Increased prescription dose for large vessel intravascular brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND: Most randomized studies testing the effectiveness of IVBT were limited to vessels less than 4 mm diameter. In fact, it is now common to treat vessels larger than 4 mm. Accordingly, the authors instituted a prescription dose increase to 34 Gy at 2 mm from source center for vessels greater than 4.0 mm. The increase in prescription dose to 34 Gy at 2 mm from center is substantial, being 50% higher than the conventional maximum of 23 Gy. AIM: To take a close look at group of patients treated to 34 Gy, and for whom follow-up angiograms are available. METHODS: Ten patients treated for ISR with a prescription dose of 34 Gy and for whom follow-up angiograms were available were studied. Beta-radiation brachytherapy was performed with a Novoste Beta-Cath System using a strontium-90 (beta) source (Best Vascular, Springfield, VA). Source lengths of 40 or 60 mm were used. A dose of 34 Gy was prescribed at 2 mm from the source center. RESULTS: Patients were re-catheterized from 2 to 21 months (median: 16 months) following IVBT, all for symptoms suggested of restenosis. All patients had some degree of ISR of the target vessel, but no IVBT-treated vascular segment showed angiographic signs of degeneration, dissection or aneurysm. CONCLUSION: The authors' clinical impression, along with detailed review of the 10 cases, suggest that using a 34 Gy prescription dose at 2 mm from source center does not result in increased toxicity.

Failure patterns after intravascular brachytherapy for in-stent coronary restenosis.

INTRODUCTION: One strategy to improve the effectiveness of intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) is to study its failures. Previous investigations described mostly discrete, focal recurrences, typically at the proximal or distal edges of the irradiated segment after plain angioplasty or bare metal stents. We reviewed failure patterns of 30 unselected drug-eluting stent (DES) patients who had follow-up angiograms for recurrence within their IVBT-treated vessel. METHODS: Records of 53 unselected IVBT patients treated between 2016 and 2021 were reviewed. Thirty of the 53 patients had at least one subsequent percutaneous intervention (PCI) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) after IVBT. Angiographic findings of those 30 patients with ISR within their previously irradiated vessel are reported here. RESULTS: Of the 30 patients, 21 (70%) developed recurrent ISR within the irradiated segment. Six of the 21 patients who failed within the irradiated segment also experienced ISR proximal or distal to the irradiated segment. Only 15 patients (50%) failed exclusively within the irradiated segment. In nine patients (30%), restenosis occurred proximally and/or distally to the irradiated segment, but not inside of the irradiated segment itself. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown here that 50% of failures after coronary IVBT for DES ISR occur exclusively within the irradiated segment. An additional 20% of patients had failure within and outside of the irradiated segment. These percentages suggest that a higher radiation dose might improve the long-term patency rates, a conclusion that should be tempered by the lack of universal follow-up.

Effect of total body irradiation lung block parameters on lung doses using three-dimensional dosimetry.

PURPOSE: Total body irradiation (TBI) is an integral part of stem cell transplant. However, patients are at risk of treatment-related toxicities, including radiation pneumonitis. While lung dose is one of the most crucial aspects of TBI dosimetry, currently available data are based on point doses. As volumetric dose distribution could be substantially altered by lung block parameters, we used 3D dosimetry in our treatment planning system to estimate volumetric lung dose and measure the impact of various lung block designs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We commissioned a TBI beam model in RayStation that matches the measured tissue-phantom ratio under our clinical TBI setup. Cerrobend blocks were automatically generated in RayStation on thoracic Computed Tomography (CT) scans from three anonymized patients using the lung, clavicle, spine, and diaphragmatic contours. The margin for block edge was varied to 0, 1, or 2 cm from the superior, lateral, and inferior thoracic borders, with a uniform margin 2.5 cm lateral to the vertebral bodies. The lung dose was calculated and compared with a prescription dose of 1200 cGy in six fractions (three with blocks and three without). RESULT: The point dose at midplane under the block and the average lung dose are at the range of 73%-76% and 80%-88% of prescription dose respectively regardless of the block margins. In contrast, the percent lung volume receiving 10 Gy increased by nearly two-fold, from 31% to 60% over the margins from 0 to 2 cm. CONCLUSIONS: The TPS-derived 3D lung dose is substantially different from the nominal dose assumed with HVL lung blocks. Point doses under the block are insufficient to accurately gauge the relationship between dose and pneumonitis, and TBI dosimetry could be highly variable between patients and institutions as more descriptive parameters are not included in protocols. Much progress remains to be made to optimize and standardize technical aspects of TBI, and better dosimetry could provide more precise dosimetric predictors for pneumonitis risk.

Extreme coronary radiation doses from intravascular brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate coronary artery integrity after very high radiation doses from intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) in the setting of source asymmetry. METHODS: Ten patients treated for right coronary artery (RCA) in-stent restenosis (ISR) between 2017 and 2021 and for whom follow-up angiograms were available were identified from departmental records. Procedural angiograms, taken to document source position, were used to estimate vascular wall doses. The 2.5 mm proximal source marker was used to estimate the distance from source center to the media and adventitia. Distances were converted to dose (Gy) using the manufacturers' dose fall-off table, measured in water. Follow-up films were scrutinized for any sign of late vascular damage. RESULTS: The average minimal distance from catheter center to the adjacent media and the adventitia was 0.9 mm (±0.2) mm and 1.4 mm (±0.2), respectively. The average maximum media and adventitial doses adjacent to the source were 75 Gy (±26) and 39 Gy (±14), respectively. Follow-up angiograms were available from 0.6 years to 3.9 years following IVBT (median: 1.6 years). No IVBT-treated vascular segment showed signs of degeneration, dissection or aneurysm. CONCLUSION: IVBT vascular wall doses are frequently far higher than prescribed. The lack of complications in this unselected group of patients gives a modicum of reassurance that raising the prescription dose is unlikely to lead to a sudden appearance of complications.

Postoperative Radiation Therapy Is Indicated for "Low-Risk" Pathologic Stage I Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Region but Not for Other Locations.

Purpose: The role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in early stage Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is controversial. We analyzed the role of PORT in preventing local recurrences (LR) among patients with low-risk, pathologic stage I MCC based on the location of the primary tumors: head/neck (HN) versus non-HN sites. Methods and Materials: One hundred forty-seven patients with MCC were identified that had "low risk" disease (pathologic T1 primary tumor, negative microscopic margins, negative pathologic node status, no immunosuppression or prior systemic therapy). LR was defined as tumor recurrence within 2 cm of the primary surgical bed, and its frequency was estimated with the cumulative incidence method. Results: Seventy-nine patients received PORT (30 HN, 49 non-HN) with a median dose of 50 Gy (range, 8-64 Gy) and 68 patients were treated with surgery alone (30 HN, 38 non-HN). Overall, PORT was associated with a decreased risk of LR (5-year rate: 0% vs 9.5%; P = .004) with 6 LRs observed in the surgery alone group. Although the addition of PORT significantly reduced LR rates among patients with HN MCC (0% vs. 21%; P = .034), no LRs were observed in patients with non-HN MCC managed with surgery alone. There was no significant difference in MCC-specific survival comparing HN versus non-HN groups, with or without PORT. Conclusions: For low-risk, pathologic stage I MCC of the extremities and trunk, excellent local control rates were achieved with surgery, and PORT is not indicated. However, PORT was associated with a significant reduction in LRs among low-risk MCC of the HN.

Matching Protocol and Practice: The Challenge of Meeting Lung and Kidney Total Body Irradiation Constraints for Scleroderma.

PURPOSE: Total body irradiation (TBI), a form of immunomodulation, improves treatment outcomes for rapidly progressive scleroderma. The landmark Scleroderma: Cyclophosphamide or Transplantation (SCOT) trial used strict 200-cGy lung and kidney dose restrictions to limit the likelihood of normal tissue toxicity. The protocol as written did not specify how or where the 200-cGy limit was to be measured, opening the door to variable techniques and outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Following the SCOT protocol, a validated 18-MV TBI beam model was used to evaluate lung and kidney doses with varying Cerrobend half-value layers (HVLs). Block margins were constructed per the SCOT protocol. RESULTS: Using the 2 HVL SCOT block guidelines, the average central point dose under the lung block center was 353 (±27) cGy, almost double the mandated 200 cGy. The mean lung dose was 629 (±30) cGy, triple the mandated 200 cGy. No block thickness could achieve the mandated 2 Gy due to contribution from unblocked peripheral lung tissue. With 2 HVLs, the average kidney dose was 267 (±7) cGy. Three HVLs were needed to reduce it <200 cGy, meeting the mandated SCOT limit. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable ambiguity (and inaccuracy) in lung and kidney dose modulation for TBI. It is not possible to achieve the mandated lung doses using the protocol-specified block parameters. Future investigators are encouraged to take these findings into account to develop more explicit, achievable, reproducible, and accurate TBI methodology.

(Potential) Mishaps of High-Dose-Rate Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy.

Considering how commonly vaginal cuff brachytherapy is used, there is relatively little literature regarding the potential, albeit low, risk for complications. We present 3 potentially serious mishaps involving cylinder misplacement, dehiscence, and excessive normal tissue irradiation due to unique anatomy. Three patients with potentially serious treatment errors were encountered in the authors' usual clinical practice. Each patient's records were reviewed for this report. For patient 1, computed tomography (CT) simulation revealed grossly inadequate cylinder insertion, which was most obvious on the sagittal view. For patient 2, CT simulation revealed that the cylinder extended beyond the perforated vaginal cuff and was surrounded by bowel. For patient 3, CT images were used only to verify cylinder depth. A standard library plan based on cylinder diameter and active length was used. In retrospect, the images revealed an unusually thin rectovaginal septum, with the lateral and posterior vaginal wall thickness estimated to be <2 mm. This patient's fractional normal tissue doses were calculated for this report, revealing a rectal maximum dose (per fraction) of 10.8 Gy, maximum dose that 2 cc of the organ receives of 7.4 Gy, and volume of the organ that receives the prescription dose or higher of 2.8 cc. All doses were far in excess of those anticipated for a minimal 0.5-cm vaginal wall depth. Vaginal cuff high-dose-rate brachytherapy is a high-volume, routine procedure. Even in experienced hands, however, it carries a risk of improper cylinder placement, cuff dehiscence, and excessive normal tissue dose, all of which could seriously affect outcomes. These potential mishaps would be better appreciated and avoided with more extensive use of CT-based quality assurance measures.

Improved safety and quality in intravascular brachytherapy: A multi-institutional study using failure modes and effects analysis.

PURPOSE: Highlight safety considerations in intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) programs, provide relevant quality assurance (QA) and safety measures, and establish their effectiveness. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Radiation oncologists, medical physicists, and cardiologists from three institutions performed a failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) on the radiation delivery portion of IVBT. We identified 40 failure modes and rated the severity, occurrence, and detectability before and after consideration of safety practices. Risk priority numbers (RPN) and relative risk rankings were determined, and a sample QA safety checklist was developed. RESULTS: We developed a process map based on multi-institutional consensus. Highest-RPN failure modes were due to incorrect source train length, incorrect vessel diameter, and missing prior radiation history. Based on these, we proposed QA and safety measures: ten of which were not previously recommended. These measures improved occurrence and detectability: reducing the average RPN from 116 to 58 and median from 84 to 40. Importantly, the average RPN of the top 10% of failure modes reduced from 311 to 172. With QA considered, the highest risk failure modes were from contamination and incorrect source train length. CONCLUSIONS: We identified several high-risk failure modes in IVBT procedures and practical safety and QA measures to address them.

Image-guided intravascular brachytherapy dose escalation.

PURPOSE: Coronary stents reduce IVBT radiation dose with a single layer by 10-30%. However, the impact of multiple stent layers and stent expansion remains unexplored. Individualized dose adjustments considering variations in stent layers and expansion could improve radiation delivery effectiveness. METHODS: EGSnrc was used to compute the delivered vessel wall dose in various IVBT scenarios. Stent effects were modeled for the stent density of 25%, 50%, and 75% with 1, 2, and 3 layers respectively. Doses were calculated at 1.75 to 5.00 mm away from the source center, normalized to 100% at 2 mm. RESULTS: Dose fall-off increased with increasing stent density. With a single layer, the dose at 2 mm from source fell from 100% of prescription to 92%, 83% and 73% at 25%, 50% and 75% density, respectively. The computed dose to points with increasing radial distance from the source decreased progressively with increasing stent layers. With three layers, at 75% stent density, the dose at 2 mm from source center fell to 38%. CONCLUSIONS: A schema for image-guided IVBT dose adjustment is described. While it would be an improvement over current standard of care, myriad factors remain to be addressed in a comprehensive effort to optimize IVBT.

Radiation therapy for low- and high-risk perineural invasion in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Clinical outcomes and patterns of failure.

BACKGROUND: Perineural invasion (PNI) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) portends poor prognosis. Extent of treatment of nerve pathways with varying degrees of PNI and patterns of failure following elective neural radiotherapy (RT) remain unclear. METHODS: Retrospective review of HNSCC patients with high-risk (clinical/gross, large-nerve, extensive) or low-risk (microscopic/focal) PNI who underwent curative-intent treatment from 2010 to 2021. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (mean follow-up 22 months; 59% high-risk, 41% low-risk PNI) were included. Recurrence following definitive treatment occurred in 31% high-risk and 17% low-risk PNI patients. Among high-risk patients, 69% underwent surgery with post-operative RT and 46% underwent elective neural RT. Local control (83% low-risk vs. 75% high-risk), disease-free, and overall survival did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: High local control rates were achieved in high-risk PNI patients treated with adjuvant or primary RT, including treatment of both involved and uninvolved, communicating cranial nerves, with few failures in electively treated regions.

Erectile dysfunction is predictive of all-cause mortality in patients with prostate cancer treated with permanent interstitial brachytherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between pre-treatment erectile function and all-cause mortality in patients with prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 1279 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer and pre-implant erectile function assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function-6 (IIEF-6) underwent brachytherapy. Potency was defined as an IIEF-6 score of ≥13 without pharmacological or mechanical support. Patients were stratified into IIEF-6-score cohorts (≤12, 13-23 and 24-30). The median follow-up was 5.0 years. RESULTS: The 8-year overall survival (OS) of the study population was 85.1%. The 8-year OS for IIEF-6scores ≤12, 13-23 and 24-30 were 78.0%, 92.8% and 91.4%, respectively (P < 0.001). Cardiovascular events accounted for a significant portion of deaths in each IIEF-6 group. When combined with other risk factors for cardiovascular disease, an IIEF-6 score of ≤12 had an additive effect on all-cause mortality (IIEF-6 score of ≤12 and less than two comorbidities vs two or more comorbidities were 18.2% and 32.1%). CONCLUSIONS: A pre-implant IIEF-6score of ≤12 was associated with a higher incidence of all-cause mortality. Pre-treatment erectile dysfunction is a surrogate for underlying vascular pathology, probably explaining the lower OS in this subset of patients. Aggressive treatment of medical co-morbidity is warranted to impactOS.

Conundrums of coronary brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: In the 1998-2005 heyday of intravascular coronary brachytherapy, a variety of delivery devices were developed and marketed. As the industry shrank, only one device, the Novoste Beta-Cath 3.5F System (Best Vascular, Norcross, GA) remained in commercial production. The 2008 instruction manual, the only official source of technical guidance, lacks recommendations for various common scenarios. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The clinical conundrums described here were encountered during regular use of the Novoste system in 81 patients treated from January to December of 2020 in the course of using the Novoste device in accordance with the 2008 manufacturer's instruction manual. Our experience and strategies are reported and critiqued. RESULTS: Ambiguous patient selection factors include vein grafts, multiple affected vessels, large vessels, retreatment, multiple overlapping stents and prior radiation. Procedural ambiguities include vessel size determination, proper prescription dose, very long lesions and eccentric source positioning. Potential procedural mishaps include stuck sources and the risk of contamination. CONCLUSIONS: The Novoste intravascular coronary brachytherapy system is the only commercially available brachytherapy delivery catheter, and may remain so for some time. The issues detailed here provide insight and guidance for current users and may prompt research into areas lacking adequate information.

Impact of lung block shape on cardiac dose for total body irradiation.

Evaluating cardiac dose during total body irradiation (TBI) is of increasing interest. A three-dimensional beam model for TBI was commissioned and lung shielding was simulated in a treatment planning system with the cardiac silhouette partially blocked and unblocked. When blocked, the median heart dose decreased by 6% (IQR = 6%) and the median cardiac V12Gy decreased by 27% (IQR = 17%). The median left anterior descending artery dose decreased 20% (IQR = 12%) for blocked cases. Because using partial heart shielding may result in considerable changes in dose to cardiac structures, TBI protocols should explicitly consider lung block design parameters and their potential effects.

Prostate cancer death is unlikely in high-risk patients following quality permanent interstitial brachytherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cause-specific survival (CSS), biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) and overall survival (OS) in high-risk prostate cancer brachytherapy patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 1995 to June 2005, 284 patients with high-risk prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥ 8 or prostate-specific antigen > 20 ng/mL or clinical stage ≥ T2 c) underwent brachytherapy. Supplemental external beam radiation therapy was given to 257 (90.5%) patients and 179 (63.0%) received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Median follow up was 7.8 years. The median post-implant day 0 D90 was 118.9% of prescription dose. Patients with metastatic prostate cancer or castrate-resistant disease without obvious metastases who died of any cause were classified as dead from prostate cancer. Multiple parameters were evaluated for impact on survival. RESULTS: Twelve-year CSS, bPFS and OS were 94.2%, 89.0% and 69.7%. On multivariate analysis, bPFS was best predicted by percent positive biopsies and ADT. The analysis failed to identify any predictors for CSS, while OS was highly correlated with patient age, percent positive biopsies and diabetes. Fourteen percent of patients died from diseases of the heart, while 8%, 8% and 6% of patients died from non-prostate cancer, other causes and prostate cancer, respectively. When OS was stratified by patients with 0-3 vs ≥ 4 comorbidities, the 12-year OS was 73.0% and 52.7% (P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: High-quality brachytherapy results in favourable bPFS and CSS for high-risk patients. Death from diseases of the heart is more than twice as likely as death from prostate cancer. Strategies to improve cardiovascular health may positively impact OS.

Medical malpractice and brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: On average, physicians spend 10 years embroiled in malpractice litigation, exacerbating burnout and depression. Only a limited number of studies regarding medical malpractice in radiation oncology have been published, mostly in the last few years. We undertook this review with the goal of looking specifically at brachytherapy-related medical malpractice literature. BASIC PROCEDURES: We used the PubMed search engine using the terms radiation oncology medical malpractice. The search yielded 34 references published between 1988 and 2019. FINDINGS: The incidence of radiation oncology malpractice claims was roughly similar to other specialties, with fairly typical payouts of $100,000-$200,000. Consistent with overall national medical malpractice statistics, a trend toward lesser numbers of radiation oncology claims from 1985 through 2017 has occurred. Medical malpractice data related specifically to brachytherapy are very, very limited. No author has provided sufficient details regarding precisely what leads to brachytherapy malpractice cases. CONCLUSION: Hopefully, the recent spate of publications will segue into a more concerted effort to provide practitioners with detailed actionable descriptions of events leading to malpractice allegations.

Intravascular coronary brachytherapy combined with a drug-coated balloon.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease leads to stenosis of the major cardiac vessels, resulting in ischemia and infarction. Percutaneous intervention (PCI) with balloon angioplasty can re-open stenosed vessels. Drug eluting stents (DES) and intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) and drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are proven to decrease the likelihood of another restenosis after PCI, but neither is completely effective. Due to the limited long-term effectiveness of IVBT or DCB used separately for salvage PCI, we combined the two in some poor prognosis patients. METHODS: Combined IVBT+DCB was intended for a total of 36 patients from 2015-2020. PCI with some combination of ballooning, laser and directional/rotational atherectomy was used to maximally open the stenotic region prior to IVBT+DCB. Beta-radiation brachytherapy for all patients was done with a Novoste Beta-Cath. Lutonix 4.0 x 40 mm paclitaxel-coated balloons (Bard, Murray Hill, NJ) were employed. RESULTS: Overall survival at two years was 88%. Nine patients had follow-up angiograms, all for cardiac symptoms. Time from IVBT+DCB to follow-up angiography ranged from 4 to 33 months. The average months PCI-free interval before brachy therapy was 11.1 mos (95% CI 1.03-23.25) versus 23.3 mos after VBT (23.3 95% CI 12.3-32.3). The mean difference was 11.2 mos (95% CI 1.06-21.4, p < 0.031). None of the follow-up angiographic procedures displayed evidence of what could be interpreted as radiation damage. CONCLUSIONS: In this uncontrolled series, IVBT plus DCB appeared to lengthen the ISR-free interval relative to what had been achieved prior to the combined intervention. We view these results as mildly encouraging, worthy of further study.

Relationship between prostate cancer mortality and number of unfavourable risk factors in men treated with definitive brachytherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the number of unfavourable pretreatment risk factors predicts cause-specific mortality in men treated with prostate brachytherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 1995 and March 2006, 739 patients were treated who had at least one of the following adverse risk factors: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >10 ng/mL, a Gleason score of > or =7, clinical stage > or =T2b, or a PSA velocity (PSAV) of >2 ng/mL/year. Supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) was delivered to 464 (62.8%) men and 301 (40.7%) received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Of men with more than two risk factors, 87% received EBRT and 62% received ADT. RESULTS: The biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival for all patients were 95.0%, 97.9% and 70.0% at 12 years. Men with three or four risk factors had a prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) at 12 years of 5.3%, vs 1.7% for men with one or two risk factors (P= 0.006). When 'percentage of positive biopsy cores >50%' replaced PSAV as a risk factor, men with two or more risk factors had a PCSM of 8.9%, vs 1.0% for men with one or two risk factors (P= 0.001). There was no difference in all-cause mortality between the groups in either analysis. CONCLUSION: Multimodal brachytherapy results in high rates of bPFS and CSS, even for men with several unfavourable risk factors. Men with two or more unfavourable risk factors had a slightly greater risk of PCSM and no difference in all-cause mortality. The presence of three or four unfavourable intermediate-risk factors does not appear to clearly identify a group that requires further treatment intensification, although the percentage of positive cores might be more predictive than PSAV.

Androgen deprivation therapy: a survival benefit or detriment in men with high-risk prostate cancer?

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been used in the management of prostate cancer for more than four decades. Initially, hormone therapy was given largely for palliation of symptomatic metastases. Following several randomized trials of patients with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer that demonstrated improvements in biochemical control and survival with the addition of ADT to external beam radiotherapy, there was a dramatic increase in the use of hormone therapy in the definitive setting. More recently, the safety of ADT has been questioned, as some studies have suggested an association of hormone therapy with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This is particularly worrisome in light of practice patterns that show ADT use extrapolated to situations for which there has been no proven benefit. In the setting of dose escalation with modern radiotherapy, in conjunction with the latest concerns about cardiovascular morbidity with ADT, the magnitude of expected benefit along with potential risks of ADT use must be carefully considered for each patient.

Prostate cancer control and survival in Vietnam veterans exposed to Agent Orange.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we evaluated the impact of Agent Orange exposure on survival in Vietnam Veterans undergoing prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIAL: From May 1995 to January 2005, 81 Vietnam veterans (29 with Agent Orange exposure and 52 without) and 433 nonveterans of comparable age (mean age, 58 years) underwent prostate brachytherapy. The mean follow-up was 5.0 years. Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) was defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA)< or =0.40ng/mL after nadir. Patients with metastatic prostate cancer or hormone refractory disease without obvious metastases who died of any cause were classified as died of prostate cancer. All other deaths were attributed to the immediate cause of death. Multiple parameters were evaluated for impact on survival. RESULTS: At 9 years, Agent Orange-exposed men were least likely to remain biochemically controlled (89.5%, 100%, and 97.2% in Agent Orange-exposed, nonexposed veterans, and nonveterans, respectively, p=0.012). No significant differences in cause-specific (CSS) (p=0.832) or overall survival (OS) (p=0.363) were discerned. In multivariate analysis, CSS was best predicted by Gleason Score and day 0 D(90), whereas Gleason Score, % positive biopsies, and D(90) predicted for bPFS. None of the evaluated parameters predicted for OS, however, a trend was identified for better OS in younger patients and those with a higher D(90). In addition, Agent Orange exposure did not predict for any of the survival parameters. To date, 22 patients have died (metastatic prostate cancer two, second malignancies nine, cardiovascular disease eight, trauma two, and pulmonary one). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of prostate brachytherapy patients, Agent Orange exposure did not statistically impact survival in multivariate analysis.

Prostate brachytherapy in men > or =75 years of age.

PURPOSE: To evaluate cause-specific survival (CSS), biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), and overall survival (OS) in prostate cancer patients aged > or =75 years undergoing brachytherapy with or without supplemental therapies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between April 1995 and August 2004, 145 consecutive patients aged > or =75 years underwent permanent prostate brachytherapy. Median follow-up was 5.8 years. Biochemical progression-free survival was defined by a prostate-specific antigen level < or =0.40 ng/mL after nadir. Patients with metastatic prostate cancer or hormone-refractory disease without obvious metastases who died of any cause were classified as dead of prostate cancer. All other deaths were attributed to the immediate cause of death. Multiple clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters were evaluated for impact on survival. RESULTS: Nine-year CSS, bPFS, and OS rates for the entire cohort were 99.3%, 97.1%, and 64.5%, respectively. None of the evaluated parameters predicted for CSS, whereas bPFS was most closely predicted by percentage positive biopsies. Overall survival and non-cancer deaths were best predicted by tobacco status. Thirty-seven patients have died, with 83.8% of the deaths due to cardiovascular disease (22 patients) or second malignancies (9 patients). To date, only 1 patient (0.7%) has died of metastatic prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: After brachytherapy, high rates of CSS and bPFS are noted in elderly prostate cancer patients. Overall, approximately 65% of patients are alive at 9 years, with survival most closely related to tobacco status. We believe our results support an aggressive locoregional approach in appropriately selected elderly patients.