Clinical Outcomes of MicroPulse Transscleral Laser Therapy with the Revised P3 Delivery Device.

Aim: To evaluate the success and safety of MicroPulse transscleral laser therapy (TLT) on intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction in adults with uncontrolled glaucoma using different total treatment durations, sweep velocities, and a number of sweeps utilizing the revised MicroPulse P3 delivery device. Materials and methods: A single-center Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved multiple cohort studies of MicroPulse TLT with the revised MicroPulse P3 delivery device, which was conducted in 61 eyes from 40 adults with uncontrolled glaucoma. Eyes that received 50-second (GI, GII, and GIII) and 60-second (GIV, GV, and GVI) treatment applications between May and October 2020 were reviewed. Each hemisphere received a total of five, four, or three sweeps. The patient's IOP and glaucoma medications were monitored over 12 months follow-up. Qualified success was defined as an IOP of ≤21 mm Hg and/or reduction of ≥20% from baseline at 12 months, with no secondary glaucoma reinterventions. Complete success was defined as meeting the above criteria with no increase in glaucoma medications at 12 months. All eyes requiring a glaucoma surgical intervention were considered a failure. Results: Qualified success was achieved in 83.6% of eyes, while complete success was achieved in 75.4% of eyes. In eyes receiving 50-second applications of five, four, or three sweeps (GI, GII, and GIII), 70, 90, and 91% achieved qualified success, respectively; in eyes receiving 60-second applications of five, four, or three sweeps (GIV, GV, and GVI), 78, 82, and 90% achieved qualified success, respectively. Within each subgroup, mean IOP reductions ranged from 32.8 to 49.4% and were statistically significant (p < 0.008). The failure rate was 16.4%, and at least one eye failed in each subgroup. Conclusions: MicroPulse TLT with the revised MicroPulse P3 delivery device and relatively low total energy levels is safe and effective at lowering IOP. Efficacy appears to increase with longer treatment durations and slower sweep velocities, but statistical differences between age and clinical differences between baseline IOP measurements limit comparison between subgroups. Clinical significance: There is a lack of literature evaluating the safety and IOP-lowering success of the revised MicroPulse P3 delivery device using different total treatment durations, sweep velocities, and number of sweeps. How to cite this article: Checo LA, Dorairaj S, Wagner IV, et al. Clinical Outcomes of MicroPulse Transscleral Laser Therapy with the Revised P3 Delivery Device. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2024;18(1):10-15.

Long-Term Efficacy of Successful Excisional Goniotomy with the Kahook Dual Blade.

Purpose: To report clinical outcomes of successful excisional goniotomy with the Kahook Dual Blade (KDB), through 60 months. Patients and methods: This was a noncomparative, single-surgeon, retrospective review of eyes receiving successful KDB goniotomy with or without concomitant phacoemulsification between October 2015 and January 2016 with five years of uninterrupted follow-up. Intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications were recorded. Primary outcomes included changes from baseline in IOP, medication use, and BCVA, through five years. Results: Fifty-two eyes of 28 patients were analyzed. Most eyes had mild primary open angle glaucoma (73%). Of the eyes analyzed, 41 underwent combined surgery and 11 underwent standalone surgery. With all eyes combined, mean (standard deviation) baseline IOP was 21.0 (4.1) mmHg and mean baseline medication use was 1.8 (1.1) medications per eye. Across time points at months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60, mean postoperative IOP ranged from 13.0 to 13.7 mmHg, representing mean reductions of 7.3-8.0 mmHg (34.7-38.3%; p <0.0001 at every time point). Similarly, mean medication use ranged from 0.4 to 0.6 medications per eye, representing mean reductions of 1.2-1.4 medications (66-75.5%; p <0.0001 at every time point). Mean logMAR BCVA improved from 0.321 (0.177) preoperatively to 0.015 (0.035) at month 60 (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: In eyes not requiring secondary surgical procedures (eg, long-term surgical successes), excisional goniotomy provided clinically and statistically significant reductions in both IOP and the need for medications that were highly consistent through five years of follow-up. KDB goniotomy appears to be highly successful in Caucasian patients with open angle glaucoma on ≥1 IOP-lowering medications at baseline and with no history of prior ocular surgery. Successful excisional goniotomy with the KDB can be expected to improve long-term glaucoma-related visual outcomes through IOP reduction and to improve quality of life through medication reduction.

36-Month Outcomes of Ahmed ClearPath® Glaucoma Drainage Device in Severe Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Ahmed ClearPath® (ACP) 250 mm2 glaucoma drainage device (GDD) in managing refractory primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective case series focused on adult patients diagnosed with severe POAG who underwent implantation of an ACP GDD. Over a 36-month follow-up period, data on intraocular pressure (IOP), the number of glaucoma medications, and complications were recorded. The primary objectives were to assess the reductions from baseline in both IOP and medication usage, through 36 months. Secondary objectives included the proportion of eyes achieving an IOP reduction of ≥ 20% from baseline at 36 months. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were also assessed. Results: Twelve eyes from 11 patients (mean age: 71.3 ± 14.1 years) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. All patients had severe POAG (n=11), with the majority being Caucasian (n=8) and female (n=10). The mean (standard deviation) IOP and number of glaucoma medications at baseline were 29 (7.6) mmHg and 3 (0.9), respectively. At 36 months, mean IOP was reduced to 10.6 (5.5) mmHg (-61.8%; p= 0.0008) and mean number of medications was reduced to 0.9 (0.9) (-71.4%; p=0.0005), with 88.9% of eyes achieving an IOP reduction by ≥20%. No vision threatening complications were observed. Conclusion: To our knowledge this is the first study to report 36-month outcomes of the novel ACP device in the treatment of refractory POAG. The safety profile and efficacy of the ACP was found to be comparable to that of other commonly utilized GDD models.

In a pickle: Cases of pickleball related ocular injuries.

Purpose: Although musculoskeletal involvement is the common presentation, studies have reported the incidence of sports related ocular trauma. Here we present the case reports of two patients who sustained injury in one of the fast growing sports - the pickleball, during play without eye protection. Observations: Two patients with history of injury during pickleball play presented to our clinic with varying spectrum of ocular presentations. First patient had an anterior segment involvement with hyphema and elevated intraocular pressure, and the second patient had both anterior and posterior segment involvement causing angle recession and commotio retinae. Conclusion: Ocular injuries related to various sports have been extensively described, our intent is to increase the awareness about the possible ocular injuries related to rising pickleball and that improved safety measures and appropriate education to the players could prevent such ocular injuries.

Spotlight on Schlemm's Canal MicroStent Injection in Patients with Glaucoma.

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has revolutionized glaucoma care with its favorable safety profile and ability to delay or minimize the need for traditional, bleb-based procedures. Microstent device implantation is a type of angle-based MIGS, which reduces intraocular pressure (IOP) through bypass of the juxtacanalicular trabecular meshwork (TM) and facilitation of aqueous outflow into the Schlemm's canal. Although there are limited microstent devices on the market, multiple studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of iStent® (Glaukos Corp.), iStent Inject® (Glaukos Corp.), and Hydrus® Microstent (Alcon) in the treatment of mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma, with and without concurrent phacoemulsification. This review attempts to provide a comprehensive evaluation of injectable angle-based microstent MIGS devices in the treatment of glaucoma.

Updates on the Diagnosis and Management of Glaucoma.

Glaucoma is the leading cause of blindness throughout the world (after cataracts); therefore, general physicians should be familiar with the diagnosis and management of affected patients. Glaucomas are usually categorized by the anatomy of the anterior chamber angle (open vs narrow/closed), rapidity of onset (acute vs chronic), and major etiology (primary vs secondary). Most glaucomas are primary (ie, without a contributing comorbidity); however, several coexisting ophthalmic conditions may serve as the underlying etiologies of secondary glaucomas. Chronic glaucoma occurs most commonly; thus, regular eye examinations should be performed in at-risk patients to prevent the insidious loss of vision that can develop before diagnosis. Glaucoma damages the optic nerve and retinal nerve fiber layer, leading to peripheral and central visual field defects. Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), a crucial determinant of disease progression, remains the only modifiable risk factor; thus, all current treatments (medications, lasers, and operations) aim to reduce the IOP. Pharmacotherapy is the usual first-line therapy, but noncompliance, undesirable adverse effects, and cost limit effectiveness. Laser and surgical treatments may lower IOP significantly over long periods and may be more cost effective than pharmacotherapy, but they are plagued by greater procedural risks and frequent treatment failures. Traditional incisional procedures have recently been replaced by several novel, minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries with improved safety profiles and only minimal decreases in efficacy. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries have dramatically transformed the surgical management of glaucoma; nevertheless, large, randomized trials are required to assess their long-term efficacy.

24-Month Outcomes of Ahmed ClearPath® Glaucoma Drainage Device for Refractory Glaucoma.

Purpose: To describe the safety and efficacy of the Ahmed ClearPath® (ACP) 250 mm2 glaucoma drainage device (GDD) in the treatment of refractory primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Patients and methods: This was a retrospective, noncomparative, single-surgeon, interventional case series of adult patients with medically ± surgically refractory POAG undergoing ACP implantation. Intraocular pressure (IOP), the number of glaucoma medications, and complications were recorded over 24 months of follow-up. Primary outcomes included mean reductions in both IOP and medication use through 24 months, and secondary outcomes included the proportion of eyes achieving an IOP between 6 and 19 mmHg, IOP reduction by ≥20%, and reduction by ≥1 medication at last mean follow-up. Results: Twelve eyes of 11 patients (mean age 71.3 ± 14.1 years) fit inclusion criteria and were enrolled. Most patients were Caucasian (n = 8), female (n = 10), and all had severe POAG (n = 11). The mean last follow-up was 18 months, at which time the mean (standard deviation) baseline IOP of 29.0 (7.6) mmHg was reduced to 12.2 (4.0) mmHg (58% reduction). 91.7% of eyes achieved an IOP between 6 and 19 mmHg, and 100% of eyes met an IOP reduction of ≥20%. Mean baseline number of glaucoma medications was 3.0 (0.9) and was reduced to 0.5 (0.7) at last mean follow-up (83.3% reduction), with 91.7% of eyes using ≥1 fewer medications. No long-term complications were observed, and short-term complications (mild hyphema, inflammation, and pain) were resolved by month 3. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the second long-term study evaluating the efficacy of the Ahmed ClearPath drainage device in adult patients, and the first study with 24-months follow-up. The ACP device is safe and effective at reducing both IOP and medication burdens in patients with severe POAG. Additionally, minimal short-term complications were noted with no long-term adverse effects, increasing comfort for both the surgeon and the patient.

Visual field decline and restoration following vitamin A therapy for vitamin A deficiency.

Purpose: To present a case of nutritional vitamin A deficiency (VAD) that caused bilateral severe dry eye symptoms and progressive visual field contraction over a 13.5-month span resulting in peripheral blindness and nyctalopia, and to document the patient's rapid visual field restoration following vitamin A therapy (VAT). Observations: A 34-year-old Haitian woman presented for a glaucoma consultation with the following symptoms in both eyes (OU): painful dry eyes, floaters, nyctalopia, and visual field contraction over eighteen months despite treatment with four anti-glaucoma medications and intraocular pressures (IOP) in the low teens OU. The glaucoma diagnosis was eliminated due to slit lamp examination and OCT imaging, which showed an absence of both optic neuropathy and secondary glaucoma features. The patient's symptoms remained consistent with VAD. The patient's visual field decline was restored with significant documented visual field improvement occurring within only 11 days, and complete visual field restoration within 5.5 months of VAT. Conclusions and Importance: Our case demonstrates the critical role of vitamin A in maintaining ocular health and visual field preservation. To our knowledge, this is the second reported case documenting a patient's visual field decline due to VAD, as well as visual field restoration following enteral VAT. As visual outcomes of VAT are significantly underreported in scientific literature, it is imperative that ophthalmologists are aware of its effects.

Deadbolt cataract due to misplanted minishunt.

A 62-year-old woman with stable unilateral glaucoma in the left eye presented for a cataract consultation. In 2010, laser peripheral iridotomies (LPI) were performed on both eyes by a different provider. Her postoperative course was complicated by a recalcitrant steroid response with a highest intraocular pressure (IOP) of 65 mm Hg in the left eye. A trabeculectomy with a glaucoma minishunt (EX-PRESS, Alcon) was then performed by that provider (Supplemental Figure 1, http://links.lww.com/JRS/A603). Thereafter, IOP control of the left eye was normalized and maintained without topical antiglaucoma medications. Historically, her right eye has been always her better eye. Recently, she noticed metamorphopsia in her left eye. Her ocular history was also notable for high refractive errors requiring continuous spectacles wear, possible mild refractive amblyopia of the left eye, history of submacular choroidal nevus with drusen in the right eye, and an epiretinal membrane (ERM) with macular pucker in the left eye. Her husband is an optician. Both inquire about refractive cataract surgery options to correct astigmatism and presbyopia; both have reservations regarding cost and visual quality associated with diffractive optic intraocular lenses (IOLs). Her deteriorating visual acuity in both eyes affects her ability to work. Her corrected distance visual acuity was 20/40 in both eyes (pinhole, no help) while wearing spectacles according to a prescription of -8.50 diopters (D) +1.50 D × 106 for the right eye and -13.00 D +3.25 D × 057 for the left eye. Her corrected near visual acuity was 14/14 in both eyes with the abovementioned prescription and a +3.00 D add. Central corneal thickness was 618 µm in the right eye and 631 µm in the left eye. IOP was 20 mm Hg in the right eye and 10 mm Hg in the left eye on no antiglaucoma medications. Pertinent findings on slitlamp examination included bilateral dermatochalasis, a shallow diffuse thick bleb superiorly in the left eye only, patent LPI superiorly in both eyes, nuclear sclerotic and cortical cataracts in both eyes (with prominent focal spoke superiorly left eye only) (Figure 1, A-C). Fundus photos show posterior vitreous detachment in both eyes, ERM with macular pucker in the left eye, and submacular choroidal nevus (2.5 × 3.0 disc diameter size) with overlying drusen in the right eye (Supplemental Figure 2, A, http://links.lww.com/JRS/A604). Gonioscopy revealed open angles in both eyes, albeit with focal narrowing without synechiae superiorly in the left eye only (Figure 1, D-FJOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202207000-00020/figure1/v/2022-06-24T130746Z/r/image-tiff). Most importantly, however, the distal tip of the minishunt was not positioned as expected in the anterior chamber; rather, it was noted to pierce the peripheral iris near the iris root superiorly. Most of the minishunt shaft and spur were positioned in the posterior chamber with the distal tip penetrating into the superior aspect of the capsular bag and cataract in the left eye-like a deadbolt. Visual field testing showed a full field in the right eye and an inferior nasal step in the left eye (Supplemental Figure 2, B, http://links.lww.com/JRS/A604). In addition to slitlamp, gonioscopic, and fundus photos, we also obtained optical coherence tomography of the macula and nerve (Supplemental Figure 2, C, http://links.lww.com/JRS/A604), optical biometry, ultrasound biomicroscopy, endothelial cell counts, and corneal topography (Supplemental Figure 3, http://links.lww.com/JRS/A605). How would you counsel this patient regarding her glaucoma condition, the misplanted minishunt, and her cataract surgery and IOL options? How would you manage the misplanted minishunt? What surgical approaches or specific techniques would you consider for cataract removal and visual rehabilitation?