Reducing tumescent anesthetic injection pain by topical anesthesia pretreatment among patients undergoing endovenous radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Tumescent anesthesia frequently causes the intraoperative and postoperative pain during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of varicose veins. We have to find a way to reduce pain caused by these injections. This randomized controlled trial investigated the effectiveness of topical anesthesia pretreatment (TAP) on relieving needle puncture pain during administration of tumescent anesthesia among patients undergoing RFA of varicose veins. METHODS: Eligible patients treated with RFA were recruited and randomized to either application of TAP with lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) or water-based cream (placebo). The primary outcome was patient described pain scores on the visual analogue scale (VAS) at different time points during the procedure. Secondary outcomes were technical success rate, complications, satisfaction level, expense, and extra analgesia use. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were randomized: 32 to EMLA and 30 to placebo. Both groups had comparable baseline demographics, CEAP classification, and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS). Less tumescent anesthetic needle puncture pain was found in the EMLA group (22 ± 7 vs 42 ± 8, p < .01). Pain scores of other time points were equivalent. There was less pain in EMLA pretreated area compared to non-pretreated area in the same patient during needle puncture (22 ± 7 vs 45 ± 7, p < .01), and similar phenomena did not appear in the placebo group. There was no statistical difference in complications, satisfaction level, expense, and technical success between the two groups. And no extra analgesia was used in all patients. CONCLUSION: We recommend the routine use of TAP to reduce the needle puncture pain during tumescent anesthesia in RFA of lower extremity varicose veins.

Clinical and angiographic outcomes of stent-assisted coiling of paraclinoid aneurysms: Comparison of LVIS and Neuroform stents.

Paraclinoid aneurysms are mainly intradural, and are associated with a potential risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The application of stent-assisted coiling has been widely used in endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Here we aimed to compare clinical outcomes between low-profile visualized intraluminal support stents (LVIS) and Neuroform (NU) stents. Between January 2013 and December 2017, a total of 101 patients with 118 unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms were embolized by LVIS or NU stents. Procedure-related complications, angiography, and follow-up results were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 45 patients with 54 aneurysms received LVIS stents, and 56 patients with 64 aneurysms received NU stents. Procedure-related complication rate was 6.7% in the LVIS group and 5.4% in the NU group, with no statistical differences between groups (P = 0.511). Compared with the NU group, greater initial complete or near-complete aneurysm obliteration was achieved in the LVIS group (79.6% vs 59.4%, P = 0.0192). DSA angiography follow-up imaging of the 118 aneurysms showed that the LVIS group increased in Raymond-Roy Grade Scale I (RRGS I), however there is no statistical difference (P = 0.32). Compared with NU stents, LVIS stents may achieve greater complete or near-complete occlusion rate immediately post-operation. However, there was no difference in procedural-related complications and follow-up outcomes between LVIS and NU stent groups.