Who Places High Value on the Uterus? A Cross-sectional Survey Study Evaluating Predictors for Uterine Preservation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors for placing high value on the uterus in patients who no longer desire fertility. The secondary objective was to identify reasons for placing high value on the uterus. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey study. SETTING: Three hospitals within a large healthcare system in the United States. PATIENTS: New patients ≥45 years old seeking care for benign gynecologic conditions, including abnormal uterine bleeding, uterine myomas, pelvic organ prolapse, endometriosis, or pelvic pain. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the summative score of the validated Value of Uterus (VALUS) instrument for measuring value placed on the uterus and the validated visual analog scale with the question "how important is it to you to keep your uterus when you have a gynecologic condition?" A total of 163 surveys were returned for analysis (79.2%). Using the VALUS cutoff, 64 patients (45.7%) were considered to have low value for their uterus (VALUS score <14), whereas 76 patients (54.3%) were considered to have high value for their uterus (VALUS score ≥14). The adjusted odds of placing high value for the uterus was 5.06 times higher among those who wanted to be sexually active in the future than those who do not desire to be sexually active (95% confidence interval, 1.55-16.52, p = .01). Patients who are sexually active have 3.94 higher adjusted odds of placing high value on the uterus than those who are not sexually active and do not desire to be (95% confidence interval, 1.36-11.43; p = .01). Race, religion, and personal history of cancer were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Patients who highly value the uterus were highly motivated by the desire to be sexually active. Nonwhite race, religion, and personal history of cancer were not predictors for placing high value on uterine preservation.

Development and validation of the Value of Uterus instrument and visual analog scale to measure patients' valuation of their uterus.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no clear frameworks or tools to objectively or subjectively evaluate patient attitudes toward uterine preservation and how they influence the decision to proceed with hysterectomy vs uterine preservation when undergoing prolapse surgery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a reliable and valid instrument to measure patients' valuation of their uterus. STUDY DESIGN: The Value of Uterus instrument was developed on the basis of existing literature and created with structured patient-reported outcome measurement development methodology. An initial 14-question instrument was administered to 152 patients, and the instrument was revised on the basis of an analysis of internal consistency. The resulting Value of Uterus instrument has 6 items and includes a visual analog scale for the question "How important is it to you to keep your uterus when you have a gynecologic condition?" To validate the instrument, we recruited 51 patients aged >45 years with uterovaginal prolapse who presented to the urogynecology department and were scheduled to undergo vaginal surgery with or without hysterectomy. Internal reliability of the instrument was measured with Cronbach alpha. For known-groups validity, Value of Uterus summary scores were compared between women who underwent hysteropexy and those who underwent hysterectomy using the t test. Intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess test-retest reliability with Value of Uterus administered to women twice. Lastly, a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to identify a cutoff Value of Uterus and visual analog scale score for predicting whether a woman would undergo hysteropexy (vs hysterectomy). RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were recruited (26 patients in the hysterectomy and 25 in the hysteropexy group), with a mean age of 64±10 years; 87.8% of patients self-identified as White. There were no differences in demographics between the groups. Cronbach's alpha was 0.94, suggesting excellent internal consistency of the items in the Value of Uterus instrument. The Value of Uterus instrument was highly correlated with the visual analog scale question, with r=0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.89; P<.001). Patients in the hysteropexy group had significantly higher Value of Uterus scores (indicating greater value placed on the uterus) than women who underwent hysterectomy (20.8 vs 12.2; P<.001). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis identified a Value of Uterus cutoff score ≥14, with good accuracy for predicting hysteropexy (area under the curve, 0.87; sensitivity, 92.0%; specificity, 68%). CONCLUSION: Value of Uterus is a reliable and valid 6-item instrument that measures patients' valuation of the uterus and preferences for uterine preservation when undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Value of Uterus and visual analog scale were shown to reliably predict whether a patient undergoes uterine-preserving prolapse surgery. The Value of Uterus instrument and visual analog scale tool can be useful tools to ensure that the patient's preferences are included in the medical decision-making. Value of Uterus may be useful for future research in other gynecologic conditions where uterine preservation is an option.

Intermediate term outcomes after transvaginal uterine-preserving surgery in women with uterovaginal prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: There is growing interest in and performance of uterine-preserving prolapse repairs. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) recurrence 2 years following transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy (USLH) and sacrospinous ligament hysteropexy (SSLH). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study with a cross-sectional survey of women who underwent transvaginal uterine-preserving POP surgery from May 2016 to December 2017. Patients were included if they underwent either USLH or SSLH. POP recurrence was defined as a composite of subjective symptoms and/or retreatment. A cross-sectional survey was used to assess pelvic floor symptoms and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 47 women met the criteria. Mean age was 52.8 ± 12.5 years, and all had a preoperative POP-Q stage of 2 (55.3%) or 3 (44.7%). Thirty (63.8%) underwent SSLH and 17 (36.2%) underwent USLH. There were no differences in patient characteristics or perioperative data. There was no difference in composite recurrence (26.7% [8] vs 23.5% [4]) and retreatment (6.7% [2] vs 0%) retrospectively between SSLH and USLH groups at 22.6 months. Survey response rate was 80.9% (38) with a response time of 30.7 (28.0-36.6) months. The majority of patients (84.2%) reported POP symptom improvement, and both groups reported great satisfaction (89.5%). In respondents, 13.2% (5) reported subjective recurrence and 5.3% (2) underwent retreatment, with no differences between hysteropexy types. There were no differences in other pelvic floor symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Although 1 in 4 women experienced subjective POP recurrence after transvaginal uterine-preserving prolapse repair and <5% underwent retreatment at 2 years, our results must be interpreted with caution given our small sample size. No differences in outcomes were identified between hysteropexy types; however, additional studies should be performed to confirm these findings. Both hysteropexy approaches were associated with great patient satisfaction.

A randomized controlled noninferiority trial of reduced vs routine opioid prescription after prolapse repair.

BACKGROUND: Given the accelerating opioid crisis in the United States and evidence that patients use fewer opioid tablets than prescribed, surgeons may choose to decrease prescribed quantities. The effect this may have on patient satisfaction with pain control after hospital discharge is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to compare patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control between patients receiving a routine or reduced quantity opioid prescription after prolapse repair. Secondary objectives included a comparison of opioid-related side-effects, the number of opioid tablets used, and the number of excess tablets prescribed between these groups. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-center, unmasked, 2-arm, randomized controlled noninferiority trial of women who underwent a prolapse repair with a planned overnight hospitalization. Patients were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 study arms: routine (28 tablets of oxycodone 5 mg) or reduced (5 tablets) prescription of opioid tablets. Patients were eligible if they were at least 18 years of age and undergoing a prolapse repair with an anticipated overnight hospital stay. Exclusion criteria included a history of chronic pain, preoperative opioid use, intolerance to study medication, or a score of ≥30 on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. In addition to their opioid prescription, all patients received multimodal pain medications at discharge. Patients were asked to complete 6 weeks of diaries to record pain and medication use. The primary outcome (patient satisfaction) was collected as part of a postoperative survey completed at patients' routine postoperative visit 6 weeks after surgery. The sample size for noninferiority was calculated at 59 patients per group for a total of 118 patients. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen patients were assigned randomly; the primary outcome was available for 116. The majority of patients were white, postmenopausal, and nonsmokers; the mean age was 62±10.4 years. The most common surgery was a hysterectomy with native tissue repair (n=71; 60%). One hundred ten patients (93%) were satisfied with postoperative pain control. Statistical analysis constructed for noninferiority showed that the difference between the groups was <15% (93% vs 93%; P=.005). Subjects in the reduced arm reported requiring an additional opioid prescription more frequently than in the routine arm (15% vs 2%; P=.01). Patients in the routine arm used more opioid tablets than the reduced arm (median, 3 [interquartile range, 0-14] vs 1 [interquartile range, 0-3]), but overall opioid utilization was low. As such, patients in the routine arm had significantly more unused opioid tablets (median, 26 [interquartile range, 15-28] vs 4 [interquartile range, 2-5]). CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction with pain control was noninferior in patients who received a reduced quantity of opioid tablets after prolapse repair compared with those who received a routine prescription. A large quantity of excess opioid tablets was seen in both groups. Surgeons should consider prescribing 5-10 opioid tablets after prolapse repair surgery and consider applying these findings to postoperative prescribing after other gynecologic procedures.

Pelvic organ prolapse recurrence in young women undergoing vaginal and abdominal colpopexy.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: While pelvic organ prolapse (POP) recurrence is believed to increase over time, outcomes of young women who undergo POP surgery are unclear. We hypothesized POP recurrence incidence among women <49 years would be higher after vaginal versus abdominal colpopexy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study with a cross-sectional survey of women 18-49 years who underwent primary POP surgery from January 2003 to September 2013. Patients were identified by CPT codes for vaginal and abdominal colpopexy. POP recurrence was defined as vaginal bulge symptoms, POP retreatment (pessary or surgery) or both. Validated questionnaires were used to assess pelvic floor symptoms, patient satisfaction and improvement. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-three women met the criteria. Mean age was 43 (+ 5.3) years; 29.1% (97) had an abdominal colpopexy and 70.9% (236) had a vaginal colpopexy. The recurrence incidence overall was 32.0% (31) in the abdominal group and 24.2% (57) in the vaginal group (p = 0.15), with a 10.3% (10) retreatment incidence in the abdominal group and 5.9% (14) in the vaginal group (p = 0.16). Forty-five percent (149) responded to the survey at a median time of 7.9 (3.1-15.2) years since surgery. The overall recurrence incidence in respondents was 13.7% (7) in the abdominal group and 15.3% (15) in the vaginal group (p = 0.80), with a retreatment incidence of 5.9% (3) in the abdominal and 5.2% (5) in the vaginal group (p = 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: One in four young women experienced subjective POP recurrence and/or retreatment, but only 5-10% underwent retreatment. There does not appear to be a difference in the incidence of recurrence between vaginal and abdominal colpopexy.

A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial on the effect of local analgesia on postoperative gluteal pain in patients undergoing sacrospinous ligament colpopexy.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of temporary gluteal pain after sacrospinous ligament colpopexy ranges from 6.1% to 15.3%. Gluteal pain may occur as a result of injury to S3 to S5 nerve roots that course over the mid-portion of the coccygeus-sacrospinous ligament complex at the time of suspension suture placement. There are no data on the use of injections to prevent postoperative pain from nerve entrapment at the time of suture placement. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether intraoperative local analgesia that is administered at the level of the sacrospinous ligament can lessen the gluteal pain felt by patients postoperatively after sacrospinous ligament colpopexy. STUDY DESIGN: In a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, women with vaginal apex prolapse who were undergoing surgical treatment with sacrospinous ligament colpopexy underwent intraoperative injection with either 0.25% bupivacaine or normal saline solution. Subjects completed visual analog pain scales (0-10) and the Activities Assessment Scale and recorded the use of pain medications over a 6-week period. The primary outcome was postoperative gluteal pain. A sample size of 50 subjects (25 in each arm) was planned to test the hypothesis that local analgesia administration will lessen postoperative pain compared with placebo. RESULTS: Between April 2014 and March 2016, 51 women were enrolled in the study, and 46 women underwent sacrospinous ligament colpopexy. On postoperative day 1, 90.2% of all subjects (n=41) reported gluteal pain. At weeks 1 and 2, 63.8% (n=29) and 44.1% (n=20) women reported pain; at weeks 4 and 6, 33.3% (n=15) and 26.9% (n=12) women continued to have some pain. On day 1, the mean score for gluteal pain was 3.7±2.9. By week 1, the score was 1.8±2.6; by week 6, the mean score was 0.1±0.3. There were no differences in pain scores for patients who had undergone injection with 0.25% bupivacaine and those who were injected with normal saline solution. Patients in the placebo group used significantly more nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs than the treatment group: adjusted odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.35; P=.01). By 6 weeks, 87.5% of patients had returned to their baseline "light" activity level. There was no difference in time to return to baseline between the groups. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative administration of local analgesia does not reduce patients' perceptions of postoperative gluteal pain after sacrospinous ligament colpopexy; however, it may reduce the need for pain medication after surgery.

Vaginal hysterectomy, vaginal salpingoophorectomy and uterosacral ligament colpopexy: a view from above (in English and Spanish).

AIM OF THE VIDEO: The aim of this video is to make vaginal hysterectomy (TVH), vaginal salpingoophorectomy and uterosacral ligament (USL) colpopexy approachable by showing the key procedural steps from both the vaginal and abdominal perspectives. METHODS: This production shows TVH with salpingoophorectomy and USL colpopexy that was performed on a cadaver and filmed simultaneously from the vaginal and abdominal views. The video begins with an anatomy overview from the open abdomen and proceeds with the TVH. The anterior and posterior peritoneal entries, a technique to safely and easily access the adnexa, as well as the placement of USL suspension sutures are highlighted. The proximity of the ureter and its distance from the three locations most vulnerable to injury during this procedure (the uterine artery pedicle, the infundibulopelvic ligament and the USL) are illustrated. The location of the USL suspension sutures in relation to the ischial spine, the rectum and the sacrum are demonstrated. For all of these crucial steps, a series of picture-in-picture views simultaneously showing the abdominal and vaginal perspectives are presented so that the viewer may better understand the spatial anatomy. CONCLUSION: This video provides the viewer with a unique anatomic perspective and helps more confidently perform TVH, vaginal salpingooophorectomy and USL colpopexy.

Entry into the peritoneal cavity in posthysterectomy prolapse: an educational video.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Entry into the peritoneal cavity can be challenging in patients with posthysterectomy prolapse; however, it is important for vaginal surgeons to be able to enter the peritoneal cavity using various techniques to perform an intraperitoneal vaginal vault suspension. METHODS: We present surgical footage of various methods of accessing the peritoneal cavity in posthysterectomy prolapse using posterior, anterior and apical approaches. RESULTS: This video highlights surgical techniques that can be used to enter the peritoneal cavity in posthysterectomy prolapse in a safe and reliable manner. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal surgeons should be able to safely and confidently identify and enter the peritoneal cavity using various approaches to perform an intraperitoneal vaginal vault suspension.

Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension Using a 3-Trocar System: Tips and Tricks.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe a technique for performing laparoscopic Burch colposuspension using a 3-trocar system. DESIGN: This educational video provides step-by-step instructions for performing a laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. This study was exempt from institutional review board approval. SETTING: Midurethral slings are an effective surgical treatment for women with stress urinary incontinence, but not all patients are candidates for, or desire, vaginal mesh. For stress incontinence, nonmesh surgical procedures include pubovaginal fascial slings and retropubic Burch colposuspension. Colposuspension may be performed via an open or laparoscopic approach. As with other minimally invasive surgeries, laparoscopic colposuspension has decreased blood loss, pain, and length of stay with equivalent outcomes at 2 years compared with open procedures. This video describes a technique for performing laparoscopic Burch colposuspension using a 3-trocar system. INTERVENTIONS: A laparoscopic Burch colposuspension is described using a 3-trocar system. Detailed step-by-step instructions are given, along with visualization of pertinent anatomy. Supplies needed for this procedure include a 0-degree, 5-mm laparoscope; two 5-mm trocars, 1 to be placed in the umbilicus and 1 in the left lower quadrant; one 5/12-mm trocar to be placed in the right lower quadrant for passing needles; a closed knot pusher; laparoscopic scissors; and 2 needle drivers. This technique assumes that the primary surgeon (located on the patient's left) is right-handed and that both surgeons can suture and tie knots laparoscopically. Tips are highlighted to ensure safety and ensure successful completion of the procedure. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension offers a nonmesh-based repair for women with stress urinary incontinence using a minimally invasive approach. It is a reasonable alternative to offer patients with stress urinary incontinence who do not desire repair using vaginal mesh.

Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) in Gynecology.

Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) is an emerging field in minimally invasive surgery. NOTES can be performed via a variety of approaches, including through the stomach, esophagus, bladder, and rectum, but the majority of cases have been performed transvaginally. Potential advantages of natural orifice surgery in gynecology include the lack of abdominal incisions, less operative pain, shorter hospital stay, improved visibility, and the possibility to circumvent extensive lysis of adhesion to reach the pelvic cavity. This chapter provides a historical overview and the potential application of NOTES.

Increasing Utilization of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.

Once the decision to perform a hysterectomy has been made, the type and route of hysterectomy must be chosen, and efforts made to accomplish the surgery as safely as possible. Hysterectomy can be performed vaginally, abdominally with laparoscopic or robotic assistance, or open. The main goal of gynecologic surgeons should be to lower the rate of open abdominal hysterectomy and increase use of both vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy in their patients. We discuss efforts to accomplish a greater use of minimally invasive hysterectomy.

Perioperative adverse events associated with colpocleisis for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse.

BACKGROUND: Colpocleisis, a vaginal obliterative procedure, offers women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse an effective, durable anatomic repair and is associated with high patient satisfaction rates. Historically, colpocleisis was reserved for the medically frail or elderly with the goal of limiting anesthetic exposure, decreasing operative time, and minimizing adverse events. Several colpocleisis and colpectomy procedures exist and limited evaluation has been performed comparing these differences in regards to perioperative adverse events. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to describe the overall rate of perioperative adverse events in patients undergoing colpocleisis. The secondary objective was to compare rates of adverse events between different colpocleisis procedures. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent colpocleisis at a tertiary care center from January 2003 through December 2013. Subjects were identified by their Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and categorized into 3 groups: (1) partial or complete vaginectomy/colpectomy (CPT 57106, 57110); (2) vaginal hysterectomy with total or partial colpectomy (CPT 58275, 58280); and (3) Le Fort colpocleisis (CPT 57120). Baseline demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative data were collected. Analysis of variance was used to describe perioperative and postoperative adverse events in all subjects and to compare outcomes among the 3 groups. RESULTS: In all, 245 subjects underwent colpocleisis during the study period. Mean age and body mass index were 78 (±7) years and 27.7 (±5.8) kg/m(2), respectively; 59.1% (140/245) of subjects had stage-4 prolapse. The most common adverse event was urinary tract infection occurring in 34.7% of subjects. Major adverse events were uncommon. There were no differences in event rates among the groups except for the following: patients undergoing concurrent vaginal hysterectomy had longer mean operative time (144 vs 108 vs 111 minutes, P = .0001), had higher estimated blood loss (253 vs 135 vs 146 mL, P = .0001), and were more likely to experience postoperative venous thromboembolism (4.6% vs 0% vs 0%, P = .01). After controlling for age, body mass index, medical comorbidities, estimated blood loss, and operative time, the risk of venous thromboembolism was no longer significant. CONCLUSION: The overall rate of major perioperative and postoperative adverse events in women undergoing colpocleisis is low; however, concomitant hysterectomy is associated with longer operative times and higher blood loss.

Incidence of adverse events after uterosacral colpopexy for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vault prolapse.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe perioperative and postoperative adverse events associated with uterosacral colpopexy, to describe the rate of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) associated with uterosacral colpopexy, and to determine whether surgeon technique and suture choice are associated with these rates. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective chart review of women who underwent uterosacral colpopexy for POP from January 2006 through December 2011 at a single tertiary care center. The electronic medical record was queried for demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data. Strict definitions were used for all clinically relevant adverse events. Recurrent POP was defined as the following: symptomatic vaginal bulge, prolapse to or beyond the hymen, or any retreatment for POP. RESULTS: In all, 983 subjects met study inclusion criteria. The overall adverse event rate was 31.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.2-38.6), which included 20.3% (95% CI, 17.9-23.6) of subjects with postoperative urinary tract infections. Of all adverse events, 3.4% were attributed to a preexisting medical condition, while all other events were ascribed to the surgical intervention. Vaginal hysterectomy, age, and operative time were not significantly associated with any adverse event. The intraoperative bladder injury rate was 1% (95% CI, 0.6-1.9) and there were no intraoperative ureteral injuries; 4.5% (95% CI, 3.4-6.0) of cases were complicated by ureteral kinking requiring suture removal. The rates of pulmonary and cardiac complications were 2.3% (95% CI, 1.6-3.5) and 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4-1.6); and the rates of postoperative ileus and small bowel obstruction were 0.1% (95% CI, 0.02-0.6) and 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4-1.6). The composite recurrent POP rate was 14.4% (95% CI, 12.4-16.8): 10.6% (95% CI, 8.8-12.7) of patients experienced vaginal bulge symptoms, 11% (95% CI, 9.2-13.1) presented with prolapse to or beyond the hymen, and 3.4% (95% CI, 2.4-4.7) required retreatment. Number and type of suture used were not associated with a higher rate of recurrence. Of the subjects who required unilateral removal of sutures to resolve ureteral kinking, 63.6% did not undergo suture replacement; this was not associated with a higher rate of POP recurrence. CONCLUSION: Perioperative and postoperative complication rates associated with severe morbidity after uterosacral colpopexy appear to be low. Uterosacral colpopexy remains a safe option for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.

Small bowel surgery for the gynecologist specializing in benign disease.

INTRODUCTION: Adhesions are fibrous bands of scar tissue that are often a result of surgery. Adhesions of the bowel are a common finding during gynecologic procedures, and their presence can lead to injury. METHOD: This video article demonstrates enterolysis and small-bowel surgery in women undergoing surgery for a benign gynecologic condition and found to have severe adhesive disease. CONCLUSION: Small bowel surgery is best carried out using a team approach. Surgeons should be especially vigilant about injury to the bowel in patients undergoing extensive adhesiolysis or enterolysis.

Female clitoral priapism: an over-the-counter option for management.

INTRODUCTION: Female priapism is a rare condition that is not commonly described in the literature. There are many treatment strategies for the management of priapism, including conservative and safe over-the-counter options. AIM: To describe a case of a woman who presented with clitoral priapism, who was managed conservatively with a simple over-the-counter treatment plan. METHODS: A 29-year-old gravida 0 para 0 presented to the emergency room with painful clitoral priapism lasting for 5 days. Despite cessation of the suspected causal agents, trazodone and wellbutrin, her symptoms persisted. RESULTS: The patient was managed conservatively with analgesics and around-the-clock oral pseudoephedrine and experienced complete resolution of her symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Oral pseudoephedrine may be a reasonable option for certain patients, and may be considered as a first-line therapy and adjunct to conservative measures.

Assessing intraoperative judgment using script concordance testing through the gynecology continuum of practice.

OBJECTIVE: To measure surgical judgment across the Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYN) continuum of practice and identify factors that correlate with improved surgical judgment. METHODS: A 45-item written examination was developed using script concordance theory, which compares an examinee's responses to a series of "ill-defined" surgical scenarios to a reference panel of experts. The examination was administered to OBGYN residents, Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS) fellows, practicing OBGYN physicians and FPMRS experts. Surgical judgment was evaluated by comparing scores against the experts. Factors related to surgical experience were measured for association with scores. RESULTS: In total, 147 participants including 11 residents, 37 fellows, 88 practicing physicians and 11 experts completed the 45-item examination. Mean scores for practicing physicians (65.2 ± 7.4) were similar to residents (67.2 ± 7.1), and worse than fellows (72.6 ± 4.2, p < 0.001) and experts (80 ± 5, p < 0.001). Positive correlations between scores and surgical experience included: annual number of vaginal hysterectomies (r = 0.32, p = <0.001), robotic hysterectomies (r = 0.17, p = 0.048), stress incontinence (r = 0.29, p < 0.001) and prolapse procedures (r = 0.37, p < 0.001). Inverse correlation was seen between test scores and years in practice. (r = -0.19, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative judgment in practicing OBGYN physicians appears similar to resident physicians. Practicing physicians who perform FPMRS procedures perform poorly on this examination of surgical judgment; lower performance correlates with less surgical experience and the greater amount of time in practice.

Risk Factors for Bladder Perforation at the Time of Retropubic Midurethral Sling Placement.

IMPORTANCE: There is conflicting evidence regarding predictive factors for bladder perforation during retropubic midurethral sling (R-MUS) placement and lack of evidence to support adoption of techniques to minimize such injury. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to describe the incidence of and factors associated with bladder perforation during R-MUS placement and to explore whether retropubic hydrodissection decreases the likelihood of perforation. STUDY DESIGN: This is a case-control study of women undergoing R-MUS placement from 2007 to 2017. Cases were identified by review of the operative reports for evidence of bladder perforation. Patients without bladder perforation were defined as controls and were matched to cases in a 3:1 ratio by surgeon, sling type, and surgery date. RESULTS: A total of 1,187 patients underwent R-MUS placement. The incidence of bladder perforation was 8% (n = 92 patients); 276 controls were matched accordingly (N = 368). Patients with bladder perforations were more likely to have a body mass index (BMI) less than 30 (P = 0.004) and to have a diagnosis of endometriosis (P = 0.02). They were also more likely to have had previous hysterectomy (P = 0.03) and urethral bulking (P = 0.01). On logistic regression, bladder perforation remained associated with a BMI less than 30 (adjusted odds ratio, 2.22 [95% confidence interval, 1.30-3.80]) and endometriosis (adjusted odds ratio 2.90 [95% confidence interval, 1.15-7.01]). Retropubic hydrodissection was performed in 62% of the patients and was not associated with a lower risk of perforation (P = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of bladder perforation was 8%. The risk of this complication is higher in patients with a BMI less than 30 and/or endometriosis. Retropubic hydrodissection may not decrease the likelihood of this event.

Reanalysis of a randomized trial of 3 techniques of anterior colporrhaphy using clinically relevant definitions of success.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to reanalyze the results of a previously published trial that compared 3 methods of anterior colporrhaphy according to the clinically relevant definitions of success. STUDY DESIGN: A secondary analysis of a trial of 114 subjects who underwent surgery for anterior pelvic organ prolapse who were assigned randomly to standard anterior colporrhaphy, ultralateral colporrhaphy, or anterior colporrhaphy plus polyglactin 910 mesh from 1996-1999. For the current analysis, success was defined as (1) no prolapse beyond the hymen, (2) the absence of prolapse symptoms (visual analog scale ≤ 2), and (3) the absence of retreatment. RESULTS: Eighty-eight percent of the women met our definition of success at 1 year. One subject (1%) underwent surgery for recurrence 29 months after surgery. No differences among the 3 groups were noted for any outcomes. CONCLUSION: Reanalysis of a trial of 3 methods of anterior colporrhaphy revealed considerably better success with the use of clinically relevant outcome criteria compared with strict anatomic criteria.

Lower abdominal and pelvic pain with advanced pelvic organ prolapse: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the relative frequencies of pain in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse (POP). STUDY DESIGN: This was an ancillary analysis of a case-control study investigating functional bowel disorders in women with and without POP. Cases were defined as subjects with stage 3 or 4 POP and controls were subjects with normal pelvic support. RESULTS: Women with POP were more likely to experience lower abdominal or pelvic pain that was significantly bothersome and interfered with daily activities (odds ratio [OR], 9.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7-20.4). After controlling for confounders, women with prolapse were more likely to report pressure in the lower abdomen (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.6-3.2), heaviness in the pelvic region (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.3-4.3), and pain in the lower abdomen (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.8-4.1). CONCLUSION: Women with prolapse are more likely to report pain, pressure, or heaviness in the lower abdomen or pelvis compared with women with normal support.