RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Neonatal resuscitation video review (NRVR) involves recording and reviewing resuscitations for education and quality assurance. Though NRVR has been shown to improve teamwork and skill retention, it is not widely used. We evaluated clinicians' experiences of NRVR to understand how NRVR impacts learning and can be improved. METHODS: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) clinicians with previous NRVR experience were recruited for individual semi-structured interviews. Using a social constructivist viewpoint, five researchers used thematic analysis to analyze participant responses. RESULTS: Twenty-two clinicians (11 nurses, 11 doctors) were interviewed. All participants expressed positive attitudes towards NRVR. Four themes were identified: (1) Learning from reality-exposure to real-life resuscitations was highly clinically relevant. (2) Immersive self-regulation-watching videos aided recall and reflection. (3) Complexities in learner psychological safety-all participants acknowledged viewing NRVR videos could be confronting. Some expressed fear of judgment from colleagues, though the educational benefit of NRVR superseded this. (4) Accessing and learning from diverse vantage points-NRVR promoted group discussion, which prompted participant learning from colleagues' viewpoints. CONCLUSION: Neonatal clinicians reported NRVR to be an effective and safe method for learning and refining skills required during neonatal resuscitation, such as situational awareness and communication. IMPACT: Neonatal resuscitation video review is not known to be widely used in neonatal resuscitation teaching, and published research in this area is limited. Our study examined clinician attitudes towards an established neonatal resuscitation video review program. We found strong support for teaching using neonatal resuscitation video review among neonatal doctors and nurses, with key benefits including increased situational awareness and increased clinical exposure to resuscitations, while maintaining psychological safety for participants. The results of this study add evidence to support the addition of video review to neonatal resuscitation training.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Identification of hypoxaemia and hypercapnia is essential for the diagnosis and treatment of acute respiratory failure. While arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis is standard for PO2 and PCO2 measurement, venous blood gas (VBG) analysis is increasingly used as an alternative. Previous systematic reviews established that VBG reporting of PO2 and PCO2 is less accurate, but the impacts on clinical management and patient outcomes are unknown. AIMS: This study aimed to systematically review available evidence of the clinical impacts of using ABGs or VBGs and examine the arteriovenous difference in blood gas parameters. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases since inception was conducted. Included studies were prospective or cross-sectional studies comparing peripheral ABG to peripheral VBG in adult non-critical care inpatients presenting with respiratory symptoms. RESULTS: Of 15 119 articles screened, 15 were included. No studies were found that examined clinical impacts resulting from using VBG compared to ABG. Included studies focused on the agreement between ABG and VBG measurements of pH, PO2, PCO2 and HCO3 -. Due to the heterogeneity of the included studies, qualitative evidence synthesis was performed. While the arteriovenous difference in pH and HCO3 - was generally predictable, the difference in PO2 and PCO2 was more significant and less predictable. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reinforces the notion that VBG is not comparable to ABG for physiological measurements. However, a key revelation from our research is the significant lack of data regarding the clinical implications of using VBG instead of ABG, a common scenario in clinical practice. This highlights a critical knowledge gap.