Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 115(4): 922-932, 2023 03 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36368434

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To map supraclavicular fossa-involved lymph nodes (SCF-LNs) in patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer, evaluate the coverage of widely adopted atlases, and propose modified borders for individualized regional irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: M0 patients with biopsy-proven SCF-LNs who were SCF treatment-naïve were included. The SCF was spatially divided into subregions, with each node mapped on the original images. The geographic misses after the borders of multiple atlases were evaluated and factors affecting SCF-LNs' spread pattern were analyzed. RESULTS: From 1998 to 2022, 209 patients with 1242 SCF-LNs were eligible. Patients had a median of 4 nodes. At least 537 nodes (43.2%) in 147 patients (70.3%) were lateral to the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM), and 403 nodes (32.4%) in 127 patients (60.8%) were dorsal to the anterior scalene muscle (ASM). In the 88 patients with ≤3 SCF-LNs, at least 66 nodes (39.1%) in 40 patients (45.5%) were lateral to the SCM, and 34 nodes (20.1%) in 29 patients (33.0%) were dorsal to the ASM. These nodes were not covered by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) atlas and partly within the Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness atlas. One hundred four patients (49.8%) had 432 SCF-LNs (34.8%) beyond the upper border of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) atlas. In multivariate regression, nodal sizes were associated with wider spread in the primary group. Being triple-negative (TN) subtype was associated with less spread in the recurrent group. Situation-based clinical target volumes (CTVs) were theorized, in which for a sequential spread, the posterior border could be the posterior scalene muscle or even be more constringent; otherwise, it should touch the anterior trapezius surface. CONCLUSIONS: SCF-LNs tend to spread laterally and dorsally beyond the RTOG borders, even in M0 stages with ≤3 SCF-LNs. The ESTRO upper border does not guarantee coverage with multiple SCF-LNs. Nodal burden and non-TN types are predictive of wider dissemination. A situation-based CTV is possibly feasible. Deciphering the SCF-LN spread route is needed.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Radioterapia (Especialidade) , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Linfonodos/patologia , Pescoço
2.
Ai Zheng ; 28(8): 844-50, 2009 Aug.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19664331

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Paclitaxel is a radiosensitizer which may stabilize microtubules, block the G2/M phase of the cell cycle and thus modulate the radioresponsiveness of tumor cells. However, its potential molecular mechanisms of radiosensitization have not been well understood yet. This study was to investigate the radiosensitizing effect of paclitaxel on human oral epithelium carcinoma (KB) cell line and to explore the molecular mechanism of radiosensitization. METHODS: The survival of KB cells following the treatment with paclitaxel and/or radiation was determined by colony-forming assay. The radiosensitizing effect was evaluated by calculating the sensitizing enhancement ratio (SER) with multi-target single hit model. The cell cycle distribution was analyzed by flow cytometry. Differentially expressed genes related to paclitaxel radiosensitization were screened using human Oligo microarray. Expressions of protein regulating cytokinesis 1 (PRC1) and cyclin B2 genes were confirmed by real-time quantitative PCR. RESULTS: The proliferation of KB cells was significantly inhibited by paclitaxel combined with ionizing radiation. The SERD0 and SERDq were (2.40 +/- 1.87) and (12.23 +/- 2.81) respectively, when the concentration of paclitaxel was 20 nmol/l. After the treatment with paclitaxel in combination with irradiation, the percentage of G1 phase cells decreased from (48.32 +/- 2.40)% to (15.73 +/- 7.00)% (P<0.01), and the percentage of G2/M phase cells increased from (13.66 +/- 2.16)% to (52.51 +/- 5.02)% (P<0.01). In total 176 differentially expressed genes were identified to be related to paclitaxel radiosensitization. Ten genes were found to regulate cell division, two of which were up-regulated and eight were down-regulated after the treatment. Moreover, the expression of PRC1 and cyclin B2 was decreased. CONCLUSION: The radiosensitizing effect of paclitaxel on KB cells may be due to the down-regulated expression of PRC1 and cyclin B2, resulting in inhibition of mitotic spindle formation and cell necrosis.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Ciclo Celular/metabolismo , Ciclina B2/metabolismo , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Paclitaxel/farmacologia , Radiossensibilizantes/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/farmacologia , Apoptose/efeitos dos fármacos , Apoptose/efeitos da radiação , Ciclo Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Ciclo Celular/efeitos da radiação , Humanos , Células KB , Aceleradores de Partículas , Tolerância a Radiação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa