Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36483384

RESUMO

Cascade reporting is an antimicrobial stewardship strategy that has been successfully implemented in inpatient settings, but evidence of its impact on outpatient settings is scarce. We report on the impact on fluroquinolone prescribing at a network of urgent care clinics following the implementation of cascade reporting of Enterobacterales in urine cultures.

2.
J Appl Lab Med ; 7(3): 776-781, 2022 05 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35021189

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rapid initiation of optimal antimicrobial therapy is crucial for the management of Gram-negative (GN) bacteremia. We aimed to evaluate the impact of Accelerate PhenoTM (AxDx) system on change in therapy and length of stay among patients with GN bacteremia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients hospitalized who had at least 1 blood culture with presence of Enterobacterales. We compared clinical outcomes among patients who had their blood cultures processed through standard methods alone vs AxDx. RESULTS: We identified 255 bacteremia episodes among 243 unique patients. In the AxDx group, 31.1% of patients had deescalation of antibiotics within 48 h from blood culture collection compared to 20.0% of patients in the control group (P = 0.09). We found no impact of AxDx on the odds of deescalation at 48 h from blood culture collection [odds ratio (OR) 1.80 (95% CI 0.91-3.56), P = 0.09] or Gram stain report [OR 1.61 (95% CI 0.86-3.01), P = 0.14]. Escalation in therapy at 48 h from blood culture collection occurred in 16.8% and 16.9% of patients in the AxDx and control groups, respectively (P = 0.99). There was no impact on the odds of escalation at 48 h from blood culture collection [OR 0.99 (95% CI 0.47-2.11), P = 0.99] or Gram stain report [OR 1.26 (95% CI 0.57-2.80), P = 0.57]. No differences were seen in length of stay and mortality between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of rapid identification and susceptibility technologies may differ according to the setting in which they are implemented.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Adulto , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hemocultura , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/diagnóstico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Hospitais Comunitários , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa