Liposomal bupivacaine provides superior pain control compared to bupivacaine with adjuvants in interscalene block for total shoulder replacement: a prospective double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Optimal pain control methods after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) achieve reduced opioid consumption, shortened hospital stay, and improved patient satisfaction in addition to adequate analgesia. Interscalene brachial plexus block is the gold standard for TSA, yet it typically does not provide pain relief lasting beyond 24 hours. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) purportedly provides prolonged analgesia, yet it has been minimally explored for interscalene block, and it is significantly more expensive than standard bupivacaine. METHODS: This is a prospective, 2-arm, double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Subjects presenting for anatomic or reverse TSA were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive interscalene brachial plexus block with either LB plus bupivacaine (LBB group) or bupivacaine plus dexamethasone and epinephrine (BDE group). The primary outcome was 120-hour postoperative opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes were pain scores up to 96 hours postoperatively, pain control satisfaction, complications, level of distress from block numbness, and hospital stay. RESULTS: Ninety patients, 45 per group, were included in the intention-to-treat analysis and randomized. Because of withdrawal of consent and loss to follow-up, 40 in each group completed enrollment through postoperative day 60. Total 120-hour postoperative opioid consumption was similar between groups (P = .127), with no differences within 24- or 48-hour time intervals. Postoperative pain scores at 24-48 hours, 48-72 hours, 72-96 hours, and day 60 were significantly lower for the LBB group. DISCUSSION: LB interscalene brachial plexus block before total shoulder arthroplasty did not reduce 120-hour postoperative opioid consumption but significantly reduced postoperative pain between 24 and 96 hours and at postoperative day 60.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Is Associated With Improved Outcomes and Reduced Racial and Ethnic Disparities After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis With Propensity-Score Matching.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol implementation was associated with improved outcomes and decreased racial and ethnic outcome disparities after isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of an institutional CABG database with propensity-score matching. SETTING: At a single tertiary care teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand seven hundred thirty-five patients undergoing isolated CABG: 656 patients from 2016 to 2017 (pre-ERAS) and 1,079 patients from 2018 to 2020 (post-ERAS). Each patient cohort was divided into a White subgroup and a racial and ethnic minorities (Minorities) subgroup. INTERVENTIONS: None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Propensity-matched post-ERAS patients (n = 584) compared to pre-ERAS patients (n = 584) demonstrated reductions in total length of stay (LOS) (median [interquartile range]): (7 [5-10] v 8 [6-11.5] days, p = .006), postoperative LOS (5 [4-7] v 5 [4-7] days, p = .001), total ventilation time (6.1 [4.8-9.5] v 6.6 [5.2-10.9] hours, p = .004), postoperative morphine milligram equivalents (mean ± standard deviation: 68.6 ± 57.5 v 100.0 ± 59.4, p < .001), and increased likelihood of early extubation (48.8% v 42.3%, p = .026); the Minorities subgroup demonstrated reductions in likelihood of intensive care unit (ICU) readmission (1.3% v 8.1%, p = .012) and postoperative morphine milligram equivalents (73.6 ± 64.0 v 107.8 ± 71.9, p < .001). Logistic regression models demonstrated that disparities in ICU readmission and postoperative LOS between White and Minorities patients were eliminated post-ERAS. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS for isolated CABG surgery was associated with reduced total and postoperative LOS, reduced total ventilation time, and increased early extubation for all patients, as well as reduced ICU readmission for the Minorities subgroup. ERAS implementation was associated with reduced disparities between White and racial and ethnic minority patients for ICU readmission and postoperative LOS.

Continuous Serratus Anterior Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block Catheters for Postoperative Pain Management Following Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Optimal pain management following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is key to promoting efficient recovery while minimizing the incidence of postoperative complications. Regional anesthesia can help achieve greater pain control, fostering enhanced recovery and increased patient satisfaction, though debate remains over the most effective technique for VATS. This study sought to compare the analgesic efficacy of two continuous regional anesthetic techniques commonly used for VATS, the serratus anterior plane block (SAPB or CSAPB) and the erector spinae plane block (ESPB or CESPB). This study also sought to identify the clinical benefits of regional anesthesia (CSAPB or CESPB) versus no regional anesthesia in the setting of VATS. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted, including 397 adult patients who underwent VATS and received multimodal analgesia. Postoperative outcomes were compared among patients who received CSAPB versus those who received CESPB; these outcomes were also compared between patients who received either regional anesthesia technique (CSAPB or CESPB, block group) and patients who did not receive regional anesthesia (non-block group). Co-primary outcomes included opioid consumption during hospital admission (presented as morphine milligram equivalents) and pain (minimum, maximum, and average numeric pain scale scores) in the first 72 postoperative hours. Secondary postoperative outcomes included post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay, time from procedure end to discharge, time to first opioid medication, ambulation distance on day one, medication use, and incidence of surgical or block-related complications. All data were retrospectively obtained from patients' electronic medical records. RESULTS: Comparing regional anesthesia techniques, patients who received CESPB reported lower pain with activity postoperatively than patients who received CSAPB (3.6 vs. 4.2, p=0.009). There were no other significant differences in postoperative outcomes between these groups. Comparing the block and non-block groups, the block group exhibited a higher overall comorbidity burden than the non-block group (p=0.001). Even so, the block group reported less postoperative pain at rest and with activity than the non-block group (mean: 3.6 vs. 4.1, p=0.012; mean 3.8 vs. 4.4, p=0.012). PACU stay and time to discharge were longer in the block group than non-block group (3.3 vs. 2.6 hours, p=0.004 and 3.1 vs. 2.9 days, p=0.012, respectively). However, the block group ambulated a significantly longer distance than the non-block group on the first postoperative day (median: 181.1 m vs. 73.2 m, p<0.001). The block group more often received acetaminophen and/or aspirin and gabapentinoids than the non-block group (94.5% vs. 75.0%, p<0.001 and 84.8% vs. 62.0%, p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both CESPB and CSAPB are effective regional anesthesia techniques for VATS postoperative pain management with clear clinical benefits over no regional anesthesia. A direct comparison of the analgesic efficacy of CESPB versus CSAPB indicated that CESPB is more effective than CSAPB in terms of pain control. These findings are consistent with existing literature and most recent practice recommendations.

Open-Label Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Effects of Preoperative Acupuncture in High Anxiety Patients Undergoing Total Knee or Hip Arthroplasty.

Background: Preoperative state anxiety is a known predisposing factor for enhanced postoperative pain and hindered recovery following total knee or hip replacement. Acupuncture administered preoperatively has been associated with reduced anxiety in surgical studies, yet evidence of its efficacy in the orthopedic surgical setting is limited. Objective: This study investigated the effects of preoperative acupuncture on preoperative anxiety and pain and compared acute postoperative pain between acupuncture and control patient groups. Design: Parallel-arm, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Setting: Bone and Joint Institute, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT. Participants: Sixty middle-aged and elderly men and women with clinically validated preoperative anxiety undergoing elective total hip or knee replacement. Intervention: One-to-one randomization to preoperative acupuncture (n = 30) or no acupuncture treatment (n = 30) on the day of surgery. Coprimary outcomes: Anxiety before and after preoperative acupuncture using the visual analog scale and postsurgical pain using the numeric pain scale. Secondary outcomes: Incidence of acupuncture-related complications, pain before and after acupuncture, nausea and vomiting incidence, opioid consumption, anxiolytics and antiemetics use, and patient satisfaction. Results: Patients reported lower anxiety and pain preoperatively following acupuncture compared with before treatment (both p < 0.001). Postoperatively, the acupuncture group reported lower pain in the first 3 h than the control group, although this difference was not statistically significant. No significant differences in postoperative complications or patient satisfaction were observed between the study groups. Most patients were satisfied with the acupuncture treatment and reported a likelihood of considering preoperative acupuncture for future surgeries. Conclusions: These preliminary findings support that preoperative acupuncture is a safe and effective means to reduce perioperative anxiety and pain in patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement surgery. Additional studies should be conducted to best determine the value of preoperative acupuncture in total hip or knee patients presenting with surgically related anxiety. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (10/31/2023, NCT06099223).

Attitudes Towards Conflicts of Interest in Medical Research: A Survey of US Medical Students.

Industry funds nearly two-thirds of US healthcare research, and industry-sponsorship may produce more favorable research results and conclusions. Medical students report feeling inadequately prepared to avoid negative industry influence. Research of educational interventions that educate students on the potential effects of industry influence is lacking, and no interventions have demonstrated long-term benefit. Surveying and assessing student opinions of the relationship between industry and research may help improve future educational interventions. We surveyed preclinical and clinical students at seven US medical schools regarding their attitudes towards industry conflicts of interest (COIs) in medical research. A total of 466 medical students including 232 preclinical and 234 clinical students completed the survey. Of those who had research experience, clinical students were more likely than preclinical students to look for COIs (62.0% v 45.9%, p = .014) and to consider whether author COIs are pertinent to the article (68.1% v 54.1%, p = .023). Many disagreed that they felt adequately educated on the issue of COIs (42.7%), but most agreed that medical school should take a role in guiding student interactions with industry (65.0%). Students responded that all listed financial relationships between industry and investigator, except for providing food and/or beverage, would likely bias the investigator's research. Many students feel inadequately educated on industry issues in biomedical research, and most believe medical schools should help guide interactions with industry. Our findings support further development of educational interventions that prepare students to navigate the relationship between industry and medical research during and after medical school.