RESUMO
Novel viral load monitoring strategies are needed to help individuals maintain an undetectable viral load (UVL). In 2018, U.S. MSM living with HIV with a past detectable VL received a dried blood spot (DBS) kit at baseline and 3-month follow-up and returned specimens to a research laboratory. Of 56 consenting participants, 91% returned specimens at baseline and 77% at 3-month follow-up; 74% who returned two specimens had UVL at both time points. At-home DBS collection and longitudinal VL monitoring is feasible among U.S. MSM with fluctuating viral load. This complementary approach to clinical care could improve viral suppression maintenance.
RESUMEN: Se necesitan nuevas estrategias para evaluar los niveles de la carga viral para ayudar a las personas viviendo con VIH a mantener una carga viral indetectable (CVI). En 2018, hombres viviendo con VIH, que reportaron sexo con hombres y una carga viral detectable, recibieron dos paquetes de materiales para colectar muestras de sangre seca después de completar una evaluación basal y después de tres meses de seguimiento. Participantes devolvieron las muestras de sangre seca a un laboratorio. De 56 participantes que dieron su consentimiento a participar en el estudio, el 91% devolvió una muestra de sangre seca al inicio del estudio y el 77% a los 3 meses de seguimiento. Además, el 74% que devolvió dos muestras de sangre seca tenían CVI en ambos puntos de tiempo. La colección de sangre seca en el hogar y el monitoreo longitudinal de la carga viral de VIH es factible entre los hombres viviendo con el VIH y que tienen sexo con hombres. Los resultados de este estudio pueden proporcionar un enfoque complementario a la atención clínica para mejorar la supresión viral del VIH.
Assuntos
Sorodiagnóstico da AIDS/estatística & dados numéricos , Teste em Amostras de Sangue Seco/métodos , Infecções por HIV/virologia , HIV-1/imunologia , Homossexualidade Masculina , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Carga Viral/métodos , Sorodiagnóstico da AIDS/métodos , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade , Estudos de Viabilidade , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , HIV-1/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , RNA Viral/sangue , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Autocuidado , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The need for early antibiotics in the intensive care unit (ICU) is often balanced against the goal of antibiotic stewardship. Long-course antibiotics increase the burden of antimicrobial resistance within colonizing gut bacteria, but the dynamics of this process are not fully understood. We sought to determine how short-course antibiotics affect the antimicrobial resistance phenotype and genotype of colonizing gut bacteria in the ICU by performing a prospective cohort study with assessments of resistance at ICU admission and exactly 72 h later. METHODS: Deep rectal swabs were performed on 48 adults at the time of ICU admission and exactly 72 h later, including patients who did and did not receive antibiotics. To determine resistance phenotype, rectal swabs were cultured for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). In addition, Gram-negative bacterial isolates were cultured against relevant antibiotics. To determine resistance genotype, quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed from rectal swabs for 87 established resistance genes. Within-individual changes in antimicrobial resistance were calculated based on culture and qPCR results and correlated with exposure to relevant antibiotics (e.g., did ß-lactam antibiotic exposure associate with a detectable change in ß-lactam resistance over this 72-h period?). RESULTS: Of 48 ICU patients, 41 (85%) received antibiotics. Overall, there was no increase in the antimicrobial resistance profile of colonizing gut bacteria during the 72-h study period. There was also no increase in antimicrobial resistance after stratification by receipt of antibiotics (i.e., no detectable increase in ß-lactam, vancomycin, or macrolide resistance regardless of whether patients received those same antibiotics). This was true for both culture and PCR. Antimicrobial resistance pattern at ICU admission strongly predicted resistance pattern after 72 h. CONCLUSIONS: Short-course ICU antibiotics made little detectable difference in the antimicrobial resistance pattern of colonizing gut bacteria over 72 h in the ICU. This provides an improved understanding of the dynamics of antimicrobial resistance in the ICU and some reassurance that short-course antibiotics may not adversely impact the stewardship goal of reducing antimicrobial resistance.