Antibody engagement with amyloid-beta does not inhibit [11C]PiB binding for PET imaging.

The elimination of amyloid-beta (Aß) plaques in Alzheimer's disease patients after treatment with anti-Aß antibodies such as lecanemab and aducanumab is supported by a substantially decreased signal in amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. However, this decreased PET signal has not been matched by a similar substantial effect on cognitive function. There may be several reasons for this, including short treatment duration and advanced disease stages among the patients. However, one aspect that has not been investigated, and the subject of this study, is whether antibody engagement with amyloid plaques inhibits the binding of amyloid-PET ligands, leading to a false impression of Aß removal from the brain. In the present study, tg-ArcSwe mice received three injections of RmAb158, the murine version of lecanemab or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before the administration of the amyloid-PET radioligand [11C]PiB, followed by isolation of brain tissue. Autoradiography showed that RmAb158- and PBS-treated mice displayed similar [11C]PiB binding. Moreover, the total Aß1-40 levels, representing the major Aß species of plaques in the tg-ArcSwe model, as well as soluble triggering receptor on myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2) levels, were similar in both groups. Interestingly, the concentration of soluble Aß aggregates was decreased in the RmAb158-treated group, along with a small but significant decrease in the total Aß1-42 levels. In conclusion, this study indicates that the binding of [11C]PiB to Aß accurately mirrors the load of Aß plaques in the brain, aligning with how amyloid-PET is interpreted in clinical studies of anti-Aß antibodies. However, early treatment effects on soluble Aß aggregates and Aß1-42 levels were not detected.

Long-term effects of immunotherapy with a brain penetrating Aß antibody in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: Brain-directed immunotherapy is a promising strategy to target amyloid-ß (Aß) deposits in Alzheimer's disease (AD). In the present study, we compared the therapeutic efficacy of the Aß protofibril targeting antibody RmAb158 with its bispecific variant RmAb158-scFv8D3, which enters the brain by transferrin receptor-mediated transcytosis. METHODS: AppNL-G-F knock-in mice received RmAb158, RmAb158-scFv8D3, or PBS in three treatment regimens. First, to assess the acute therapeutic effect, a single antibody dose was given to 5 months old AppNL-G-F mice, with evaluation after 3 days. Second, to assess the antibodies' ability to halt the progression of Aß pathology, 3 months old AppNL-G-F mice received three doses during a week, with evaluation after 2 months. Reduction of RmAb158-scFv8D3 immunogenicity was explored by introducing mutations in the antibody or by depletion of CD4+ T cells. Third, to study the effects of chronic treatment, 7-month-old AppNL-G-F mice were CD4+ T cell depleted and treated with weekly antibody injections for 8 weeks, including a final diagnostic dose of [125I]RmAb158-scFv8D3, to determine its brain uptake ex vivo. Soluble Aß aggregates and total Aß42 were quantified with ELISA and immunostaining. RESULTS: Neither RmAb158-scFv8D3 nor RmAb158 reduced soluble Aß protofibrils or insoluble Aß1-42 after a single injection treatment. After three successive injections, Aß1-42 was reduced in mice treated with RmAb158, with a similar trend in RmAb158-scFv8D3-treated mice. Bispecific antibody immunogenicity was somewhat reduced by directed mutations, but CD4+ T cell depletion was used for long-term therapy. CD4+ T cell-depleted mice, chronically treated with RmAb158-scFv8D3, showed a dose-dependent increase in blood concentration of the diagnostic [125I]RmAb158-scFv8D3, while concentration was low in plasma and brain. Chronic treatment did not affect soluble Aß aggregates, but a reduction in total Aß42 was seen in the cortex of mice treated with both antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Both RmAb158 and its bispecific variant RmAb158-scFv8D3 achieved positive effects of long-term treatment. Despite its ability to efficiently enter the brain, the benefit of using the bispecific antibody in chronic treatment was limited by its reduced plasma exposure, which may be a result of interactions with TfR or the immune system. Future research will focus in new antibody formats to further improve Aß immunotherapy.

Brain pharmacokinetics of mono- and bispecific amyloid-ß antibodies in wild-type and Alzheimer's disease mice measured by high cut-off microdialysis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with amyloid-ß (Aß) targeting antibodies is a promising approach to remove Aß brain pathology in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and possibly even slow down or stop progression of the disease. One of the main challenges of brain immunotherapy is the restricted delivery of antibodies to the brain. However, bispecific antibodies that utilize the transferrin receptor (TfR) as a shuttle for transport across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) can access the brain better than traditional monospecific antibodies. Previous studies have shown that bispecific Aß targeting antibodies have higher brain distribution, and can remove Aß pathology more efficiently than monospecific antibodies. Yet, there is only limited information available on brain pharmacokinetics, especially regarding differences between mono- and bispecific antibodies. METHODS: The aim of the study was to compare brain pharmacokinetics of Aß-targeting monospecific mAb3D6 and its bispecific version mAb3D6-scFv8D3 that also targets TfR. High cut-off microdialysis was used to measure intravenously injected radiolabelled mAb3D6 and mAb3D6-scFv8D3 antibodies in the interstitial fluid (ISF) of hippocampus in wild-type mice and the AppNL-G-F mouse model of AD. Distribution of the antibodies in the brain and the peripheral tissue was examined by ex vivo autoradiography and biodistribution studies. RESULTS: Brain concentrations of the bispecific antibody were elevated compared to the monospecific antibody in the hippocampal ISF measured by microdialysis and in the brain tissue at 4-6 h after an intravenous injection. The concentration of the bispecific antibody was approximately twofold higher in the ISF dialysate compared to the concentration of monospecific antibody and eightfold higher in brain tissue 6 h post-injection. The ISF dialysate concentrations for both antibodies were similar in both wild-type and AppNL-G-F mice 24 h post-injection, although the total brain tissue concentration of the bispecific antibody was higher than that of the monospecific antibody at this time point. Some accumulation of radioactivity around the probe area was observed especially for the monospecific antibody indicating that the probe compromised the BBB to some extent at the probe insertion site. CONCLUSION: The BBB-penetrating bispecific antibody displayed higher ISF concentrations than the monospecific antibody. The concentration difference between the two antibodies was even larger in the whole brain than in the ISF. Further, the bispecific antibody, but not the monospecific antibody, displayed higher total brain concentrations than ISF concentrations, indicating association to brain tissue.