RESUMO
Background: There is no unified scope for regional lymph node (LN) dissection in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Incomplete regional LN dissection can lead to postoperative recurrence, while blind expansion of the scope of regional LN dissection significantly increases the perioperative risk without significantly prolonging overall survival. We aimed to establish a noninvasive visualization tool based on dual-layer detector spectral computed tomography (DLCT) to predict the probability of regional LN metastasis in patients with PDAC. Methods: A total of 163 regional LNs were reviewed and divided into a metastatic cohort (n=58 LNs) and nonmetastatic cohort (n=105 LNs). The DLCT quantitative parameters and the nodal ratio of the longest axis to the shortest axis (L/S) of the regional LNs were compared between the two cohorts. The DLCT quantitative parameters included the iodine concentration in the arterial phase (APIC), normalized iodine concentration in the arterial phase (APNIC), effective atomic number in the arterial phase (APZeff), normalized effective atomic number in the arterial phase (APNZeff), slope of the spectral attenuation curves in the arterial phase (APλHU), iodine concentration in the portal venous phase (PVPIC), normalized iodine concentration in the portal venous phase (PVPNIC), effective atomic number in the portal venous phase (PVPZeff), normalized effective atomic number in the portal venous phase (PVPNZeff), and slope of the spectral attenuation curves in the portal venous phase (PVPλHU). Logistic regression analysis based on area under the curve (AUC) was used to analyze the diagnostic performance of significant DLCT quantitative parameters, L/S, and the models combining significant DLCT quantitative parameters and L/S. A nomogram based on the models with highest diagnostic performance was developed as a predictor. The goodness of fit and clinical applicability of the nomogram were assessed through calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The combined model of APNIC + L/S (APNIC + L/S) had the highest diagnostic performance among all models, yielding an AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.878 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.825-0.931], 0.707, and 0.886, respectively. The calibration curve indicated that the APNIC-L/S nomogram had good agreement between the predicted probability and the actual probability. Meanwhile, the decision curve indicated that the APNIC-L/S nomogram could produce a greater net benefit than could the all- or-no-intervention strategy, with threshold probabilities ranging from 0.0 to 0.75. Conclusions: As a valid and visual noninvasive prediction tool, the APNIC-L/S nomogram demonstrated favorable predictive efficacy for identifying metastatic LNs in patients with PDAC.
RESUMO
Background: Thyroid nodules (TNs) cytologically defined as category Bethesda III and IV pose a major diagnostic challenge before surgery, demanding new methods to reduce unnecessary diagnostic thyroid lobectomies for patients with benign TNs. This study aimed to assess whether a model combining dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) quantitative parameters with morphologic features could reliably differentiate between benign and malignant lesions in Bethesda III and IV TNs. Methods: Data from 77 patients scheduled for thyroid surgery for Bethesda III and IV TNs (malignant =48; benign =29) who underwent DECT scans were reviewed. DECT quantitative parameters including normalized iodine concentration (NIC), attenuation on the slope of spectral Hounsfield unit (HU) curve, and normalized effective atomic number (Zeff) were measured in the arterial phase (AP) and venous phase (VP). DECT quantitative parameters and morphologic features were compared between the malignant and benign cohorts. The receiver operating characteristic curve was performed to compare the performances of significant DECT quantitative parameters, morphologic features, or the models combining the DECT parameters, respectively, with morphologic features. A nomogram was constructed from the optimal performance model, and the performance was evaluated via the calibration curve and decision curve analysis. Results: The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve with 95% confidence interval (CI) of the NIC in the AP (AP-NIC), slope of spectral HU curve in the AP, and NZeff in the AP were 0.749 (95% CI: 0.641-0.857), 0.654 (95% CI: 0.530-0.778), and 0.722 (95% CI: 0.602-0.842), respectively. The model combining AP-NIC with enhanced blurring showed the highest diagnostic performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of 0.808, 0.854, and 0.655, respectively; it was then used to construct a nomogram. The calibration curve showed that the discrepancy between the prediction of the nomogram and actual observations was less than 5%. The decision curve analysis indicated the nomogram had a positive net benefit in threshold risk ranges of 14% to 58% or 60% to 91% for malignant Bethesda III and IV TNs. Conclusions: The model combining AP-NIC with enhanced blurring could reliably differentiate between benign and malignant lesions in Bethesda III and IV TNs.
RESUMO
Purpose: To evaluate the capability of dual-layer detector spectral CT (DLCT) quantitative parameters in conjunction with clinical variables to detect malignant lesions in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (TNs). Materials and methods: Data from 107 patients with cytologically indeterminate TNs who underwent DLCT scans were retrospectively reviewed and randomly divided into training and validation sets (7:3 ratio). DLCT quantitative parameters (iodine concentration (IC), NICP (IC nodule/IC thyroid parenchyma), NICA (IC nodule/IC ipsilateral carotid artery), attenuation on the slope of spectral HU curve and effective atomic number), along with clinical variables, were compared between benign and malignant cohorts through univariate analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to identify independent predictors which were used to construct the clinical model, DLCT model, and combined model. A nomogram was formulated based on optimal performing model, and its performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. The nomogram was subsequently tested in the validation set. Results: Independent predictors associated with malignant TNs with indeterminate cytology included NICP in the arterial phase, Hashimoto's Thyroiditis (HT), and BRAF V600E (all p < 0.05). The DLCT-clinical nomogram, incorporating the aforementioned variables, exhibited superior performance than the clinical model or DLCT model in both training set (AUC: 0.875 vs 0.792 vs 0.824) and validation set (AUC: 0.874 vs 0.792 vs 0.779). The DLCT-clinical nomogram demonstrated satisfactory calibration and clinical utility in both training set and validation set. Conclusion: The DLCT-clinical nomogram emerges as an effective tool to detect malignant lesions in cytologically indeterminate TNs.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To construct and validate a model based on the dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) quantitative parameters and radiological features to predict Ki-67 expression levels in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 143 PDAC patients were analysed. The variables of clinic, radiology and DECT were evaluated. In the arterial phase and portal venous phase (PVP), the normalized iodine concentration (NIC), normalized effective atomic number and slope of the spectral attenuation curves were measured. The extracellular volume fraction (ECVf) was measured in the equilibrium phase. Univariate analysis was used to screen independent risk factors to predict Ki-67 expression. The Radiology, DECT and DECT-Radiology models were constructed, and their diagnostic effectiveness and clinical applicability were obtained through area under the curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis, respectively. The nomogram was established based on the optimal model, and its goodness-of-fit was assessed by a calibration curve. RESULTS: Computed tomography reported regional lymph node status, NIC of PVP, and ECVf were independent predictors for Ki-67 expression prediction. The AUCs of the Radiology, DECT, and DECT-Radiology models were 0.705, 0.884, and 0.905, respectively, in the training cohort, and 0.669, 0.835, and 0.865, respectively, in the validation cohort. The DECT-Radiology nomogram was established based on the DECT-Radiology model, which showed the highest net benefit and satisfactory consistency. CONCLUSIONS: The DECT-Radiology model shows favourable predictive efficacy for Ki-67 expression, which may be of value for clinical decision-making in PDAC patients. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The DECT-Radiology model could contribute to the preoperative and non-invasive assessment of Ki-67 expression of PDAC, which may help clinicians to screen out PDAC patients with high Ki-67 expression. KEY POINTS: ⢠Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) can predict Ki-67 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). ⢠The DECT-Radiology model facilitates preoperative and non-invasive assessment of PDAC Ki-67 expression. ⢠The nomogram may help screen out PDAC patients with high Ki-67 expression.
RESUMO
Background: The misdiagnosis of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) and micronodular goiter (MNG) may lead to overtreatment and unnecessary medical expenditure by patients. This study developed and validated a dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based nomogram for the preoperative differential diagnosis of PTMC and MNG. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the data of 366 pathologically confirmed thyroid micronodules, of which 183 were PTMCs and 183 were MNGs, from 326 patients who underwent DECT examinations. The cohort was divided into the training (n=256) and validation cohorts (n=110). The conventional radiological features and DECT quantitative parameters were analyzed. The iodine concentration (IC), normalized iodine concentration (NIC), effective atomic number, normalized effective atomic number, and slope of the spectral attenuation curves in the arterial phase (AP) and venous phase (VP) were measured. A univariate analysis and stepwise logistic regression analysis were performed to screen the independent indicators for PTMC. A radiological model, DECT model, and DECT-radiological nomogram were constructed, and the performances of the 3 models were assessed using the receiver operating characteristic curve, DeLong test, and a decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The IC in the AP [odds ratio (OR) =0.172], NIC in the AP (OR =0.003), punctate calcification (OR =2.163), and enhanced blurring (OR =3.188) were identified as independent predictors in the stepwise-logistic regression. The areas under the curve with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the radiological model, DECT model, and DECT-radiological nomogram were 0.661 (95% CI: 0.595-0.728), 0.856 (95% CI: 0.810-0.902), and 0.880 (95% CI: 0.839-0.921), respectively, in the training cohort; and 0.701 (95% CI: 0.601-0.800), 0.791 (95% CI: 0.704-0.877), and 0.836 (95% CI: 0.760-0.911), respectively, in the validation cohort. The diagnostic performance of the DECT-radiological nomogram was better than that of the radiological model (P<0.05). The DECT-radiological nomogram was found to be well calibrated and had a good net benefit. Conclusions: DECT provides valuable information for differentiating between PTMC and MNG. The DECT-radiological nomogram could serve as an easy-to-use, noninvasive, and effective method for differentiating between PTMC and MNG and help clinicians in decision-making.
RESUMO
Objectives: To investigate the potential value of a contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT)-based radiological-radiomics nomogram combining a lymph node (LN) radiomics signature and LNs' radiological features for preoperative detection of LN metastasis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, 196 LNs in 61 PDAC patients were enrolled and divided into the training (137 LNs) and validation (59 LNs) cohorts. Radiomic features were extracted from portal venous phase images of LNs. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression algorithm with 10-fold cross-validation was used to select optimal features to determine the radiomics score (Rad-score). The radiological-radiomics nomogram was developed by using significant predictors of LN metastasis by multivariate logistic regression (LR) analysis in the training cohort and validated in the validation cohort independently. Its diagnostic performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), decision curve (DCA) and calibration curve analyses. Results: The radiological model, including LN size, and margin and enhancement pattern (three significant predictors), exhibited areas under the curves (AUCs) of 0.831 and 0.756 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Nine radiomic features were used to construct a radiomics model, which showed AUCs of 0.879 and 0.804 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The radiological-radiomics nomogram, which incorporated the LN Rad-score and the three LNs' radiological features, performed better than the Rad-score and radiological models individually, with AUCs of 0.937 and 0.851 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Calibration curve analysis and DCA revealed that the radiological-radiomics nomogram showed satisfactory consistency and the highest net benefit for preoperative diagnosis of LN metastasis. Conclusions: The CT-based LN radiological-radiomics nomogram may serve as a valid and convenient computer-aided tool for personalized risk assessment of LN metastasis and help clinicians make appropriate clinical decisions for PADC patients.