Extracorporeal Albumin Dialysis in Liver Failure with MARS and SPAD: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Liver failure is associated with hepatic and extrahepatic organ failure leading to a high short-term mortality rate. Extracorporeal albumin dialysis (ECAD) aims to reduce albumin-bound toxins accumulated during liver failure. ECAD detoxifies blood using albumin dialysis through an artificial semipermeable membrane with recirculation (molecular adsorbent recirculating system, MARS) or without (single-pass albumin dialysis, SPAD). METHODS: We performed a randomized crossover open trial in a surgical intensive care unit. The primary outcome of the study was total bilirubin reduction during MARS and during SPAD therapies. The secondary outcomes were conjugated bilirubin and bile acid level reduction during MARS and SPAD sessions and tolerance of dialysis system devices. Inclusion criteria were adult patients presenting liver failure with factor V activity <50% associated with bilirubin ≥250 µmol/L and a complication (either hepatic encephalopathy, severe pruritus, or hepatorenal syndrome). For MARS and SPAD, the dialysis flow rate was equal to 1,000 mL/h. RESULTS: Twenty crossovers have been performed. Baseline biochemical characteristics (bilirubin, ammonia, bile acids, creatinine, and urea) were not statistically different between MARS and SPAD. Both ECAD have led to a significant reduction in total bilirubin (-83 ± 67 µmol/L after MARS; -122 ± 118 µmol/L after SPAD session), conjugated bilirubin (-82 ± 61 µmol/L after MARS; -105 ± 96 µmol/L after SPAD session), and bile acid levels (-64 ± 75 µmol/L after MARS; -56 ± 56 µmol/L after SPAD session), all nondifferent comparing MARS to SPAD. CONCLUSION: A simple-to-perform SPAD therapy with equal to MARS dialysate flow parameters provides the same efficacy in bilirubin and bile acid removal. However, clinically relevant endpoints have to be evaluated in randomized trials to compare MARS and SPAD therapies and to define the place of SPAD in the liver failure care program.

Effect of intravenous lidocaine on pain after head and neck cancer surgery (ELICO trial): A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of postoperative pain after ear, nose and throat (ENT) cancer surgery is mainly morphine administration. Additional systemic lidocaine has shown promising results in some surgical procedures. OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to evaluate morphine consumption in the first 48 postoperative hours after intra-operative lidocaine infusion during major ENT cancer surgery. DESIGN: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Bicentric study including a university hospital and a major cancer centre, conducted from December 2016 to December 2019. PATIENTS: A total of 144 patients undergoing major ENT cancer surgery were included. INTERVENTION: The patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous lidocaine or placebo during surgery and in the recovery room. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Endpoints were postoperative morphine consumption in the first 24 and 48 h postoperatively, intra-operative remifentanil consumption, adverse events occurrence and assessment 3 to 6 months after surgery with the McGill pain questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were included (lidocaine n  = 57; placebo n  = 61, 26 patients were excluded). There was no significant difference in morphine consumption during the first 48 postoperative hours in the lidocaine group compared with the placebo group with a median [IQR] of 0.60 [0.30 to 1.03] mg kg -1 vs. 0.57 [0.37 to 0.96] mg kg -1 , total dose 44 [21 to 73.3] mg vs. 38 [23.3 to 56.5] mg, P  = 0.92.There was no significant difference between the two groups in any of the other endpoints, including at follow up 3 to 6 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Intravenous lidocaine in ENT cancer surgery did not show any additional analgesic or morphine-sparing effect 48 h after surgery. Three to six months after surgery, there was no significant difference in pain scores or consumption of analgesics. Patients treated pre-operatively with opioids were not evaluated in the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02894710 and EUDRACT number 2015-005799-90.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Coagulation Profile Derangement After Liver Surgery: Implications for the Use of Epidural Analgesia-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic surgery is a major abdominal surgery. Epidural analgesia may decrease the incidence of postoperative morbidities. Hemostatic disorders frequently occur after hepatic resection. Insertion or withdrawal (whether accidental or not) of an epidural catheter during coagulopathic state may cause an epidural hematoma. The aim of the study is to determine the incidence of coagulopathy after hepatectomy, interfering with epidural catheter removal, and to identify the risk factors related to coagulopathy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter, observational database including patients over 18 years old with a history of liver resection. Main collected data were the following: age, preexisting cirrhosis, Child-Pugh class, preoperative and postoperative coagulation profiles, extent of liver resection, blood loss, blood products transfused during surgery. International normalized ratio (INR) ≥1.5 and/or platelet count <80,000/mm defined coagulopathy according to the neuraxial anesthesia guidelines. A logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between selected factors and a coagulopathic state after hepatic resection. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred seventy-one patients were assessed. Seven hundred fifty-nine patients had data available about postoperative coagulopathy, which was observed in 53.5% [95% confidence interval, 50.0-57.1]. Maximum derangement in INR occurred on the first postoperative day, and platelet count reached a trough peak on postoperative days 2 and 3. In the multivariable analysis, preexisting hepatic cirrhosis (odds ratio [OR] = 2.49 [1.38-4.51]; P = .003), preoperative INR ≥1.3 (OR = 2.39 [1.10-5.17]; P = .027), preoperative platelet count <150 G/L (OR = 3.03 [1.77-5.20]; P = .004), major hepatectomy (OR = 2.96 [2.07-4.23]; P < .001), and estimated intraoperative blood loss ≥1000 mL (OR = 1.85 [1.08-3.18]; P = .025) were associated with postoperative coagulopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Coagulopathy is frequent (53.5% [95% confidence interval, 50.0-57.1]) after liver resection. Epidural analgesia seems safe in patients undergoing minor hepatic resection without preexisting hepatic cirrhosis, showing a normal preoperative INR and platelet count.

Evaluation of intravenous lidocaine in head and neck cancer surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Pain after major head and neck cancer surgery is underestimated and has both nociceptive and neuropathic characteristics. Extended resection, flap coverage, nerve lesions, inflammation, and high-dose opioid administration can also lead to hyperalgesia and chronic postoperative pain. Opioids are frequently associated with adverse events such as dizziness, drowsiness, nausea and vomiting, or constipation disturbing postoperative recovery and extending the length of hospital stay. Patients eligible for major head and neck cancer surgery cannot benefit from full multimodal pain management with locoregional anesthesia. Intravenous lidocaine, investigated in several studies, has been found to decrease acute pain and morphine consumption. Some data suggest also that it can prevent chronic postsurgical pain. Evidence supporting its use varies between surgical procedures, and there is no published study regarding systemic lidocaine administration in major head and neck cancer surgery. We hypothesized that intravenous lidocaine infused in the perioperative period would lead to opioid sparing and chronic postsurgical pain reduction. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 128 patients undergoing major head and neck surgery will be included in this prospective two-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients will be randomly assigned to lidocaine or placebo treatment. After induction of general anesthesia, an intravenous lidocaine bolus will be administered (1.5 mg.kg- 1), followed by a continuous infusion (2 mg.kg- 1.h- 1) which will be reduced in the postanesthesia care unit (1 mg.kg- 1.h- 1). The primary outcome measure is morphine consumption 48 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes include intraoperative remifentanil consumption, morphine consumption 24 h after surgery, and chronic postsurgical pain that will be assessed 3-6 months after surgery. DISCUSSION: Recent evidence suggests that intravenous lidocaine can lead to opioid sparing and chronic postsurgical pain reduction for certain types of surgery. This is the first trial to prospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine in major head and neck cancer surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02894710 . Registered on 11 August 2016.