The Austrian fulvestrant registry: results from a prospective observation of fulvestrant in postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Endocrine therapy is the preferred treatment in oestrogen- and/or progesterone-receptor (ER/PgR) positive breast cancer. Fulvestrant is a pure ER-antagonist. We present results from the Austrian Fulvestrant Registry. METHODS: Three-hundred and fifty patients were included. Time to progression (TTP) was defined as primary endpoint. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors significantly associated with TTP. RESULTS: Fulvestrant was administered as first-line therapy in 26%, second-line in 49%, and third-line or beyond in 25%. TTP was median 7 months. We observed a response in 15% of patients and 41% had SD > or = 6 months. First-line treatment and non-visceral metastases were associated with longer TTP. One case of pulmonary embolism was reported. Grade 3 toxicities consisted of joint pain (1.4%), nausea (1.4%) and hot flashes (0.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Fulvestrant was effective and well tolerated. TTP was superior to other trials, due to the large proportion of first-line patients. Activity is apparently independent of Her2-status.

Trastuzumab and gemcitabine as salvage therapy in heavily pre-treated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: In Her2-postive metastatic breast carcinoma, first-line trastuzumab-based therapy is well established; many centres continue antibody treatment beyond disease progression. In this trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and trastuzumab after earlier exposure to anthracyclines, docetaxel and/or vinorelbine, and trastuzumab. METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients were included as eligible. Patients received gemcitabine at a dose of 1,250 mg/m2 on day one and eight, every 21 days. Trastuzumab was administered in three-week cycles. Clinical benefit rate (CBR; CR + PR + SD > or = 6 months) was defined as primary endpoint. RESULTS: As of July 2007, all patients are evaluable for toxicity, and 26 for response. Earlier therapies consisted of trastuzumab (100%), anthracyclines (100%), vinorelbine (96.6%), docetaxel (72.4%), and capecitabine (72.4%). 19.2% of patients experienced PR, and SD > or = 6 months was observed in a further 26.9%, resulting in a CBR of 46.2%. Time to progression was median 3 months, and overall survival 17 months. Neutropenia (20.7%), thrombocytopenia (13.8%), and nausea (3.4%) were the only treatment-related adverse events that occurred with grade 3 or 4 intensity. Four patients (13.8%) developed brain metastases while on therapy. CONCLUSIONS: While CBR was low when compared to trastuzumab-based first-line therapy, it is higher than what would be expected from gemcitabine monotherapy in a similar setting. Together with the favourable toxicity profile, this regimen appears to be a safe and potentially effective salvage therapy option in a heavily pre-treated population.

Her2 and progesterone receptor status are not predictive of response to fulvestrant treatment.

PURPOSE: It has been hypothesized that response to endocrine therapy for breast cancer depends on Her2 and progesterone receptor status, grading, and tumor proliferation rate. In this study, we evaluated factors that are potentially predictive of response and time to progression in patients treated with fulvestrant. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: One hundred fifty-five patients were included and followed prospectively. Patients received fulvestrant at standard dose by i.m. injection. Response was evaluated every 3 months using International Union Against Cancer criteria. Time to progression and overall survival were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. A multivariate analysis was done to evaluate factors potentially influencing response and time to progression. RESULTS: We observed a partial response in 19 patients (12.3%), stable disease > or =6 months in 56 patients (36.1%), stable disease >3 months but <6 months in 7 patients (4.5%), and progressive disease in 73 patients (47.1%). Median time to progression was 5 months, and median overall survival was 27 months. Probability of achieving clinical benefit was significantly associated with a low proliferation rate (P = 0.015), nonvisceral metastatic sites (P = 0.023), and first-line therapy (P = 0.023). First-line therapy was also associated with prolonged time to progression (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Response rate and time to progression are shown to be independent of Her2 status, grading, and progesterone receptor status. This is probably caused by the unique mechanism of action associated with fulvestrant: Due to receptor down-regulation, it blocks nuclear, cytoplasmatic, and membrane-bound estrogen receptor. Therefore, it seems to inhibit the cross-talk between growth factor receptor signaling and estrogen receptor in a more effective manner.

HER-2-positive breast cancer: hope beyond trastuzumab.

Therapeutic antibodies have shown great promise as targeted agents in the treatment of patients with cancer. Trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2), is of special importance in breast cancers overexpressing HER-2. Such rationally designed substances bind to cancer cells expressing the targeted antigen and, by various mechanisms, lead to tumor cell degradation. Only one-third of patients, however, initially respond to trastuzumab monotherapy and the majority of initial responders demonstrate disease progression within 1 year of treatment initiation. Therefore, alternative compounds targeting the HER-2 receptor or downstream signaling pathways are of great importance. Lapatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, blocking tryosine kinase domains of both epidermal growth factor receptor and HER-2. This substance holds promise for the treatment of cancer after trastuzumab failure, and might be active in cerebral metastases. Other strategies in trastuzumab-resistant disease include bispecific antibodies (which bind to HER-2 and Fc receptors, thereby directing immune cells towards the tumor), the combination of antibodies, or targeting tumor vessel growth by blocking vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or VEGF receptors. Heat shock protein 90, a chaperone protein that controls the folding of HER-2, also represents a potential target. Multi-targeted kinase inhibitors such as sunitinib or sortenib are already established in renal cell cancer. These compounds are currently being evaluated in breast cancer and might represent interesting options both in HER-2-positive and -negative disease. In conclusion, trastuzumab remains the gold standard in HER-2-positive breast cancer therapy. However, in trastuzumab-resistant disease, new strategies and compounds are currently under evaluation.

Expression of thymidine phosphorylase in peripheral blood cells of breast cancer patients is not increased by paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: A synergistic cytotoxic effect has been hypothesized for taxanes and capecitabine, a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil. Based on preclinical studies, this synergism has been attributed to an up-regulation of the enzyme thymidine phosphorylase (TP). Beside tumour tissue, TP is highly expressed in white blood cells, possibly causing increased hematotoxicity, when taxanes are combined with capecitabine. So far, this hypothesis has not been investigated in humans. METHODS: A total of 128 consecutive blood samples were collected from eight patients with advanced breast cancer receiving paclitaxel weekly at a dose of 80 mg/m2. To assess the expression of TP in blood cells, samples were collected prior to first therapy, at the end of infusion, and up to 15 days thereafter. This procedure was repeated during the sixth application of paclitaxel. After isolation of the peripheral mononuclear blood cells, the expression of TP was assessed by ELISA. In parallel, paclitaxel level in plasma was evaluated at three selected time points as pharmacokinetic control parameter. RESULTS: Paclitaxel concentrations at the end of infusion did not change significantly from week 1 to week 6. The expression of TP in peripheral mononuclear blood cells decreased significantly after infusion below pretherapeutic values (p = 0.023; n = 8). After the nadir on day 3, the expression of TP increased moderately returning to baseline levels within one week. The overall picture in week 6 was similar to week 1. Using a trend analysis, neither a short-term nor a long-term induction of TP was observed. CONCLUSION: TP in peripheral mononuclear blood cells was hardly regulated under therapy with paclitaxel. Therefore, no increased haematotoxicity due to TP upregulation is expected from the combination of taxanes and capecitabine.

Intensified local treatment and systemic therapy significantly increase survival in patients with brain metastases from advanced breast cancer - a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases have evolved from a rare to a frequently encountered event in advanced breast cancer due to advances in palliative systemic treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All Patients treated at our centre from 1994 to 2004 with WBRT for brain metastases from breast cancer were included. We performed a multivariate analysis (Cox regression) to explore which factors are able to influence significantly cerebral time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (metastatic sites [visceral versus non-visceral], Karnofsky performance score [KPS], age, intensified local treatment [boost irradiation, neuro-surgical resection] further systemic treatment). RESULTS: Overall 174 patients, median age 51 years, range 27-76 years, were included. Median TTP was 3 months (m), range 1-33+ m. Median overall survival was 7 m, range 1-44 m. Factors significantly influencing TTP were KPS (p = 0.002), intensified local treatment (p < 0.001), and palliative systemic treatment (p = 0.001). Factors significantly influencing survival were intensified local treatment (p = 0.004), metastatic sites (p = 0.008), KPS (p = 0.006), and palliative systemic treatment (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: As shown by the significant influence of metastatic sites, some patients die from their advanced systemic tumour situation before they would die from cerebral progression. In other individuals however, intensified local treatment and systemic treatment appear to influence cerebral time to progression and overall survival.

Analysis of trastuzumab and chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer after the failure of at least one earlier combination: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Combining trastuzumab and chemotherapy is standard in her2/neu overexpressing advanced breast cancer. It is not established however, whether trastuzumab treatment should continue after the failure of one earlier combination. In this trial, we report our experience with continued treatment beyond disease progression. METHODS: Fifty-four patients, median age 46 years, range 25-73 years, were included. We analysed for time to tumour progression (TTP) for first, second and beyond second line treatment, response rates and overall survival. RESULTS: Median time of observation was 24 months, range 7-51. Response rates for first line treatment were 7.4% complete remission (CR), 35.2% partial remissions (PR), 42.6% stable disease > 6 months (SD) and 14.8% of patients experienced disease progression despite treatment (PD). Corresponding numbers for second line were 3.7% CR, 22.2% PR, 42.6% SD and 31.5% PD; numbers for treatment beyond second line (60 therapies, 33 pts 3rd line, 18 pts 4th line, 6 pts 5th line, 2 pts 6th line and 1 patient 7th line) were 1.7% CR, 28.3% PR, 28.3% SD and 41.6% PD respectively. Median TTP was 6 months (m) in the first line setting, and also 6 m for second line and beyond second line. An asymptomatic drop of left ventricular ejection fraction below 50% was observed in one patient. No case of symptomatic congestive heart failure was observed. CONCLUSION: The data presented clearly strengthen evidence that patients do profit from continued trastuzumab treatment. The fact that TTP did not decrease significantly from first line to beyond second line treatment is especially noteworthy. Still, randomized trials are warranted.

Prognostic value of monitoring tumour markers CA 15-3 and CEA during fulvestrant treatment.

BACKGROUND: At many centres tumour markers are used to detect disease recurrence and to monitor response to therapy in patients with advanced disease, although the real value of serial observation of marker levels remains disputed. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of tumour markers for predicting response (partial response [PR], stable disease [SD] > or = 6 months), de novo disease progression (PD) and secondary PD in patients receiving fulvestrant ('Faslodex') 250 mg/month for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: Changes in cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were prospectively monitored (monthly) and were also evaluated for the 3 months preceding secondary PD. Data from 67 patients with previously treated MBC participating in a Compassionate Use Programme were analysed. RESULTS: In patients with a PR (n = 7 [10.4%]), a non-significant increase in CA 15-3 occurred during the first 6 months of treatment; CEA was significantly reduced (P = 0.0165). In patients with SD >/= 6 months (n = 28 [41.8%]), both CA 15-3 (P < 0.0001) and CEA (P = 0.0399) levels increased significantly after 6 months treatment. In those experiencing de novo PD (n = 32 [47.8%]), CA 15-3 increased significantly (P < 0.0001) after 4 months; CEA also increased significantly (P = 0.0002) during the same time period. Both CA 15-3 (P < 0.0001) and CEA (P < 0.0001) increased significantly in the 3 months preceding secondary PD. CONCLUSION: CA 15-3 increases in patients progressing on fulvestrant but may also increase in those experiencing clinical benefit; this should not be taken as a sign of PD without verification. Overall, both CA 15-3 and CEA appear to be poor prognostic markers for determining progression in patients receiving fulvestrant.

Oral vinorelbine alone or in combination with trastuzumab in advanced breast cancer: results from a pilot trial.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the efficacy of oral vinorelbine (OV) (Navelbine oral Boeringer-Ingelheim Austria) in patients with advanced breast cancer as first-line therapy or after progressing under earlier line chemotherapies alone or in combination with trastuzumab (T). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight patients [median age: 63.5 years (y), range (r): 38-84 years] were included into this trial. Patients with her-2/neu positive tumours received a combination of OV and T. Treatment effect was evaluated every three cycles and treatment continued until progression. OV was administered in a dose of 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 8, q = 21 days, and no dose escalation to 80 mg/m(2) was performed. RESULTS: We observed a complete response in 5.9% of patients, partial remission in 22.1%, stable disease (SD) > 6 months in 33.8%, SD < 6 months in 2.9%, and progression despite treatment in 35.3%, respectively. Time to progression was 6 months (range 1-23+). The main toxicities consisted of nausea/vomiting (N/V) and neutropenia. Grade IV neutropenia was found in 5 patients (6.4%), grade III in 6 patients (7.7%) and grade I and II in 11.5%. We did not find any grade IV N/V in our patients, however, grade III N/V was observed in 3.8%. No other grade III and IV toxicities were reported. CONCLUSION: OV appears to be effective in the treatment of advanced breast cancer at the dose and schedule chosen. It is well tolerated, effective, and the oral formulation is an advantage for the patients as well as for the nursing staff.

Retrospective analysis of re-irradiation in malignant glioma: a single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Malignant gliomas are brain tumors deriving from the brain's glia cells. Primary treatment comprises resection, irradiation and chemotherapy, but these tumors almost always recur. In this situation, palliative chemotherapy is relatively well established, but a second local treatment is sometimes possible. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of re-irradiation in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients were treated with a second irradiation for recurrent or progressive glioma. Patients either received hypo-fractionated stereotactic treatment or conventionally fractionated conformal therapy, depending on tumor size. Wherever possible, a second resection was performed. Time to progression (TTP) and survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. RESULTS: Median age was 31 (8-77) years. Median TTP after onset of re-treatment was 4 (1-31) months. Median overall survival was 7 (1-46) months, and overall survival from primary diagnosis was 49 (7-136) months. Significantly longer TTP (P = 0.008) and overall survival (P = 0.005) were observed in re-resected patients than in those without a second surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: Re-irradiation in malignant glioma is a feasible and safe treatment option, and the benefit appears to be especially large in re-resected patients. To make a final conclusion possible, larger prospective trials are warranted.

Preoperative second-line chemotherapy induces objective responses in primary breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer results in high response rates, allowing breast-conserving surgery in patients primarily not suitable for this procedure. Tumors of patients with histologically proven breast cancer that fail to respond to preoperative chemotherapy are thought to be chemotherapy resistant. We questioned this hypothesis and treated 13 patients who did not respond to preoperative anthracycline-containing first-line treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight patients received a combination therapy consisting of epidoxorubicin and docetaxel as neoadjuvant first-line treatment and were treated with CMF as preoperative second-line chemotherapy. The other five patients did not respond to first-line FEC and were given paclitaxel or docetaxel as second-line treatment. RESULTS: A major response to treatment was observed in 10 of 13 patients (77%) during preoperative second-line therapy: one patient (8%) achieved pathological complete response (pCR) and nine patients (69%) partial response (PR). Three patients (23%) had stable disease (SD), and no patient had progressive disease (PD). Eight patients (62%) could undergo breast-conserving surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that it is possible to achieve objective responses including pCR with potentially non-cross-resistant neoadjuvant second-line therapy, leading to breast-conserving surgery in a high proportion of patients. Thus, preoperative second-line chemotherapy appears to be justified when breast conservation is an important treatment goal and may have potential in improved tailoring of neoadjuvant treatments.

Sequential Administration of Interferon-gamma, GM-CSF, and Interleukin-2 in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Phase II Trial.

SUMMARY: Various cytokine combinations have been tested for efficacy in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC). Because several immunologic synergisms between granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating-factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) have been demonstrated, this phase II trial was conducted on the efficacy and toxicity of subcutaneous, sequentially administered, interferon-gamma (IFNgamma), GM-CSF, and IL-2. Fifty-five consecutive patients with MRCC were treated with 100 &mgr;g recombinant IFNgamma1b administered thrice weekly during weeks 1 and 4, followed by 400 &mgr;g GM-CSF on 5 consecutive days during weeks 2 and 5. In weeks 3 and 6, patients received 4.5 MU recombinant IL-2 from days 1 to 4. The treatment was repeated every 8 weeks. Five (10%) of patients experienced an objective response (complete response [CR]: 2%, partial response [PR]: 8%). Fourteen (26%) patients had stable disease with a median duration of 19 months (6-47+). The median overall survival was 12 months (range: 0.3-44 months). No toxicity greater than World Health Organization grade II was observed, with fever (43%) and erythema (43%) being the most frequent side effects. Compared with other phase II trials with IFNgamma and IL-2 alone, the addition of GM-CSF failed to improve response or survival in patients with MRCC.

Capecitabine in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma failing immunotherapy.

Capecitabine is a novel fluoropyrimidine carbamate, orally administered and selectively activated to fluorouracil by a sequential triple-enzyme pathway in liver and tumor cells. This prospective trial aims to evaluate the therapeutic effects and systemic toxicities of capecitabine in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in which immunotherapy failed. Twenty-six patients (median age, 58 years; range, 47 to 76 years) with disease in which first- or second-line immunotherapy treatment failed entered the trial. Median time of observation was 13+ months (range, 3 to 25+ months). Capecitabine was administered in the outpatient setting orally at a dose of 2,500 mg/m2/d divided into two daily doses for 14 days, followed by 7 days of rest. This schedule was repeated in 3-week intervals. Twenty-six patients are now assessable for toxicity, and 23 patients, for response. We observed a partial response to treatment in 2 patients (8.7%), minor response in 5 patients (21.7%), stable disease in 13 patients (56.5%), and continued disease progression despite treatment in only 3 patients (13.1%). Outpatient capecitabine therapy was well tolerated, and World Health Organization (WHO) grade III toxicity in these 26 patients consisted of hand-foot syndrome in 2 patients (7.7%) and anemia in 1 patient (3.8%). We did not observe WHO grade IV toxicity. Oral capecitabine appears to be a promising treatment with a favorable toxicity profile in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and should be evaluated in first- and second-line treatment schedules as monotherapy, as well as in combination with immunotherapy agents.

Preoperative therapy with epidoxorubicin and docetaxel plus trastuzumab in patients with primary breast cancer: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Combining anthracyclines and taxanes are to date the most active cytotoxic treatment option in the neoadjuvant and palliative therapy of breast cancer patients. Adding trastuzumab to these cytotoxic agents can improve outcome for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing advanced breast cancer. We conducted a pilot study of preoperative epidoxorubicin and docetaxel plus trastuzumab in outpatient patients suffering from breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen consecutive patients were enrolled in this prospective clinical pilot trial. Preoperative treatment consisted of weekly trastuzumab (4 mg/kg body-weight loading dose, 2 mg/kg/week maintenance dose), in combination with weekly epidoxorubicin (30 mg/m2 body surface area [BSA]) and docetaxel (35 mg/m2 BSA) once a week for 6 weeks followed by 1 week off therapy. RESULTS: Patients received a total of 30 cycles (median: 2 cycles, range: 2-3 cycles) of this therapeutic regimen. Outpatient epidoxorubicin and docetaxel plus trastuzumab were well tolerated. A major response to this preoperative therapy regimen could be demonstrated in 12 of 14 patients (86%) leading to breast-conserving surgery in 11 of 14 patients (79%). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that outpatient epidoxorubicin and docetaxel plus trastuzumab are safe in the neoadjuvant treatment of patients suffering from breast cancer, based on a favorable side-effect and activity profile. Thus, this regimen can be considered for further clinical trials.

Cytogenetic and comparative genomic hybridization findings in four cases of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

To assess a potential common pattern of genetic alterations in chemotherapy-resistant tumors we analyzed four tumors from breast cancer patients (patients 1-4) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, by comparative genome hybridization (CGH) and conventional chromosome banding analysis. All patients showed structural aberrations involving chromosomes 1, 5, 11, 16, and 17. In CGH analysis, the patients showed typical imbalances for ductal breast cancer: gains of 1q (3 patients), 5q (2 patients), 8q (3 patients), and X (4 patients) and losses of 1p33 approximately p36 (3 patients), 16q (3 patients), 17p (3 patients), 19 (4 patients), and 22q (4 patients). Other recurrent imbalances of atypical pattern for ductal breast cancer were gain of 4q21 approximately q32 (2 patients), 20q21 approximately q22 (2 patients), and 21 (2 patients) and loss of 20p (3 patients). Three patients showed involvement of several regions bearing genes of drug resistance (MDR1 [HUGO symbol: ABCB1], BCRP [HUGO symbol: ABCG2], MRP1 [HUGO symbol: ABCC1], RFC1); the fourth patient displayed an amplification in the region of MYC (alias c-myc), thus providing--at the level of the light microscope--an explanatory background for the ability of their tumors to survive anthracycline-, taxane- and cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. Conventional cytogenetic analysis and CGH displayed highly coincidental findings in the tumors of four patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Phase I/II trial of weekly epidoxorubicin and docetaxel (wED) in the neoadjuvant and palliative treatment of patients with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Anthracyclines and taxanes are the most active cytotoxic agents in the treatment of breast cancer. Based on observations with weekly administration of paclitaxel which results in better tolerability and higher dose intensity as compared with 3-weekly schedules, we designed a phase I/II trial with weekly epidoxorubicin and docetaxel (wED) for the preoperative and palliative treatment of patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A group of 33 female patients (20 neoadjuvant and 13 palliative) were treated with weekly epidoxorubicin (25-35 mg/m(2)) as a short i.v. infusion followed by docetaxel (25-40 mg/m(2)) as a 1-h i.v. infusion once a week for 6 weeks followed by 1 week off therapy, without G-CSF support. Sequential cohorts of patients were treated with epirubicin and docetaxel at the following dose levels: 25/25, 25/30, 30/30, 30/35, 35/35, and 35/40 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Patients received a total of 74 courses (median 2, range 1-4 courses) of this therapeutic regimen. The maximum tolerated dose occurred at the dose level combining 35 mg/m(2) of epidoxorubicin and 40 mg/m(2) of docetaxel, with the dose-limiting toxicity being neutropenic fever in two patients at dose level 6. CONCLUSIONS: The wED regimen is a feasible, safe, and highly active combination chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. We recommend epidoxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 35 mg/m(2) for further trials because of the high incidence of neutropenic fever and lymphocytopenia of WHO grade IV at dose levels 5 and 6.

Alterations in intestinal permeability following the intensified polydrug-chemotherapy IFADIC (ifosfamide, Adriamycin, dacarbazine).

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the severity and time-course of alterations in gastroduodenal and intestinal permeability in relation to nausea/emesis following administration of the highly emetogenic polydrug regimen IFADIC (ifosfamide, Adriamycin, dacarbazine) using a differential lactulose/mannitol absorption (SLM) test. We also assessed the ease of administration and patients' tolerance of the SLM test. METHODS: The SLM test was performed in seven patients with soft tissue sarcomas on days 1, 3 and 14 of cycle I and cycle III of chemotherapy; seven healthy volunteers served as controls. The degree of correlation between the clinical grade of nausea/emesis according to WHO criteria and gastroduodenal permeability, expressed in terms of urinary sucrose excretion, and intestinal permeability, expressed in terms of the permeability index (urinary lactulose to mannitol permeability ratio), was also assessed. RESULTS: The permeability index values were significantly different (P < or =0.01) on days 1, 3 and 14 during both cycles of chemotherapy. The median permeability index on day 3 was higher (P < =0.01) in patients with nausea/emesis than in those without symptoms. Additionally, the permeability index when nausea was present (day 3) was higher (P < or =0.01) than when nausea/emesis was absent (days 1 and 14). In 59% of patients the increased permeability index on day 3 was accompanied by nausea/emesis of WHO grade 3. Gastroduodenal permeability did not alter consistently following chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms an acute, transient increase in intestinal permeability following the polydrug regimen IFADIC, accompanied by nausea/emesis of WHO grade 3 in the majority of patients. Normal intestinal permeability was achieved on day 14 in all patients, thus allowing intensified 2-weekly treatment administration. The SLM test may be recommended as a feasible test for the objective assessment of alterations in intestinal permeability following chemotherapy administration.

Endothelial cell activation and blood coagulation in critically ill patients with lung injury.

INTRODUCTION: Adult respiratory distress syndrome is a life-threatening disease that requires respiratory assistance. It is associated with endothelial cell damage, coagulation activation, and intravascular fibrin deposition. This prospective study was conducted to determine whether the plasma levels of specific markers of endothelial cell function and coagulation activation are related to the degree of pulmonary disturbance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients (8 male, 6 female, median age 69 years), admitted to a medical intensive care unit with various stages of lung injury needing mechanical ventilation, were compared with 16 healthy age- and sex-matched control subjects. RESULTS: Markers of endothelial cell damage and coagulation activation were significantly elevated in patients with lung injury compared with controls: von Willebrand factor (vWF) 4.12 vs. 1.25 U/ml, p < 0.0001; F VIII 4.40 vs. 1.88 U/ml, p = 0.0001; tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) 11.6 vs. 8.7 ng/ml, p = 0.02; plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI) 48.9 vs. 14.6 ng/ml, p < 0.0001; D-dimer 2.9 vs. 0.6 microgram/ml, p < 0.0001; thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT) 7.9 vs. 2.2 ng/ml, p < 0.0001 (median values; Mann-Whitney U-test). vWF, tPA, PAI and D-Dimer were significantly correlated with the PaO2/FiO2 ratio (p = 0.0003, 0.003, 0.04, 0.02, respectively; Spearman's rank correlation). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the endothelial cell disturbance and the activation of the coagulation system in patients with lung injury are related to the degree of pulmonary dysfunction.

The role of ST-segment elevation in lead aVR in the risk assessment of patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUD AND AIM: Patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE) present with highly variable symptoms and ECG abnormalities. As ST-elevation in lead aVR has recently been described to predict right ventricular dysfunction (RVD), we aimed to correlate this sign to the severity of APE. METHODS: Three-hundred ninety-six consecutive patients (in centers a and b) with proven APE were retrospectively analysed with respect to 12-lead-ECG, symptoms, thrombus location, echocardiograpy, troponin T, initial therapy and outcome. Data were then compared between patients with and without aVR-ST-elevation. RESULTS: On admission aVR-ST-elevation was present in 34.3% (n = 136). Presence of aVR-ST-elevation was assossiated with more severe clinical presentation (dyspnoea at rest 44.9 vs. 29.2%; p = 0.002, hypotension 17.0 vs. 6.5%; p = 0.001, syncope 16.2 vs. 6.5%; p = 0.002), higher median troponin T levels (0.035 [0.01-0.2] versus 0.01 [0.01-0.02]; p < 0.001), more frequent RVD (74.5 vs. 46.6%; p < 0.001) and central located thrombi (50.8 vs. 29.2; p < 0.001). Thrombolysis was used more frequently (29.1 vs. 7.5%; p < 0.001) and in-hospital-mortality was increased (10.3 vs. 5.4%; p = 0.07) when compared to patients without that sign. Mortality in intermediate-risk APE patients with aVR-ST-elevation was 8.9% compared to 0% in those without (p = 0.04). In contrast, the presence of other classical ECG pattern of APE did not further increase mortality in intermediate-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: ST-elevation in lead aVR is associated with a more severe course of APE, especially in patients with intermediate-risk. Therefore, aVR-ST-elevation might be useful in risk stratification of APE.

Factors influencing the time to development of brain metastases in breast cancer.

This retrospective study analyzed risk factors influencing the time to development of brain metastases with the aim to facilitate the definition of a high-risk population among breast cancer patients. One hundred seventy-four breast cancer patients with brain metastases, treated with whole brain radiotherapy, were evaluated. Statistical analysis included hormone receptor status, HER2/neu status, tumour grading, tumour stage, young age at the time of diagnosis, adjuvant systemic treatment, palliative systemic treatment, metastatic sites (if brain metastases were not the first site of recurrence), and immunotherapy with trastuzumab. Time to development of brain metastases was significantly prolonged by systemic palliative treatment (p< or =0.0001) whereas high tumour grading (p< or =0.04) and trastuzumab therapy (p< or =0.04) significantly shortened this time span. Patients with the brain as first metastatic site, age>35 (p< or =0.001) and stage III (p< or =0.018) at the time of diagnosis had a significantly shorter time to development for brain lesions. These factors should be further validated by a prospective trial to identify a high-risk population amongst breast cancer patients and enable the development of screening programs for early detection.