Can celiac serology alone be used as a marker of duodenal mucosal recovery in children with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet?

OBJECTIVES: Assessment of treatment response in children with celiac disease (CD) after commencing a strict gluten-free diet (GFD) is generally based on the resolution of clinical features and normalization of serology. Recent adult studies have shown that serologic markers do not correlate with mucosal recovery. We aimed (i) to determine whether anti-tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin (Ig)A (tTG) and anti-deamidated gliadin peptide IgG (DGP) antibodies are sensitive and specific markers of mucosal recovery in children with CD on a GFD for at least 12 months, and (ii) to determine whether a validated dietary questionnaire of compliance can identify patients with mucosal recovery. METHODS: A total of 150 children with biopsy-proven CD were prospectively evaluated with duodenal biopsies at ≥12 months on GFD, paired with repeat tTG and DGP serology. The biopsies were reviewed in a blinded manner by two histopathologists and graded by Marsh criteria. A validated questionnaire of dietary compliance was also administered. RESULTS: Of 150 children recruited, 27 (18%) had positive serology, 97 (65%) had negative serology, and 26 (17%) had equivocal serology. Of the 97 children with negative serology, none had Marsh type 3 enteropathy. Of the 27 patients with positive serology, only 6 had Marsh type 3 changes. The sensitivity and specificity of serology as a marker of significant mucosal pathology was 75 and 85%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 22% but a negative predictive value of 98%. Of the 129 (86%) questionnaires completed, 88% reported good or excellent compliance with a GFD (negative predictive value 97%). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that follow-up using two serological tests in children with CD on a GFD may obviate the need for repeat mucosal biopsy in the majority of patients. A standardized dietary questionnaire may be useful in identifying patients who require further evaluation.

Tolerability and safety of olive oil-based lipid emulsion in critically ill neonates: a blinded randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the safety and tolerability of an olive oil-based lipid emulsion compared with a soybean-based lipid emulsion in critically ill neonates. METHODS: A double-blinded, randomized study was conducted in critically ill neonates requiring parenteral nutrition in the first week of life. Infants were randomized to receive a lipid emulsion based on olive oil (OO; ClinOleic) or soybean oil (SO; Intralipid) for a minimum of 5 d. Plasma phospholipid fatty acids, F(2)-isoprostanes, liver function, and clinical outcome were assessed after 5 d of therapy. RESULTS: Seventy-eight neonates (men gestational age 37 wk, range 26-41 wk) received OO (n = 39) or SO (n = 39). Both emulsions were well tolerated with no adverse events observed. At day 5, plasma phospholipid oleic acid (C18:1omega-9) levels increased in infants receiving OO compared with lower levels in infants receiving SO (mean percentage +/- SD 33.1 +/- 6.4 for OO versus 18.6 +/- 2.4 for SO; mean difference -14.7 mmol/L, 95% confidence interval -17.5 to -11.9). The increase in plasma phospholipid linoleic acid levels was attenuated in infants receiving OO (mean percentage +/- SD 12.6 +/- 3.0 for OO versus 23.7 +/- 6.9 for SO; adjusted mean 11.4 mmol/L, 95% confidence interval 8.1-14.8). No differences were observed in plasma F(2)-isoprostane levels according to the type of lipid emulsion received. CONCLUSION: The OO-based emulsion (ClinOleic) was well tolerated in critically ill neonates. Differences in plasma phospholipids at day 5 reflected the fatty acid composition of the administered emulsion. No significant differences in plasma F(2)-isoprostane levels were detected after 5 d of lipid administration.

Acute gastroenteritis in children.

BACKGROUND: Gastroenteritis (GE) is inflammation of the mucous membranes of the gastrointestinal tract, and is characterised by vomiting and/or diarrhoea. The most common causes are viruses, but bacterial, protozoal and helminthic GE occur, particularly in developing countries. Vomiting and diarrhoea can be nonspecific symptoms in children, and the diagnosis of viral GE should be made after careful exclusion of other causes. OBJECTIVE: This article outlines the assessment and management of children with acute GE. DISCUSSION: The most important complication of GE is dehydration. The amount of weight loss as a percentage of normal body weight provides the best estimate of degree of dehydration. Clinical signs are not present until the child has lost at least 4% of their body weight. The best signs for identifying dehydration include decreased peripheral perfusion, abnormal skin turgor, and an abnormal respiratory pattern. Fluid replacement is the mainstay of management and most infants and children can be rehydrated safely with oral rehydration solution. Antiemetics and antidiarrhoeals are not indicated in children with acute GE.