Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 77(6): 830-9, 2011 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20939040

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analysis for bifurcation lesions needs to be standardized. OBJECTIVES: In vitro validation of two models for bifurcation QCA segmental analysis. METHODS: In the latest edition of the Cardiovascular angiography analysis system (CAAS 5v8, Pie Medical Imaging, Maastricht, The Netherlands) a 6-segment model for two-dimensional coronary bifurcation analysis was implemented next to the currently available 11-segment model. Both models were validated against 6 precision manufactured plexiglas phantoms, each of them mimicking a vessel with three successive bifurcation lesions with variable anatomy and Medina class. The phantoms were filled with 100% contrast agent and imaged with a biplane gantry. Images acquired in antero-posterior (AP) direction by either C-arm and at 30° right and left anterior oblique angulation were analyzed by two independent analysts, blinded to the actual dimensions. Manual correction of the contours was not allowed. Measurements for minimal lumen diameter (MLD), reference vessel diameter (RVD), percent diameter stenosis (DS) and bifurcation angle (BA) were compared with the true phantom dimensions. RESULTS: In AP views the accuracy and precision (mean difference ± SD) of 11- and 6-segment model for MLD, RVD, and DS were 0.065 ± 0.128 mm vs. 0.058 ± 0.142 mm, -0.021 ± 0.032 mm vs. -0.022 ± 0.030 mm, and -2.45% ± 5.07% vs. -2.28% ± 5.29%, respectively. Phantom MLD values ≤ 0.7 mm were systematically overestimated; if excluded, MLD accuracy and precision became 0.015 ± 0.106 mm and 0.004 ± 0.125 mm for the 11- and 6-segment model, respectively. Accuracy and precision for BA were -2.2° ± 3.3°. Interobserver variability for MLD, RVD, DS, and BA for either model was ≤ 0.049 mm, ≤ 0.056 mm, ≤ 2.77%, and 1.6°, respectively. Agreement between models for MLD, RVD, and DS was ± 0.079 mm, ± 0.011 mm, and ± 2.07%. Accuracy and precision for diameter-derived parameters were slightly decreased in angulated projections; precision for BA measurements dropped to 6.1°. CONCLUSIONS: The results of both models are highly reproducible and for phantom MLD values >0.7 mm in excellent agreement with the true dimensions.


Assuntos
Angiografia Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Imagens de Fantasmas , Polimetil Metacrilato , Interpretação de Imagem Radiográfica Assistida por Computador , Software , Meios de Contraste , Angiografia Coronária/instrumentação , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Desenho de Equipamento , Humanos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
2.
EuroIntervention ; 7(11): 1326-35, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22433196

RESUMO

AIMS: To validate a new two dimensional (2-D) bifurcation quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) software. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the latest edition of the Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System (CAAS 5.9; Pie Medical Imaging, Maastricht, The Netherlands) video-densitometric information is dynamically integrated into the edge-detection algorithm of 11- and 6-segment models to reduce overestimation of small diameters. Furthermore, automatic reference obstruction analysis was optimised. Values of the minimal lumen diameter (MLD), reference vessel diameter (RVD), percent diameter stenosis (DS) and bifurcation angle (BA) for the different bifurcation segment models were validated against precision manufactured plexiglass phantoms. In anteroposterior views, accuracy and precision (mean difference±SD) of 11- and 6-segment models for MLD were 0.013±0.082 mm vs. 0.003±0.100 mm, for RVD -0.030±0.047 mm vs. -0.029±0.045 mm and for DS -0.48±3.66% vs. -0.11±3.97%. In smaller vessel segments (true MLD <0.7 mm), MLD overestimation was reduced. Inter-observer variability for MLD, RVD and DS for either model was ≤0.052 mm, ≤0.043 mm and ≤2.24%, respectively. Agreement between models for MLD, RVD and DS was ±0.076 mm, ±0.021 mm and ±2.53%, respectively. Accuracy and precision for BA were -2.6±3.5°, and variability was ≤1.2°. Accuracy and precision for diameter-derived parameters were slightly decreased in projections with 30° rotation; BA precision dropped to 6.2°. CONCLUSIONS: MLD quantification is improved for true MLD <0.7 mm, resulting in highly accurate and precise diameter measurements over the entire range of phantom diameters. Automatic reference obstruction analysis provides highly accurate, precise and reproducible RVD and DS measurements.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Angiografia Coronária/instrumentação , Angiografia Coronária/normas , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Vasos Coronários , Angiografia Coronária/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/instrumentação , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/normas , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Imagens de Fantasmas , Valores de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Software
3.
EuroIntervention ; 3(5): 553-7, 2008 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19608480

RESUMO

AIMS: To develop a novel dedicated quantitative coronary analysis (QCA) for bifurcations. METHOD AND RESULTS: A dedicated software that has minimal user interaction so as to increase the QCA results reproducibility. The new CAAS 5 bifurcation software combines established algorithm for contour detection with novel ways to determine the lesion characteristics together with the angulation of the bifurcation. CONCLUSION: The paper describes how this methodology is accomplished and reported.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa