External Validation of a Survival Nomogram for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using the National Cancer Database.

PURPOSE: Survival nomograms offer individualized predictions using a more diverse set of factors than traditional staging measures, including the American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor Node Metastasis (AJCC TNM) Staging System. A nomogram predicting overall survival (OS) for resected, non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been previously derived from Asian patients. The present study aims to determine the nomogram's predictive capability in the US using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). METHODS: This was a retrospective review of adults with resected, non-metastatic NSCLC entered into the NCDB between 2004 and 2012. Concordance indices and calibration plots analyzed discrimination and calibration, respectively. Multivariate analysis was also used. RESULTS: A total of 57,313 patients were included in this study. The predominant histologies were adenocarcinoma (48.2%) and squamous cell carcinoma (31.3%), and patients were diagnosed with stage I-A (38.3%), stage I-B (22.7%), stage II-A (14.2%), stage II-B (11.5%), and stage III-A (13.3%). Median OS was 74 months. 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates were 89.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 89.5-90.0%], 71.1% (95% CI 70.7-71.6%), and 55.7% (95% CI 54.7-56.6%), respectively. The nomogram's concordance index (C-index) was 0.804 (95% CI 0.792-0.817). AJCC TNM staging demonstrated higher discrimination (C-index 0.833, 95% CI 0.821-0.840). CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram's individualized estimates accurately predicted survival in this patient collective, demonstrating higher discrimination in this population than in the developer's cohorts. However, the generalized survival estimates provided by traditional staging demonstrated superior predictive capability; therefore, AJCC TNM staging should remain the gold standard for the prognostication of resected NSCLC in the US.

Management of computed tomography scan detected hemothorax in blunt chest trauma: What computed tomography scan measurements say?

AIM: To investigate the hemothorax size for which tube thoracostomy is necessary. METHODS: Over a 5-year period, we included all patients who were admitted with blunt chest trauma to our level 1 trauma center. Focus was placed on identifying the hemothorax size requiring tube thoracostomy. RESULTS: A total number of 274 hemothoraces were studied. All patients with hemothoraces measuring above 3 cm received a chest tube. The 50% predicted probability of tube thoracostomy was 2 cm. Pneumothorax was associated with odds of receiving tube thoracostomy for hemothoraces below 2 cm (Odds Ratio: 4.967, 95%CI: 2.225-11.097, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: All patients with a hemothorax size greater than 3% underwent tube thoracostomy. Prospective studies are warranted to elucidate the clinical outcome of patients with smaller hemothoraces.

Outcomes of complicated appendicitis: Is conservative management as smooth as it seems?

BACKGROUND: This study characterized the failure rate of non-operative management (NOM) for complicated appendicitis (CA; perforation, abscess, phlegmon), and compared outcomes among patients undergoing acute appendectomy (AA), elective interval appendectomy (EIA), and unplanned appendectomy after failing to improve with NOM. METHODS: Adults treated at one facility between 2007 and 2014 were retrospectively studied. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients presented with CA. Sixty individuals underwent AA. The remaining 35 patients initially underwent NOM: 14 underwent EIA, nine (25.7%) failed NOM, 12 never underwent surgery. All patients failing NOM had an open operation with most (55.6%) requiring bowel resection. AA and EIA were comparable in surgical approach, bowel resection and post-operative readmission. However, AA demonstrated a lower incidence of bowel resection (3.3% vs 17.1%, P = 0.048) when compared to all patients initially undergoing NOM. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the high incidence of failed NOM and the morbidity associated with failure, AA may be appropriate for CA.

EAST Multicenter Trial on targeted temperature management for hanging-induced cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the outcome of suicidal hanging and the impact of targeted temperature management (TTM) on hanging-induced cardiac arrest (CA) through an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) multicenter retrospective study. METHODS: We analyzed hanging patient data and TTM variables from January 1992 to December 2015. Cerebral performance category score of 1 or 2 was considered good neurologic outcome, while cerebral performance category score of 3 or 4 was considered poor outcome. Classification and Regression Trees recursive partitioning was used to develop multivariate predictive models for survival and neurologic outcome. RESULTS: A total of 692 hanging patients from 17 centers were analyzed for this study. Their overall survival rate was 77%, and the CA survival rate was 28.6%. The CA patients had significantly higher severity of illness and worse outcome than the non-CA patients. Of the 175 CA patients who survived to hospital admission, 81 patients (46.3%) received post-CA TTM. The unadjusted survival of TTM CA patients (24.7% vs 39.4%, p < 0.05) and good neurologic outcome (19.8% vs 37.2%, p < 0.05) were worse than non-TTM CA patients. However, when subgroup analyses were performed between those with an admission Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 to 8, the differences between TTM and non-TTM CA survival (23.8% vs 30.0%, p = 0.37) and good neurologic outcome (18.8% vs 28.7%, p = 0.14) were not significant. Targeted temperature management implementation and post-CA management varied between the participating centers. Classification and Regression Trees models identified variables predictive of favorable and poor outcome for hanging and TTM patients with excellent accuracy. CONCLUSION: Cardiac arrest hanging patients had worse outcome than non-CA patients. Targeted temperature management CA patients had worse unadjusted survival and neurologic outcome than non-TTM patients. These findings may be explained by their higher severity of illness, variable TTM implementation, and differences in post-CA management. Future prospective studies are necessary to ascertain the effect of TTM on hanging outcome and to validate our Classification and Regression Trees models. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV; prognostic study, level III.

The need for intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring during radioguided parathyroidectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS).

PURPOSE: We report on a patient with primary hyperparathyroidism (1HPT) who had a preoperative Tc-99m sestamibi scan localizing a single parathyroid adenoma in the mediastinum. METHODS: On removal of this hyperfunctioning adenoma by radioguided video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), intraoperative PTH levels failed to decline in the appropriate manner consistent with curative resection. This prompted the surgical team to investigate further for a second adenoma, which revealed a 2 x 1-cm mass near the inferior border of the thyroid gland on the right lateral aspect of the trachea. RESULTS: In the absence of intraoperative PTH monitoring, the operation would have been terminated after the removal of the mediastinal adenoma, leading to an incomplete surgical resection and persistent 1HPT. CONCLUSION: In our patient, curative resection was obtained and a second operation was avoided because of the use of intraoperative PTH monitoring. This case also emphasizes that although VATS was planned, in treating patients with 1HPT, one must also be prepared to perform a neck exploration.

Severe complicated Clostridium difficile infection: Can the UPMC proposed scoring system predict the need for surgery?

INTRODUCTION: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common health care-associated infections, and it continues to have significant morbidity and mortality. The onset of fulminant colitis often requires total abdominal colectomy with ileostomy, which has a mortality rate of 35% to 57%. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) developed a scoring system for severity and recommended surgical consultation for severe complicated disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the UPMC-proposed scoring system for severe complicated CDI can predict the need for surgical intervention. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all patients who developed severe complicated CDI at Geisinger Medical Center between January 2007 and December 2012 as defined by the UPMC scoring system. Main outcomes were the need for surgical intervention and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients had severe complicated CDI based on the UPMC scoring system. Fifty-nine patients (67%) required surgery and 29 did not. All patients had a diagnosis of CDI as shown by positive toxin assays. There was no difference between the groups with respect to age, sex, body mass index, or comorbidities. When comparing the surgical group to the nonsurgical cohort, the surgical cohort averaged 20 points on the scoring system compared to 9 in the nonoperative cohort. In patients with severe complicated CDI, 15 or more points predicted the need for surgery 75% of the time. Forty-two percent of the surgical cohort had respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation compared to 0% in the nonsurgical cohort (p < 0.0001). Forty-nine percent of the surgical cohort required vasopressors for septic shock before surgery compared to 0% in the nonsurgical cohort (p < 0.0001). Acute kidney injury was present in 92% of the surgical cohort versus 72% within the nonsurgical cohort (p = 0.026). Seventy-six percent of the surgical patients were admitted to the ICU before surgery. Within the nonsurgical cohort, only 24% of patients required ICU stay during admission. Overall, 30-day mortality in the surgical cohort was 30%, and there was no mortality in the nonsurgical cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The UPMC scoring system for severe complicated CDI can help us predict patients who need a surgical consult and the need for surgical intervention. In patients with severe complicated CDI, evidence of end-organ failure predicts surgical intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level III; therapeutic study, level IV.

Same-day combined endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and cholecystectomy: Achievable and minimizes costs.

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that choledocholithiasis is present in 5% to 20% of patients at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Several European studies have found decreased length of stay (LOS) when performing LC and intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) on the same day for choledocholithiasis. In the United States, common bile duct stones are usually managed preoperatively and typically on a day separate from the day LC was performed. Our aim was to evaluate LOS and total hospital cost for separate-day versus same-day ERCP/cholecystectomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing ERCP and cholecystectomy during the same admission for the management of choledocholithiasis from 2010 to 2014 at Geisinger Medical Center. The separate-day group underwent ERCP at least 1 day before cholecystectomy and often underwent two separate anesthesia events, while the same-day group had ERCP and cholecystectomy performed on the same day under one general anesthesia event. The primary outcome measured was LOS. RESULTS: The study population included 240 patients. There were 175 patients in the separate-day group and 65 patients in the same-day group. Median age was similar between the two groups. The separate-day group had a median of one minor comorbidity compared with zero within the same-day group using the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Overall, LOS for the separate-day group was 5 days compared with 3 days in the same-day group (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in conversion rates to open cholecystectomy between the two groups (14% in the separate-day vs. 12% in the same-day group). Total median hospital cost for the separate-day group was $102,537 compared with $90,269 in the same-day group (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Same-day ERCP and cholecystectomy is feasible and minimizes costs. Same-day procedures decreased hospital LOS by 2 days and had approximately $12,000 in cost savings. Future goals include a multidisciplinary protocol to study outcomes in larger numbers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV. Economic study, level III.