Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
World J Surg ; 42(7): 2011-2017, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29318356

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Case-irrelevant communication (CIC) is defined as "any conversation" irrelevant to the case. It includes small talk, but also communication related to other work issues besides the actual task. CIC during surgeries is generally seen as distracting, despite a lack of knowledge about the content of CIC and its regulation in terms of adjustments to the situation of CIC. Primary goal of the study was to evaluate CIC content; secondary goal was to evaluate whether surgical teams regulate CIC according to different concentration demands of surgical procedures. METHODS: In 125 surgeries, 1396 CIC events were observed. CIC were content coded into work-related CIC (pertaining to other tasks or work in general) and social CIC (pertaining to acquaintance talk, gossip, or private conversation). The impact of different phases and the difficulty of the surgical procedure on CIC were assessed. RESULTS: Work-related CIC were significantly more frequent (2.49 per hour, SD = 2.17) than social CIC (1.42 per hour, SD = 2.17). Across phases, frequency of work-related CIC was constant, whereas social CIC increased significantly across phases. In surgeries assessed as highly difficult by the surgeons, social CIC were observed at a lower frequency, and less work-related CIC were observed during the main phase compared to surgeries assessed as less difficult. CONCLUSION: The high proportion of work-related CIC indicates that surgical teams deal with other tasks during surgeries. Surgical teams adapt CIC according to the demands of the procedure. Hospital policies should support these adaptations rather than attempt to suppress CIC entirely.


Assuntos
Atenção , Comunicação , Relações Interprofissionais , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Cirurgiões/psicologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Competência Clínica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 26(3): 404-10, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22285350

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are two principally different methods for measuring toe pressures (TP)-photoplethysmography (PPG) and laser Doppler (LD). PPG is based on detecting changes in the blood filling of the digital arteries and arterioles, and the LD perfusion signal is derived from the Doppler shift undergone by the emitted infrared laser light after reflection from moving particles (red blood cells). The aim of the study was to compare two PPG devices and one LD device in TP measurement. The PPG devices used were the Nicolet VasoGuard (Nicolet Vascular Inc, Madison, WI; PPG1) and Systoe (Atys Medical, France; PPG2), and the LD device was the Perimed system 5000 (Perimed, Stockholm, Sweden). MATERIALS AND METHODS: TPs were measured from 54 nonselected consecutive patients who visited the vascular surgical outpatient clinic or underwent an endovascular procedure owing to chronic lower limb ischemia. A total of 107 toes were measured. The symptoms were claudication in 51.4% (n = 55), rest pain in 4.7% (n = 5), and ulcer or gangrene in 14.0% (n = 15) of the legs. Of the measured legs, 29.9% (n = 32) were asymptomatic. Forty patients had undergone endovascular revascularization immediately before the TP measurement. The limits of agreement show the estimated range within which the differences between measurements by the two devices would fall in approximately 95% of the measurements. The approximate 95% limits of agreement were calculated as the mean difference ± 2 standard deviation and presented in the Bland-Altman scatter plots. RESULTS: For PPG1 versus LD, the mean difference between two measurements was 14 mm Hg and the limits of agreement were 38 mm Hg. In 47% of the toes, the difference was ≥10 mm Hg, and in 37% of the toes, it was ≥15 mm Hg. For PPG2 versus LD, the mean difference between the TPs was 12 mm Hg and the limits of agreement were 24 mm Hg. In 44% of the cases, the difference was ≥10 mm Hg, and in 30%, it was ≥15 mm Hg. For PPG1 versus PPG2, the mean difference between two measurements was 14 mm Hg and the limits of agreement were 24 mm Hg. In 50% of the cases, the difference between the two machines was ≥10 mm Hg, and in 33%, it was ≥15 mm Hg. Repeatability measured with LD, PPG1, and PPG2 showed that the difference between the first and second measurement was <10 mm Hg in 93%, 86%, and 78% of the cases, respectively, and <15 mm Hg in 98%, 94%, and 88% of the cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TP values vary greatly depending on the device used. However, the repeatability seemed to be acceptable with LD and PPG1. We recommend using same device when circulation is repeatedly assessed in the same patient. Also, we emphasize the importance of clinical examination and low threshold for angiography and revascularization especially in diabetics with wound healing problems.


Assuntos
Determinação da Pressão Arterial/instrumentação , Pressão Sanguínea , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Fluxometria por Laser-Doppler/instrumentação , Fotopletismografia/instrumentação , Dedos do Pé/irrigação sanguínea , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Doença Crônica , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Gangrena/etiologia , Gangrena/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Claudicação Intermitente/etiologia , Claudicação Intermitente/fisiopatologia , Isquemia/complicações , Isquemia/fisiopatologia , Isquemia/terapia , Úlcera da Perna/etiologia , Úlcera da Perna/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 26(1): 62, 2018 Jul 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30045769

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Open tibial fractures are serious, complicated injuries. Previous studies suggested an increased risk of death, however, this has not been studied in large population-based settings. We aimed to analyze mortality including causes of death in all patients with open tibial fractures in Sweden. Moreover, we wanted to compare mortality rates with the Swedish population and determine whether treatment-related or demographic variables were independently associated with death. METHOD: We searched the Swedish National Hospital Discharge Register for all patients with open tibial fracture between 1998 and 2010. We collected the following variables: age, gender, length of stay, mechanism of injury and treatment rendered. We then cross-referenced the Swedish Cause of Death Register to determine the cause of death, if applicable. We compared mortality in the study population with population-based mortality data from Statistics Sweden and determined whether variables were independently associated with death using regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 3777 open tibial fractures, 425 (11.3%) patients died. The most common causes of death for elderly patients were cardiovascular and respiratory disease. Patients aged 15-39 years succumbed to external causes (accidents, suicides or poisoning). Increasing age (OR 25.7 (95% CI 11.8-64.8) p < 0.001), length of hospital stay (HR 1.01, (95% CI 1.01-1.02,) p < 0.001), limb amputation (OR 4.8 (95% CI 1.86-11.1) p < 0.001) and cause of the accident were independently associated with an increased mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients with open tibial fractures have an increased risk of death compared with the general population in all age- and gender-groups. External causes of death are over-represented and indicate a subgroup with a risky behaviour among younger males. Elderly patients have an increased risk of dying comparable to hip fracture patients. They are at risk for cardiovascular and respiratory failure and should be treated with urgency, emphasizing the need for specialized geriatric trauma units.


Assuntos
Sistema de Registros , Fraturas da Tíbia/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Causas de Morte/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Suécia/epidemiologia , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
4.
Contrib Nephrol ; 184: 87-96, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25676294

RESUMO

In the last years, simulation training has become widespread in different areas of medicine due to social expectations, political accountability and professional regulation. Different types of simulators allow to improve knowledge, skills, communication and team behavior. Simulation sessions have been proven to shorten the learning curve and allow education in a safe environment. Patients on dialysis are an expanding group. They often suffer from several comorbidities and need complex surgical procedures with regard to their dialysis access. Therefore, education in evidence-based algorithms is as important as teaching of practical skills. In this chapter, we are presenting an overview of available dialysis access training modalities. We are convinced that simulation will become more important in the near future and has a substantial impact on strategies to improve aspects of patient safety.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/métodos , Cadáver , Simulação por Computador , Corpo Clínico/educação , Modelos Anatômicos , Modelos Animais , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular , Algoritmos , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/educação , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Segurança do Paciente , Competência Profissional , Diálise Renal , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa