Advances in Analyzing the Breast Cancer Lipidome and Its Relevance to Disease Progression and Treatment.

Abnormal lipid metabolism is common in breast cancer with the three main subtypes, hormone receptor (HR) positive, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) positive, and triple negative, showing common and distinct lipid dependencies. A growing body of studies identify altered lipid metabolism as impacting breast cancer cell growth and survival, plasticity, drug resistance, and metastasis. Lipids are a class of nonpolar or polar (amphipathic) biomolecules that can be produced in cells via de novo synthesis or acquired from the microenvironment. The three main functions of cellular lipids are as essential components of membranes, signaling molecules, and nutrient storage. The use of mass spectrometry-based lipidomics to analyze the global cellular lipidome has become more prevalent in breast cancer research. In this review, we discuss current lipidomic methodologies, highlight recent breast cancer lipidomic studies and how these findings connect to disease progression and therapeutic development, and the potential use of lipidomics as a diagnostic tool in breast cancer. A better understanding of the breast cancer lipidome and how it changes during drug resistance and tumor progression will allow informed development of diagnostics and novel targeted therapies.

Targeting aberrant fatty acid synthesis and storage in endocrine resistant breast cancer cells.

Background: Lipid metabolic reprogramming is an emerging characteristic of endocrine therapy (ET) resistance in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. We explored changes in lipid metabolism in ER+ breast cancer cell lines following acquired resistance to common endocrine treatments and tested efficacy of an inhibitor in current clinical trials. Methods: We derived ER+ breast cancer cell lines resistant to Tamoxifen (TamR), Fulvestrant (FulvR), and long-term estrogen withdrawal (EWD). Parental and ET resistant cells were subjected to global gene expression and unbiased lipidomic profiling. Lipid storage changes were assessed via neutral lipid staining with Oil Red O (ORO). The impact of the fatty acid synthase (FASN) inhibitor TVB-2640 on the growth and lipid storage of these cell lines was evaluated. Additionally, 13 C 2 -acetate tracing was used to examine FASN activity in parental and ET resistant cells in the absence or presence of TVB-2640. Results: Compared to parental cells, lipid metabolism and processing pathways were notably enriched in ET resistant cells, which exhibited distinct lipidomes characterized by increased triglyceride and polyunsaturated FA (PUFA) species. ET-resistant cells displayed enhanced cytoplasmic lipid droplets. Increased FASN protein levels were observed in ET-resistant cells, and TVB-2640 effectively inhibited FASN activity. FASN inhibition reduced cell growth in some but not all cell lines and ET resistance types and did not correlate to lipid storage reduction. 13 C 2 -acetate tracing confirmed reduced palmitate synthesis and enhanced PUFA synthesis in ET-resistant cells, especially when combined with FulvR. Conclusion: ET resistant breast cancer cells exhibit a shift towards enhanced triglyceride storage and complex lipids enriched with PUFA acyl chains. While targeting FASN alongside ET may not fully overcome ET resistance in our models, focusing on the unique lipid metabolic dependencies, such as PUFA pathways, may present a promising alternative strategy for treating ET resistant breast cancer.

Estrogens and Progestins Cooperatively Shift Breast Cancer Cell Metabolism.

Metabolic reprogramming remains largely understudied in relation to hormones in estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) positive breast cancer. In this study, we investigated how estrogens, progestins, or the combination, impact metabolism in three ER and PR positive breast cancer cell lines. We measured metabolites in the treated cells using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS). Top metabolic processes upregulated with each treatment involved glucose metabolism, including Warburg effect/glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, and the pentose phosphate pathway. RNA-sequencing and pathway analysis on two of the cell lines treated with the same hormones, found estrogens target oncogenes, such as MYC and PI3K/AKT/mTOR that control tumor metabolism, while progestins increased genes associated with fatty acid metabolism, and the estrogen/progestin combination additionally increased glycolysis. Phenotypic analysis of cell energy metabolism found that glycolysis was the primary hormonal target, particularly for the progestin and estrogen-progestin combination. Transmission electron microscopy found that, compared to vehicle, estrogens elongated mitochondria, which was reversed by co-treatment with progestins. Progestins promoted lipid storage both alone and in combination with estrogen. These findings highlight the shift in breast cancer cell metabolism to a more glycolytic and lipogenic phenotype in response to combination hormone treatment, which may contribute to a more metabolically adaptive state for cell survival.

Cytokeratin 5 alters ß-catenin dynamics in breast cancer cells.

Estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancers often contain subpopulations of cells that express the intermediate filament protein cytokeratin 5 (CK5). CK5+ cells are enriched in cancer stem cell (CSC) properties, can be induced by progestins, and predict poor prognosis in ER+ breast cancer. We established through CK5 knockout and overexpression in ER+ breast cancer cell lines that CK5 is important for tumorsphere formation, prompting us to speculate that CK5 has regulatory activity in CSCs. To interrogate CK5 interacting proteins that may be functionally cooperative, we performed immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry for CK5 in ER+ breast cancer cells. Focusing on proteins with signaling activity, we identified ß-catenin, a key transcription factor of the Wnt signaling pathway and cell adhesion molecule, as a CK5 interactor, which we confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation in several breast cancer models. We interrogated the dual functions of ß-catenin in relation to CK5. Knockout or knockdown of CK5 ablated ß-catenin transcriptional activity in response to progestins and Wnt stimuli. Conversely, CK5 induced by progestins or overexpression was sufficient to promote the loss of ß-catenin at the cell membrane and total E-cadherin loss. A breast cancer patient-derived xenograft showed similar loss of membrane ß-catenin and E-cadherin in CK5+ but not intratumoral CK5- cells and single-cell RNA sequencing found the top enriched pathways in the CK5+ cell cluster were cell junction remodeling and signaling. This report highlights that CK5 actively remodels cell morphology and that blockade of CK5-ß-catenin interaction may reverse the detrimental properties of CK5+ breast cancer cells.