Selective Tumor Cell Apoptosis and Tumor Regression in CDH17-Positive Colorectal Cancer Models using BI 905711, a Novel Liver-Sparing TRAILR2 Agonist.

Activation of TRAILR2 has emerged as an important therapeutic concept in cancer treatment. TRAILR2 agonistic molecules have only had limited clinical success, to date, due either to lack of efficacy or hepatotoxicity. BI 905711 is a novel tetravalent bispecific antibody targeting both TRAILR2 and CDH17 and represents a novel liver-sparing TRAILR2 agonist specifically designed to overcome the disadvantages of previous strategies. Here, we show that BI 905711 effectively triggered apoptosis in a broad panel of CDH17-positive colorectal cancer tumor cells in vitro. Efficient induction of apoptosis was dependent on the presence of CDH17, as exemplified by the greater than 1,000-fold drop in potency in CDH17-negative cells. BI 905711 demonstrated single-agent tumor regressions in CDH17-positive colorectal cancer xenografts, an effect that was further enhanced upon combination with irinotecan. Antitumor efficacy correlated with induction of caspase activation, as measured in both the tumor and plasma. Effective tumor growth inhibition was further demonstrated across a series of different colorectal cancer PDX models. BI 905711 induced apoptosis in both a cis (same cell) as well as trans (adjacent cell) fashion, translating into significant antitumor activity even in xenograft models with heterogeneous CDH17 expression. In summary, we demonstrate that BI 905711 has potent and selective antitumor activity in CDH17-positive colorectal cancer models both in vitro and in vivo. The high prevalence of over 95% CDH17-positive tumors in patients with colorectal cancer, the molecule preclinical efficacy together with its potential for a favorable safety profile, support the ongoing BI 905711 phase I trial in colorectal cancer and additional CDH17-positive cancer types (NCT04137289).

Differential inhibition of primary versus preactivated T cells by pimecrolimus but not by tacrolimus in vitro.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies in murine models of allergic contact dermatitis have shown that systemic treatment with pimecrolimus in contrast to tacrolimus did not inhibit the sensitization phase, whereas both compounds equivalently suppressed the inflammatory response in sensitized animals. This finding indicated a differential sensitivity of antigen-naïve and primed T cells towards pimecrolimus and tacrolimus. METHODS: T cells obtained from healthy and allergic donors were subjected to primary and secondary stimulation by allogeneic or staphylococcal superantigen-presenting dendritic cells (DC). Human skin-derived, allergen-specific T cell clones from an atopic dermatitis patient were activated by anti-CD3 antibodies or by specific allergen-presenting DC. The inhibition of T cell proliferation and cytokine release by graded doses of calcineurin inhibitors was evaluated. RESULTS: Primary stimulation of T cells was inhibited by pimecrolimus with an approximately 8-fold lower potency as compared with tacrolimus. In contrast, the secondary response of ex vivo expanded T cells activated by allogeneic or staphylococcal superantigen-presenting DC was inhibited by both compounds with equivalent potency. Likewise, both drugs showed very similar potency to inhibit the proliferation and cytokine synthesis from antigen- stimulated T cell clones and the induction of cytokines in Jurkat T cells. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that pimecrolimus has a selectivity for antigen-primed memory T cells not seen with tacrolimus.