBE. Eighty-nine percent (63 of 71) of CDs reported use of SBE in some form: 27% of those programs (17 of 63) reported only the use of the online-based Computer-Assisted Learning in Pediatrics Program, and 73% (46 of 63) reported usage of other SBE modalities. Fifty-four percent of CDs (38 of 71) agreed that SBE is necessary to meet the requirements of the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME). Multiple barriers were reported in initiating and implementing an SBE program. CONCLUSIONS: SBE is commonly used for instruction during pediatric undergraduate medical education in North American medical schools. Barriers to the use of SBE remain despite the perception that it is needed to meet requirements of the LCME.