'Adulting' with IBD: Efficacy of a Novel Virtual Transition Workshop for Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

PURPOSE: The rising prevalence of IBD in children corresponds with a need for patient education on transition to adult care. The objective of this study was to design, implement and evaluate a novel transitions program for adolescents with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and their parents, and to assess the impact of this program on transition readiness skills, self-efficacy and participant satisfaction. DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixteen adolescent-parent dyads participated in the virtual transition workshop. Workshop programming was designed utilizing a biopsychosocial and multidisciplinary approach to IBD management and engagement with healthcare resources. The impact of the workshop was measured utilizing validated self- and parent-report measures of transition readiness (TRAQ), self-efficacy (IBD-SES), depression (PHQ8) and anxiety (GAD7). RESULTS: Over 60% of participants found the workshop helpful and 92% would recommend it to other teens with IBD. The average adolescent transition readiness score (TRAQ) significantly increased by 5.00 points following the workshop (SD = 7.49, p = 0.04), while total parent scores increased by 10.55 points (SD = 11.15, p = 0.011). As was expected, this demonstrates increased transition readiness skills. The average total adolescent IBD-SES score decreased by 6.75 (SD = 8.95, p = 0.024). CONCLUSION: This novel transition program resulted in increased participant transition readiness, as reported by adolescent and parents, indicating the workshop's utility in promoting tangible skill development. Self-efficacy scores did not increase; self-efficacy is a delayed measure of program success and is tied to disease status and other stressors which also changed across time points. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Future directions include continuing the virtual program for increased participation and dissemination, integrating feedback and increasing interdisciplinary involvement.

Assessing the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Severity of Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Admissions and New Diagnoses.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced new challenges to the diagnosis and management of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Many patients have had only limited access to their providers through telemedicine, and many chose to delay nonemergent treatment. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients with IBD seen by the Pediatric Gastroenterology Division at Doernbecher Children's Hospital from January 2018 to August 2021 was conducted. The study cohort was divided into 2 groups: those presenting before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (January 1, 2018 to February 28, 2020) and those presenting during the pandemic (March 1, 2020 to August 1, 2021). Variables collected included: age, sex, race, ethnicity, IBD type, insurance type, location of residence. Primary outcome measures selected focused on disease severity, initial type of treatment, or surgical intervention offered. A subgroup analysis of the new diagnosis patients was performed. Data were analyzed using independent t-tests, chi-squared analysis, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results: Two hundred and eleven patients met inclusion criteria, 107 (72 new diagnoses, 35 admissions) within the pre-COVID epoch and 104 (67 new diagnoses, 37 admissions) within the during-COVID epoch. Patients in the during-COVID epoch had higher fecal calprotectin level and were more likely to be started on a biologic as initial treatment. Patients admitted during COVID for IBD flare were more likely to require surgical intervention. Subgroup analysis of newly diagnosed patients revealed higher incidence of comorbid depression and anxiety. Conclusions: Our review identified increased disease severity in newly diagnosed pediatric patients with IBD as well as pediatric patients admitted for flare during COVID. Increases in anxiety and depression rates during COVID may have contributed to worsened disease severity.

Evaluating the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Postpartum Depression.

Objective: Studies examining the impact of natural disasters noted that in the setting of stable rates of depression, postpartum depression (PPD) increased in vulnerable subgroups. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may similarly impact maternal health. This study aimed to characterize the effect of COVID-19 on the incidence of PPD and to identify vulnerable subgroups. Methods: Retrospective chart review of maternal-newborn dyads was conducted over two epochs: pre-COVID-19 (January 1-June 1, 2019) and during-COVID-19 (January 1-June 1, 2020). PPD was defined as an Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score of ≧ 10 at any postnatal appointment. Prevalence of depression and anxiety was recorded. Data were analyzed using chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and t-tests. Results: Among 1061 dyads (557 in the 2019 epoch, 504 in the 2020 epoch), the epochs had similar clinical and demographic characteristics. Incidence proportion of PPD was similar (16.9% to 18.1%, p = 0.67). In subgroup analyses, this outcome was also similar among primiparous mothers (17.4% to 22.2%, p = 0.22) and publicly insured mothers (23.9% to 25.9%, p = 0.78). The 2020 epoch exhibited higher prevalence of current depression (9.9% to 14.3%, p = 0.03) and anxiety (10.1% to 18.7%, p < 0.001). However, incidence proportion of PPD decreased among women with current mental health diagnoses (41.5% to 31.3%, p = 0.19). Conclusions: A stable PPD incidence despite increased prevalence of current mood disorders highlights the complexity of the biopsychosocial milieu contributing to PPD. Further study of psychiatric care access and treatment is an important next step in understanding relationships between current mood disorders and PPD during the pandemic.

Disparate resource allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic among trauma centers: A Western Trauma Association national survey.

BACKGROUND: During the pandemic, hospitals implemented disaster plans to conserve resources while maintaining patient care. It was unclear how these plans impacted injury care and trauma surgeons. STUDY DESIGN: A 16 question survey assessing COVID-related hospital policy and resource allocation pre-COVID-19 peak (March), and a 19 question post-peak (June) survey was distributed to Trauma/Critical Care attending's via social media and the Western Trauma Association member email list. RESULTS: There were 120 pre- and 134 post-peak respondents. Most (95%) altered trauma PPE components, a nd 67% noted changes in their admission population pre-peak while 80% did so post-peak. Penetrating injury increased 56% at Level 1 centers and 27% at Level 2 centers. Altered ICU and transfusion criteria were noted with 25% relocating TBI patients, 17% revised rib fracture admission criteria, and 23% adjusted transfusion practices. Importantly, 12% changed their massive transfusion protocol, with 11% reducing the symptomatic transfusion threshold from 7 g/dL to 6 g/dL. Half (50%) disclosed impediments to patient care including PPE shortages and COVID test-related procedural delay (Fig. 2). While only 14% felt their institution was overwhelmed by COVID, the vast majority (81%) shared durable concerns about personal health and safety. CONCLUSIONS: Disparate approaches to COVID-19 preparedness and response characterize survey respondent facility actions. These disparities, especially between Level 1 and Level 2 centers, represent opportunities for the trauma community to coordinate best-practice planning and implementation in light of future consequence infection or pandemic care.